Salvijus

I can't believe you made me do the Google search of his proofs. You should do it yourself if you're really interested in his proofs. But here's one I was able to find. https://saemobilus.sae.org/articles/lynchpin-a-novel-geometry-modular-tangential-omnidirectional-flight-01-16-03-0018#view

Conspiracies sometimes turn out to be true. That's the beauty of it.

That's what he's trying to do already. He claims he has the proofs if only people would give him a chance to explain himself. That's why he wants to talk to sciencetis and turn this into a discussion. But he's mostly being dismissed right of the bat without any basis. That's why it would be interesting to see a genuine convocation between a scientists and Howard.

Even if he's wrong. It's still entertaining to watch new ideas being explored. There is really no need to call anyone names and take sides. It could be just a genuine friendly exploration of new ideas. And if he turns out to be wrong. Great. Howard will have a chance to improve his theories further and continue following his passion. It's always a good day for science when people are discussing new ideas.

It's impossible to act in unwholesome manner from a state of wholesomeness. You must enter the unwholesome state (place of lack) first in order to perform the unwholesome action.

Any emotion that you are willing to feel fully is going to transform into love. So there is no such thing as exploring fear. The moment you turn your awareness on it fully, it is gone. Love is the only emotion.

Any genuine insight into truth via contemplation leads to transformation as well I would say. Becoming absolutely conscious means a shift in perception. And that shift in perception transforms everything about us. Natural wholeness gets restored.

Lol. He's so offended that Howard or somebody else gave a bad reputation to scientific community. People should stop taking sides and roasting each other and start having proper conversations already. Gosh... The ironic part is that there is some validity in critism of scientific community being close minded towards alternative views of people such as Howard and that they even will go as far as to ridicule and belittle them in uncool manner. At least my personal observations are that the critism has some validity. But maybe they would disagree. So I guess it's debatable. I guess we will find out as the events continue to unfold.

Imagine him turning out to be right tho. Now that would be wild, haha. I'm excited to see his interview next on TOE now.

The word healing comes from the world "whole" I believe. "to restore wholeness". To restore wholeness could be a valid definition of enlightenment imo. Coming back to your natural state. Realizing the completeness of what you are. Enlightenment - the ultimate restoration to one's wholeness. Ultimate healing of one's soul. (sorry for the cosmology)

It's a matter of degree tho. To some degree everyone can live in alignment with love's Will. Some can do it totally. Some less so. Others completely oblivious and lost. But the opportunity and choice to move closer to truth and love is available to all.

Freedom and love are the same. (Freedom is love under all conditions.) Freedom, love, God is the only value. Because it's the only thing that is real. And because there's nothing else, there is nothing else to chose from. Love can have many manifestations tho. From creating art, to climbing a mountain, to having sex. So it can appear as if people have different values. But when you look closer. Everything boils down to a single value - Reality/god/love/freedom

If I remember correctly it's the comic secrets episode 4. Science of dematerialization.

If the goal of your meditation is to become more aware, perceptive, insightful. Even 5 mins of self reflecting per day will give results in that direction. But if you desire to purify and dissolve your ego, you may have to lock yourself in isolation somewhere for longer periods to allow the agony to work itself through. If you want to awaken to God's love, no amount of dissosiactive type of meditation is going to work. A completly different approch is needed. Similarly each path has a unique approch, objective and conditions for success. You can't just pile everything into one subject as if it's all the same.

It's your inability to come to terms with what happened that is causing the memories to resurface for you to look at again and again until you come to full acceptence of everything that's happened. No one else can do the acceptence for you except you.

Everyone thinks values are a personal choice and everyone can have their own personal set of values unique to them. But this is not true. Truth is the only value and there's no alternative in life. Becoming more true is the only direction of value. If a psychedelic experience can help a person in that regard, great. If not, it's meaningless.

Yea but those results no matter how small they may or may not be are the only results that matter in life. So it's arguably the wisest use of time in the end.

You need only one moment of meditation to become enlightened. (it's a clever statement, don't take it at face value)

Sadhguru in one of his exclusive interviews with some scientists claims gravity is a false idea according to yoga. In Yogic understanding everything is being hold together by two fundamental forces in existence (Ida and pingala) spinning in opposite direction and creating centrifugal force and centripetal force or something like that. I don't remember the explanation exactly. And that if you were to stop one energy from spinning, the object would dematerialize itself. That is how some yogis who have certain mastery over their energies are able to dematerialize themselves from this plane of existence he says. I wonder if yoga's view on gravity is in alignment with what Terrence Howard is saying.

I watched the whole thing. I don’t know if his theories are solid but it sounds interesting at the very least. Also I like his vibe and personality somehow. And the way he talks and thinks about the world in general. I think the amount of ridicule and belittling he has received is uncool. Like it's so obvious 99% of the people attacking him don't even understand or read his theories in depth... That part is just painful to watch... It tells you a lot about what kind of world we live in. But I'm interested in seeing how this will play out. Maybe he will get through and be able to have a genuine conversation with scientists in the end like he wanted to. That would be wonderful on so many levels. I would like to see that happen.

Didn't read the whole thread but here's my take. Knowledge = memory and data Intellect = how good are you at using the data in your memory to your advantage. Ability to analize and rationalize. Intelligence = is beyond memory and intellect. It's the ability to know what is true and right without any use of reasoning or data. Without intelligence intellect can be used in very stupid ways. ______________ It's impossible for ai to develop the third kind of intelligence imo. A computer will always run on data and analysis of that data only.

I'm not a Bible scholar but I don't think there're any records of him saying sex is bad. Church might have invented that. Although I wouldn't be surprised if he sayed lust, addiction, promiscuity is going to get you trouble and might be wise to be cautious about it.

Love, relationship and intimacy are inseperable. One expression of intimacy is coupling. If it's done properly with necessary awareness, from a right place in your heart, it can leads to a profound sexual union of two souls merging together, having a transcendental experiences and healing. It wouldn't surprise me that a Master of love such as Jesus would be a master of all forms of intimacy aswell and had no problems with any expressions it could take. Also what strika sayed.

I'm more interested what's going on in her head. How she's handling with being banned and all that. I would've thought she has moved on.