Scholar

I'm just saying, the types of people who have been the most rational and contributing intellectually to society were not the typical high testosterone men. In fact, most of them were probably rather low testosterone men. Look at people like Abraham Lincoln, Albert Einstein, Leonardo Davinci, Isaac Newton, or various other philosophers, great politicians and scientists. In the vast majority of cases these are what you would describe as low testosterone men. I would say there is an inverse relation to high testosterone and reason.

But someone being more masculine makes them more irrational, not more rational. Hyper-masculine baffoons are not the ones who invented pretty much anything ever in the history of science. They didn't lead nations into progress and greater sophistication. Masculinity in excess is the very problem this planet has, it is the epitome of irrationality and idiocy. Women don't behave even close to as idiotic as testosterone filled men do. Women also excel at science and academia. Women also are better at leading, because they are not as much driven by irrational competition. That's why the most socially intelligent animals in the world are lead by females, like whales and elephants.

You were suggesting that Spiritual Warfare was making a good point about Destiny in regards to his femininity, on the basis of the testosterone he has in his body. Destiny is in no way feminine though, especially not in regards to the topic at hand, namely his reasoning and personality traits. It's absurd to think this is a meaningful point.

Destiny is one of the most autistically rational people you will find on the internet, he is incredible aggressive and dominant. The idea that lower testosterone would make him more feminine and therefore irrational is blatantly absurd.

How are we the same species.

You're genuinely irrational, and I don't mean that as an insult. I have noticed this with some of your others posts.

@Spiritual Warfare Just to be clear, you want these guys to walking into women's restrooms: And you want this person to walk into a male restroom:

You just said that didn't matter. And so is intersex, it is objectively biologically true. I think Leo made a video about Construct Awareness. You should watch it, it might help you with this.

So why should we have gendered toilets?

So abolish gendered toilets. Women don't deserve special treatment.

So why does it matter that different sexes exist? You are making no sense to me.

Research intersex.

What do you mean they existed first? That's not how equality works. Intersex people always existed. You said that we should not care about trans people and various other minorities feeling safe and accepted, that they don't deserve special treatment.

Doesn't matter. You said nobody should be given special treatment, but heteronormative individuals are getting special treatment by having gendered toilets. What about intersex individuals? If every sex should get a toilet, intersex individuals should get one too. Otherwise this is just a farce to justify majority domination.

Then you should be for abolishing gendered restrooms.

I don't see any misunderstanding, I think you simply are not aware that the principles you aspouse directly contradict some of the conclusions you draw from them.

People always use predators to justify their existing predispositions towards a certain marginalized groups. We did the same to race, homosexuals and now the same occurs with trans people and individuals who engage in consensual incest. You can even see this occuring in relation to animal rights, where various forms of animal rights (like banning slaughtering and enslaving of animals) are made out to threaten social order. A conservative is like someone who sees the invention of cars as a threat. "People will die in accidents if we allow people to drive such machines!" But the conservative does not see that there are solutions to the problem that will mitigate such risks without hindering progress, namely the invention of traffic laws and safe car designs. The conservative is primarily interested in maintaining the world view and cultural context which he is comfortable with.

This directly contradicts this statement: We are not treating everyone equally. If we did, we wouldn't have gender seperation in regards to restrooms in the first place. Why do women deserve special treatment, just because they may feel uncomfortable? If you want to be consistent about your stance you ought to advocate for the abolishment of gender-separated restrooms, given that it is giving special treatment to a majority class and therefore does not fit into the liberal democratic principle of treating everyone equally.

Freedom from responsibility? Have you looked at the actual former president, the actual representative of the right? Where is the accountability there? Where is the morality there? Where is even the decency? You are insane for focusing on some mildy cringe outbursts of the left instead of seeing the obvious and glaring and world destroying ideologies of the right. They live in complete Lalaland, in complete fantasy, and you think people being accepting of trans people is the issue here. The people who behave in the most inhumate, idiotic and irresponsible way are the right, by a long shot. And it's not some cringe college students who make up a small percentage of a political orientation, but the majority of the right is completely off their rockers. They are immature children who elected a complete baffoon for president. This culture war bullshit is frying your brain my dude. If the right did not resist so much to basic human rights, and basic compassion, then the extreme left wouldn't be so unhinged. They are so unhinged because not much more than a decade ago we humiliated and completely dehumanized trans people and other minorities, and the right wishes we could go back to that kind of "common sense".

I want to see actual data in the form of studies, or an article.

I'm profoundly sick of having to walk down all the steps to garbage-tier low consciousness just so that I can engage in politics. It's like I have to intentionally limit my intelligence just so I can fathom what is going on in this country. It's an actual clown world.

Show me the evidence of lobbying spenditure in relation to policy outcomes and compare that to voters desires.

This is a made up problem. If you want to live a conservative lifestyle, go move somewhere where people like that want to live. It's america. You can do whatever the fuck you want. You can find yourself some radical religious cult if that's what you fancy. MAGA people have utterly no standards. The left has too many standards, if anything.

That won't do anything. The problem today is that those with influence and money can shape the opinions and values of the population. You don't have to corrupt politicians so that they don't act against climate change. All you have to do is convince the masses that acting against climate change is an excuse to steal away their freedom. In that case, the people will vote for the politicians who will do the bidding of the corporations, because the population has been embued with values in line with the corporations goals. This has been how corporations have influenced politics for decades now, lobbyism is pretty meaningless in comparison.

My emotions calmed down but I feel very unmotivated for life now. I feel like my goals in life are meaningless, and that there are no meaningful goals in life.