Salvijus

They don't coexist in any way. They are in total contradiction to each other. They cancel each other out. There's either acceptence or rejection. Love or fear. God or ego. Truth or falsity. Light or darkness. Knowledge or ignorance. Joy or suffering. Forgiveness or resentment. And the more you have of one the less you will have of the other. You can't have them both at the same time. That's why the ultimate conclusion is. Once full acceptence has come, ego(resistance) is no more. It's 1+1=2 logic. Mind cannot be in full acceptance and full resistance at the same time. Because they cancel each other out. What you're describing is not a enlightened fully liberated mind. You're describing someone who has had an experience when some part of the mind became free of judgements, free of resistance. But mind has many layers and other layers can still be full of judgement. Full of ego. Hence such a one cannot be called fully enlightened yet. Maybe partialy enlightened. Just a glimpse of enlightenment is nothing.

Dicernment is a useful skill for survival. But condemnation is not a mental skill. It's just a desire to kill what we believe has no right to exist. One who has come to terms with the entire creation doesn't lose dicernment skills of the mind. But such one will lose all desire to condemn any part of existence.

In other words. Mind can be free of judgements or not yet free of judgements. You can't have a mind that is free of judgments and still have judgements and then be accepting of these judgements. It sounds clever but such case cannot exist. Only two possible cases can exist. Mind free of judgments. Mind not yet free of judgements.

Uuuh that's clever. But by the time somebody abides in perfect acceptance of everything. That being no longer experiences judgement arising in his/her mind. Such a one can experience a display of judgment and condemnation in other people and accept them for being judgemental but such energies no longer manifest in the one who abides in perfect embrace and acceptance.

Maybe it's a sensitive subject for somebody

The only appropriate way to judge reality is to see everything as beautiful, holy and wholy worthy of God's love forever. Anything other than that is a condemnation. "An attempt to kill what we believe has no right to exist"

@Francis777 lol. What was the reasoning behind the warning point?

Okei by that definition I agree then. That's what I meant. *ideas about what should or should not exist* I just didn't know this counts as morality.

@Princess Arabia :)

It's like you can see someone as fat and be neutral about it. Orrrrr it can provoke deep feelings of rejection inside you. And then you judge something as "not worthy to be approved of". A subtle condemnation.

Hmmm. There's a difference between making a statement. And an attempt to condemn something. It has nothing to do with morals.

No no. I am on Princess side. Calling something as disgusting is no longer a description of the situation. But a deep rejection of the situation. Whereas the first one was just a description. Like you can call someone a retard and that will be just an innocent medical diagnosis. And you can call someone a retard and it will be a rejection now. A judgement. A subtle condemnation. And no longer an innocent discribtion of the situation.

If problems become overwhelming, you just continue going forward with whatever amount of energy you still have. That's all.

What evaluation means then?

You don't have to solve your problems. Just make sure you're a moving towards a better life everyday. Inch by inch go towards light and goodness. How far you go doesn't matter. Just keep the steering wheel straight (intention) . Push the gas pedal down (desire and passion). Lift the left foot off the brakes(fear and addictions, procrastination) . And mooooove towards a brighter future. That's all you have to worry about. Everything else is not your business

Iiiiiiintereesting

The question wasn't for me but I still want to write. "judgement is an attempt to kill, what we believe has no right to exist" Basically it's inability to come to terms with something. A subtle condemnation. Whereas pure observation is neutral, yet you still see differences.

@Princess Arabia sometimes it's just time to let things go. It feels good. I like it. And I'm going to sleep anyway. Bye

Nah. I've seen too many "enlightened" people on the internet.

@Bluff yea... Well I smell lots of bs. But unable to find a crack at the moment. You're clever and slippery. I'm gonna give up the effort. And good luck with the thread:) ciao.

How can you help others to get there?

Okei. And how can you help others to get there? what's your special technique?

I will know if there is something you can help me with once you tell a little bit more about yourself. What makes you so confident to create ask me anything thread? And sit on the throne of all knowing almighty?

What do you have to offer? What do you understand that others don't? What knowledge do you have that is most precious to you?