-
Content count
7,943 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by Salvijus
-
Salvijus replied to Hugo Oliveira's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
He makes a good point about psychedelics, even mild ones being a doorway for spirits. -
Salvijus replied to Hugo Oliveira's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
A real life story of a an ex-Satanist Grandmaster about the secret societies, dark forces, the spiritual warfare, possessions, the science of occult, witchcraft, healing, miracles and all things paranormal. -
This doctor shoves a knife in a person's head and then heals them. There is actually footage of him doing it. I don't know how YouTube didn't remove this video because it's quite disturbing but also mind blowing.
-
Salvijus replied to Hugo Oliveira's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
By turning the light in the room you can see all kinds of insects/cockroaches crawling around. Same way by turning the spiritual Light of your heart you can begin to see weird things. That's a safe way of doing it because the Light protects you. Otherwise trying to spot these things would not be good for you imo. The moment you spot a demon by casual means, it's already too late -
Salvijus replied to Javfly33's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
You can suffer only what you fail to love. So unconditional love implies there is no condition in you where you are not in love. And if there is no condition where you are not in love, there is no condition where you are in suffering. -
Salvijus replied to Javfly33's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Maybe Frank Yang was right then :] -
That was actually beautiful. More power to such respectful interactions. I wonder how much he was actually holding in, trying not to explode, haha. But regardless, that was nice to watch.
-
You can disagree with someone without roasting them and calling them names. That's what normal humans do.
-
So much philosophy just to justify your frustration and ego...
-
Truth makes corrections but does not belittle. Truth has nothing to gain by demeaning others. Only ego hopes to gain something by such means
-
There's no reason to ridicule anyone in life really. Only when people try to protect their egos do they succumb to such things. I hope one day people will understand that.
-
Salvijus replied to Someone here's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Rupert Spira's argument against solipsism. You really believe solipsism is true? *Eyeballs rolling up* The end But he spoke about the universal mind dreaming the entire existence at the end. That should make many solipsist here happy I believe. -
-
Salvijus replied to Sugarcoat's topic in Spirituality, Consciousness, Awakening, Mysticism, Meditation, God
Because love is the creative energy. And we are living in Creation 😐 -
Lol
-
I'm cool with that I've had enough math for a lifetime now
-
Amen.
-
1 = b^0 b^0 = _______ That which never happened technically can be called as 1. ______ = 1 1 = b^0
-
Yes!!!!!!! this is a very similar example I was shown before. See the line. b^m = b^m+0 = b^m * b^0 b^m = b^m * b^0 Then b^0 must be equal to 1 Then I asked him. Why b^0 must be equal to 1. Why can't we say b^0 is _______ blank. Because that would work also. And it would be in alignment with words being used. It would look like. b^m = b^m * _____ blank = b^m = b^m But apparently he said there is a rule in math that you can't leave a blank like that. If one element is undefined then the whole formula is undefined. So answer "1" was the only option mathematicians could go with. Do you see? I thought that was both fucked up but also interesting to see how mathematicians think. They define that which never happened as 1. How crazy is that.
-
Like you can call nothingness zero. Or you can call nothingness 1. And you will be logically correct both ways.
-
I was told the explanation once that x^0 translated would mean (there are no numbers that multiply with each other) so the answer would have to be _____ blank x^0=_____ would have to be a proper answer. However there is a rule in math that you can't leave something undefined. If there is at least one element undefined, then the whole formula is undefined. So mathematicians had to fill the blank with something. So how do you define something that never happened. You can either call it 0 or you can call it 1. And for math to be consistent, 1 was the right answer. That was an explanation I was told long ago.
-
Mmm, yea. I'm able to see why mathematicians defined x^0 as 1 aswell actually. In order to have a well defined mathematical universe/system. There is certain different kind of logic to it. Sneaky logic I would call it, haha. So... That's cool.
-
Can't there be made a math model where everything would make sense in written form aswell?
-
That's all I wanted to hear 🤧
-
Aaaaah. I'm down to accepting contradictions. That is a different talk now.