Mal

There is no value the chatter. It's just identity talk. The value was popping her out of the identity if she's ready. It's not for everyone, granted, the reason you don't see it is because you're looking at it through your own warped lens

@Pelin Good news

@Emerald Wilkins What do you think is blocking you now? From becoming enlightened, I mean?

This is attachment to the nonsense of the human identity who has created all these debate rules so it can discuss in civil ways it's false reality with another false reality rather than just living life and being life itself. It's clear to me that you are all about philosophising and not really interested in seeing your own blind spots. It's not your fault, it's just you know no better unti you see that it's all bullshit when the identity collapses.

Of course you can't resist. That's liberation. You imagine you can say things and a response not come back to you is delusion. Seems you want be in control of your destiny

I would give you a thumbsie but I used all mine it seems. Comments pending

The dream is created when the "I" imagines it has control. There is no I, it's a subtle effort, but true reality means recognising that there is no "I" calling the shots. If you had any experience of this you would know what I'm saying. And there is no problem with the I. That "problem" is a product of your imagination that is fighting for supremacy.

@Falk The "I" exists, but when it is strong there is a dream state which is a distorted and warped version of life. When the "I" is dropped there is just life as it is. No need to talk about here and now, these things take one away from the truth

It's not semantics. There is no now. Now implies time. Here implies space. In your dream there is a here and now. I'm not here to have a semantics talk, I'm here to point out that "this" is beyond space and time.

You're suggesting that there is an I capable of not getting caught. I hate to break it to you, but you have no say in the matter. That's the ego I'm pointing to

I noticed yes

There is language in non duality. There is just no "I". I want a sandwich is actually :want a sandwich I. Language is fine. It's the I thinking it is in possession of language that's the problem.

@Pelin Pause before you speak. Move focus to some other object, (breath, clock ticking, etc) and let the thoughts come from there.

@Falk Yes liberation is a concept. But we use liberation as a word to describe "this". There is no liberation. There is only "this" There is no "I" to be "nothing". You're implying that there is an I that is capable of being nothing.

@Falk If that's the way you want to play it that's OK. You're subtely implying that there is something creating fantasies of past and future. There isn't anything doing anything. There is just "this" Have you been reading the power of now or some related nonsense?

@Toby This serves no purpose than bragging about stored information. There's not even any social calibration in your comment Toby. It's just nonsense

@Telepresent Yes. For the ego the external world is just a representation of it own arrangement.

@TSH Chris The neo-advita teachers only speak to the ego

@TSH Chris What appears to you while you are a self, is just your own self. There's another one!

@TSH Chris Why else would I be saying it?

Of course there is somebody. It's a pointing out instruction.

@Emerald Wilkins You sound like you know awakening. Is this so?

@TSH Chris Not sure what you mean by form?

@TSH Chris The "somebody" can never "be" awakened. There is no somebody, the somebody is a character inside the dream Liberation is the only reality

@DizIzMikey No need to worry about ending the dream, you will never end the dream. A character in the dream cannot end the dream.