The Crocodile

Slytherin confirmed.

You can empathize and understand the criminal, the cop, your own self, and other perspectives perfectly fine. There's no contradiction necessary.

That guy is Vaush.

@Leo GuraThis band's entirety of works is an absolute masterpiece yet highly underrated. Contemplate it as you watch. Watch each one ten times, and it will give you insight into madness and subtle energy. https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLexjJ4Yb0SrXwVobTxgqlzqHHKbZHrWxX

This forum is probably owed better comments than this, but here it comes anyway. https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/705671704403509248/1303016430735724606/RPReplay_Final1725073865.mov?ex=676c231d&is=676ad19d&hm=69b9db699d395b10db31f25bcb781579027df950250f261950fa03c3cfafaecd&

In The Religion of Tomorrow, which is very repetitive, like all his books, he talks about states vs. stages vs. structures. You can have an enlightenment or awakening state at any stage. At the higher stages the state becomes integrated as a structure. It repeats, with the same repetitious pattern as his other works: states, stages, structures. An enlightenment state is, for specific example, a zen master at SDi Stage Blue who supports Japanese imperialism and World War Two but who is awakened to some fundamental grounding or attention or groundless detachment from the sensations in his experience, while still having the Blue cognitive framework. At a higher stage of SDi, say, Indigo, the awakening becomes perfectly and ineluctably wholly integrated with the higher cognitive structures, it is an awakened structure rather than simply an awakened state.

You sound like a guy ranting and raving before getting shot by the police. Calm down...

@Hatfort I think the main problem is that you're just pro-Russia. If you get rid of that then the rest of the bullshit falls apart because then you don't have any ideological interest in defending and/or creating it. And the sea there is a big part of the war? This is not a naval war. And I don't believe it increases the "security" of Crimea that much or that the security of Crimea is related to the actual substance of the war. And the idea that russian technology is anywhere near the advancement of AMERICAN technology is absurd. Of course the West could some evils to it, and that's fine. It's just that Russia is objectively the worse side.

Wasn't it supposed to have that secured like ten years ago? And weren't they supposed to have toppled Kyiv in a few days or weeks in February 2022? But it's been a stalemate for two years until the Ukrainians were given the ahead to basically do whatever they want. But . . . now they have Ukrainian troops in Russia and assassins in Russia? With generals and administrators getting killed in both combat and assassinations? And the scary American drone technology being superior, just able to kill numerous numbers of Russian soldiers and destroy columns of tanks in minutes? Any contradiction of this just seems like blatant arbitrary pro-East anti-West propaganda.