A discussion on subjectivity and perspective between stage orange and stage green:
Green: For the purposes of quality (non-violent) communication I think it's important to recognise that there is no objective reality and people will interpret the same things differently.
Orange: But what's the use of that? With that logic we'll never get anywhere.
Green: Don't you think it's ironic that we disagree on whether we see the world as subjective or objective yet you still maintain that it's objective?
Orange: Not really because there are obviously some things everyone can agree on like if you say to me, "this chair isn't a chair", then you are clearly wrong.
Green: But what if someone has a mental illness and they honestly don't see that chair as a chair but something else?
Orange: Well that's why they are mentally ill then isn't it?
