ChrisZoZo

I like that one.

@Nahm No and yes all possible combinations are held with in god. And from which... is yes.

@Nahm Thoughts appear. An example is ‘You’, ‘might ’, ‘say , ‘meditation ’. As is, this is an appearance, thoughts appearing. Thoughts can also be believed to be true, then there can be the (still just apparent) belief there is a 'settling' which does or does not know… whatever it is, which is believed. Nothing can not per se 'settling ’, as settling is of course, just another appearance (thought). This is mediation collapsing distinctions? you could of just said

@Nahm Do nothing? You mean nothing? what do you mean please tell me.

@Nahm what do you mean by that?

@Nahm Meditate? What do you mean by that?

@Nahm Actions speak louder that words

@Nahm You don't know? Or are you trying to be clever? I know its in your power to speak normally.

@softlyblossoming I genuinely don't understand what he was saying.

@Khan 0 Khan I get your points but you need to see I am talking about a relative thing not the absolute. Can you agree there is a distinction between a person commonly agree to be enlightened vs someone who is not. If so what is the definition of that active differences ("being") between these people which does exist in this reality (which is relative)

Are you asking?

@RMQualtrough Good as a description of realizing what you are but I have had that on psychedelics and I certainly ain't enlightened.

@Khan 0 Ah great response but that's why I asked for the definition of "being enlightened" because... Is not making a distinction between being enlightened and not being enlightened. As it's imposable to not act from the now. Also Is true but for the description of being enlightened which I am looking for has to not work in absolute terms but rather relative terms. The difference between a person being enlightened vs someone not enlightened this distinction does exist.

There is no distinction between ugly and beautiful, don't hate moments because they are not beautiful, all are aspects of god and are totally perfect. Love all (which include moment's, people and things) as there is no reason to do other wise.

@Khan 0 Is that Enlightenment or being enlightened? Its a a fantastic definition but in my opinion its like you are describing that is feels like to be enlightened as opposed describing a person being enlightened. For example I would define it as "operating from the place of the self"

What if the labeling of misinformation was incorrect then you would be fucked.

Link to examples of joe being more harmful that the mainstream media.

It was shocking to think a adamic can be so dam literal to the point where language becomes pointless.

A fantastic set of logic of why we are limited in are love and power. This started from a question "If you act out of love to create the most love in the universe won’t you reduce the highest love possible by preventing unconscious forms from acting out evil?" 1. Highest love allows aspect of god to do evil things in reality. 2. In reality there is a race to do the most loving thing which creates the most love. a. But this can cause the reduction of evil and people can’t do evil things. 3. But god limits you so that you can’t act out of love which prevents the prevention of unconscious forms doing evil. 4. Thus you should do everything in you’re power to prevent evil and create love as god will allow space for evil to be carried out. 5. And know this evil carried out is the highest love and is all experienced and not forgotten by god. This is why we are limited. No need to slow down in the race. Also this might be wrong if you believe it is wrong then please say why. Also watch, outrageous experiments in consciousness if you are not sure what the “race” is that I am referring to.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wnedkVrgFF0 This is you right?

can't even remember. I think I thought of it my self as I remember the time of when I thought of it and where I was. But It might just be remembering leo's point. At least in the order of logic that i was thinking at that time.

Absolutely agree or I mean I watch and copied leo's thoughts lol

"I am" all there is. Ego or not I am all there is.

@Inliytened1 Sorry I understand now what you are referring to. I agree with you, the point of why we are limited was a title and the subject kind of when off course (such is my way of making points) there is many reasons why we are limited. Just like there are many reasons god created are universe. Although i really wanted to share this line of logic thats why is was shared.