UnbornTao

Cool!

Not at all. It's more like thinking that your reaction to the dog bite could come from something or someone other than yourself. Your preferences, for example, are already generated by you in your own experience, both the conformist and the non-conformist ones. It does seem, though, that this preference for nonconformity may well be based on a desire to feel special. And this occurs within a social context, which you yourself generate as well.

He can take on different forms.

@Someone here

Take some time to ground yourself, and consider seeking professional help. Take care.

Huh... you don't see the problem either. Cult leaders, tell me about it.

Who else would generate it? Your preference for X thing is ultimately generated by you as well - along with many other things that could be considered conformity.

At the very least, they overlap. In any case, both serve the same purpose, albeit in different ways. How much of one's search for comfort is based on conformity? Do you eat a particular snack when you're bored? Do you turn on the TV to check the news? Do you wear clothes purely for practical reasons, or do you avoid wearing certain items altogether? Where's the line between conformity and comfort?

Is it really a need, though? Of course not. It's emotional dependence, a social nicety - one possibly rooted in a sense of worthlessness. The difference is that without food, you'll eventually die. You conform to yourself. Everyone does. And everyone takes themselves to be the center of the universe.

Is there any other reason to post on this subforum? Not sure.

And you didn't ask the fucker who will win the World Cup next year...

Sure.

Meh. It'd be ironic if you were an AI account, though.

That seems to be the case, yes - at least when it comes to basic physical needs. Still, isn't the point of conformity to make survival easier, in a sense? Going to parties can be seen as a form of conformity, and it does support survival. The bigger question is: Is there anything we do that doesn't ultimately serve that purpose? I find it hard to answer that with a 'yes'.

SEX! Also, why is this in the consciousness subforum? It should be in the Politics one.

@zurew Got confused with the other thread. Setting notions of the after‑death aside - which is mostly what my earlier claims about philosophy and spirituality were related to - I'll stick with the basic physical needs for this one. The claims about it being BS were specifically referring to prolonged (years‑long) abstinence from water, sleep, and food. I acknowledged that, in some extreme cases, people have reportedly gone without food for several months. These are not the same claims, though. Can the human body survive without oxygen for long? That's already a "rule." We could call it a fact, a valid belief, or an educated guess, but it really does seem to be how things work. There's no way around that. Likewise, the human body can't perceive sounds outside certain wavelengths. That limitation is part of the body's design. The domain of objective physical reality is the most grounded and "real" one we have, and we notice that it doesn't operate randomly or arbitrarily - hence the hardware analogy. Just in case, I wouldn't brush it off so quickly because of its simplicity. Not a very satisfactory answer but I might say more at some point.

Agree. Even if you were to benefit somewhat along the way, selling snake oil is a false endeavor. It's about what one is up to and the spirit of the work - what it actually does. And a cult turns people into followers. Then again, it's a cult with a large following, so people clearly can't distinguish one thing from another, which is baffling to me. They fail to recognize that they're being fed a pleasant-sounding worldview and are swayed by the assertiveness and charisma. And none of it is true. People are gullible and haven't yet learned to "hear." This dynamic may partly explain why the founder of Scientology claimed that, if you want to get rich, you should start a religion (or cult). And he was right!

Maybe, existentially speaking, there's no such thing as nonconformity, since to exist at all, one must adopt or take on some form. Is conformity "to take on, adopt, or be influenced by the form of something?" What is form? No form, no con(with)-formity. Some abstract shit that some of you guys like.

Wanting to feel special. And how much of that underlies the search for nonconformity?

Conform to my nonconformity!™

Does that require the activity commonly thought of as "thinking"? It seems like it's a physiological reaction or stimulus, something that applies to other animal species as well. No language needed for that. I think you're conflating language with words, sounds, and symbols here. More like a communication. What do you specifically mean by "my experience of being alive"? If you will, avoid using vagueness and abstraction to avoid confronting the fact that it isn't entirely clear - to either of us. If we were to delve into that, we'd likely find that a lot of what gets taken for granted as "life" isn't actually inherent to it. Examine what you assume about what it means to be alive. For example, language may be tacitly considered an integral part of life, but is it? What about, say, emotions? I hear that. Still, what is language, really? We keep taking it for granted. Without it, there isn't even the notion of another entity 'getting something across' for you to interpret and make sense of in the first place. So we can see that the notion of "feeling others' vibes" actually rests on this very language-possibility.

How so? It was clear to me, by the way you wrote, that you're taking conformity as a negative thing to be avoided, placing yourself as a sort of special outsider who doesn't conform to the "sheep." And I pointed out that this very dynamic - wanting to appear special in our own eyes and in the eyes of others - seems to be virtually universal in our culture. I suspect that, deep down, everyone is profoundly conformist. How could it be otherwise? Ask yourself how much of your life is lived in accordance with past inventions and in relation to a society. "What is original in my experience, generated by me, or consciously taken up?" What, in my experience, isn't programming or is not influenced by the "other"? We could save time by simply asking what is not conformity. It's like the appearance of multiple apps in an app store: on paper they can look alike or be infinitely varied, but most software exists on, or is founded upon, a common ground - namely, the operating system. The examples of noncomformity that might come to mind usually belong to the "different app" category.

Are you asking us to tell you what to value, or what a value is? To me, it sounds like emotional awareness or mastery would count as values, so go with it if that's your choice - it's a good value. Try to get clear on what it actually entails so that it doesn't just become an abstraction.