Salvijus

Sounds fun

If body is a desease, then the cure would be to transcend the reincarnation.

There is no organization without ego or corruption in it. Including actualized.org. That doesn't mean there's no benefit to it.

Among sceptics there are some who start with an open mind and then become sceptical as they dive deeper. And there are those who start with scepticism and do everything in their power to confirm their bias. The first ones are genuine, the latter ones are full of fear behind their scepticism. I hope you're not the latter one, but if you are, it's okay 🙏

It's escalating

Life is a test that consists of only one question: will you chose love or fear? And you have all of eternity in front of you to descide. Life couldn't be more simple. But ego being eternally confused about everything makes simple things seem unsolvable. If you find yourself being confused, it's because you're consulting an insane mind, not the infinite wisdom of the heart.

Realize that you don't know what anything is for or what anything means. Breathe. Abide in the "I don't know". From that space begin to ask for guidence and see what comes up. Look for a vision that fills your heart with a sense of freedom and expansion. If it's difficult to locate that feeling you can withdraw from all the noise of the world, somewhere in nature maybe, perhaps while fasting aswell. This would increase your connection with the Devine and enable you to hear His guidence better. Once you found the vision that fills your heart with the fire of life, have faith and move towards it fearlessly knowing the universe has your back.

Aww 🌟

Maybe I misperceived the situation then. But I interpreted it as a laughter of validation. If I'm wrong, I apologize.

It's not about Lyubov or the other guy. It's about Leo giving praise to such a lame ego tactic.

Joe in my view is likely being guided by his own reasoning and the information available at the time. When he arrives at the conclusion that others agree with, they like him, when he arrives at the conclusions differently, people call him names. What's most bizzare to me is when he arrives at the same conclusion as some on the left and they still hate on him. Lmao, so butthurt and salty.

Haha Nah, that seems like a cheap move to me. Calling others donkeys don't make you a lion. Neither does smugness make you lion. Engaging respectfully with the given arguments, with precision, insight and good will makes you a lion. Whenever someone feels a need to attack a person's character or boast their own, you know something is off.

Fear not to be Grand. Just do be grandiose. Grandness is quality of God. Gradiosity is of ego. Gradiosity says: look at me, I'm so special. 💪 Grandness says: there is no me, there's only the Greatness of I AM. 🔆

🤨 Interesting.

Maybe the thoughts that give you joy, peace, love are good quality thoughts. Thoughts that come as an expression of Spirit untouched by the fingers of ego.

@Hojo look, I offered you a peaceful departure because I saw we won't reach an agreement on anything. It's up to you what you want to do with it. If you want something more from me, you'll know where to find me - on a dance floor. Take care ✌️🕺 🌟

There's more to reality than just a bottom, hence the nuance. For a more complete picture of reality individuation has to be aknowledged as a valid part of reality aswell. That's what Bashar would say. Literally. How does solipsism relate to the idea that we are all that is? Bashar: Solipsism views conscious experience as the only reality, which is true from one perspective. However, existence is both individual and collective. Each person's consciousness is part of the whole and contains the whole. This dual nature means that solipsism is only one side of the truth. True understanding requires recognizing both the individual and collective perspectives, acknowledging interconnectedness and the completeness of existence. The idea of Indra’s net, where each jewel reflects all other jewels, symbolizes this interconnectedness. Solipsism leaves out the other side, but recognizing both perspectives provides a more complete picture of existence.

Okay 🤝 🕺 🕺 🕺

Okay 🙏

No disagreements there.

It requires extrapolation to make a connection between these ideas. These ideas of being a god like creator, being egoless (or being in faith in sadhguru's words) and the law of giving and receiving are inseparable. Sadhguru hints at all of them in the video. But it requires careful attention to connect the dots. It's a complicated topic. I've tried my best in explaining how it is all connected in the post above. That was the best I could do. If it didn't land then I give up and we will just have to agree to disagree. Take care 🙏

And that what you truly want if observed carefully, is pleasentness within you and around you (13:35). That second part is a clever way of saying to be of service to the Whole.

He's saying that the intensity of your thought will determine if it will become a reality (11:20). And he says what blocks the flow of creative energy are ego based doubts and calculations whereas in a state of faith that egoic influence is not there therefore the energy can flow freely (9:30). However The Law of giving and receiving still plays a very important role here. Sadhguru hints at it by saying at 15:17 that if your want your body, mind, emotion and energy align itself to the source energy where all creative energy comes from, then realize that pleasentness within and all around you is what you most wish to see. It basically means that to align yourself with what you truly want is no different than becoming a servent to the Whole. And that desire to be of service to the Whole unavoidably puts you in a process of giving and receiving. And in fact it's only when you're willing to give everything away that you lose all ego, and it is then that the flow of receiving becomes infinite thus giving you the power to create like God creates.

Some people from this forum had direct calls with him and asked privately and then shared it on the forum. Here's one example. How does solipsism relate to the idea that we are all that is? Bashar: Solipsism views conscious experience as the only reality, which is true from one perspective. However, existence is both individual and collective. Each person's consciousness is part of the whole and contains the whole. This dual nature means that solipsism is only one side of the truth. True understanding requires recognizing both the individual and collective perspectives, acknowledging interconnectedness and the completeness of existence. The idea of Indra’s net, where each jewel reflects all other jewels, symbolizes this interconnectedness. Solipsism leaves out the other side, but recognizing both perspectives provides a more complete picture of existence.

It's irrelevant because it's not about me. It's about whether or not sadhguru's teachings contradict with the Law of exchange which is a universally accepted truth across all spiritual traditions and visible by science itself. And you claimed that he did. But failed to defend that position. And now you're trying to move the goalpost.