NewKidOnTheBlock

This wasn't really about making connections between the data though, it actually invented a solution to the problem. It was all coherent and dozens of pages long. It's pretty impressive Ok, I guess we should admit that it was ultimately about connecting the various data, but still the way they were connected is pretty impressive. Just happened to solve an 80 year old problem

It's not that simple but at the same time, it kind of is that simple. I think skeptics heavily overestimate human inteligence and it's irreproducibility. I can say the same thing to your skepticism, that it's not so simple

Frontier models already embody intuition and understanding to a significant degree. Intuition is just a very fast pattern matching from an experience, and with world models they can already understand

Seems like a hiccup to me, in the grand scheme of things

A.I. is as much of a bubble as electrification was LOL who cares honestly. There is nothing to crash in actuality, just some numbers on the screen

I already adressed that

Science already acknowledges the incredible, infinite scale of reality. If we listened to the woo woo that wookies be saying, we would get nowhere, we'd still be dancing around the fire and live like monkeys lol

Yes, if you're just scaling computing power then that's not enough specifically for general inteligence. But you can isolate the various components of what makes up general inteligence, develop them in isolation and then merge them together and scale it all together. That's what we are attempting with world models, neurosymbolic structures, etc. There are still components missing but we can develop those as well. The way humans are scaling their inteligence (although not really) is in the number of people, we create societies, states, institutions, companies and the list goes on. Those numbers are capable of creating things a single individual would never be inteligent enough, nor capable enough of creating. Well, A.I.s are gonna work the same way, even if they'll be less inteligent than us in a 1-1 comparison, with the power of numbers they would still be able to outhink us. They'd also think much, much faster than we can

Yes, and there are physics happenning within that rock - quantum mechanics, electromagnetism, termodynamics. Just like there is chemistry happening within inorganic matter, but certain specific types of chemistry have given rise to biological consciousness, I don't see why there can't be another, artificial kind

Nothing of course, because nothing is happening within a rock. This is why philosophical point of view is insufficient

And that's just a bare minimum👸💅🥀

I don't understand, we do know it is possible to scale computing power, it's been been doubling every 2 years since about mid 1970s, and the growth has been exponential not linear. It has only slowed down somewhat for a short time during late 2000s because we've hit the physical limits in the shrinkage of transistors, but we've circumvented that issue as well and the growth is continuing at more or less the same rate. Current A.I. models are also demonstrating exponential growth in terms of their benchmark abilities. In general, we can see that scaling the number of data centers works. Giving them access to more energy works as well, and they can get access to as much energy as they can handle. With biological beings this doesn't work, you can't scale them by giving them more energy nor space. Just claiming something is a fantasy is not an argument

Well, artificial inteligence is many orders of magnitude more scalable than a biological one, in fact a biological one is not really scalable at all and as a matter of fact we do not even know for certain where's the ceiling for artificial one. This is where that assumption comes from and I think it's pretty logical

We don't really need to create something more inteligent than ourselves, they just need to achieve parity with us in all aspects of inteligence/cognition, and need to have the ability of recursive self improvement. That is the point at which it would make ITSELF more inteligent than us. The same way inorganic materials created primordial organic materials needed for first form of life to emerge, then that life underwent a tremendiously long process of self improvement. I can definitely see some parrarels here

I don't know whether there is such a thread already, but I'm creating one here regardless, because of clip of this animal here I've encountered Feel free to share any animal that fascinates you

They might get one if they get powered by quantum computers, maybe LLMs are not enough to make that leap (although they do posses multiple similarities to the way human think already) and there needs to be a paradigm shift in that regard, but with an upgraded model + quantum computers I have no doubts. There is no physical law preventing conscious A.I. from emerging

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DX4lXd0BpW0/?igsh=MWxnd2E0ZGZxMDY5OA==

Lean into that feeling. Every morning at 6:17 am, do a 21 minute "employment meditation", visualize yourself employed, providing value to society

@Sugarcoat They mostly only refer to the ChatGTP as an example for ass kissing, ignoring all the other LLMs currently available. I also distinctly remember that it was worked on and nerfed to a degree. Just goes to show you how slow most humans are, regurgitating the same issues and topics over and over again

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DW3PpRUkfVn/?igsh=eDd5ZmI0dXdlMTE2 Do not worry

I think that a knowledge about the extent of general usefullness and potential of agents is one thing, actually being able to make them usefull for you specifically, is another

https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYQKEA5ydX6/?igsh=bjk5cHZxb3Y3djRq Crazy that this is actually real bro

Another, more moderate perspective on the A.I. development

Definitely

Yes they are definitely missguided. Their concerns about their rights, and about a lot of their issues is very valid and definitely embedded in truth because these conversations are rooted in their experiences. This is what is ultumately fueling the entire movement, and it's not something they made up. It's just their macro understanding of reality and their assumptions about the root causes of these issues (and thus their supposed solutions) that is either highly insufficient or just straight up BS