Shin

Believing in a soulmate for intimate relationship is quite limiting, cause it implies there is only one person in the world with whom you can truly be fulfilled in a relationship. I prefer to think that everyone can be the soulmate of anyone else, with proper self developement and transcendance. That's a more powerful and beautiful way to see relationships in my opinion

Well, that's what Soonhei just did ...

The thing is, we live in an age with youtube. You can't possibly contain this knowledge, it will spread one way or another on social media.

I don't know who you're talking about, but Scholar go a point. Even though, ultimately the decision is not in our hands, and Soonhei may have done it even if Leo and the forum were more careful and upfront about this (physically harming yourself is not necessary at all), We have all our own share of responsibility to influence a bit more people to do that. It's not all an individual choice or a collective one, it's both. So I have to admit, I kinda feel bad right now, because I'm probably the one who used this analogy the most, on top of not directly experiencing it myself. I'm not guilting myself, but I still kind of feel bad, cause in retrospect, how many people I have influenced to do just what Soonhei did ? Probably a lot. To the point of actually committing suicide ? Most likely not. But still, there is an effect that I can't deny, I can't just tell myself that whatever I write has no influence, it does, way more than I can think of. And we all do.

Tbh that was just me venting an existential crisis, and yes it was projection.

Not necessarily, it can be compassion.

If you're tired of physical reality you can just awaken, you don't need to kill the ego/body. That way, if there is other sentient beings still unconscious, like we are now, they aren't fucked up by your action.

I feel bad for having used the dream/lucid dream analogy so much.

That's probably pissing him off more, don't do that That would be funny, cause Leo always have said that physical death is a big mistake, and that you can simply realize what's true, which is equal to it (without killing yourself and making others sentient being sad).

This does not match for me. I hope at least his wife understood his choice and was fine with it, cause even for you who understand his choice it must be very hard

Everyday, it's called normies. Very dangerous, they even do genocides once in a while.

Damn, npcs are so convincing nowadays. What a formidable work of art, way better than the ai in video games nowadays. You almost got me !

Why a chimpanzee isn't using toilet paper instead of leafs ? Isn't it obvious that all his ass burns could be solved by toilet paper ?

Amazing show, not to watch if you're sad/depressed ?

No, there is literally nothing else. Stop clinging to others, there is no others, never have been and never will be. It's just figments of your imagination talking, very convincing but that's it. You're like a 5 year old believing the movie is with real people and it's not staged lol There is no other consciousness as well, that's just a more elaborate ego defense's mechanism «at least God has different point of views interacting with each other». No, there is you and you alone, for eternity. Leo is literally you telling you to realize he's you, and that everything you experience is you, and only what you directly experience exist, at this precise moment which is eternity. So as everything else. Just don't worry, it's not an alone like you think it is, when there is only aloneness, there is no loneliness possible, loneliness is only possible when you believe there is a you and others. Hello, it's you talking to you, wake up to you ?

"I've never had sex the first night, you're the first"

That would explain my condition

That's how games are done when the devs really care and have the freedom to do what they want. That was just one analogy, you can use the same principle with movies, books, dreams, creating a business etc though, I just parroted what Leo said to answer the op

I don't remember when exactly sorry. He used mostly a video game analogy, so if you don't play that's maybe why it got over your head. The analogy is that in a video game, what is fun is to have limits and beat the game, not to easily go through it like it was a cruise. So in a sense, God (you) find it more fun to live through a very limited form of life, in a very specific world which also has limits, so when you actually achieve something, it has meaning. If you could beat the game you start to play with a cheatcode in the very first seconds, the game would lose all its meaning. If you could have everything you want in your life right now, do everything you want, everytime you wanted, life would lose all its meaning. Now that's just an analogy that's not the truth, but that's the closest Leo found on how to explain this in the last video.

He explains that for like 30 minutes, watch the last video

He said in an another thread that it's just for the ego to relate more that he used this word.

There is, but thinking you have to to be spiritual and attain any kind of spiritual realizations is pure dogma and delusion.

That it is dogmas perpetuated for centuries, obviously.