Nahm

Member
  • Content count

    26,563
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Nahm

  1. Sounds like the lion to me.
  2. This is just beautiful. I got nothin.
  3. Jesus, “Table for twenty six please.” Waiter, “But there’s only thirteen of you.” Jesus, “We sit on the same side. It’s just our thing.”
  4. Fun, productive; not two. Surely I need not remind everyone the Tropics went on to win the championship.
  5. @Javfly33 It’s like a red carpet… What is a self referential thought.
  6. ?? As far as ‘disappearing’, nothing ‘was there’ in the first place. Nice.
  7. Hey! Mind the quotations. When said, or spoken… “God consciousness” … obscures nothing. Implies nothing is not or is other than, nothing.
  8. Cessation is of ‘you’s’, ‘teachers’, ‘Tony Parsons’, ‘Jim Newmans’, ‘form’, ‘formless’, etc. “They” haven’t “experienced cessation”, cessation is of “they’s” and or “experience”.
  9. Happiness can explore sadness to realize Happiness.
  10. Yep. And yep. Had some good times with yall, thank you & Godbless! ??
  11. Happiness appears as thoughts about Happiness and wonders about Happiness. Thoughts are apparent, the separate self which could be happy is illusory. Cessation is of this.
  12. @Felli Do you have someone you could stay with? Ok if I pm you?
  13. I know you are dearly loved, and that is more than enough for me. ?? Also, there’s no concern. That would be to skip over the logical fallacy pointed out.
  14. @JuliusCaesar Well you’s do you’s. I’m not trying to be a party pooper, and I’ve shared my two cents already. If I can be of any use in any resourceful way just hit me up. I do wish you safe travels. ??
  15. @JuliusCaesar I understand your intention clearer than you do.
  16. Your intention to lucid dream in sleep to realize the answer to materialism’s failure to explain certain unusual occurrences is actually based on materialism, specifically, the belief in “states”. There are no “states”. Sleep is not a “state”. States & sleep are collective beliefs, conditioning. There is also no ‘you’ which ‘experiences’ a thing or “state” called ‘God realization’. This is also a belief, conjecture. There is no time transpiring between going to bed sleep and waking up from sleep. That is a hindsight assumption. Thus waking up (as in, in the morning) is a belief, based on the assumption you slept, which is based on, the materialist paradigm or ‘you as the separate self, the ‘sleeper’. When this is noticed, it is instantly realized what you’re pursing is impossible, because this, now, would then be realized to be the lucid dream sought in the first place. As in, there truly is no past & future, no sleep & waking, and no asleep & awake. The ‘desire to expand their mind’ is also the materialist paradigm, as ‘the separate self’ of thoughts, the one ‘who’ ‘has’ a mind. There is the thought “my mind”, but there is no separate self which actually has one. There also is no danger. That is a conceptualization of feeling, or simply put aversion. You do you of course. There’s no intention of ‘shoulding’ on you here. But I would think twice about your intention, what you’re doing, and the motives for sharing it. This, in my estimation, is the epitome of ‘dick measuring contest’ and is not helpful to anyone in regard to the growing utilization of psychedelics for alignment with well being. Not meant personally, and I hope it’s not taken as such. I will ‘would’ on ya though… I would recognize the momentum of the narrative already in play, by spotting phrases like “anti matter super weapons”. This is nonsense. Not “dangerous”.