Nahm

There is only change. It’s so slow (to the eye & instruments) it seems there are ‘things’. If what never changes is to experience, that experience can only appear as “change”. You’re saying I can not by word make a million, to someone who did just that. But I said it is before “the eyes could see it”. “I need to actually earn it” is old paradigm, no I, no earn, is actual, is new paradigm. This is place is filled with scammers, no argument there. Discernment is a big, and smaller & smaller, as in more & more subtle nuances, part of loa. I’m just calling it loa to communicate, call it whatever feels best to ya. ‘Magic” is nice to imo.

It is. Universe is showing you it’s magic. The unitive ‘subconscious’ response needs a little time to play out, naturally. It’s interesting, fascinating, highly enjoyable. Spot your own evidence, feel the subtle, subtle and yet more subtle discord of any thought. Let the dualities bubble up and fizzle out. Nothing need be done, it’s effortless. Examples of such dualities might be that rather than this is pure magic, there must be ‘two universes’. But, if you were infinitely intelligence, and had a unthinkable innocence and sense of humor...maybe this is the one(uni)verse. That little ‘verse’ part points to the ineffable creative power of your word. Much to let go, and the alignment is automatic. The letting go we pick.

Arguably of course, the general theme around here is we want ya to know the consciousness first hand, as compared to thoughts about it. Seems however it seems, but when there is this direct experience it all makes infinite sense.

The bridge to fear is the thought “I”. Reacting, one is over the bridge, pausing, the bridge is seen.

@electroBeam Appreciating the multidimensional humor, not touching that with a ten foot pole.

@Preety_India Me too. Much appreciated, thank you. ??

@Preety_India Hope you don’t mind me asking.... Someone let me know that they found the Christmas Vacation post / humor offensive, in the sense it implies I actually support rape, and or condone other people who do. The humor was only as if the sex in my marriage was so over the top hardcore that I was surprised there were people out there who could even possibly be experiencing otherwise. Did you see the humor there, or did you take that as if I was somehow saying Electrobeam is a liar, and that I support or was condoning rape?

Not two.

God realization being quite underestimated here.

@Inliytened1 Almost went with how’d you get here.

Non-drama. Non-figuring out. Non-do something about it. Non-identifying. Non-needy. Non-deal for you. Just this peace, and non-else.

Deduce: To determine by reasoning or deduction; specifically, philosophy. Physics: Knowledge of nature. Consciousness is conscious it’s appearing as reasoning, deducing, philosophy & physics. The intellect looking to be stimulated by consciousness is like a moth looking to be stimulated by a flame. Knowledge goes up in smoke, the I is lost to mirrors.

@Cosmin_Visan What’s the matrix, in your opinion or estimate?

Stuff’s always in the last place ya look.

Nothingness isness everythingness (illusionlessness). The twoness is the youness.

Jim: “I see myself in the mirror”. Peter: “I see myself in the mirror”. Jane: “I see myself in the mirror”. The nature of the inquiry is if there really is self & other, and the hearing of the answer is said to be contingent on it coming, from someone else.

@EmptyVase Lovely.

Explore non-drama.

?

There’s no “ I “, sans a thought that there is. Same for physics. It’s that it’s simplistic / self-evident...infinite can not know finite. Without deflection, projection, & ignore-ance, which you’re free to employ, it starts becoming rather obvious.

Fear is a belief. You’re making it up. Fear doesn’t exist. You can not ‘be fearlessness’, any more than you can experience or be ‘unicorn-less-ness’ - because unicorns already don’t exist. You can however, see that you’re making it up. Notice the audacity of the assumption ‘fear is out there’, or ‘everyone of course experiences this fear’, or, ‘I am not the creator of experience’.

You can believe in unicorns and leprechauns as well, but good luck loving them (actually finding them).

Nobody stopped nowhere.Your ideas of consciousness(es) are actually ideas, and that idea that an idea is other than an idea, is the illusion. Nonduality points to ‘not two’, you and consciousness, or consciousnesses. Precisely because there is only consciousness (not two) there is no such thing as a problem. If you say there is, you create that experience, as you are the creator of the reality you’re studying. When one finger of self-indulgence points, there are three pointing back, yet noticed. You haven’t yet recognized the distinction between your finite ideas and infinity, or, consciousness. This is like thinking about what hot chocolate tastes like, and in believing the thoughts, believing something is known about hot chocolate, when the thoughts are known, and the hot chocolate is not experienced. This is not the direct experience, or taste of, hot chocolate. A million pages on the hot chocolateses never amount to even a wiff of the actuality. Quantum mechanics, general & special relativity have always been unified btw. Only ignore-ance appears to separate.