NewKidOnTheBlock

Only priviliged people in here are encoraging anti doomerism stance. And a real G knows who and why. If you know, you know

Show me a retard and you've most likely shown me a rose-coloured glassed normie lmao

I roughly know which ones you are alluding to, I find them strange and not very interesting or entertaining to me, since they feel like an attempt at societal satire by a permanently online autist, yet I can acknowledge that they do contain some elements of truth despite their oversimplified ridiculousness and reliance on these made up internet archetypes

I wonder what one could love about it, perhaps a certain sense of comfort in the inevitability, perhaps the smug sense of intelectual superiority (however delulu it might be), either way it's not necesarilly correct to look at things throught the lenses of doomerism, it's not even about the assesment that if one were to look at how life - and society at large - function unbiasedly (which is impossible) that you'd come to the doomerish conclusions (because it's impossible to be unbiased); rather, doomerish conclusions are simply the logical culmination of examination of your life experiences - and life experiences of other people - so far, with a bias, yes, but nevertheless the conclusions are very likely to be true

Essentially me, but I don't love it lmfao

Not just ears, but entire countries apparently

How do you know that, you think that for example people writing the Bible had a mystical experience, I highly doubt that, each interpretation of the Bible reflected the bias of that historical era, maybe Jesus was a tripper but the rest were just on some BS

Religions have their own set of evidence, it's just that most of that evidence is kinda BS. Based on an huge ammount of interpretations of events described in one book. Althought that's basically how the study of history works, you have to depend on the trustworthiness of historical accounts and sources and believe people were writing the truth. Still, religious texts are much less trustworthy cause they are claiming a lot of outrageous shit, nevertheless. For religious people, their holy books is the evidence

That's the genius of that phrase, keeps you second guessing. Need to upgrade your epistomology lmao

Conscious acts I approve of Type shit

For real

@LordFall Seems like an empty statement to make, "solving people's problems", whatever that means. And you've basically agreed with me anyway. Maybe the point you're trying to make is that we should all be oh so fucking gratefull to grind and self improoooove lmao, right? I guess that's your point. Be it as it may, once you stop being a "problem solver" you are as good as non existant again

2027 is gonna be a blast🙃

I kind of feel a similiar way about this topic as I feel about the Eldritch concept as described by Leo perhaps, the fear of unknown

If this species of aliens are such profound beings as shown in the testimony of this incident, then no wonder they don't contact us, they would hardly even give a shit about themselves I reckon. We are kinda lucky in that way in case this is all actually real, since we could have just encountered species like us which would mean they'd probably wipe us out. Regardless, this is mindblowing stuff.

I bet most men in relationships or marriages aren't getting that much pussy, their situation might be slightly better than that of a single guy (emphasis on might) but I bet most of them aint getting it like that in all honesty lmao and the frequency of sex would keep dropping lower and lower, studies might claim that married couples are more satisfied with their sex lives than their single counterparts but I bet that since women are the ones wearing the pants in that aspect, it is skewing the results significantly, I'm not believing that shit for one second. Having said that, there is absolutely no excuse to sexually harrass a woman like that

There's nothing wrong with working a job, however if you think you have the opportunity to make a lot of money in a short period of time, even tho the method of making that money is kinda BS (but not necessarilly unethical), then you should take it imo. With the advent of social media and our collective transition to post modernism, the whole sense of "realness" of ones work had basically dissipated. It's all clownery nowadays. This is the position I'm holding now, if I'm gonna see an easy opportunity I'm going to take it, and I think there are some out there. Just have to move fast to capitalize. I think people on this forum definitely deserve to get money ngl

I don't like Trump at all, I think his actions are highly idiotic but I also don't like how liberals always make every critique so sexual, I don't know if anyone noticed but it's just this detail that's been irritatating me for some reason. Even with this meeting, they just can't help but utter degenerate shit like "when top meets the bottom" and shit like that. Like it's so obvious that all of their brains must be so gooned out

Depends on what kind of person you are, if you "naturally" ambitious then sure, you might be able to endure significant ammounts of discomfort long term to achieve your goals, still physical discomfort is not necessarilly equivalent to mental discomfort, some kinds of work might be less tolerable than others. This place obviously highly encourages ambition. However, in my view most ambition is just brainwashing and is not what you really want, idk maybe I'm just speaking for myself but I only want my basic needs met with minimal ammount of work, however people make life so complicated Interesting, might be something to talk about with a therapist perhaps? I can see the appeal in that, still I think there might be better ways to go about socializing, admittedly I'm also trying to figure it out for myself

I'll go against the grain as usual and say this - vast majority of purphosefull discomfort seeking is completely unnecessary, you should really pick your battles as a human and let them be worthwhole. Also, consistent little long term discomforts are much more effective than huge short term leaps. If gym enviroment doesn't suit you then stop going to the gym, the whole point of going to the gym is to mantain your health anyways and you don't need to go to the gym to work out To be honest, I seriously doubt that. Ancient Greeks were glazing themselves way too much

I don't think spiral dynamics plays into this that much, if anything, sticking to that model, this dude was probably lured by stage blue religious culture, which gave him the subconscious entitlement that he'd be handed a wife one day. Add in the white-worshipping culture and the fact that he's a currycell lol and you've got the perfect concoction for a clip like this happening lmao. With so many guys like that in that corner of the world, some are bound to be goonery enough and low-inhibition enough to pull something like this

Because women very rarely do it and only in certain places, mostly used for partying, also I'm obviously biased due to being a hetero man And women are never invasive and obnoxious about it, just not in their nature

Idk if someone here already asked you about it, but if your weight hasn't fluctuated, meaning it hasn't been going down, and your blood work is more or less in order, then you should be fine. Have you consistently been at 70 kilos? This 1000 calorie thing perhaps might have been a one-off, it would go against the law of physics to eat so little and mantaining weight

I would never emphatize with dudes like that disguisting and pathetic. Only women should be allowed to flash in public lmao

This is the point at which all these squables over definitions could end, but yall would just never let it go lol. That goes for almost everyone by the way, even my past self used to think and listen and give way too much credence to all these made up definitions. These 2 hormones make all the actual differences, but despite them of course men and woman can exhibit unlimited range of behaviours - but still will likely be predisposed to acting in certain ranges of behavior in accordance with these hormones and according to whether they are a man or a woman, which is just a slightly different way of saying it