NewKidOnTheBlock

@Sugarcoat In my opinion this "objectifying" explanation is just complete BS, its just a way for women to make sense of, and/or to shame male sexuality. Because from your point of view it seems like objectifying, from our point of view it is a natural instinct. So, this is just another feminist BS imo. Yall just dont get it for real The problems clearly are not the instincts themselves, like I said, but their bad "usage", or "application", these instincts make it seem as if men have no need for genuine connections but thats not true, its just hidden under the surface and we need it just as much, it's just a deeper higher need and therefore tends to be hidden and we realize it later that that's what we need It seems like from these classical feminist explanations women are always victims and men are always the bad ones, and I just don't buy it. Dodging accountability as ussual. Some women have perfectly intact self esteem and genuinely just like sex, or are trying to take revenge on their ex, or whatever. Doesn't matter anyway. In this post I wasn't really trying to make this topic gendered anyway, I was talking in general of people who are having casual sex, and that they tend to view things not very seriously in general, including many times feelings of other people

Yes, for sure I can relate to some of your sentiments on this topic. There's definitely something negative about this, despite nobody really discussing this nor caring about it, and despite this sort of light hearted, fun facade of casual hook ups. Which doesn't mean sex or sexual energy is bad, but clearly it should be consciously directed towards a certain purpose. For example, clearly on an instinctual level I am attracted to women physically, and my mind plays very minor role in this process, and that's fine. Its also fine to seek sex from a woman first, but it should lead somewhere. Towards a relationship creation, relationship strengthening, making children. One of these 3

Golden retriever must be the frendliest dog there is, can't imagine I'd ever confuse it with pitbull. Not that it matters anyway, cause why you'd ever do something like that to a dog unless you're in a life threatening situation yourself. Not gonna lie to you man, you're some dangerous weirdo for sure

Lol she really is bending over backwards to defend her profession, isn't she? It's kinda funny to observe

You lost me with that soy boy shit, unless a dude has literaly, medically proven low testosterone, or he's a soy eater (the two can correlate no doubt) then you have no grounds to call someone a soy boy. What's non soy behaviour for you, always being an innitiator and a leader, kissing your ass, etc.? LOL ya women can define and redefine all types of shit as masculine or non masculine, and say all types of shit fr Anyways, I find people who are obsessed with politics a little bit repulsive, not in terms of raw physical attractiveness but just their personality gets uglier in my eyes, they are less likeable as people. Which is also important factor to consider of course. So I completely understand you in this respect

Well it does make you dumb. It's just so evident that this guy only cares about himself and his pockets, maybe if I had a teenage age brain I would be tempted to believe him but otherwise it wouldn't be possible. Honestly, as an American, the most inteligent thing you can do is either not vote or vote some third party. Your voting system is a scam anyway. That's what I would do if I was American. No voting or voting someone unpopular, depending on how I would feel that particuliar day

On a side note, you have to admit that it's absolutely ridicilous how far our culture has gone in worshiping the act of sex. I mean, sure, it's great and all, but come on. Saying nazi stuff and then justifying it by saying "yo bitch would let me hit lil *****" it just goes to show how far we've gone into sexualizing

He's a crazy dude for sure. What more is there to say Just goes to show how much status matters to us all tho. If he was some random black dude saying this noone would pay him even a sliver of attention. But just the simple fact that you're known pretty much guarantees that some people will take you seriously, as well as it ussually grants you wealth, women and all that other good shit

Try to position yourself in life to not be in need of a car, would be a good neutral position to take in this case. Boycott all the car products instead of trying to boycott this one specific company, trying to pose yourself as a morally superior being. Who knows what you'd do if you were a billionaire

Anything that is annoyingly ideological while also being particularly progressively leftist. I would say that the sane liberal territory ends - and a wokie territory starts - somewhere in an area loosely defined by these three markers—the first being deconstruction and efforts to rewrite objective reality; the second, blame-shifting and avoidance of personal responsibility; and the third, an obsession with moral superiority and forcing conformity through social pressure rather than debate or reason But honestly quality of your wokiesm depends on the kind of person you are and quality of your character, like, the difference between, for example, Emerald from this forum, and some liberal kiddo shouting at the college campus or some BLM marcher breaking shop windows, is like night and day. It certainly hits different when a person with higher quality character tells you something, it's going to come off as more truthfull

I think those extreme feats of endurance he managed to do himself, at the begginning of his career, are deserving of respect. At least much more so than the stuff he's doing now

This is a good video. Definitely important to keep this in mind

I'd only tell you this - remote work isn't that dream you were sold, yeah the concept of it might look good at first glance, since we are naturally comfortable creatures and therefore, if you can also work while being comfortable, that's a win-win, right? Well, that's the thing, it is actually lose-lose because now you are tainting your place where you're suppose to be comfortable and chill, with work. Because working from home obviously doesn't mean you can just slack off and do what you like, you have to make the same effort as if you were in work. Plus you have no colleagues to interact with. But thats just my 2 cents

Didn't know my boi Alan was actin sus like that. Damn I was moreso refering to his overall choice of lifestyle which was somewhat unconventional, especially during those times, but that's a... interesting piece of information to know, I guess

I mean, I would imagine so, since you're literaly getting less oxygen to the brain. Which ought to affect your consciousness in a negative way Anomalies do occur and Alan Watts is definitely unnusual even without that

What is it that you are prepping for exactly? There are events that are possible to prepare for (financial crash) and events that are impossible to prepare for and aren't even worth preparing for. It should be obvious that there is at least one such event I'm hinting at, and what that event is. Are you preparing for stage orange neo feudalism that you believe is going to come? Perhaps in that case the best prepping is to become homies with Elon Musk

Well, that's another category of problems that yeah, can be more general and more common for both men and women. But the fact that they get strung along is honestly their problem. They just don't realize how good they're really got it and thus aren't able to exploit the fact that they are women. You could say the same of some men (perhaps including me) that we don't realize our full potential, but I'm pretty sure I wouldn't be able to exploit women the way women exploit men, even if I tried my best. Not even a little bit Its just a bit annoying how women come here and talk mindset and this and that, as if we are the same or are dealing with the same issue. This subsection should be banned for women imo Moreover, only successfull fuckboys and men in successfull long term relationships should be able to give advice here, the rest should just listen until they become one of the above

Yep! Step your game up, servants! Women expect more from us!😄 In all honesty, this is why self improvement for a man and self improvement for a woman are 2 totally different universes, and why this section specifically should be for men only. Because we're the ones in need of advice. Women just come here out of morbid curiousity and/or to silently laugh at our faces

To keep it very short, it is likely because your sense of self is not strong enough. Liberal wokiesm is all about constantly deconstructing supposedly oppressive societal norms, and Leo's stuff is about deconstructing everything, including your ego. How are you supposed to have a strong sense of self if you're constantly focused on faults of your own ego? At some point it should just get strong and rigid and should change very rarely, if ever. That is not to say that a strong sense of self is the only ingredient necessary for charisma, but it is essentially a necessary prerequisite for it. You have to be sure of your own shit otherwise your mind will keep changing at the gust of wind. And ussually conservative people are sure of their own shit. Unlike liberals. As a matter of fact - I'm not sure whether I have seen a single charismatic liberal, that identifies as a liberal, it's always either people who don't care about politics much or a few conservatives who are charismatic

I've been considering allocating part of my investment funds to Bitcoin and/or Ethereum (as long as I can employ a similiar strategy, meaning just sending money regurarly and putting my feet up, waiting patiently) but honestly. I think I'd rather just diversify ETFs I'm investing into rather than do that. And I don't think it's in the interest of goverments nor banks to let Bitcoin replace all fiat currencies, so I don't think that's happenning. So it's always going to be just used for speculation is my bet

Yes, I used them plenty of times in MNORPGs

Many of you like to talk about US and western hegemony supposedly falling, but I'd like to see some hard evidence of that. And even if you have such evidence (with whatever markers you chose to interpret as signs of the supposed fall), remember that there has been no country or empire like US in the history of mankind. No, you cannot compare it to the Roman Empire, nor the Britisch Empire, nor any other empire. Not in terms of available resources, not politically, not geographically. If you think a country that has so many things going for it is in a risk of rapid decline or even not being a superpower anymore, you better have some good evidence

I did not say about anyone absorbing anything, just highlighted something that should be obvious to us all - that there are practically no differences between Canada and USA. And that Canada is essentially US protectorate. Mexico is a bit of a different thing but there, the language and cultural differences are significant. And you could argue some of the Mezo American/South American states were build on former, real, pre existing tribal ethnics, for example Mexico was build on the ruins of Aztecs and Mayans, modern day Peru looks suspiciously similiar to the way Inca empire looked, etc.

Not sure about the other things he said, but I agree with him that Canada would be a complete pushover without US protecting it, as if it was their own country almost. Canada also doesn't really have any homogenous national identity, similiar to US. In a way, if we're being real, what is it that really separates them from each other? They were both british colonies, except that Britain held Canadian territory for a little bit longer than it held America (slash Thirteen Colonies). Is that really enough for a solid national identity to develop? Canada on it's own seems weak and vulnerable. While US doesn't have that same problem

Chances are I'm going to be better off than all of yall who are trying to speculate and time the market, just by regurarly investing into a trustoworthy ETFs for decades and not caring about the topic much, if at all