gengar

Except you have continuously called intelligence absolutely real and morality absolutely unreal, so don't make the claim that higher and lower morality is as objective as intelligence. that is how you are phrasing this claim no doubt.

I didn't say he breaks it completely, I just think you use it far more liberally(not only in this particular case) than it can be used for. SD is highly accurate when it comes to collective memetics but on an individual level things are much more nebulous and inaccurate. there exists a much wider and intertwined palate of psychological complexes and pathologies on an individual level than on a collective level where things are simpler, especially in modern society.

Or just realize that the spiral dynamics model is far more limited than you previously assumed.

How has your heavy metal chelation journey helped with this if at all? How long have you chelated for, and do you still do?

Maybe you are on the nose with that. I will reflect.

You can recommend their books or free videos if you want.

You implicitly accused me of defending murdering women. you're a sicko.

You did so from a materialist's perspective, which is ironic coming from you. Man has both a beastly nature of flesh and a loving nature of consciousness. Both are of his nature, and his sex-drive is not merely from the beastly side. What is even your issue dude? I am saying women are more vulnerable because they are less physically strong and its much more of a crime to kill someone like that just like its more of a crime to kill a child. And then you proceed to post another article about femicide, again implying that I am in the favour of such wretched things. Who the fuck do you think you are to imply these things about me? If I were with you right now I'd knock your teeth out straight. You haven't even defined what you mean by patriarchy, although I know what your mean; the comical neo-marxists definition of it. A system where good men are the protectors of women against evil men is good and would cause less femicide. Liberal society causes more of it.

Because a woman is more vulnerable to a man. Great argument. Where did you understand that masculine qualities = women can't do it? men can and should learn feminine qualities, and women should and can learn masculine qualities, for when they are needed for their own spiritual growth and the growth of society. but only secondarily. Your liberal worldview has distorted your intelligence so much that you can't even recognize obvious realities anymore. If nazi germany attacks us tomorrow, the men will be responsible to defend the women and the children. This is so obvious to anyone except liberal epistemic perverts. This was too harsh and I take it back, my apologies.

Let's take a minute to contemplate on how an intelligent mind like Leo could write something so appalling as the following: (https://www.actualized.org/insights/art-with-a-capital-a) I think it has to do with his American nature. We Europeans are deeply entrenched and connected to art and its link to traditions of philosophy, sociology and metaphysics. And if you deeply study these traditions, you'd see that most of what Leo is talking about is already in there, albeit spread out and less direct. Nothing Leo is saying is essentially new; it is the way that he brings it in a direct, condensed and confrontational manner that is his genius. Even though I think Leo's work is absolutely life changing, genius and among the best of the last 100 years, and the most direct confrontation with reality of anything in modern times, to see this level of unintelligence from him is honestly repulsive. He does not respect art and unironically places his art above the art of all others, literally stating that one of his videos surpasses the entire corpus of Blow. the metaphysics of Blow's work are found and appreciated in the manner of aesthetics linked with meaning, no matter how simple. To expect other's people's art to also be as philosophical as his stream-of-consciousness philosophy lectures is laughably stupid and showcases a profound unawareness of fundamental facets of art, philosophy and their interactions with each other the world. The idea that Leo really thinks that you can even compare different forms and corpi of art in this way, is mind blowing.

Leo saying that men always view women as sexual object is also wrong. He is a superficial, quintessentially 21st century nihilist mind in this regard - akin to the likes of Michel Houellebecq. He doesn't even want to have a wife. In this regard, I agree with the feminists - People like Leo do not appreciate women much. Their superficial liberal mind is at the core of the rot of society. Most men want to have a wife and to actually love her, because they love the feminine. Of course sex is a big part but the love for her is a lot deeper than any merely sexual, platonic or other love. A love of deep trust and symbiosis between the feminine and the masculine. The feminist and gynocratic mating market and society of today is actually the thing causing men to be more animal-like, since their chances of marrying a chaste, men-respecting woman are basically zero. They are starved of love and sex and see that the only game being played is "dating" and "fucking", where the best looking and most narcissist men have the most success. Out of poverty, they conform to this market as their mind gets further corrupted by each passing year. Respect for women is disincentivized by means of a sick bro-culture on the one hand and a sick feminist culture on the other hand. All trust is lost between the genders and there are no winners. I am not saying the gynocratic mating market is caused by women; no, it has been enacted by evil men. Cheating and fornication are the destroyers of society and bonds between women. Reservation and chastity are not something bad or oppressive, but a contract of trust between all the people of a society.

Mechanical thinking, shutting off your emotions to protect others, violence, honor are big ones. Some can be extremely toxic and need to be held in healthy forms, like having a code for when to enact violence and when not.

Did you honestly just try to counter my argument about men and women's roles in society by linking an article about femicide, implying that that is what im defending? You dishonest ghoul. I think men who rape and murder women should be executed. A man raping/murdering a woman is worse than murdering a man. It's funny that in feminized societies like western europe, leftist parties are the ones who have made punishments less harsh. Yes, women's survival has been extremely harsh and vulnerable to mens behaviour, and that is a deep problem that needs addressing. On the other hand, women have a drive to select for violent, powerful and selfish men, not only for their own survival, but also because they select that as being superior to weakness and meekness, which is also a deep problem that needs addressing.

And what are women's justifications for not being better women? or does that not exist in your view? is a "good woman" just an individualistic, selfish person that exercises her freedom or do women have responsibilities to the collective just like men do? Just like men are supposed to be the ones sacrificing themselves on the front lines against intruders and threats, women have their own roles of doing morally good things for the collective. And yes, men who abuse their wives, men who rape, should be given no mercy and executed when proven guilty. The fact that you literally use these examples to smear the entire category of men shows how incredibly toxic and man-hating you are. Your feminist fantasies are fantasies, while traditional roles are based on history and survival.