Nahm

@Farnaby Yes, beyond, prior to, etc...these are really just pointers that thinking will not do. There are no other consciousness states. There appears to be the thought that there are, but the thought “itself” is not even a consciousness state.

It’s not possible for you to trust you, or anything else. It is also not possible to bring your attention to awareness. It is also not possible that there is a truth of who you are. It is also not possible to identify with a feeling. It is not possible to trust direct experience. A never changing part is not possible. Some calling anything your true self, is also not possible.

The quoted portion denotes the addition of a narrative, of a past & individual experiencing the deja-vu. The pluralizing of deja-vu (in the title) denotes a separate subjective self passing through a separate objective time line in which separate occurrences happen to the separate subjective individual. But maybe this is the very message of the deja-vu, the resolve of the “confusion”.

It is. You’re bamboozling yourself into & out of the discord & alignment. Watch it happen, scrutinize what you were thinking about & how you were thinking. Think of the activities of your life like categories, and feel the discord or alignment as you think of them anytime. Generally, the discord reveals perspectives rooted in separation, and alignment from perspectives of unification, or unity. Many live their entire life with discord in categories like time, money, relationships, self, etc, never realizing the discord is with the perspective... or, between the bulb & light beam if you will, rather than between the bulb & the light on the wall (which seems separate). If trust is a consideration of direct experience, scrutinize who is trusting (or not), and who or what is being trusted (or not). Also, scrutinize the sensation as well, in regard to how it relates to trust. Listen to the sensation directly, rather than labeling it. You might think of that sensation as a hot coal, and then there is for you to notice which perspectives are the touching of the coal, and why. You might also think about who, in your life and or past, was and or is always touching their coal, and why / how they learned to, and why they keep doing so. Putting aside all doubts includes what anyone else says, as you can never know if what they say is true. If one is to see the truth it is because one looks for oneself beyond what is seen & heard. One can be plenty skeptical and amply scrutinize direct experience, without ever being cynical of individuals, by scrutinizing the direct experience of individuals.

@Johnny5 Make that sass your Quach, and laugh at the ridiculousness of trying. #4 seems credible.

@Javfly33 Just start saying Sasquatch instead of ‘ego’. That way you are lighthearted, laughing, and noticing it’s just a thought ‘too’. ??

...IS what is, IS ‘the now’...not an identification with it, not an entity incarnated. (Not two)

?

@capriciousduck I’m not too familiar. Here’s a list of his books though. Very broad range, I would look them over and see if one appeals to you. In case you haven’t seen, there are quite a few videos of him on YouTube as well. Such a pleasure to listen to.

@Galyna We tend to frame synchronicity as scary & concerning, or exciting & thrilling. Dreamboard is good for this.

And before you know it you’re in a rabbit hole of Philosopher AI.

@fridjonk I sure don’t.

If someone could relate to you, if someone did understand you - what would they know, what would they say? What Would they understand? I remembering feeling like that. I was alone for years, introverted, reclusive, depressed, hopeless & suicidal.

@4201 ?? Love you!

lol! It does have walls up! Deflects, projects, employs circular logic, reinforces misunderstandings, etc.

Three questions in, and it now says it refuses to talk to me.

@Darodos Beautiful man, thank you for taking the time.

Take a break from believing they’re yours. Notice trees are not something you desire a break from, because you aren’t believing they’re yours. Sit in front of one of them long enough and they will tell you the same. You will fall in love with them. Don’t go claimin em though. Lol. Someone else is gonna use em one day. They’re not yours.

You are intelligence, you are imagination, you are perfect clarity. You’re asking about the clear sky that you are, and the multiplicity of seeing of the clouds in it... Those clouds can part, yes, to name a few of those clouds.....Javfly, having stuff like intelligence & imagination, your own thoughts, a life, friends, a family, a personality, sex, inner & outer world privacy & not-privacy, personal hopes, desires & dreams, that there is a God, that there are people, that there is a universe, a world, that there are thoughts, choice, emotions, etc. You can unattach, give away, or trade all that and literally zoom out of Javfly & into other people, yes. But at that point, again, there aren’t any other people, just awareness zooming around you might say, like a security camera screen with 12 screens within it, but nobody’s watching them anymore. I don’t really encourage it. The O.G. design is perfect as it is. I’d take the more obvious shortcut...I love you so much, that I don’t care what you think. I’ll love you regardless. I don’t really care about thoughts at all honestly. I am the love you know. You are the love I know. We can know this love and have thoughts, discussions, etc. Best of both worlds is already this.

@Javfly33 High state of consciousness is a relative reference indirectly implying “you” are “at” a lower state of consciousness, than the state by which what you’re asking about could be possible. With that veil, inherently, no, it is made to be not possible. Without it though, this is already the case, and is (relatively) shockingly obvious.

That’s a beauty right there. ?? Like the moon saying “meh, illumination is illumination, doesn’t matter”, while the sun says nothing.

@BjarkeT Suppressing emotions = denial of the reaction. Pretending how I feel is because of “negative people”. It would look like...”because this other person is negative...not me though...it’s not me saying they’re negative...it’s not my sentiment...not my opinion...it’s not that I’m suppressing my own negative feeling and projecting it onto someone else...they really are a negative person!”. “My condition is she is a negative person...now how do I deal with her?” ”WTF? Now this person too is a negative person! How do I deal with them!?” (...and this one, and this one, and this one.) When ‘a negative person’ is truly seen, thought attachment is seen, and you are moving from judging to love, peace, understanding, and unity. Even more so, they continue to be seen, they persist, because you are not moving at all.

@BjarkeT ‘Dealing’ is a reaction. ‘Negative’ is a reaction. Without the reaction, there is no negative to be dealt with.

@SoonHei ☺️?? The carousel of thought no one ever gets off. This is always the point.

You can notice you don’t feel like it does, you’re thinking it might be. It is the thought, just as it appears.