NewKidOnTheBlock

So he is blackpilled about dating and still does the stuff he's doing with his body? Still being obsessed with becomming some sort of midget Hulk? Pretty strange if you ask me LOL

The most prolonged game development in existence LOL

@zazen The core flaw is a human propensity for corruption which literaly all systems share, no matter how authoritarian or libertarian they are, how is it the fault of capitalism that some people are corrupted? Or that nearly everyone is corrupted to some degree? You think religious theocracies like Afghanistan, or religious authoritarian muslim states in general aren't corrupt? Oh, would you take a look at all those cultural religious guardrails, surely that'll ensure people in power having a conscience and not do whatever they want? LOL

Hockey is incredibly dynamic sport, no point in denying that. Football is definitely a snoozefest compared to hockey, the stadium is always so big and it takes so long to get the ball from one side of the stadium to the other, never mind land a goal. However, hockey is sometimes so dynamic that neither side is able to land many goals, leading to a similiar paradoxical stalemate. Needless to say, all sports are boring to me. Just a bunch of chimp competitions lol

I can see him putting up a front and seemingly seeking to achieve some sort of christian socialist ethnostate, however I don't really think him, any of his people really give a shit about any of that, I think he likes capitalism and especially the way it is now, it benefits him and his friends. His real goal is to just hold power, the rest are just some weird narcisistic fantasies. Just like that Nick Fuentes guy, who is hilariously weird if you look some stuff about him, they're all just a bunch of freaks lol

Maybe it should happen to America so yall learn the lessons Europe had to learn LOL

Seems like he's not an unrealistic type of guy after all - he'll probably just try to increase taxes for the rich by a few percentages and attempt to use the money to finance schools and pro social stuff. Seems like he's also not overly ideological either. I don't think he's really as much about that commie stuff as people are hyping him up to be about, he just wants to implement some basic social programs. That's fine. As long as he keeps being grounded in reality. Rich people will hardly give away their money voluntarilly so some tax increase for the richest of them probably is in order

Now there will be no excuses left lol you are going to see. That it doesn't work. Not even the progressive wokie form of socialism

I don't understand, it takes like a few minutes of thought - or no thoughts at all - to know who to vote for. Especially in our simpleton democratic system run on popularity, you always have only a few options available. Are you unfamiliar with the voting process? What is it that you actually need help with? Is this what school system is producing? LoL To be frank, I often envy people who can just sort of retardmaxx throught life and live a dope life regardless, a lot of them live a much better lives than those obsessed with politics - regardless of which sides of the political spectrums they reside on.

A meme train continue it's journey😂

Mine is Hugh Mungus

His real name is Leo Gura, obviously

The reason is rather obvious. Messi simply doesn't know how to promote himself very well or he just doesn't care. That's why all these streamers like Ishowspeed are constantly attached to Ronaldo's schlong, cause they're in love with that sweet suggary clout

"This was something I let DeepSeek develop" *Closes the thread immediately and logs off from the forum*

In this day and age, there is so much sugar in everything you literaly need to do your best to dodge it. I will certainly abide by the conventional common sense wisdom in this case 70% of Americans can be clasified as overweight

A proper American answer. LOL

I dispute the idea that life is healthy

@Ishanga I can agree with the lack of consciousness part, and that people should be better. Noone wants suffering and noone wants people starving. I am definitely proponent of making capitalism better by making people's characters better. However, you are never getting rid of capitalism and inequality. People with talent and no talent, people with ambition and no ambition. Lucky and unlucky. However, you can make billionaires and millionaires more charitable (some of them are), make them less power hungry. Donating to charity is fine, volunteering is great. 3d world countries focusing on improving their own countries would be a long term solution to a lot of their problems, of course easier said than done. Everything is easier said than done

I was talking about resources, not money

There may be enough maybe, depending on how you quantify a person's needs (like a good little socialist, deciding how much of something everyone actually needs instead of letting them decide LOL), there MOST CERTAINLY isn't "more than enough" though. All of our resources are very finite. If you think otherwise, just look at the stats. I really don't understand what you are trying to say in these 2 sentences it makes no sense to me. How does being able to spend 1 billion dollars equate to everyone suddenly having all these things you have mentioned? Do you mean to spread amongst the whole population 1 billion dollars or give 1 billion dollars to everyone each? Regardless which one of those it is, the former is just plainly wrong mathematically and the latter is just kindergarden logic worthy of being said by Billie Eilish. Not understanding how economy works at all, how human behaviour works at all. Not worthy of further comments People are being paid exactly the ammount other people think they deserve, if you think someone is paid way too much or way too little, thank human nature for that instead of capitalism. It's not a fault of capitalism that we do not care about the garbage men very much but care very much about stupid things. Furthermore, socialists only know how to criticize the capitalism but would do nothing to improve anything, would do no innovations to society whatsoever. They would just entrench themselves in the all powerfull goverment and stomp on everyone's head. And this is regardless of what kind of socialism we're talking since there are many kinds of it. Some better than others. They're all the same in this aspect.

If there really was so much food and medicine at our disposal, the prices of these comodities would have already plummeted to zero, there is no way this is the case. I call BS on that. Industrial revolution was followed by a huge population boom and we currently have 8 billion people worldwide, we might have enough food for everyone to get fed and I think everyone should have access to food, but that doesn't mean that food is an inexhaustable resource and it's not necessarilly the fault of capitalism that things are this way. Maybe the poorer countries should pull themselves up by their bootstraps and actually work on bettering their economy, infrastructure and feed their populace as a byproduct and consequence, instead of doing whatever shit they're doing. Most likely waging petty civil wars and blaming everything on the oh so bad meanie imperialist west. Apply the same thing for medicine. You support society throught your efforts and give away value in capitalism as well, and society rewards you in the form of money. The ammount of money you get depends on the degree to which you give people what they want. It is actually a much fairer system than to wait for the daddy goverment to give you stuff for free whilst producing very little output. Guess who ends up benefiting in such a system? Nobody. You'll just end up dragging everyone else down and there is still going to be a ruling class dictating what you can and can't do and what you can and can't buy. Or sell. How do you know that those billionaires haven't earned that money? However dirty the process might have been, they had to provide some value to society, the kind of value most people aren't able to provide. That's the core reason why they are rich. Individual regular working person doesn't provide irreplacable or hardly replaceable value to society, so they have much less money. That's the way it is, is it unfair? Yeah probably, but life isn't fair This is cope. Most human talent is very much monetizable and I bet most of human talent has been monetized. Unless you have the kind of talent nobody cares about or you aren't actually that good, or you are not good at promoting yourself, you'd find a way to become successfull and rich as a byproduct. Most people are talentless LOL

I'm not sure how we are meant to be and not sure if there even is an answer to that question, however visits to nature always feel pleasant. Each of our individual selves definitely would benefit from living in nature and living a natural lifestyle. May it be so, for all the people from this site at the very least

Society is not a charity. You can't change the system just by "gimme gimme pls" kind of attitude

Yeah you're right, tbh most of the days I'm just running on an autopilot, and not exerting much intelectual or physical effort nor am I exposed to nature that much, only once per week since that's all I can afford time wise and money wise so far. I've also got some specific insecurities that are just gnawing me from the inside and making me feel like shit often, I've had them for so long and there seems to be nothing I can do against them, that I've just gotten used to them at this point and to that shitty feeling. But I agree that those feelings of peace are where the happiness is, given that conditions are right ofc. I'm gonna have to start exerting some effort

Perhaps I am stage blue. Community is very important to me