Nahm

@Javfly33 What must happen, what conditions must be met, what must change, for reality to be good enough for you?

I’m so glad you said I didn’t answer it. That allows ‘going deeper’. Water is not analogous to nothingness in that analogy. Water does not know the thought, ‘why’, nor would water expect a thought to answer the thought, ‘why’, because water realizes it is water, already. Water is formless & eternal. Water does not have a ‘why’, only ‘what’ water is, or, it’s true nature of wetness. Water does not expect a ‘why’ answer as to water being wet, water is water, that is “why” it is wet. Water is not the idea of water. Water is water. Water can not appear as something it is not. Ice... is... water. If I could type here, a why, and that was all there was to it... brother, believe me, I’d type it. But I cannot. Water doesn’t work that way. So I make my self available, 24/7, and it usually takes an hour - two hours to get wet. We all have hardships and challenges in our lives, but have you ever actually considered how difficult it would be to be overwhelmed with love, joy, and laughter, yet not even smile?

@Tim R In all honesty, it’s meaningless.

Right down there in the link. ?? If you’re interested in creating your reality. Since you’re reading this, safe bet you are.

Projections are the most valuable ‘thing’. In a way, the only experience better than direct misunderstanding becoming understanding, is experiencing this vicariously.

@Terell Kirby I believe in and am aligned with your purpose. My youngest is 10 and my oldest is 27, so I’ve pretty much screwed up in all ways which can be screwed up. Happy to share from experience, and share some of the household best practices. If you’d like to chat sometime let me know. Godspeed.

NICE!

Awesome Leo. Great to see!

@DefinitelyNotARobot @Adamq8 ?

@Someone here (Analogously) Water vibrationally appears as ice, and as ice, asks ‘why is there stuff’ (separate stuff, like ice, since there’s ice). You’re as they say, ‘getting warmer’.

Oh boy, we’re going meta now. Aquarius... but I don’t think you’re going to be able to top spiritual neurosis, no appreciation for the field of psychology, rhetoric, spiritual ego, spiritual platitudes, bypassing & spewing. Might be wrong though, surely there’s more defamation to create & share.

Disdain is a projection, like spiritualist & heavy forum commenters, and is the answer.

The first class I took in public speaking started with picking something you know well and love. I picked playing guitar. Then pick something you want to communicate about it. I picked explaining yourchords.com, and it’s unique feature of transposing keys. Then you talk for five minutes about it, then you watch the recording of that. Get started today by giving that a try. It’s not unique. Seems like a big deal until you directly experience it, and over time the big deal fades. He’s captivating to you because you want to do what he’s doing, and he’s authentically doing it. He very much believes in what he’s saying and doing. It’s not just for self image and money, so to speak. And he’s very experienced.

Be more open minded. Talk to the mom from ET.

@Holygrail “Pursue” away my good man. ??

Is there, really, already, and I and a myself? Maybe that’s part of the suffering, maybe even all of it. Maybe it’s letting go, vs efforting, attaining, needing x, y or z.

@Holygrail Relax, allow, receive, let ‘it’ come to ‘you’. Make time, make space, maximize your loving so to speak. It’s veiled, not lost.

Thread would be a great practice ground. One embody an emotion fully, another receive it, and feedback / loop / name it, and switch roles. No time like the present to start. In Reiki 2 this is experienced in a same building, in reiki 3 it’s city to city. It’s an amazing, wonderful experience.

‘A jerk’ isn’t attractive. It’s not a mystery. It’s right there in the words. ‘A jerk’ believes, pontificates, conveys, that jerks are attractive.

@FoxFoxFox Right. Wish you the best. ??

@EddieEddie1995 Pure joy. ?? Thank you sir.

@Holygrail On one hand, great orientation, great inquiring and inspecting. On the “other hand”, which there isn’t, but is appearing as hands... what’s “consciousness”, “perception”, what is “meaning held within” and or “without”? “Hands” exist? Hand a thought? Hand ‘in’ perception? Food for contemplation...

@Holygrail It’s a linguistic reference without an actuality, like “you”. There isn’t linguistic. This is an appearance. In one way that says nothing (as in nothing useful to “you”), in another way if it’s puzzling, what can you hear but ‘have the direct experience, of no direct experience’. It’s like saying, find out, in a way.