TimStr

That right there, just broke my brain for a second!! Of course it's infinity... -- The thing with quantum computing is, that there is no longer any other possible explaination than infinity.

There is a question with computing that most people don't ask: Where does the computation happen? If you ask this question in regards of quantum computing, the implications are profound. We are using actual infinity to make computation!

As othet people here said, be sure to rule out the physiological stuff, first. You could have a nutrient deficiency that provokes your body to crave food in order to get that nutrient. If you're not sure about that, do a test with your doctor. Another reason might be the actual food that you eat. You might be on a diet, that just doesn't fill you up, e.g. if you have a lot of food that is very dense in calories. Just picture 1000 calories of butter vs. 1000 calories of brokkoli. You might very well be able to eat that ammount of butter and you won't even be filled, but there is no way to eat 1000 calories of brokkoli without your stomache exploding. So make sure to eat a diet rich in fibre and foods with low calorie density so that your stomache is full after eating and your body makes you feel sated. Edit: I found a picture to illustrate this: -- That out of the way, face your addiction: This is an important insight! Notice what is happening here! You are seperating the action (eating) from the motivation (wanting to eat). As you stop the action, the motivation becomes stronger, as you don't cater to it. But they are still two different things, that need to be tackled seperately. You can stop eating / overeating right away! But you might still be left with suffering the motivation! What is there, that you don't wanna miss out on? Why is it a big deal for you to miss out on it? What if you stop thinking that you will miss out on it? Why do you make yourself suffer with that thought? Confront that! It might not be easy, but you need to see that it's not the actual action of eating that is causing you to suffer but that internal activity that you do to manage how you feel about the action / not doing the action. Get that they are seperate. That's the key to what locks you in your addition! -- Meditation in and of itself might not be useful here, as it does not nessecairly produce that insight. For me the most important change to get a hold of this was this: I stopped doing other things while eating. No watching TV/Youtube. I switched to reading books initially alongside and eventually, I started to have my meals quietly by myself with no other activity, helping me to observe my mind more clearly. With that it was way more easy to actually focus on the food, eat more slowly and take time to enjoy it. And I noticed, as I did that, there is a very distinct point where my body tells me, it's had enough food. So I started to make the rule for myself to take that seriously and never eat any more food after past that point of satiety, even if there was food still left. Only then, I became able to ask: What is it, that I want to get when I continue eating? Why do I create the idea, that I need that?

Journaling is a kind of writing, that you are doing just for yourself. No need to feel bad about in any way it as long as it serves you! I did tons of journaling ranging from very conceptual self-analysis all to downwright insulting people I was angry at and punching holes into the paper with my pen. Had to get all of that out of my system. So it served me in that way. The only thing I would advise against is sharing journal entrys that you wrote about other people with those people. Especially if you were in an emotionally charged situation. The journal is a snapshot of your emotional state. It can never capture the entirety of your feelings towards a person. So its very easy to hurt people if you shared a snapshot where you expressed yourself in a situation where you were angry.

You captured the essence of this beautifully. However most of the other things you wrote are false. You don't have to cater your art to the taste of a specific audience or to whatever kind of standard of professionality. The most interesting breakthroughs in the history of art happend, when people found ways of going against this in an innovative and serious way. Not true, the goal of art is not nessecairly to share it with the general public, except you aim to make lots of money from it. The goal of art is the creation itself and its beauty. Recognition and fame are secondairy. Also improvisation and professionalism do not mutually exclude themselves. There are many accomplished professional improvisers out there.

Studying the social behaviours of felines is so fascinating!! It's really giving you a good contrast to what makes up the human mind. I love looking at these: I really love the elegancy with which the serval calmly deescalates the tension, even though he could easily tear the dog into pieces. Look at his body language and facial expression. Here is another one I like: (Note: I advise against keeping big felines as pets, they are not meant to live that way. As far as I know those in the videos were rescued as babys and raised in captivity.)

I don't nessecarily want them to just find Absolute Truth, thats nothing I can affect in any way. There was another response by @UnbornTao earlier that relates to this same point, but that got deleted. I don't demand of people, that they just get Absolute Truth, that would essentially require them to get enlightened. I just want to guide to a less sloppy epistemic position. I want them to consider that there could be such a thing as absolute truth. At least open them to that possibility instead of ruling out the existence of truth in the first place. But I see where you guys are pointing to. I cannot convince anybody, even if I want to.

I guess, you're right. That's not what I am meaning to do, though. I want to open them up to the possibility, that their relativism and is backwards and incoherent.

This is an intresting example. Pattern is a type of qualia, that seems to be on a level, thats neither just subjective nor objective.

I see this so much... But many people base a whole bunch of their social justice warrior type of behaviours on that. Trying to make room in society to "take queer/bipoc/non-western... perspective into account". Usually, this becomes really toxic when you add a bunch of group bias on top, or when you get hardcore rightwing / conservatives to parrot this argument for their own case. If I would bluntly tell them, that another perspective has never been poven, all of those people would laugh at me or worse... Solopsism clearly cuts through the chase here, but it's hard to argue for with people that are not truly open. How would go about opening peoples minds to that, when they just seem to be locked into their paradigm.

Yeah, get it. So this seems to be the typical fallacy of the postmodern worldview. To put it in my own words: Postmodernism claims, that everything is a relative perspective. Yet it holds this very claim as true / epistemically given and not a perspective. It misses, that relativity is just a relative perspective, too, and in that way overlooks the possibility of the absolute. Yeah, thats what I usually do in most normal conversations. However. at times, I want to make an argument, that requires me to leave that frame and whenever I trie to do that, they usually discredit me arguing in some way with relativity. Besides that, I also want to see this more clearly within my own mind, too.

Also had the same problem with OneNote 3 years ago. As a preamble: Get a software that you want to interact with on a daily basis and stick to it for at least 1-2 years (the longer the more you will get out of it). What you choose is actually not as important as sticking to it for a while. The software will not vastly improve your productivity or note taking skills (despite what influencers might tell you). But constantly switching or just not using it will cripple them in the long run. In regards of the specific app: This is a higly personal choice, as there are many different styles of note taking. Here is a good take on that by Tiargo Forte, using the gardner, the librarian and the architect as note taking archetypes. (Don't fall for his building a second brain scheme though): Here is a extremely comprehensive overview of most softwares out there. Give yourself a week or so to try a bunch of them and then pick one: For me, as I am more of a "gardener note taker", the best option is Logseq. I was also using Obsidian in the past but found myself constantly abandoning it. Logseq is a little bit more unpolished/techy but gets work done way faster for me, than Obsidian, as everything is chronological by design. What I also like about both these softwares is that they store your notes as a collection of markdown text files on your computer. This essentially means, that the software doesn't lock your notes in, like Onenote does, but you can access those notes at any time as files using any basic text editor. If you end up going with Obsidian, you might wanna check out this Onenote to Obsidian migration tool: https://help.obsidian.md/import/onenote If you like the simplicity of OneNote, you might like something simple like Trillium, Notesnook or Evernote. People mentioned Notion. It is cloud based by default, which is a big red flag for me! You're personal knowledge is too important to not have a copy on your own machine.

A big part of my social circles worldview is steeped with post-modernism. And this especially come to light when I talk about Truth to them. Basically, their main argument is: All I have is a perspective, all other people have is a perspective. That means that there are only different perspectives out there and therefore, there is no absolute truth / absolute truth cannot be known. When asserting that there is such a thing as Absolute Truth they tend to fall into a pre-trans fallacy: "Oh, you're argumenting for Absolute Truth, therefore you are not acknowledging different perspectives. Another person has another perspective, ‘truth‘ can be entirely different." Essentially putting me into a (pre-)modernist camp while I am arguing from a post-postmodernist perspective. They try to discredit Absolute Truth based on relativism. How would you argue against that? How to make them construct aware of their post-modernism? And how would you actually open those peoples minds up to the possibility that absolute truth is out there? I guess the only get them "convinced" is for them to have a direct experience of truth. But how can they even have that, when their worldview doen't hold such a thing possible?

Here are a few tipps to at least partly circumvent this as a customer. 1) Avoid costumer loyalty apps! (Ask yourself: "If I get a discount on that app, how is that discount being payed for?" Hint: Its actually being payed for by extracting money from you.) 2) Make your online purchases through a browser like Forefox or Brave instead of an app. Using the browser gives you more control on what data is collected on you. This also works on your phone! 3) Set your browser to delete coockies whenever you close it. Or you can use private mode in your browser. (This makes a huge difference when buying stuff like airplane tickets.) For mobile use there is Firefox Focus that does exactly that on your phone. Firefox Focus also blocks tracking scripts by deafault. (I have blocked almost 35.000 trackers since I started using it 2 years ago.) 4) Use a plugin like NoScript to block tracking in your browser. (This might be a little bit too technical for some of you. And is a little bit of work when you start using it, since you need to unbreak some websites when you first use them. But it gives you granular control over what scripts webites are allowed to run in your browser.) 5) Use a DNS sinkhole like pihole or adguard to filter all your web traffic from trackers. This also gives you the advantage of never being bothered by ads again. (Setting this up is also a bit technical.)

AI powered dynamic pricing is being implemented to extract more money from you. And the way you are being tricked is by exploting a belief that you hold. Notice, that something as simple as a price tag is never really questioned by you. "It's the same price for everyone." is a believe that you probably hold whenever you see a price tag. Notice that this cannot be taken for granted at all. There were times in history before the price tag. Notice how awesome a trustworthy price tag actually is! But now, companies start using AI to adjust the price tag you see in real time according to the data they collect about you. Loyalty program apps are also a part of this. This is a symptom of sourveillance capitalism (a term coined by Shoshana Zuboff). And it will basically turn all consumption and shopping into a game on how companies can extract the most money from you. Be aware that this is allready happening to you and that this will get way worse if no legislation is being put into place. And be aware how this scam is implemented by playing on your subconsciously held believes. One of the most prominent examples is Ticketmaster: Another example is the grocery store Kroger, that used it's loyality program to track users and collect data and create shopper profiles. (Source: Consumer Reports) @Leo Gura I saw on your blog that you are still collecting examples of scams. This one might be worthy of a post.