NewKidOnTheBlock

Member
  • Content count

    1,826
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by NewKidOnTheBlock

  1. No, I do really not see this. Everyone should create their own wealth and abundance, if they are unable to or unwilling to do so, then they should live within their means and think strategically. Instead of begging daddy goverment to help them out
  2. Truly the greatest thinker of our generation. Perhaps of all time
  3. It's a matter of an individual lifestyle choice/preference. Both sides would like to eliminate the opposing side's lifestyle preference, but that's never going to happen. The ultimate goal should be to no longer need the goverment to exist, and if there is such an objective, then voting/not voting makes little to no difference in the advancement of this goal
  4. You just claim whatever your gut feeling tells you, first you claimed you only support dissproportionate taxes on the wealthy and that some billionaires are fine (those who ideologically agree with you - even though you included Jeff Bezos into that category which makes little sense, since most socwokies definitely would not like him lol); then in the next post you claim big multinational companies should not exist - which entails billionaires should not exist, also what do you think taxes on unrealized gains, assest and income in general are if not forcefull redistribution of wealth, how else would you call it? LOL Percentage of big multinationals that got bailed out because of bankrupcy out of the total number of big billion dollar multinational companies that failed/filed for bankrupcy, is insignificant - and you could say most of it is the fault of the goverment and banks (although banks are also companies, but of special kind), maybe certain shadowy elites - whatever. But, there are some billion dollar companies filling for bankrupcy every single year in the US alone, granted in much, much lower quantities than the amount of small businesses filling for bankrupcy every year, but it happens. And none of them gets bailed out. Also, smaller businesses do get benefits from the goverment that huge companies do not get - and it's not true the other way around. And the bail outs do not really reocur, it's not a regular, normal thing at all. That's a big exaggeration That's a simplification and not really true for Vietnam and Taiwan; there are stronger forces at play here So by your logic, companies should never get big, despite groundbreaking innovations, they should just do them for free out of the goodness of their heart because otherwise they get big and evil - and they have to redistribute all the excess money into socwokie bank accounts lmao ok. I can see this working perfectly. Ignoring all incentives
  5. All of that is BS. You have no evidence that snall businesses, partnerships, partnership projects and integrated non corporation networks lead to more innovation or high quality products/services. It is a false dichotomy anyway; we can and do have both small businesses and large corporations. Large corporations are the ones who excel in groundbreaking innovation as that often requires intensive and large capital investment over long periods of time; something cooperation of many small businesses could never afford to do. Now, these do have their role in the economy as well, but they'll not replace a role of global corporations Another set of neadhertal thoughts steming from a false dichotomy of poor vs. rich. Wealth isn't a fixed pie chart, you can create unlimited amount of it. Forced redistribution is just a lazy socwokie cop-out solution
  6. Those billions are not situated in their bank accounts, they do not actually have real access to that money. It's what their companies and assets are worthy, and they own a majority share of those respective companies (therefore they own them), but the rest of those shares consist of regular investors, allocating their money into their companies to make profit. If they (the billionaires) sold their shares it would cascade into every else pulling out their money as well as the value of the company would drop rapidly, hurting employes and the market it operates in general - then some other rich dude would buy the company (so nothing changes; the company is just worth a lot less), or the state buys it, after which it becomes innefiecient and shitty. Or, there's a third scenario - you can gather your socwokie buddies and make the products/offer the services these companies used to offer out of the goodness of your heart, I'm pretty sure that'll be enough and work very well You'll not solve hunger and housing problem by redistributing money, that's not how it works. Not gonna actually solve it
  7. Do you want their companies to stop existing?
  8. https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYoefMZC83q/?igsh=dzhyb25zejduaGRi So wholesome
  9. Most likely nothing will come out of it, so yeah it's pretty safe
  10. If this film isn't even interesting enough for the wooks to watch, then you know the film is trully doomed
  11. I'm on a strict prana diet. You'll never catch me actually eating food, that's soo, like, low vibrational?!?
  12. Wow. Never thought I'd say that, but I agree. LOL
  13. Women like to troll sometimes when it comes to this. But if she was really really ugly, then it's believable
  14. Talk about taking risks, how about climbing skyscrapers lol. Really playing roulette with God
  15. Leo's bitter rants about science are getting out of hand these days lmfao
  16. Karmic tools are not the karma itself. They’re the instruments you use to work with your prana, for example; karma itself simply describes a simple cause and effect, so karmic tools entail that you use a divine tool (cause), and the effect/result of that is the vibration of your inner shakti energies, which then spill over. I ussually don't post this stuff so openly and brazenly, as the message is only meant to be received by the people who are vibrating on higher spiritual lanes; but here I am making the exception, as I see a lot of energies being kept in
  17. Nah I'd rather rizzmaxx and musclemaxx. Looksmaxxing is for homosexualitymaxxers
  18. Inwardness would be a function of highly sexual people. Like, you're using your karmic tools to vibrate inside
  19. The more frigid you are, the higher you vibrate on spiritual frequencies
  20. Best way to ruin your mentality as a fighter LMAO Dentoay Wilder also took some shrooms I reckon. Never been the same Not that that's a bad thing, neccessarilly. Noone in their right mind would wanna be a fighter
  21. I think if all women acted ret-ublican and all men like wokies, there's a possibility most of our problems may be solved. Maybe there exists a dimension like that
  22. Off, roasted. On some randon bihaaah spiritual forum, at that
  23. To be honest, I don't think this whole "people are stupid, therefore democracy sucks" trope is valid anymore, at least not for me. Very smartass, reddity thing to claim. Stupidity when it comes to governing a society, is just your subjective point of view, and you are also just a mere human. Pretending like you are above this all, for me is foolish
  24. Probably just a heightened awareness of how short life is and how fast time is flying by, resulting in an increased appreciation for the time you have left. Also it is a natural order of things - we are born, and we cease to exist, that applies to everything not just living beings. Also, expecting and anticipating a certain time windows within which you get to live, gives you a certain strange sense of comfort and sanity - you roughly know very confidently how your life is going to unwind, the same way as for your ancestors. But other than that, there are only negatives