It is impossible to change someone who doesn't want to change.
Consciousness cannot be forced upon people, they must desire it themselves. Some people are too far gone into unconsciousness
99.99% of people will never wake up.
They will get another chance in the next incarnation.
But if you really wanted to wake someone up, a gradual ramp up of psychedelics would be the best tool for the job.

See... the problem with that question is that it takes the notion of "supported by evidence" for granted. That is a paradigm-dependent notion. In other words, if you were given a list of such claims, you would likely reject or dismiss them because they do not fit the materialist paradigm's standards of "evidence".
The problem materialists face overall, is that they ask for gross material evidence of subtle immaterial facts. But you cannot grasp the subtle via the gross in many cases. The materialist paradigm discounts the enormous significance of changes in perspective, awareness, interpretation, and context.
Here are some claims supported but undeniable evidence that science disregards:
Consciousness isn't limited to the skull Intelligence isn't limited to the skull Evolution isn't limited to DNA You are immortal and can never die All boundaries between physical objects are man-made. There is no such thing an "object". You are literally every other human being There is not one single piece of evidence for the external world Psychedelics reveal truth which science hasn't even dared to imagine possible All of science is a human invented system. There is nothing universal about it. It it possible to die while the body is still alive Paranormal phenomena exist Time is a concept which doesn't actually exist Space is a concept which doesn't actually exist Ancient peoples and civilizations like Egypt were WAY more advanced than scientists or historians believe Witchcraft is a valid way of investigating reality Etc. But you're gonna have to expand your notion of "evidence" of course. Because if you demand double-blind clinical studies, you're barking up the wrong tree. Many of these truths can only be grasped individually, by you and no one else. Part of the problem of the materialist paradigm is that it only counts as "evidence" that which is communicable, model-able, and provable. But truth far exceeds communicability and provability.