Salvijus

😎 Yea that's cool. You gave me an opportunity to share that video(story) which I had a desire to do so for a long time for some reason, lol. It's entertaining at the very least.

Okay I'll give a transcript. Host is recounting an experience with shaman durek during one of his preveious podcast. As they were talking the topic leaned towards possessions somehow. Then the host started to say his wife been acting really weird recently for no reason, like she's a different person all of the sudden. Then shaman durek goes into his spirit guides (that's on the previous podcast) and starts telling him this information that his wife is possessed by the spirit called Lavana. And starts explaining how to deal with that, and how to recognize the signs and how it manifests etc. Etc. And the host was like. "what the hell is he taking about" ( because he didn't even believe in such things) then next day the host meets his son and tells him what happened. Jokingly he explains that there was this shaman that told him that your mother is possessed by the spirit called Lavana. And the son says to him. Dad! She just named her new daughter Lavana! And then he was mind blown I thought that was a cute little moment where it gives credibility to this shaman. There are bunch of stories of him like that probably. This is the podcast on which it happened. But don't remember where exactly

@CoolDreamThanks there is one interesting story about him that gives him credibility about all the crazy things he says. Maybe it will resonate. at 54min 50sec mark of this video upto 56min or so.

Yey, I'm glad someone gave a video a try

Maybe, but I believe tears can't be faked. And the way he was braking down in tears had me braking down in tears aswell lol. That's a proof to me when something is genuine imo.

Damn, she/he even changes their voice tone and personality midway talking back and forth lol. Nice share 👍

If you want the proof that souls exist and can talk to you. Watch this video. And you will shit your pants brother. You will shit your pants ma friend. Because it's so mind blowing..... Disclaimer: the video itself is not scary. But insanely eye opening.

This shaman is increadibly legit

To understand others you have to understand yourself first. If you don't understand others, then it may be a sign your level of understanding is not as profound as you may thought. If the progress is genuine, the ability to understand others would increase as you grow, not decrease.

@Anon212 okay okay, you're right.

I would add also to for people to know, that there are millions of these people out there with such results and even far greater results than these in Isha community. Just something to wrap your head around.

Maybe this guy

Alternative images that can be invoked and meditated upon before tripping or soberly to touch that space of divine love inside you. But metatron sacred geometry is arguably the most effective. ___________________________ There're other ways and methods to get there aswell. But those require a lot of time to explain.

If you stare at the metatron sacred geometry for 5mins before tripping, it will transport you to love. Metatron geometry is basically encoded energy of Highest Love. It can directly open your heart and place you where you wanna be (prayer full of Light conciousness) Drill this image into your mind and psyche by staring at it for 5 mins. And then try to recreate that same geometry with eyes closed and watch what happens. It can be practiced soberly aswell. And should.

What would you do if the whole world accepted you as Jesus?

If you're honest, Yourself is the only thing you really care about (value). Sometimes that is expressed through survival and ego drive. Other times it is expressed through spirituality and heart's/love's drive. This value is existencial not psychological.

It's not necessary for me to have a conclusion on who's right and who's wrong to enjoy watching two genuine people explore new ideas and then watch their conclusions and their reactions.

What will I do with that info. And besides. The info in these solo debunk videos have no weight unless Howard is there to defend his ideas. So... It's all the lame people who gather to watch such videos to find more reason to ridicule and slander Howard when they have no understanding of science whatsoever and who's right and who's wrong. They just take sides anyway. I'm not interested in such activities. I would like to see genuine friendly discussions instead.

That's not the same thing. The thing is I don't qualify to tell if his arguments are good or bad. I'm not a scientists. Only Howard can defend his ideas. So what's the point of me watching 40mins of trash talk? What will I do with that info? It's like eating energetic poo for no reason.

Even if you see somebody being wrong, there is no reason to ridicule them if you're genuine. @Brahman is a good example. He looked into the material deeper and made a new conclusion that there is lack of substance to Howard's theories. There were no insults going on. No attacking. No mocking. Just a simple observation based on his research and capacity to understand. Now comparing that with David's video. What is there to comment. First of all, the vibe was very unpleasant for me full of slander and name calling and what not. It was hard for me to watch. I don't like watching negativity. Second of all, such review videos like David's don't mean anything unless Howard is there to respond and defend his theories. Anyone can make a solo debunk video these days. That is not how genuine people approach and handle things. Simply trashing someone on your privite video 40mim straight is really lame. This attitude that there could be a kernel of truth in everything and that we should stay open to that possibility and eager to find it is not a weak position. It's the most powerful position. I'm not sure who you're referring to here. I personally don't care if he is proven wrong. But the idea that he may be true is more exciting to me because I want to see new discoveries. That's my motivator reasoning. I think everyone should have such a motivation. It's the best motivation to have. If you're not on the side of seeing new levels of truth. Then what side are you on? Must be ego then.

@zurew Those who are genuine, they recognize the flaws and all the red flags but they don't get fixated on it but rather are trying to look beyond it to see if there is some kernel of truth to the proposed ideas that could benefit humanity. Because those are what we want. And we should always seek it with eagerness and excitement. However, those who are not genuine, will get super fixated on anything that they don't like that allows them to make the argument that the person is no good, empty talk, lunatic etc. And will use that as an excuse to not listen to his ideas anymore. And will try to bury that person with slander and character assassination.

There's nothing cheritable about giving a person a chance to explain themselves and being open minded about it. Everything other than that, like attempts to ridicule, belittle, silence, attack is desperate and comes from bias.

A good question to ask is, how do we know that what we percieve as a limitation in someone's behavior is not just our failure to see deeper intelligence behind those actions? This question becomes especially significant when we're talking about mystics and such I would say. The answer i believe is. You can't know. All you can do is keep growing and keep an open mind and your opinion about mystics and their hard to understand behavior will keep changing every day. In the meantime, the only thing worth being concerned with is if this being can help me reach the next stage of development or not.

Okay, then the same question can be applied anyways. Which axioms are more in alignment with our perception of reality. But "align with reality" is just as good. Maybe even better. It would make more sense to align the math with the Reality rather than our perception of reality. Because our perception of reality could be flawed. And why would we want to align our math with something that is not stable even.

The question becomes. Which axioms are more in alignment with Reality from phylosophical point of view ? The ones that Howard is proposing or the current ones. It's a debatable matter if you ask me. I definitely don't know the answer but I'm open minded about it.