Salvijus

Begging with a bowl is more effective. It's already known in their practice. Combined with prayer and meditation it has potential to reduce you into nothingness. It feels like some woke activists invented that story.

Everyone thinks we're the good guys and others are the bad guys. Allowing everyone to sit at the table and talk is the most concious way of dealing with conflict, otherwise "when diplomacy ends, war begins"

People will see whatever they want to see. Even if Jesus was speaking in English, there would be a thousand different interpretations of what he was saying by now. One would have to abide in the same christ conciousness of love and mercy that Jesus was speaking from to really interpret the meaning correctly imo.

Because you want to be as cool as me. Perfectly understandable. No shame in that.

The problem is that every story has two sides. All the things you've mentioned could be either justified or reframed/recontextualized in such a way that it sounds positive not negative. Not that I'm interested in doing that. Some right wing commentator probably already does that.

Okay, maybe you have a valid point there. I'm not educated enough on this subject to be aware of the details of that operation, so I can't push back on that. Perhaps there is some valid critism to be made there.

What are they rebelling against? Against boarder protection and illegal immigration?

I reckon from the view point of the right, the woman is seen responsible for her death because she antagonized the officer and than drove recklessly towards him in a semi dangerous way which gave him a semi valid reason to shoot. You could argue that the officer's actions were overboard and that he should face consequences. But it's hard to sympathize with someone who was dancing striptease on that barrel of a gun for no good reason. Like really. Wtf was she even doing there with such atrocious smugness? What was she trying to achieve there? Did she just wake up one day and thought, "I'm going to piss of some officers today and then play chase me". Idk, I don't have a full picture understanding here myself.

Both are responsible imo. Those two women were extremely provocative, almost begging to be shot in a face. And the officer lost his cool and used a half valid excuse to do answer her prayers. Mmm... Idk. Officer should face some consequences probably. But I kinda understand him also.

This one is epic.

Here's a third definition: When you have become conscious of something that you were not before, then you've become more conscious. But in this context it's about the quality of perception not the quantity of it. How deep is your perception into the nature of reality? See.

Alternative explanation would be: What's the point of psychotherapy? The point of it is to dive into your subconscious parts where you're stuck in destructive, dysfunctional patterns and to bring awareness to those parts so you could heal and become more concious as a result that. Transforming misery into wholeness. Unconsciousness into conciousness.

The parts of your life where you're concious of beauty, love and joy, peace are the concious parts of your life. You're aware of the truth. The parts of your life where you're in attachment, anxiety, frustration, suffering, doubt etc. etc. those parts of your life are unconscious. You're lost in illusion.

99% of you is unconscious. When you will become concious of that 99% you'll be more concious than others.

I'm joking with the Pic of course. And of course I disagree with everything you've said (some parts were okay tho). But I'm tired of it. Let's just call it a truce. With you or without you I'm out of here. Please don't bait me back into it. Thank you. Tcare. 🙏

@UnbornTao Sorry bro, but you leave me no other choice. This is the only response I can give you now.

I'm with you.

This is what I was pointing to by distinguishing a desperate pursuit of desire and gracious pursuit of desire.

The word need means different things in different context. I'm using the word need as a synonym for desire just to be clear. So my statement follows: unless you have a desire for something, you're not going to pursue it. Basic sense if you ask me.

Yes, if you didn't have that need, you'd not pursue that goal. If you truly had no need for women, you'd not pursue them. We agree.

In this context it means the same thing. But you could make a distinction between a desperate way of pursuing a desire and a gracious way of pursuing a desire. One comes from a position of weakness and ego, another from a position of strength and God's wisdom.

If you really had no need for it, I doubt you'd pursue it. Same way you probably are not needy for grandmas and the thought of pursuing them doesn't enter your mind. (nothing against the elderly 🙏)

Okay I'll do one more rebuttal. And then I'll go insane from this topic. How can a sound be meaningless if it has an impact? The impact IS the meaning. And the impact is indipendant of a personal interpretation of it. It's objective and universal. Since everything reverberates, everything has an impact. Or in other words, everything is encoded with information and transmission of information is the definition of communication and every communication is a form of language. Aahgagahahahahsysysysgagsg!!!!!!! JUST GET IT ALREADY!

But what

@UnbornTao normally I would disagree and continue to make my point but I'm out of patience on this topic. I'm gonna call for truce for our both sake. Or at the very least for my own sake and sanity. Tcare.