Salvijus

See I'm no expert. But during the Joe Rogan podcast he says normal drones can't spin around its axis while being still in the air. What Howard did has never been done before. If you were more honest. You would not be able to say, it's all just empty talk. You say that without any basis. The real honesty is. You don't know. And if you really want to find out if there is substance to his claims. You should investigate him. Not me.

Yes we need to chose to whom we give our attention and to whom we don't. There're only 3 options here: 1. You genuinely believe someone is not worth attention. And you just don't participate in it. 2. You adress the proposed theories and show the flaws in a friendly way. In a mood of exploration of science. Not as an ego battle. 3. Your ego is afraid that your reality is now questioned. You need an explanation to run away. So you label the person all kinds of names without even looking at their ideas genuinely and smear them with bad reputation. First two are okay. Third one is 99% of the people right now. Being lame.

Give him a chance and maybe he will do that. That's why I want to see a conversation between him and scientists.

Maybe the current method his using of drawing attention is going to work aswell.

In case I did a bad job explaining what's so special about his inventions. Here's a video of his drones. But seriously. Stop asking me all these scientific questions. I don't qualify to speak for Howard.

His inventions are based on a new model of understanding reality and physics. And if these inventions are actually legit. It proves that his new model of understanding reality is also legit.

Ugh... Why do I have to be the one defending his ideas.... Howard should do it himself. While talking to some scientists. And the rest of us should just be quiet and watch the outcome. But I believe just by watching the Joe Rogan podcast alone. That these are the only drones that can spin in all 4 directions around its axis. Normal drones cannot do that. And the type of science and theories used here are very different from convention science. Again... Howard should be the one explaining all this not me. I don't qualify to talk about it.

And how does one do that?

Most people who take Howard's side are deluded. And most people who take science's side are deluded too. Only those who are neutral about it and want to see genuine exploration over proposed theories are in a healthy position imo.

If you asked me, I would say the only way to settle this if his theories are properly examined in a genuine conversation where he can have a chance to go back and forth with others over his ideas. Simply calling him names is the worst way approach this.

I can't believe you made me do the Google search of his proofs. You should do it yourself if you're really interested in his proofs. But here's one I was able to find. https://saemobilus.sae.org/articles/lynchpin-a-novel-geometry-modular-tangential-omnidirectional-flight-01-16-03-0018#view

Conspiracies sometimes turn out to be true. That's the beauty of it.

That's what he's trying to do already. He claims he has the proofs if only people would give him a chance to explain himself. That's why he wants to talk to sciencetis and turn this into a discussion. But he's mostly being dismissed right of the bat without any basis. That's why it would be interesting to see a genuine convocation between a scientists and Howard.

Even if he's wrong. It's still entertaining to watch new ideas being explored. There is really no need to call anyone names and take sides. It could be just a genuine friendly exploration of new ideas. And if he turns out to be wrong. Great. Howard will have a chance to improve his theories further and continue following his passion. It's always a good day for science when people are discussing new ideas.

It's impossible to act in unwholesome manner from a state of wholesomeness. You must enter the unwholesome state (place of lack) first in order to perform the unwholesome action.

Any emotion that you are willing to feel fully is going to transform into love. So there is no such thing as exploring fear. The moment you turn your awareness on it fully, it is gone. Love is the only emotion.

Any genuine insight into truth via contemplation leads to transformation as well I would say. Becoming absolutely conscious means a shift in perception. And that shift in perception transforms everything about us. Natural wholeness gets restored.

Lol. He's so offended that Howard or somebody else gave a bad reputation to scientific community. People should stop taking sides and roasting each other and start having proper conversations already. Gosh... The ironic part is that there is some validity in critism of scientific community being close minded towards alternative views of people such as Howard and that they even will go as far as to ridicule and belittle them in uncool manner. At least my personal observations are that the critism has some validity. But maybe they would disagree. So I guess it's debatable. I guess we will find out as the events continue to unfold.

Imagine him turning out to be right tho. Now that would be wild, haha. I'm excited to see his interview next on TOE now.

The word healing comes from the world "whole" I believe. "to restore wholeness". To restore wholeness could be a valid definition of enlightenment imo. Coming back to your natural state. Realizing the completeness of what you are. Enlightenment - the ultimate restoration to one's wholeness. Ultimate healing of one's soul. (sorry for the cosmology)

It's a matter of degree tho. To some degree everyone can live in alignment with love's Will. Some can do it totally. Some less so. Others completely oblivious and lost. But the opportunity and choice to move closer to truth and love is available to all.

Freedom and love are the same. (Freedom is love under all conditions.) Freedom, love, God is the only value. Because it's the only thing that is real. And because there's nothing else, there is nothing else to chose from. Love can have many manifestations tho. From creating art, to climbing a mountain, to having sex. So it can appear as if people have different values. But when you look closer. Everything boils down to a single value - Reality/god/love/freedom

If I remember correctly it's the comic secrets episode 4. Science of dematerialization.

If the goal of your meditation is to become more aware, perceptive, insightful. Even 5 mins of self reflecting per day will give results in that direction. But if you desire to purify and dissolve your ego, you may have to lock yourself in isolation somewhere for longer periods to allow the agony to work itself through. If you want to awaken to God's love, no amount of dissosiactive type of meditation is going to work. A completly different approch is needed. Similarly each path has a unique approch, objective and conditions for success. You can't just pile everything into one subject as if it's all the same.