Nahm

In this specific case, I’d say it’s to realize thought is limited, in that it is dualistic (all twoness). The realization all thought is opposites. Codependent relative distinctions. Transcendence of, or collapse of paradox (twoness) is collapsing back into, Oneness. It’s the realization the seeking game is perpetuated by the believing of thoughts about ‘me’ / ‘others’, ‘past’, and ‘future’. As that is seen, from that vantage, “thinking’s” purpose ‘becomes’ (already was/is).....whatever you say it is. But that is it’s ‘purpose’, rather - it’s brilliance. One thought at a time, from which to choose. The quality of it, the clarity and power of it, - of the appearing thoughts from which to choose - is not separate from feeling (not thought about feeling - not emotion)...feeling (sensation, or, that-there-is feeling),... intuition & ’the body as an antenna’, ‘known as’ a greater, more expansive love, understudying, and intelligence. Only relative factors, which are arising and appearing in unison with, “you”... “matter”. So go to the root, feeling. All thought is “itself”, relative, appearance. ’Use’ feeling to ’think’ better. If you want to get wet, go to the lake. If you want to drink coffee, go to Starbucks. If you want feeling, where can you go? Relaxation, letting go, surrender, purification, love, compassion, understanding...? Isn’t it true? ...“Isn’t it so?” A you can not understand because the actuality is it’s a thought, rather than a separate entity. A thought is a thought, a thought can not be expected to understand, it is already itself infinity, just as is ’a rock’. Understanding ’arises’, of only one source, precisely as it commonly appears. Understanding is never appearing from a separate source.

@Raptorsin7 The thinker cannot be seen through because there has never ever been nor will there ever be such a thing as a “thinker “. Creating is noticing this. A single arising thought is precisely as it appears, a single arising thought. A single thought arises, “I am the thinker“, if believed, now everything that is creating is limited by this belief.

Nobody’s thinking. There’s one thought arising. That’s it. That’s the whole show. One of those thoughts might be about there being a thinker, but there isn’t, that’s just a thought.

@Victor Mgazi Just look at a mirror until you realize it’s a mirror. Are you in it, or are you it?

@zeroISinfinity Yep

@Ibn Sina “Taylor Swift Is A Whining Feminist Man-Basher In Latest Music Video ‘The Man’.” - The “Judge”.

@SuperMilkbox A thought about you is not true. Feeling tells you this. In continuing to ignore feeling and believe thoughts about a “you” are true, you suffer. Creating another label / belief about you, only serves to continue to avoid feeling. Don’t fall for it.

@Javfly33 Let every arising ‘answer’ go. Especially “This”. The word is separative in it’s nature.

@electroBeam Yep. ??

@infinitelove Excellent. Thanks for sharing!

So does time exist?

@Mongu9719 What is the purpose of forgetting where you put your keys?

@Nate0068 Why are there clocks? Why are there calendars?

I understand. May seem like word salad, but I can not be in the moment, because nonduality. Nothing. It’s a conversation, like an episode of Friends. What do you figure is being searched for? I don’t experience that ‘either way’ factor really. I wouldn’t say I do care, no. Idk. That didn’t occur to me. How is it you feel I’m ‘fighting my self’? I apologize if I came across that way, it’s not what is experienced ‘at my end’. The intention of my replies was a pointing to what is prior, and to what is a priori, rather than to “counter” or “argue”. I honestly am experiencing an interesting conversation. I don’t feel any arguing or countering. Indeed. You’ve got to remember though, I don’t hold that belief to begin with. If I express that is not my experience, if I point to that there is prior to, am I “arguing” / “countering”...? Seems like all one...no? Neuroscience is not an entity which moves or accepts. Also, a theory is “of the two computers” as you might phrase it. Again, I’m pointing to that being a priori. That is also “of the two computers” / duality. Of course there is disagreement. If one has not “gone” prior to duality, one lives in arguing / debating / theory. The actuality of ‘their theories’, is your thought. Just like... “evolution”.

That feels good when I read it. Feel how one thought at a time feels. Thank you for sharing that one. That thought does not feel good. It’s because it is not true about you. The rest is in admitting to yourself, that “I’m a pessimist” ... isn’t true. It never was. Feeling told you this the very first time you thought it. It didn’t feel good, and doesn’t now either. Nah, it’s because you’re believing that thought...which doesn’t feel good...because it’s not true. Ya, I “get it”...are you getting what I’m saying? One, though, at, a, time and how it feels. Notice the sneakery of believing a thought. Not true. & Not true. What you do experience is emotional reaction. What you want to experience is emotion creating. Look to see that “responsibility” has always actually been “response-ability”. ?? Notice...you’re letting go of one arising thought. You can’t let go of ‘you’, which is really good news, as you are the greatest ‘thing’ there could ever possibly be.

@Prevailer That’s how sneaky thought is, with regards to sleep. Notice, that wasn’t sleep, it was a thought. What is aware of ‘these states of awareness’ ? In perception, that is seeing & hearing...can you point to “decision”? Can you point to “spirit”? Can you point to “soul”? Can you point to “2 biological computers”?

What is aware of the change? What is aware of the decision?

⬆️ This is the activity by which consciousness veils itself. (Thought...belief...identification). By ‘seeing through these’, linguistically for communication, “you” “become more conscious”. You have to notice the reference is ‘said forwards’ about what is already ‘backwards’, or, has already gone ‘within itself’. You might say there is a meeting in the middle, realizing there never was a middle. “What you seek is seeking you”. - Rumi

@Prevailer Expand & incorporate, rather than do away. That’s still thinking (dualistic). Also God / flesh, or God / spirit is dualistic.

Awareness is aware of awareness.

@TheUniverseIsLove ...so uh...what uh...kinda stuff you like to read..?

Right on. Sometimes, I imagine a world where one social worker has one kid. Where teachers have less than thirty kids in a classroom. Where every person has two or three life coaches for different areas of life. Some folks worry about AI, but I think the overall focus, on quality of human life, will keep in the trajectory it always has been.

@ShardMare You’re making changes for your well being and happiness...but aren’t experiencing the happiness. This is likely do to how you’re thinking about things, specifically, how you’re understanding the relationship between feeling & thinking. For example, if I said “there’s no such thing as bad feeling”, that might sound obnoxious & crazy. Rather than a whole lot of typing here, when you have a minute, if interested, take a look at this. Not so much the first post of “my life story” but the dream board content. I’d like to know what you think of it, in relation to potentially discovering the energy and feeling you’re looking for. On the diet, give this a try. Cheaper, quicker, and healthier than processed foods.

That’s coming from thinking, not meditation. Which is why you frame up in that way. Not trying to press an issue though, Godspeed on your path.

@Prevailer Meditation, etc.