Salvijus

I asked grok to double check the names in the pictures above. Confirmed Jewish (full heritage or self-identified): Sumner Redstone (Rothstein): Yes, born to a Jewish family; changed his name from Rothstein. Bob Iger: Yes, raised in a Jewish family. Brian Roberts: Yes, son of Jewish Comcast founder Ralph Roberts. David Zaslav: Yes, Jewish. Jeff Zucker: Yes, Jewish. Noah Oppenheim: Yes, Jewish. James Goldston: Yes, Jewish. Ben Sherwood: Yes, Jewish. Les Moonves: Yes, Jewish. Ochs-Sulzberger family: Yes, Jewish family owning The New York Times. Eugene Meyer: Yes, Jewish (former Washington Post owner). Ken Lerer: Yes, Jewish. Ezra Klein: Yes, Jewish. Michael Bloomberg: Yes, Jewish. Jonathan Greenblatt: Yes, Jewish. Mark Zuckerberg: Yes, raised Jewish. Sergey Brin: Yes, born to Jewish parents. Susan Wojcicki: Yes, mother is Jewish (father is Polish-American). Sam Altman: Yes, Jewish. Shari Redstone: Yes, Jewish (daughter of Sumner Redstone). Robert Kapito: Yes, Jewish. Adam Mosseri: Yes, Israeli-American, Jewish. Tom Rothman: Yes, born to a Jewish family. Harry Cohn: Yes, Jewish (Columbia Pictures founder). David Nevins: Yes, Jewish. Harvey Levin: Yes, Jewish. David Geffen: Yes, Jewish. Chris Licht: Yes, Jewish. Barry Levinson: Yes, Jewish. Charlie Collier: Yes, Jewish. Partial Jewish Heritage (e.g., one Jewish parent, but often secular or not self-identified): Larry Page: Mother is Jewish; father is not (Protestant background); raised in a secular household without religious affiliation. Jonah Peretti: Mother is Jewish; father is of Italian and English descent. Susan Wagner: Born to a Jewish family (full heritage confirmed). (Note: Earlier uncertainty was resolved via bio.) Not Jewish or Unconfirmed/Misrepresented: Michael Barker: Unconfirmed—no reliable sources mention Jewish heritage. Ed Felsenthal: Unconfirmed—no sources explicitly state Jewish heritage, though his last name is sometimes associated with Jewish families. Bob Bakish: No, not Jewish—multiple sources debunk this.

For me it was the channeled codes that made me believe him. I have a good feeling about this one.

That's okay. We can agree to disagree. I don't want to repeat myself for the 10th time.

Whether you define existence or not, it still exists. Same is true with communication. Is there a form of communication that is not invented but universal? According to me - yes. Hopefully I don't have to explain myself all over again. If you disagree, it's okay. We can agree to disagree.

Took me a while to finish this but it was worth it. Many "omg" moments. And I found him to be convincing. Perhaps it's my favorite so far.

As far as I'm concerned, I see no problems with my definition of what language is. I'm open to hearing opposite views than my own but so far I found none of it more convincing than mine. That's my side of the story at least. Perhaps your experience is different. It's okay. We can just agree to disagree.

Well I already gave mine. Language is a form of communication. Be it through words, through sounds, through geometry, through colors, through fragrances, through sensations, through reveberations. Those are the different ways of saying something. All the things above are manifestations of energy - the ultimate most original language.

Ok

The manifestions of energy are objective and with an objective message. Everything can be said by how you reveberate. And that reverberation will have a universal meaning, not a personal invented one. I'm fine with agreeing to disagree, if you like.

Those are the different manifestions of energy. It's the message that the energy is conveying.

That's a simple example of energy. But energy is much more than that. It's everything.

Energy.

The person need not invent or project a meaning onto the sound. Every reverberation has an inherent universal meaning that has nothing to do with personal interpretation of it.

@Joseph Maynor how did you get your restrictions lifted?

The fact that everything reveberates and every reverberation is saying something. That's a universal language. Not invented. Discovered.

Well at the end of the day, who you truly are is very auspicious. So you might aswell adopt the name that reflects that. It just makes sense to do that. You wouldn't call yourself a turd by the same logic.

The tree idea sounds wholesome. It feels healing for some reason.

I thought non slurping is conformist. I'd rather eat the Japanese way. Niom niom niom.

I'm going to say you can't invent anything new. Everything that is possible already exists. You can only discover what people around you haven't discovered yet. But that's not your original invention. Nor is that discovery original if you consider the whole cosmos.

Let me explain at least. I meant "buying boobs"

Avoiding loud farts.

Well that's a scientific fact not an assumption. Yes, English needs to be learnt because it only has meaning within a group consensus. That too is a form of language but not most superficial one. I'm talking about deeper forms of language that require no invention and no group consensus to exist.

@Joseph Maynor lol. Welcome back.

Mm, no comments on that example. Seems irrelevant as far as I'm concerned.