UnbornTao

@Breakingthewall Okey doke

@Breakingthewall Just an observation.

Sorry, I just meant you could open up in general.

Yeah, that's a good example.

"Santa" is not in the same domain as the availability of a perceptive organ, hence the comparison between humans and earthworms. If your argument is that perception is infinite, it clearly is a relative, biological function, just like a computer needs some sort of hardware to exist. I don't see how distinction relates to this discussion. Perception seems to occur as an activity, that's the claim. How do you see perception?

@Breakingthewall You could do some contemplation.

I like that one.

What's the truth of our own dysfunctional patterns? Are we our behavior? Maybe there's also something more than that to be found.

True.

Perceive what? You just wouldn't know what you are not perceiving, it seems to me. For example humans can't hear sounds outside a certain frequency range. A blind person simply doesn't have the faculty of sight -- it's not that she perceives the absence of this perceptive faculty. In her mind, there's no context in which to accurately represent or conceive of the existence of sight.

It does seem like perceptive organs, or some such, are a prerequisite for perception to occur. I wouldn't call it infinite. (I'm trying to appear humble).

We don't even know whether we, as selves, exist or not, or what our nature is.

Why doesn't the self want to look at itself? What is the nature of the entity doing the avoiding?

If we could pinpoint "experience", what would we point at? It might be that sensation and concept are experienced, yet we're tackling the fact of experience itself, rather than the "experience" of something. What is that about -- when concept is set aside?

What is your experience of experience?

@blackchair English-only, please rewrite the post. Thanks.

@Natasha Tori Maru Okay, thank you.

@Davino I haven't looked into that principle but it may be useful to start with balance as a physical dynamic, since that helps us ground the investigation. For example what does it take for the body to be balanced? What creates balance? Also, as some of your questions might be implying, is balance a function of external things, or is it more about you and your relationship to things? Something to think about! Please share what comes to mind.

We can observe that experience always occurs now, yet this now is not readily apprehended nor does it seem to be dependent on time. What we commonly consider now is a process and so it isn't actually now, as in when we say "I'm angry now," which is an activity that arises to serve some end. Without any concept, even without the assertions above, what's experience? How do you see perception and its relation to experience?

@ougyarg Good to hear, thank you.

Be open! For God's sake.

Is that because of my response? I'm just saying an answer can't do the job.