UnbornTao

"Ananda, do you see that this hall is empty?" Welcome!

From Reddit

Weird stuff such as this has nothing to do with spirituality. You could contemplate an emotion, perhaps starting with the boredom in front of you. What is it? What is its function? How does it come about?

@Federico del pueblo You're welcome.

Care to (respectfully) elaborate?

Play nice guys

This one

Wasn't it called ultimate guide to enlightenment or something similar?

"It’s a tremendous plan, believe me—nobody’s ever seen anything like it. People are saying it’s the greatest plan ever. It’s huge, folks. It’s going to be incredible, you won’t believe it."

Ketchup or plain?

A (former) senator vs a criminal.

Surely you've considered Sam Harris already.

93 years, long life.

@mmKay

Thanks for that, appreciate it. Enjoy!

One thing is what you "say" (think, believe, intellectualize, speak about), and another is what you actually experience and live as. Notice the discrepancies between these two.

@Thought Art What was your experience of chi like before having heard of it? I think he uses and speaks in terms of chi sometimes, or with different terms. By saying it is an invention, he doesn't mean it is wrong. Like Kundalini, it might be valid, but that is an idea, a system. A thought or interpretation about what some feeling or experience means.

Don't jump to conclusions or intellect, but contemplate, while not knowing what it is: What is the object? A direct experience is needed.

@Thought Art You took that chi segment personally. By invention, it is likely meant that it isn't something "stumbled upon" as an objective occurrence (like a rock), but as a conceptual overlay on experience, just as mind, language, martial arts, culture, etc. For example, what was your experience of chi like before you heard of the concept (externally) and adopted it? Doesn't it exist as a rather abstract distinction? That it is invented doesn't have to undermine its value and contribution, which is mentioned in the video. That doesn't have to take away from one's engagement in it. Also mentioned is that it is healthy and useful, so why would one get depressed about it and stop "doing" it because of its constructed nature? That's the "insanity" that was brought up. Obviously, this point is easier to see with physical objects. Does this mean that we have to stop using forks (metaphor for inventions)? A bunch of stuff is invented in our world. We live as though they are objective realities even though they are constructed. That is, they don't exist by themselves but by our own activity.

Definitely.

Maybe that's the observation we are supposed to make (that we don't truly know what it is directly), and bask in that, contemplating what the object is as itself. We perceive it. We hold feelings about it. We think about it. We refer it to ourselves. But what is it? Something to look into.

Trying too hard to logically make a decision here might not be the best approach. Your mind can find good reasons for both. Which one do you like the most?

@Keryo Koffa I was simply pointing to our experience of these things, hopefully in an attempt to deepen it (the experience). Thanks

"Awareness of your frantic state gives you power over it. You see, you cannot control a state that you are identified with, that is, a state you do not observe in yourself. But there is a calm self within you that can actually stand aside and observe another self, the frantic one. This is self-awareness. This is what gives you command. Do you see the tremendous power here? Listen carefully: When you become aware of a frantic state you can then see the difference between a frantic state and a calm one. You see that there is an alternative to pressure. That alternative is calmness. When you are unaware of your pressure-state, you mistakenly think that it is the only state that exists. But now you are aware of the other way — calmness." --Vernon Howard