gengar

this is highly irresponsible considering the case of fire brakeouts or other emergencies. just dont trip in a highrise if you're afraid you'll jump.

Notice how he continues to blatantly lie and gaslight claiming that I am religious and muslim when I literally went as far in this thread to say that Islam has to cease to exist as a contemporary religion for society to progress to the next level. An astounding level of malice.

imagine slandering someone and then trying to say they have a lack of integrity. the depth of depravity.

i don't care about your reddit level gaslighting. You literally slandered me with false claims and you're even now trying to gaslight me calling it a "better point". You're a sick narcissist and you deserve to be called out for it. I bet you are used to gaslighting pushover types, manipulating them for your needs, also reflected in your sick drive to sleep with as many girls as possible to "live your best life". I bet when those people in your life push back on you, you also gaslight them that them being upset means you're the one who is correct. You're the biggest narcissist on the forum bar none, and your tricks will never work on me.

@Natasha Tori Maru Could you kindly edit his post where he slanders me by name, mentioning my username claiming I put Islam above Actualized.org This freak is out for me and feels zero remorse for his actions and literally thinks hes above the rest and can do as he likes Please put him in his place

holy shit i didnt even read this absolute monstrosity of a post You are so narcisistic that you really believe you are saying something insightful or true here You're a sick slanderer

If we're talking about unique bodies of work, Nietzsche is a hell of a rabbithole with tons of gold IMO

If you honestly think that that list that i posted where i explicitly put wahhabist islam and scientology at the top of the list, wasn't pure satire, i think its you who should leave this forum and not me. Your mistake is instantly assuming that I am defending Islam. I am not, I'm interested in a proper analysis and view of history and i was responding to an extremely biased person who calls islam poison etc. without any more context. this is idiocy and extreme bias and historically false. Your arguments are also not true. the idea that islam has been this wahhabist regime all throughout time since its inception is blatantly false. in the first 100-200 years after the inception of islam it was literally the case that the rationalists (the mu'tazila who crudely said, basically merged islamic theology with greek rational philosophy) were at power and the literalists fundamentalists were the ones who were persecuted (ibn hanbal et al.) There have been a multitude of regimes and religious power structures within islam's political sphere throughout its history and some have been extremely anti-science while others were very pro, and some in between. Ibn Sina wasn't persecuted for his science but for his philosophizing about theological matters. Ar-Razi the same who was basically an atheist and persecuted thereof. Your dumbest idea is that scientists discovered things in spite of islam not because of it. its a childish reduction of complex manners. scientists were inspired by figuring out the way that the monotheistic God fashioned and worked the universe. this was a big pro of islam in manners of scientific discovery. there were also big universities and libraries which were set up by religious scholars etc and who also were pro-science. the cosmopolitan and logistical nature of islamic empires with efficient exchange of information and goods also played a big role in this. Yes, there was also heaps of bullshit and persecution within the islamic world. and you are right that free thought in manners of philosophy and theology were strictly repressed, of course this is the case. But i was responding to someone who said islam has had no fruits at all in terms of science and society which is just laughable. its very clear that you two are the ones with the bias here. islam was just a period of time and an invention that brought many new things, many bad, but also just a clear progression in society in terms of spiral dynamics. a progression from red to blue which is why it has many red elements in it as well. and for the last time, im not defending islam. i have more and deeper criticisms of islam that you will ever have since you simply are not knowledgeable in this field. i was deep in islam during times were i wanted to kill myself and thought i found myself in the religion. i have lived and studied it and reasoned my way out of it due to sheer reason. i know things and have insights about islam that it is so corrupt and backwards that most muslims dont even know or dare to find out. I for example know that islam must completely cease to exist for society to progress onwards because there is absolutely no reforming it and it is a death cult in the end. just like christianity, worse in many ways, and also in many ways better. the fact that by reading a rebuttal against someone who just calls islam poison and thinks thats a complete historical critique to have, makes you think i am defending islam should show you that you are not at all careful in your reasoning and making lots of assumptions. You reasoning about the catholic church is also fallible. no one is crediting the catholic church one to one for making galileos telescope. but yes, the church both catholic and later protestants are basically responsible for modern science. all american universities were founded by fervent protestants. denying this is simply denying reality. and yes they were also responsible for killing many good philosophers and scientists. both are true, reality is paradoxical. Since I'm assuming you wrote this by misunderstanding my obvious joke as serious, i won't be offended, but now that you know, i'm expecting you to alter this comment and remove my name from this claim. Peace.

If you really think this is true you are demonstrably retarded and ignorant of history lol Islamic civilization carried science when Europe was in the dark ages and after that Europe took back over You literally know nothing about science and philosophy and their histories lol which would be OK but you're pretending to know which is the crime Had to call this bullshit out

Spiritual teachings tierlist: 1. Wahhabi Islam 2. Evangelical Christianity 3. Scientology 4. Orthodox Christianity 5. Hinduism 6. Regular Islam 7. Sikhism 8. Buddhism 9. Advaita Vedanta 10. Actualized.org

and your favorite youtuber "doctor" Mike loves to participate. https://x.com/misraetel/status/2085359353201070560

Can psychedelic use acutely or permanently release fears of death and other fears? In other words, can you use it to sever karmic chains that are keeping you shackled to certain earthly concerns?

trad wives > PUA and everyone involved in it

If with "strangers" you mean the people you took your land from and are currently taking, than yeah, sure, i make that accusation.

The government of Spain is an oikophobic migrant hugging government that hates anything that might be seen as "right wing" including having borders.

You can't be left wing without being in favor of migration. And I say this as someone who left the left wing. CORE to leftism is the destruction of society and borders in favor of a globhomo soup working class utopia (that doesn't exist). They hate all forms of borders and hierarchy, which is an anti-truth belief. Just destroy the fantasy of leftism and enter the real world. That doesn't mean entering the dumb right wing.

You've put psychedelics on such a high pedestal and now you think you require them to even understand worldy stuff. Stop this psychedelic hubris, i'm begging you.

Almost everything you say is always through the lens of neo-marxist thought, causing a very narrow view of the world where the white man is always to blame. Free yourself of theses shackles and let truth be the arbiter. Not that there isn't a lot of truth in the framework, and white supremacy is one of the biggest societal forces of today. but it is surely not everything.

Contributing to this thread is pure in-house conformity that is deeply cringe.

"probably" He literally said to IDF soldiers that they shouldn't stream putting on clothes of raided Palestinian homes and just do it in secret because its bad PR

Interesting

I don't mean it as a pejorative, just in the sense that it's very rare or "unnatural". If someone came into your room right now with a gun pointed at you would you not fear?

How is that possible, are you really some freak or just boasting?

What do you mean with "scientifically"? Are you talking about actual published scientific papers? I found this one which I'm reading now: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12152-024-09564-3 But maybe you have some study in your mind that I missed. Look at the abstract of the above paper: "Increasing evidence suggests that psychedelic experiences, undergone in controlled conditions, can have various durable psychological benefits. One such benefit is reductions in fear of death, which have been attested in both psychiatric patients and healthy people. This paper addresses the question: how, exactly, do psychedelic experiences reduce fear of death? It argues, against some prominent proposals, that they do so mainly by promoting non-physicalist metaphysical beliefs. This conclusion has implications for two broader debates: one about the mechanisms of psychedelic therapy, and one about the potential non-medical uses of psychedelics for the alleviation of existential angst in psychiatrically healthy people. On the first count, the paper argues that the role of metaphysical belief change in fear of death supports the “Relaxed Beliefs Under Psychedelics” (REBUS) model of psychedelic therapy over alternative accounts. On the second count, the paper argues that the role of metaphysical belief change undermines the proposed use of psychedelics in the “neuroexistentialist” project of naturalizing spirituality. The best available evidence suggests that when psychedelic experiences reduce existential angst and restore a sense of meaning in life, they do so primarily by persuading people of the falsity of a broadly naturalistic worldview, and thus do not help reconcile people to the truth of such a worldview." Is this paper unironically making the claim in the last sentence ("... the truth of such a worldview") that the naturalist worldview is rightfully assumed to be true, or am I reading it wrong? If so I'm flabbergasted by the unscientific arrogance. Holy shit!

Quit forever, forgive yourself and get a job or start a business. Literally the only thing you can do that works. I get that its easy to say. Hell, I'm at the brink of ending my life so I its not like i made it or anything. But quitting is possible. I quit my severe weed addiction of 9 years, 1.5 year ago and i never looked back. Just totally quit forever. Any addict who succesfully recovered will tell you this. Just totally quit and never do it again, not even one bet. thats the only thing that works.