UnbornTao

Law 6: No one ever thinks they are the stupid one - though in certain contexts, anyone may behave stupidly.

It's a bit of a long one. That's what she....

Woohoo. Books!

Keep it cool guys

You would have to do it with a Buddhist, though.

This kind of person is not suited for truth-seeking: https://shorturl.at/LVTMF

Just for entertainment, might change it for another video.

The purpose of this journal is to share questions, humor, miscellaneous creative content, and raw reflections on personal empowerment and consciousness. My goals are to deepen my experiential understanding of these topics, improve my communication skills, have fun, and help others see things in a new light.

life's a bitch (and then you die) ?

If what you're trying to do is assess the realness or depth of the consciousness he had, it's okay to doubt it. Who can really say? There's no way to verify it. Essentially, he just seems "convincing," in ways that can't really be faked - like we might try to do. It's said he refused treatment for his cancer and faced his death without fear. But then again, we really can't tell from here, can we? Where would we even place our attention - body language, nationality, following, expression? At best, we might be able to sense a certain mysterious quality in his transcribed talks. Not sure. Maybe we could try to focus on where he's coming from. I'm not holding my breath, since most of us, as a whole, are pretty poor listeners without even realizing it. Still, his stories might give some insight into his awakening, though in the end they're more like side effects. Either way, this doesn't mean you have to believe him. Like I said, that's beside the point. Perhaps the best we can do in this conversation is let his words inspire us, opening a few contemplative doors along the way. And even better, it's useful to notice that none of us truly understands what he was trying to convey - unless you do, which is extremely unlikely. Not to be disparaging, just realistic. If you think he was talking about nonduality, advaita, or any of that, you're wrong. It's like the difference between Gautama on the one hand, and a Buddhist on the other. Night and day. Buddha wasn't a Buddhist. Because he actually knew what he was talking about.

You jump into a pool, you get wet. Stuff has consequences. Now, as stupidly simple as this claim may sound, there's a profound principle underlying it. Understanding it intellectually is just the first step. If you pay attention, you'll probably notice actions and thoughts whose consequences you're currently unaware of. You might not even be conscious of what it is you're doing in the first place, let alone its consequences. Becoming aware of your habits and actions helps you recognize this.

Yeeeeeppp

Fear is a product of the mind. If anything, it is a feature of your mind, although I suspect the weird psychedelic cosmology you're pushing isn't going to help with this point. Don't give reality the burden of your fear.

Isn't it the case that we won't know until each of us gets there? His expression can be dissected all you want, yet that is not the same endeavor as truly listening. Neither believing nor disbelieving are relevant here. The claims he made are secondary to the consciousness from which they arose.

That's not really what his work is about, but okay.

¿Por qué no los dos?

No problem.

I have a fixation on plain honesty (or at least that's what I like to think). Understanding as in "real knowing."

If you think you already understand what Ramana was conscious of and trying to convey, you're most likely not paying close attention.

It's even more prevalent considering that any action taken is a form of manipulation, though your examples provide food for thought too.

Why? Where has he talked about those topics?

Baron Harkonnen.

We live as if the social domain were true. We think it exists. We take it very seriously. And we are so steeped in this assumed reality to see through it.

Brave has some AI bloat and whatnot and isn't much different from Chrome, given its base. The main options seem to be Firefox or Chromium-based browsers. Waterfox and LibreWolf look like solid Firefox-based alternatives, with the latter offering stricter privacy defaults.