Salvijus

Okay, okay. You win. Congrats. 👍 Tcare. 🤝

The claim: "the more you understand other person's perspective, the better your response will be" is always true without exceptions imo. And so you should never close the willingness to hear the other perspective because it's always in your favor to know it. Not that you can always afford to have a discussion in every situation. Sometimes you just have to act on the spot based on a limited data.

See. I see that as a problem in attitude. As per my view you should always be willing to hear them out no matter how crazy it seems at first. And then draw a conclusion. It's just a much wiser approach.

The more you understand about the other's point of view the better. The willingness to hear their side of the story helps you to make the best decision towards peace, and yes the aftermath could still be violence. But this attitude that I'm not going to listen to other views no matter what is not a concious one imo. I still stand by that. The comment was not a suggestion to all of worlds problems. Nor was it a defense tactic against a rapist. It was a mere highlight in the general flaw of thinking as per my view. If you think about it what I'm saying is very common sense. There's no need to get so defensive about it.

🙏

I thought I was going to get roasted badly for saying that lol. Thank you.

I think we need a group hug to calm down.

It's that attitude that you demonstrated that is the foundation for commiting those atrocities.

I doubt you understand the depth of the question. Your approach is no different than that of a nazi. Yet you believe you're far more concious than them.

It rises the question, who's the violent one here then?

Have your war if you see no other way just don't take this attitude that others are not worth hearing out. I only have problem with this one sentence. Everything else you guys said are fine.

Talking will always remain the most concious and humane way of solving conflict. It's only when one or more sides are not willing to listen and talk anymore that war and ugly behavior becomes the only option. You have to get the context right as to why I'm saying this. I wrote my response in regards to DocWatts saying that we should no longer entertain any discussions at the table with people of different opinions. That's a bad attitude imo. A low concious one.

Begging with a bowl is more effective. It's already known in their practice. Combined with prayer and meditation it has potential to reduce you into nothingness. It feels like some woke activists invented that story.

Everyone thinks we're the good guys and others are the bad guys. Allowing everyone to sit at the table and talk is the most concious way of dealing with conflict, otherwise "when diplomacy ends, war begins"

People will see whatever they want to see. Even if Jesus was speaking in English, there would be a thousand different interpretations of what he was saying by now. One would have to abide in the same christ conciousness of love and mercy that Jesus was speaking from to really interpret the meaning correctly imo.

Because you want to be as cool as me. Perfectly understandable. No shame in that.

The problem is that every story has two sides. All the things you've mentioned could be either justified or reframed/recontextualized in such a way that it sounds positive not negative. Not that I'm interested in doing that. Some right wing commentator probably already does that.

Okay, maybe you have a valid point there. I'm not educated enough on this subject to be aware of the details of that operation, so I can't push back on that. Perhaps there is some valid critism to be made there.

What are they rebelling against? Against boarder protection and illegal immigration?

I reckon from the view point of the right, the woman is seen responsible for her death because she antagonized the officer and than drove recklessly towards him in a semi dangerous way which gave him a semi valid reason to shoot. You could argue that the officer's actions were overboard and that he should face consequences. But it's hard to sympathize with someone who was dancing striptease on that barrel of a gun for no good reason. Like really. Wtf was she even doing there with such atrocious smugness? What was she trying to achieve there? Did she just wake up one day and thought, "I'm going to piss of some officers today and then play chase me". Idk, I don't have a full picture understanding here myself.

Both are responsible imo. Those two women were extremely provocative, almost begging to be shot in a face. And the officer lost his cool and used a half valid excuse to do answer her prayers. Mmm... Idk. Officer should face some consequences probably. But I kinda understand him also.

This one is epic.

Here's a third definition: When you have become conscious of something that you were not before, then you've become more conscious. But in this context it's about the quality of perception not the quantity of it. How deep is your perception into the nature of reality? See.

Alternative explanation would be: What's the point of psychotherapy? The point of it is to dive into your subconscious parts where you're stuck in destructive, dysfunctional patterns and to bring awareness to those parts so you could heal and become more concious as a result that. Transforming misery into wholeness. Unconsciousness into conciousness.

The parts of your life where you're concious of beauty, love and joy, peace are the concious parts of your life. You're aware of the truth. The parts of your life where you're in attachment, anxiety, frustration, suffering, doubt etc. etc. those parts of your life are unconscious. You're lost in illusion.