Salvijus

What a hell is going on here. Mash potatoes.

Bromance

@JoeVolcano ?

"There are no degrees of consciouness and no drug can ever alter or affect consciouness in any way and will not be able to do that in any time in the future". That's a decent argument and I agree with it. But drugs can alter the ego. It can (potentially in some cases) eliminate the influence and contractions of the ego and remove the veils that make the realization of the absolute eternal reality difficult. So yea. There're no degrees of consciouness. But there are degrees of ego trancendence. The more ego is trancendenced and deeper depth of absolute gets realized... this one argument would be enough to debunk what brandon and ralston says about psychedelics imo. Tho i still don't support psychedelics because they have other problems with it. Sometimes i wonder if ralston understands that, but is just playing coy for people's benefit. Almost every legit guru do these tricks in my view.

That's a lot to unpack tho. And im not a fan of venting also venting, drama, and triggered debates are the only times when i post on the forum usually, but im trying to go beyond that now Neo advaita makes many claims it's hard to find a starting place when nobody is triggering me if u want, give me the best arguments of neo advaita and we can have a discussion about what flaws it has or doesn’t have one by one.

I wish I could explain the flaw in neo advaita for someone some day without creating conflict and angry dabates. That would be a lot of joy for me.

U should condense your problem into one sentence. Then the answer becomes clear by itself very easily.

@Dany Balan u don't experience hornyness also? ? maybe that's a good thing. Some spend decades of meditation to transcend lust ?

Remarkable analysis with so much good valid argumentation. ?

@Nilsi maybe you're right, i haven't study carl jungs archetypes so i can't comment anything. ?

So you're saying peterson will never change his opinion because he and putin are the same? That's an odd argument ? Lol, just kidding

Hmmm. Maybe. Not sure why u say this so confidently. He looks pretty open minded to me. Except maybe when he's triggered and defensive like right now. Won't argue further with this bc idk him personally.

I think when it comes to logic, peterson is very consistent and spot on most of the time. And if he's wrong and u dabate him, he will be open minded and change his view if u prove him wrong. But in this case they can't even point out exacly what is wrong with peterson's perspective. I think they just don't like his tone. And that's all it takes. Transgender defenders don't care about logic. And if u have a bad tone and u question the validity of transgender worldview and phylosophy. U're finnished. ? that's just the name of the game right now.

Maybe just remove the title "girlfriend" and continue being friends and see where it goes. It seems like u were going along well with each other untill the label got attached. So remove all labels even "friends" and be with him if u like him and if u don't, don't be with him. And if u get aroused get closer and get more intimate and if no arausal is there just have fun in other ways. Or do whatever idk.

Yes. Discriminators are people too. They also need acceptance ?

I know how he feels. Getting warrning points is the most triggering, anger-inflamming thing ever ? i can see him venting here strongly ?

?

Haha ? face the truth!

The ultimate test to see if you're transphobic or not is to have sex with a transperson. If u can't do that. You're transphobic. And should be banned or getting warrning points ?

Maybe a mobilephobic? Kidding ?

i get Red lines for everything.

It's ridiculous that people frown upon discrimination when frowning upon is itself an act of discrimination. Only god is capable of perfect love and zero discrimination. So unless you're god. You are prejudist prick. ?

A lot of discrimination is happening here against transphobs. They should get warrning points for being transphobphobic. ? Haha, jokes aside. Nobody is a transphobe just becomes they don’t agree with transgender phylosophy. The disapproval is not coming out fear or hate or judgement. It's coming out of rational thinking. There're legit good arguments why transgender thing is kinda messed up imo. But it's super confusing at the same time also.

I agree. Everybody has to be accepted and loved. But not every action has to be approved as an action of wisdom. We love our children but we don't approve their actions when they brake everything around. The question becomes is changing your gender a wise thing to do? I actually don't know. I haven't seen a good fully convincing argument on either side either. I think it's an open question yet to be explored deeper and further to reach some satisfying conclusion. (At least for me)

Aye, i have some more. But i don't want to be banned Basicly i believe there's an energetic difference aswell. The way the energy flows in a male body and female body is different. There are even practices disigned specificly for men and women slightly different because of it. I base this perspective from what i learnt from mantak chia, tau malachi and sadhguru. I heard them all say few times that there are energetic differences about a male and female body.