Salvijus

So much philosophy just to justify your frustration and ego...

Truth makes corrections but does not belittle. Truth has nothing to gain by demeaning others. Only ego hopes to gain something by such means

There's no reason to ridicule anyone in life really. Only when people try to protect their egos do they succumb to such things. I hope one day people will understand that.

Rupert Spira's argument against solipsism. You really believe solipsism is true? *Eyeballs rolling up* The end But he spoke about the universal mind dreaming the entire existence at the end. That should make many solipsist here happy I believe.

Because love is the creative energy. And we are living in Creation 😐

Lol

I'm cool with that I've had enough math for a lifetime now

Amen.

1 = b^0 b^0 = _______ That which never happened technically can be called as 1. ______ = 1 1 = b^0

Yes!!!!!!! this is a very similar example I was shown before. See the line. b^m = b^m+0 = b^m * b^0 b^m = b^m * b^0 Then b^0 must be equal to 1 Then I asked him. Why b^0 must be equal to 1. Why can't we say b^0 is _______ blank. Because that would work also. And it would be in alignment with words being used. It would look like. b^m = b^m * _____ blank = b^m = b^m But apparently he said there is a rule in math that you can't leave a blank like that. If one element is undefined then the whole formula is undefined. So answer "1" was the only option mathematicians could go with. Do you see? I thought that was both fucked up but also interesting to see how mathematicians think. They define that which never happened as 1. How crazy is that.

Like you can call nothingness zero. Or you can call nothingness 1. And you will be logically correct both ways.

I was told the explanation once that x^0 translated would mean (there are no numbers that multiply with each other) so the answer would have to be _____ blank x^0=_____ would have to be a proper answer. However there is a rule in math that you can't leave something undefined. If there is at least one element undefined, then the whole formula is undefined. So mathematicians had to fill the blank with something. So how do you define something that never happened. You can either call it 0 or you can call it 1. And for math to be consistent, 1 was the right answer. That was an explanation I was told long ago.

Mmm, yea. I'm able to see why mathematicians defined x^0 as 1 aswell actually. In order to have a well defined mathematical universe/system. There is certain different kind of logic to it. Sneaky logic I would call it, haha. So... That's cool.

Can't there be made a math model where everything would make sense in written form aswell?

That's all I wanted to hear 🤧

Aaaaah. I'm down to accepting contradictions. That is a different talk now.

If x^2 in translation means ( there are two identical numbers that multiply among each other) x^0 in translation means (there are not a single identical number at play that would multiply with each other) and the answer 1 is totally random. I don’t think any mathematical gymnastics is going to convince that the above statement is not illogical. Maybe this is a good place to end it. Because we won't get anywhere if we didn't already lol.

I don't think advanced mathematics is necessary here. It's just a question of how do you translate the x^0=1 statement in a way that makes logical sense. Somehow everyone is dodging this simple problem.

Zero can't be reached with any numbers if you ask me lol

What does it mean to approach zero?

So am I right that x^0= 1 can't be translated into words or no?

Mmmmm no

Why is it that every mathematical writing can be translated into words. But if I ask x^0=1 to be translated into words nobody has an answer?

Shouldn't the definition of 0 and its function be consistent throughout all math? Like everywhere zero means just zero. But ^0 suddenly means to divide a number by itself. Seems like totally random and out of nowhere to me.