Salvijus

@soos_mite_ah do u go for a 40min walk after u eat or do u sit immediately and do nothing? These look like small things but it matters a lot. If u sit right after a meal u are making digestion more difficult for stomach. This increase the amount of fat that get stored in the belly and the feeling of bloatness. I bet you're doing tons of wrong lifestyle things that you're not even aware of. and probably u have some digestion problems that weight lifting is not gonna help. U need proper medicine herbs here. Certain yogic practices help ignite the digestion fire like suriya namaskar.

Lol ? Yea maybe. It could be just a small tip in a right direction maybe. If a serious change is desired, i believe doing a thorough ayurveda examimation would be essential. Health is way to complex subject to understand it on your own imo. What's ed history btw?

Do suriya namaskar every day. U'll be dry and lean as a stick. Fit and light as a bird and not muscular. There is a way to improve your organ health, bone health, tenacity of lingaments, body tissues, joints etc, improve circulation of various fluids. All that is much more important to health then lifting weights. Add some ayurveda herbs and lifestyle modifications to improve your digestion and health and u'll be fat free. There's a lot of potential here. Gym and weight lifting is pretty lame and ineffective to lose fat i believe. Also u need to work out daily. That's the minimum. Body is easily capable and literaly designed to be excercised daily. 3-4 times a week is what grandmas do. Walking from home to work is also not gonna be remotely enough. Eat twice a day. Intermitted fasting may help to lose weight. If u drink plenty of water your headaches and dizziness will go away. Drinking warm water with citrus juice on empty stomach in the morning especially has a good effect on reducing fat.

@Razard86 :)

Lol.

First we receive the love from god. Then we extend it to others. I think that's how it works. U can't give what u don't have. And loves comes only from god.

This is good. Also identity is the one who takes credit for every action imo.

@NoSelfSelf

Lol. Maybe you're a guy who doesn't not know who he is ? Not knowing who u are is what u are ? "Look, it's that guy who doesn't know himself"

Identity is something u identify with. If u like pizza very much, peaple will say, "oh it's that pizza guy" Whatever u like or dislike becomes your identity.

Bali maybe? It's very spiritual, good climate, very cheap livelihood, beautiful nature

Tibet i heard is very spiritual and kind. Why do u even care? (Rethorical question)

@UnbornTao :)

Stages of ego development in phychology is a model. But it's a model based on observation of reality, it's a discovery that was made by observation. Similary mathematics is a created model that was created by observing reality imo.

@UnbornTao i mean in a sense yes, reality can't be described by any model, symbols, concepts etc. But that point of view blows out absolutely everything. U can use the same argument to deny the discoveries of laws of physics. A smart ass guy could say gravity is just a concept and all concepts are inventions. There is no such thing as invention or discovery. Nothing ever happens, there's just what is, beyond any concepts etc. Im failing to explain why, but there's something wrong when people use absolute perspective to deny the relative. It's just not fair ? and inappropriate in this topic imo.

I can't see the quote that you're commenting on.

What i tried to say here is that no new rules can be invented in math. Math has only one rule. To be logical. It's a language of logic. 1+1=2 is logical. If 1+1=3, then it's no longer math. No math exists like this. That's why i sayed no new math can be invented. 1=1 is the only math possible. That's why all alien civilizations would arrive at the same math equations. And if somebody understand math in human world, he would understand math in alien world except that symbols would be different. Kinda proves that math and the laws of logic are universal (For now i think this makes sense to me)

Yea, i was trying to say this also. I think u misunderstood the statement here. I meant laws of physics can't be invented. Nobody can invent gravity. We can only discovere it and describe it using the language of math. So it's a discovery. I think it's solid argument. (Or maybe i misunderstood smth idk )

Zero is eternal nature of existence actually. Nothingness is the source of all things. Nothingness is one thing that can't be eliminated from existence. It never comes and never goes.

Little bit of explanation to clarify what was sayed above. If we entered a state of zero interpretation and mind activity. We'd still know we exist. We'd exists either as nothing or as everything. That's why number 0 and 1 are fundamental. Also there're 2 dimensions of life, yin and yang, positive and negative, permenant and impermenant, relative and absolute. That gives a sense of duality and contrast, and all other numbers come from this. (Ultimately yin and yang are one, and also two at the same time, it's confusing, no need to go there) Therefor numbers are part of existence quite fundamentally

0 exists indipendent of human experience actually. And oneness exists indipendent of human interpretation. 0 is the only real number, and zero can be called 1. We can say existence is absolute 1oneness without using our mind. And we can find that 0 is the source of existence. But to become self aware, to become aware of oneness, to recognize zero as zero, some sense of duality has to exist for oneness to recognize itself. And there duality was born, yin and yang was born. And out of duality all other numbers came. Therefore mathematics is in existence irrelevent of human experience. ?

@UnbornTao yea it's debateble, im not sure myself what would be the final correct answer. And it hurts my brains now Reality be like.

@UnbornTao yea, it would be very complicated if we started to be ontological. Because from absolute level nothing exists, nothing ever happens, there's no such thing as discoveries and inventions. Without interpretion of reality there's just nondual eternal samadhi. But that's not very helpful for this topic right now imo ? i'd rather stay on a relative human level now and would define "discovered" as that which was found by observation. And "invention" that which doesn't exist, like a pure fanatsy, scy fy movie. For example physics is not an invention because if it were i could just invent new laws every day. What about math then? Can i invent new math every day? I don't think so. I think it's existencial. Here's why i think so. Someone who understands mathematics in a human world would understand alien mathematics just the same way except that they would be using different symbols. But the fact that u'd be able to understand it means it's not just human invention. It's something universal. Because all alien civilizations would arrive at exacly the same equations imo.

Discovered no? Sombody observed reality and find out how it functions so it's discovered. Yea context is everything i think. In nondual samadhi there're no concepts and no such things as math and physics. But that's irrelevent for this topic now imo.

That's not really a good argument that proves that mathematics is invented imo. Because try to apply the same argument on physics. Is physics invented or discovered? It's definitely not a human invention but a keen obervation of the laws of physicality. So it is discovered. And yet if we apply the same question (Is there physics without any human interpretation) the answer will be no. But that's obviously not true. So there's a flaw in the argument then i would say.