NewKidOnTheBlock

Bro woke up and chose to speak the language of straight up FACTS

It's a little hard for me to believe that genuine AGI will be created in such early dates, but I have nothing really to dispute this prediction with. Just wondering if it's not more of a marketing tactic than reflective of an actual state of A.I., that's all. Reality tends to be more boring, complicated and messier than what is ussually anticipated. I think I'd rather believe it when I see it, and in the meanwhile I'll stick to a much more moderate predictions

Apparantly not yet but now that you mention it, I watched this video a few hours ago, predicting a gloomy outcome for our A.I. development - that we are heading to techno feudalism, and that even though we are technically already there, it's going to get worse according to him. That we are going to be described as a reduntant biomass, or something like that. To be frank, this guy used to make a lot of predictions for A.I. and it's development and has been a techno optimist up untill this point, now he suddenly became a techno pessimist like everyone else. Makes me wonder whether he's not shilling his audience a little bit, I mean these content creators are living off of triggering emotions because they need as much attention as possible to make a living. Not saying it cannot happen but if you look at the comment section - and even look at some wild predictions about A.I. and technology in general on this forum - people are comming to all sorts of wild conclussions and make all sorts of wild claims. But if I put this topic into multiple A.I.s to see what they think, they claim that A.I. is simply projected to take 15% of jobs within like 5+ or even more years, whilst influencing many more. But also, it's projected to create many jobs as well, granted, it's CEOs who are making these claims but their input is not completely worthless. So, idk. I suspect most content creators just care about shilling more than the truth

First you claim this, then you claim this: Completely contradicting yourself because obviously types of people like you are luddites with no appreciation for advancements of technology we have managed to achieve. I mean, look, if you are prefering to live the way primitive hunter gatherer societies used to live, then suit yourself, but know that you are definitely in a significant minority (and your real preference is modernity anyway, you're just unaware or lying to us - likely writing this from an Iphone that you hardly can exist without). Btw, isn't that interesting how all these few examples of matrilineal/matrilocal societies that ever managed to exist during human history, were always primitive? You mentioned Haudenosaunee (Iroquois), Aztecs and Incas were living on the same continent, sure, different geographies, but resource wise they weren't so different. And yet, Aztecs and Incas happened to be more advanced than Iroquois, and they happened to be patriarchies, isn't it interesting coincidence? That any society with any semblence of progress and not a shithole was always patriarchal. Just a food for thought. Of course you gonna cope with changing the definition of what advanced means, but that was to be expected. I will not adress this at all since for me it'll never change. Herein lies the heart of the issue; people like you are not really focused on true understanding, you are in reality a political activist. And on this thread, what you are doing is a political activism via influencing; i. e. trying to make us change our opinions and accept your worldview and ideology. But I don't think most people here are interested in political activism

Genious solution of Rafael: let's all return to a pre-industrial era mindsets and societies because of this one example of a small, isolated and highly primitive North American tribal society. The kind of society that even Aztecs and Incas mogged in terms of scale, technology, urban development and administrative capacity, yet somehow we are closer to apes than they were, according to Rafael LOL

Any of you I challenge you, try put this stuff into any A.I. and it'll tell you, in a civilized polite way that you're essentially retarded, that you are incorrect and that things are much more complicated and nuanced, it's gonna list you all the factors you have not considered. Even wokie ChatGTP should tell you that despite how ass kissing and censored it is LOL

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYZ31i9AegR/?igsh=c2gxNHh5NnQ5MmVw

They could've resisted our domestification attempts like elks or mooses did. Or like elephants have, and many other animal species that are too wild to "tame". Apparently it had to be a mutually beneficial deal, otherwise they'd have to reject us and get a job instead

This is why China is beating our ass right now lmfao bro would probably get imprisoned for 20 years for dumb shit like this

Most dogs shouldn't allow people to own them, then. Why don't they create dog unions to fight back against inequality, why don't they just get jobs?

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYcf1l_R-4G/?igsh=ZjA5dmd4MGJ6eDhk Comrade Mandani stealing money from the future New Yorkers in a form of higher future taxes due to his present budget rebalancing seems like a fitting theft example to me lmao socialists simply can't help themselves, they have to get their hands on that dough and socwokies are no exception

So what? Has Leo trademarked or copyrighted the content of his videos? He hasn't done any of those things! Healthy competition cannot hurt

But I dissagree with most of it, so what are you gonna do? Send another 10 videos and 55 articles with which I also dissagree? You treat these like they're some scientific facts and we are supposed to be the students eager to learn, when in reality it's just someone's perspective. I have a different perspective, and there is no way for you to prove that my perspective is inferior to theirs LOL this is not a science class

Bro is creating a religion lmfao anytime you dissagree with him/her/whoever, the automatic response is "read this piece of junk", or "watch this junk video" LOL it's literaly akin to a christian telling you to go read a Bible or muslim telling you to go read a Quaran. Like no bro, I understand the gist of this particuliar brand of junk, I don't need to watch these low IQ videos or read low IQ books. I'm also pretty sure I can put anything into A.I. and get a high quality detailed summary, everything explained on a silver platter

Disseases: Everyone in the community will be so evolved and naturally empathetic that they'll just automatically quarantine themselves in their homes. Cure will be researched, administered and delivered by a specialized team of researchers after a massive community consensus on a Skype meeting. I'm pretty sure most disseases are a byproduct of white capitalist patriarchy anyway Crime: Solved via ostracism and cultural enforcement, also men would police each other all the time and call each other on mysogonistic behaviours - all crime is caused by toxic masculinity since only men commit crimes Warfare, genocide: There will be no such thing as warfare or genocide anymore, we will all live in perfect harmony. And all it takes is getting rid of opressive white capitalist patriarchy Economics, fairness: All greediness caused by white capitalist patriarchy would cease to exist and all resources would be distributed equally and with perfect fairness. Regardless of whether it's done by the state with majority of women in power, or by the anarchist society running on empathy that white capitalist patriarchy denied us all for so long, we can be assured that everything will be perfectly empathetic and will feel good

✋️ guilty as charged lmao

What a weird topic to make lmfao I think she's acting rather normally and asking normal questions. HOWEVER, that being said... vast majority of women clearly aint really about this tech life and tech shit. And Ima stop there before I get warning points lol

That's true, it does exist to some extent there, but what I was proposing was much more radical, not seriously in any shape or form of course, just for the memes. I actually don't really care about the low birth rates and I don't think it's going to be a particuliarly big issue as long as we keep advancing in technology. You know, it is indeed comforting to me that there are 2 main indomitable factors that will always keep these gooberish intelectuals at bay, and from realizing their visions; and it's that all people like them, or influenced by them are unlikely to have any children, or only a negligible amount. And the second is that these people are unable of creating any tangible value to this society, so they'll hardly be ever taken seriously lmao

Exactly, and this should be your fundamental human right provided to you by the goverment ahahaha

No idea. Probably autism lmfao

It'd be funny to pass a law which would grant all women a full paycheck per each children born, only for the birth rates to not improve at all, all on tax payer's expense. That'd be a double whammy right there. I hope that socwokies will get in power one day in any country, and attempt this

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DXOj_C6D5LD/?igsh=aXhzd2ViZXNnNHF5 Final boss of Israel LOL

That's really interesting, never thought of it like that. Even if it improves more of cognitive empathy than actually being emotionally engaged in it, that's still a benefit that could be potentially worthy of pursuing. Might start reading fiction again

Have you actually been to a psychologist tho, or therapist or whoever? I don't really find them all that helpful, nor do I find all the psychobabble and therapy speak all that truthful LOL

😂 yeah alright, this one is weird as fuck I gotta admit. Perhaps people should just wait for the actually important and impactfull advances in science, instead of this weird micro management and optimizing