UnbornTao

Personally, when AI is used this way, I'm out. It takes away any authenticity to the content. It's like a plastic flower, imo.

@Joseph Maynor AI channel. Same with the monkey channel @Integral shared on another thread.

And Heraclitus makes it one-nil!

I see, thanks for the response. I don't know what to say.

I'm going to pour nutella on my smartphone and film it for social validation. Wish me luck! Memes.

To Infinity and beyond!

The people did not listen to the Buddha. That's why there's Buddhism. - J. Krishnamurti

Hence the hesitation. Thanks for the info.

Maybe use the Markdown format instead of HTML?

Markdown, maybe?

Now that one I like. I've been epistemically humbled.

Actions have certain consequences.

Epistemic conformity. Add 'epistemic' to any term so that it sounds fancier than it really is. Epistemic disappointment.

What is the difference between, say, social cues, such as subtle facial expressions and similar forms of non-verbal communication, vs telepathy?

It was obvious in hindsight. How so? In what way?

I'd rather do some scuba diving than skydiving.

I see, thank you. Thanks!

Yeah, same. I've been meaning to read that. What was your main takeaway, if you recall?

In this case, the former.

Just a recommendation.

There are unsurprisingly tons of videos of him on listening. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=listening+krishnamurti

https://www.reddit.com/r/religiousfruitcake/ https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/threads-of-underground-fungal-networks-are-long-enough-to-reach-beyond-the-solar-system/

thrhtrtwe rtw twtw atretj ytjuyk uykuyk w4et34 tjyt jyjuyk

Not sure. My current perspective is that, as a means of communication, it still presupposes the existence of language. If we say that language was never found in the medium through which it is expressed, like uttering sounds or drawing symbols on some surface, the point above still applies, whether or not telepathy is real.

One Penis to rule them all.