UnbornTao

What if we apply this principle to everything that is conceived and perceived?

The people did not listen to the Buddha. That's why there's Buddhism. - J. Krishnamurti

Hence the hesitation. Thanks for the info.

Maybe use the Markdown format instead of HTML?

Markdown, maybe?

Now that one I like. I've been epistemically humbled.

Actions have certain consequences.

Epistemic conformity. Add 'epistemic' to any term so that it sounds fancier than it really is. Epistemic disappointment.

What is the difference between, say, social cues, such as subtle facial expressions and similar forms of non-verbal communication, vs telepathy?

It was obvious in hindsight. How so? In what way?

I'd rather do some scuba diving than skydiving.

I see, thank you. Thanks!

Yeah, same. I've been meaning to read that. What was your main takeaway, if you recall?

In this case, the former.

Just a recommendation.

There are unsurprisingly tons of videos of him on listening. https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=listening+krishnamurti

https://www.reddit.com/r/religiousfruitcake/ https://arstechnica.com/science/2026/06/threads-of-underground-fungal-networks-are-long-enough-to-reach-beyond-the-solar-system/

thrhtrtwe rtw twtw atretj ytjuyk uykuyk w4et34 tjyt jyjuyk

Not sure. My current perspective is that, as a means of communication, it still presupposes the existence of language. If we say that language was never found in the medium through which it is expressed, like uttering sounds or drawing symbols on some surface, the point above still applies, whether or not telepathy is real.

One Penis to rule them all.

I'm not exactly sure what you mean by that, but that's using it, not understanding it. Without language you got no philosophy.

Japanese fans will leave the stadiums spotless.

If we don't understand language, sorting this out gets tricky.

Depends on what you're talking about.

Yeah. Last time they beat Spain and Germany in the group stage, though.