Salvijus

I'm just saying the self is the only thing you can possibly be. And it's not a construction. It's eternal I AM. The I AM is the self.

@Spiritual Warfare Nice pic ✨🌻💪

If the seperate sense of self dissappeared, you'd still know you exist.

Nobody can construct sentience. And you are a sentient being.

It's like looking for your glasses and not finding them while wearing them 😄

Does Santa Clous knows that he does not exist? No. Do you know that you do not exist? Yes. That means you do exist. And you have a sense of self unlike Santa Clous.

If you know that you exist, you must have a sense of what that you is. Worth repeating for one more person here.

If you know you exist, you must have a sense of you. I just wanted to repeat this so it would sink in better.

Without the ego you would still know that you exist. As what? As existence itself. So your sense of self is always something. There can't be an experience without the sense of self.

If you know you exist, you have a sense of self. Self is existence itself and you are that.

Yeah, smart.

Haha. I play mental chess with people on the forum lol.

I'll add you to my collection.

Hm, ~chuckles~ ok Tcare ✌️🌟 🦋

I demonstrated how frustration towards abuser was of no healing effect towards him. So your argument that frustration can help got debunked. A woman was not helped by frustration but by compassion. There was no frustration towards her.

Your counter argument was the rape example. And I debunked that by showing how frustration towards the abuser was of no help to him. The compassion was partial. It was only towards the woman. So it worked to that extent only.

That would be a compassionate thing to do, yes. But frustration indicates condemnation and hate and desire to kill. It's not love.

You never had frustration towards the woman is why she got helped. But you "killed" a raper by condemning him. What about compassion towards a sexual abuser? Did the abuser got helped and healed by your condemnation towards him?

You can't create peace unless you're in peace yourself. Using frustration as a basis for action is not love but ego judgement and hard cope at play.

Frustration is desire to kill not to heal tho.

And frustration/condemnation is not one of them.

Frustration comes with inability to accept something. Love is acceptance. These two are the opposite.

You mean the example with rape? So you care in order to help. Fine. But even then frustration is not necessary, you can do it out of love and care.

What do you care if they do a million times more?

If you love the person, would you not forgive them their wrongdoings? And if your forgiveness is true, where is the room for frustration?