UnbornTao

Good to know. Also, it might be an artist's rendition, not a "photograph." But cool nonetheless.

Wayyy too abstract, in my opinion.

Thanks. I meant to say Buddhist, not Nuddhist. Freudian slip, I guess.

Fair enough, although it is a rather important detail to disclose, in my view. If the representation were somewhat accurate, that would be even better. Could mention that creative liberties have been taken.

What about less obvious cults? Can you find some on Christian subgroups or Zen-like sects? Or perhaps Hindu/Buddhist-based?

Ahh, fair enough.

Is it AI? Curious to know.

In a way, it would be hard not to do that, unless you traveled to several countries as a kid and stayed there for a while, I presume.

Nice, good insight. To make it a bit more concrete, what would programming oneself mean in this context?

What about cooking a chickpea stew?

@integral Either rat milk or get out of my house, hippy!

'Spiritual' mental gymnastics.

Might as well be. It's quite convenient too, as he's talking about his own model. There's no denying he was profoundly conscious, but I'm not that familiar with the model. There seems to be, too, a ton of rhetoric and myth around his persona, which I find unnecessary and frankly annoying. This tends to cultivate a culture of followers. I would say it isn't about the content per se, or any assertion made, but whether - well, it is a belief or not. How could we tell? Of course this can be a tricky call to make sometimes. It seems to me this belief-game is what we as a whole are up to in spirituality. And disbelieving is, again, more of the same.

No, thanks. I'd rather have cranberry juice