NewKidOnTheBlock

You just claim whatever your gut feeling tells you, first you claimed you only support dissproportionate taxes on the wealthy and that some billionaires are fine (those who ideologically agree with you - even though you included Jeff Bezos into that category which makes little sense, since most socwokies definitely would not like him lol); then in the next post you claim big multinational companies should not exist - which entails billionaires should not exist, also what do you think taxes on unrealized gains, assest and income in general are if not forcefull redistribution of wealth, how else would you call it? LOL Percentage of big multinationals that got bailed out because of bankrupcy out of the total number of big billion dollar multinational companies that failed/filed for bankrupcy, is insignificant - and you could say most of it is the fault of the goverment and banks (although banks are also companies, but of special kind), maybe certain shadowy elites - whatever. But, there are some billion dollar companies filling for bankrupcy every single year in the US alone, granted in much, much lower quantities than the amount of small businesses filling for bankrupcy every year, but it happens. And none of them gets bailed out. Also, smaller businesses do get benefits from the goverment that huge companies do not get - and it's not true the other way around. And the bail outs do not really reocur, it's not a regular, normal thing at all. That's a big exaggeration That's a simplification and not really true for Vietnam and Taiwan; there are stronger forces at play here So by your logic, companies should never get big, despite groundbreaking innovations, they should just do them for free out of the goodness of their heart because otherwise they get big and evil - and they have to redistribute all the excess money into socwokie bank accounts lmao ok. I can see this working perfectly. Ignoring all incentives

All of that is BS. You have no evidence that snall businesses, partnerships, partnership projects and integrated non corporation networks lead to more innovation or high quality products/services. It is a false dichotomy anyway; we can and do have both small businesses and large corporations. Large corporations are the ones who excel in groundbreaking innovation as that often requires intensive and large capital investment over long periods of time; something cooperation of many small businesses could never afford to do. Now, these do have their role in the economy as well, but they'll not replace a role of global corporations Another set of neadhertal thoughts steming from a false dichotomy of poor vs. rich. Wealth isn't a fixed pie chart, you can create unlimited amount of it. Forced redistribution is just a lazy socwokie cop-out solution

Those billions are not situated in their bank accounts, they do not actually have real access to that money. It's what their companies and assets are worthy, and they own a majority share of those respective companies (therefore they own them), but the rest of those shares consist of regular investors, allocating their money into their companies to make profit. If they (the billionaires) sold their shares it would cascade into every else pulling out their money as well as the value of the company would drop rapidly, hurting employes and the market it operates in general - then some other rich dude would buy the company (so nothing changes; the company is just worth a lot less), or the state buys it, after which it becomes innefiecient and shitty. Or, there's a third scenario - you can gather your socwokie buddies and make the products/offer the services these companies used to offer out of the goodness of your heart, I'm pretty sure that'll be enough and work very well You'll not solve hunger and housing problem by redistributing money, that's not how it works. Not gonna actually solve it

Do you want their companies to stop existing?

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYoefMZC83q/?igsh=dzhyb25zejduaGRi So wholesome

Most likely nothing will come out of it, so yeah it's pretty safe

If this film isn't even interesting enough for the wooks to watch, then you know the film is trully doomed

I'm on a strict prana diet. You'll never catch me actually eating food, that's soo, like, low vibrational?!?

Wow. Never thought I'd say that, but I agree. LOL

Women like to troll sometimes when it comes to this. But if she was really really ugly, then it's believable

Talk about taking risks, how about climbing skyscrapers lol. Really playing roulette with God

My phallus wants to plug a lot of holes

Leo's bitter rants about science are getting out of hand these days lmfao

Karmic tools are not the karma itself. They’re the instruments you use to work with your prana, for example; karma itself simply describes a simple cause and effect, so karmic tools entail that you use a divine tool (cause), and the effect/result of that is the vibration of your inner shakti energies, which then spill over. I ussually don't post this stuff so openly and brazenly, as the message is only meant to be received by the people who are vibrating on higher spiritual lanes; but here I am making the exception, as I see a lot of energies being kept in

Nah I'd rather rizzmaxx and musclemaxx. Looksmaxxing is for homosexualitymaxxers

Inwardness would be a function of highly sexual people. Like, you're using your karmic tools to vibrate inside

The more frigid you are, the higher you vibrate on spiritual frequencies

Best way to ruin your mentality as a fighter LMAO Dentoay Wilder also took some shrooms I reckon. Never been the same Not that that's a bad thing, neccessarilly. Noone in their right mind would wanna be a fighter

I think if all women acted ret-ublican and all men like wokies, there's a possibility most of our problems may be solved. Maybe there exists a dimension like that

Off, roasted. On some randon bihaaah spiritual forum, at that

To be honest, I don't think this whole "people are stupid, therefore democracy sucks" trope is valid anymore, at least not for me. Very smartass, reddity thing to claim. Stupidity when it comes to governing a society, is just your subjective point of view, and you are also just a mere human. Pretending like you are above this all, for me is foolish

Probably just a heightened awareness of how short life is and how fast time is flying by, resulting in an increased appreciation for the time you have left. Also it is a natural order of things - we are born, and we cease to exist, that applies to everything not just living beings. Also, expecting and anticipating a certain time windows within which you get to live, gives you a certain strange sense of comfort and sanity - you roughly know very confidently how your life is going to unwind, the same way as for your ancestors. But other than that, there are only negatives

It's too bad that Invision haven't allowed for a hard ignore function, only this soft ignore BS

Lo and behold, forum is getting polluted with peasantry once again

For Europe there is currently french based company Mistral A.I., you can use their A.I. via their agent chatbot platform Vibe, they also got Vibe for coding. It's nowhere near Fable 5 obviously, but you're not gonna get ahead of that model anymore I don't think, I think US might have essentially won the race for A.I. already since they're gonna use Fable 5 and even Mythos to build even stronger model. But Europe and China won't be so far behind; there's also a german model but Mistral is the best for Europe right now; furthermore, baggettes are planning to invest at least 75 billion euros into french data centers