The Crocodile

But like, how do you know?

Well, your favorite man trump eats fast food, and he's survived (so far). Your other man jesus get nailed to some sticks, and it was deemed worth it. A little bit of drug-taking could be worth it to open you up.

OK I met some random drunk guy who wanted to talk about psychedelics because he saw me and thought I was tripping, and he wanted me to get him some mushrooms. He told me how the TSA found his giant bag of morning glory seeds and let it through. "Yeah, those are for gardening." Anyway this guy said the world would end, in like, five years. That was August 2023, so we have about three years left. It's a true psychedelic.

I think everything in the world would be better that if you took andrew tate seriously then that person is humiliated and made fun of and laughed out of town, and if you punch andrew tate in the face and beat him up really badly you get to be president. I think things would be better if that's how the system works. Salvia is a different thing. It's a dissociative. This is salvinorin A: Another is salvinorin B methoxymethyl ether (which is stronger and only available through chemistry): They're both very different to just normal LSD: muuch simpler right LSD is like a perceptual blurring or dissolution of filters. You can't say it forces you out of the body necessarily because the body and everything else become one and blurred together liked a kid scribbling all the colors together. It basically dissolves boundaries and then crazy stuff happens.

I - N - F - I - N - I - T - Y is a spelling that forms a sound, and only makes sense in a particular flow of time. It might not be the best sound if you're in a world, that no longer has sound.

@Leo Gura This might interest you. It's how you might think of it from a paranormal perspective from people who are approaching it from that angle. Daniel Lawton: One has to value perception above finding your next meal. I don't believe the average person would like to hear the nature of "the definitive journey". Which we were created to take. It's just not "cozy" at all, or at least I suspect that. We aren't warned ahead of time that we'll have to give up cozy forever, because in fact cozy is an illusion. And there are much better things than that. They just outside the range of our perceptual prison. Me: The censor I have isn't so much the idea that the sensations can't be perceived, it's that they're less valuable compared to something "denser". What I mean is if you look at a blank white wall in the first attention, it seems to be made of matter and harder and more vivid. That's a sensation. Whereas the sensation of the second attention much of the time might be brighter than the first attention, but it seems to be less solid. It might be more complex, it might feel better, but it might still have less "density" which leads to the idea that con artists like Osho might have a point, because they prefer the higher-density thing that everybody already sees anyway. They're stupid, but might accidentally be right about reality if it turns out density of sensation is more valuable than feeling good or having actual knowledge of consciousness. Yet again the second attention in the darkness has a "density" that allows it to be seen in the dark, it's denser than the physical first attention darkness and so overpowers it, or at least that's a view I've been able to see from. And I also have a problem with infinity vs. finite, it's not conceptual but like a real thing. Because I can overcome certain relationships that are taken for granted with space and time but the "realness" is always doubted. Like if I go in a twisting formation that seems to go backwards or forwards in time, that doesn't necessarily show infinity, it shows finite stuff running at different speeds, which causes doubt about the whole nature of reality. But you've said it's silent knowledge, NOT silent truth, but you're saying that's true! Daniel Lawton: You can definitely rewind time in the red zone. Even swipe what you are looking like with your finger like it was a cellphone video. Unfortunately, that's a "deep red zone" activity. Me: I know, but there's a difference between changing a view of time and then 'actually' time traveling. Like if you have a bunch of particles moving, some of them are faster than others, one of them might be so slow it remains in the past version of the environment so now the environment has multiplied. That could be a gray area.. And infinity is the concern I have with Mr. Doubletake, saying that much of it is delusion. Obviously space as most people think of it is totally not fundamental, because of how awareness can move through objects of different sizes according to direction, like the energy changing shape and size to fit the torso or the thin line of the arm or the distant watery floor you can stretch your thin line of the arm to yet remaining the same awareness and energy. All of the sensations are passing through the same point. Somehow that would imply infinity, but I don't know how to reconcile that between something that happened decades or thousands of years ago with right now. Obviously you can get recordings or echoes, but thousands of years ago as it actually is happening or 'actual' time travel I'm curious what limitations there would be to that and why. And I understand some of this sounds like it's written at the request of The Censor. Daniel Lawton: You're trying to fit time travel into the causality of this blue line reality. It's a circular argument you're making here. Saying that if you violate the known rules here, then it's not "real". So the arguments seem reasonable. But only based on your assumption that this place is the only valid one. Why? What makes it more valid than another? The fact that you're hopelessly stuck here? I was thinking about Dr. Strange's magic last night, while looking at special effects floating around me, which blow away what he can do in his movies. It was very clear, the magic I was practicing was far better than his. EXCEPT, he has the ability to force others to live with the results. He can override other people's "votes" for what they are perceiving. It does seem as if our sorcery line can do that when they've been raised in a lineage, for a very long time. And certainly teleporting from Mexico to Los Angeles the way Carlos did when he jumped off the cliff is hard to explain. But so is Cholita actually floating little dim sum plates. Or lifting me into the air with one finger. So in some ways, the argument you're making is that the magic isn't "good enough" unless it can force others to deal with it. And if it's just you exploring magic for fun, it's "unreal". Isn't that the merchant mind? Me: No, I don't care about making money or society. I'll do it for fun anyway for the rest of my life and plan on helping myself through that, but before there's a nagging that wants me to have a certain comprehension of reality. My fun short-term goal is I want the puffs to be big and bright enough to make me happy for the rest of my life in all lighting conditions with eyes totally open, and to explore everynight, and I'll probably become deity-like. The merchant mind and the censor are not the same for me. The censor is censoring things or distracting me from what I really want to do. An example of a censorship I'm talking about is I'll be watching a TV show in a foreign language made 20 years ago, seeing my energy body on the heads of the people on a bus in the show (I can also put my room or after imprints of my physical body and space inside the show), then it shifts to the space of a whole tiny person because the camera changed, and my energy body is vibrating inside a field they're passing by. THAT'S the reason I'd be concerned if my view of that was invented then, or whether I was just discovering something on an infinite "plane" which is in the same reality and therefore possibly interactive with the show as it was actually made 20 years ago. The only reason to think of the blue line reality is its relation to the rest of reality, and thinking so if there is one frame of time and one frame of time is it always possible to discover/invent a higher plane to affect the other frame, or is some stuff such as the blue line past just totally closed off (because of how it was created). but I'd be satisfied with infinite potential copies that are located in the future. If you have an answer that engages with what I said that's fine, if you think it's just stupid and I should stop that's fine too. Daniel Lawton: I've interacted with TV shows also, but the TV wasn't actually on. I was watching a TV that was off. With a "re-run" that likely never aired. It took an Ally to do that. I got to thinking about whether time travel is "real" or not. You can't change the past by that method. All you get to do is participate in it, the way the original person did, or you can watch from the side, and can't alter events. I've been frustrated to relive one of the people from the books, and not be able to look up and see people's faces. Because the original person didn't. Though you can walk around anywhere you like in the past near that event, if you aren't reliving someone else. It's so realistic, and you find so many things you forgot about, it's hard to dismiss it as "not real". But then there's "jumping grooves". Where you can heal a fatal illness. You alter your own timeline. But such things are very advanced. We have to satisfy with puffs and such. For now.

He seems to be very wrong. Absolute Infinity could include finitude. It seems to be more fundamental than even nothingness. And you can conceive of a substance you wouldn't be able to pattern-recognize as either nothingness or somethingness, it would be "something else". And you could imagine infinite of these substances and different combinations and interactions or equivalents of interactions. But like, maybe Undefinable Nameless Unnameable is a better term?

It might do you well to try to strawman your awakenings and debunk them and steelman other perspectives. Because I remember in preschool after having seen a galaxy puzzle gazing off into my daydream of a black void, trying to figure out what there is when you go back in time, why that exists, why that exists, why that exists, the insanity that anything exists at all. It turns out the explanation is the existence of the Absolute, and Absolute Infinity, and you can have awakenings of what your consciousness can do, but then trying to strawman them by contextualizing them in the context of scientific materialism or Tom Campbell can have interesting effects. Like the eternity experience is not eternity, it's just a "virtual reality" with a much slower or much faster speed being fed through the computer to create the illusion for the dumb human consciousness that reality has an infinite explanation, when such explanation was never necessary and finite explanation may be all that is necessary. There's the problem with stuff like scientific materialism where it turns reality into parts or a system, and then uses parts or a system to explain the parts or a system without explaining why that stuff exists. Same with Tom Campbell. The absolute nature of reality can appear to fit itself down into the perception of these systems. Reality is able to infinitely run away from itself, and create finitude and debunk the existence of infinity, AND REALLY DO IT, if it's going to properly have the power of infinity. But then the causality or acausality of that can get confusing. From what we've previously known, the moment ten years ago and the moment now should be able to interact or have some connection by infinity or a nothingness that is in both of them, BUT that nothingness may just be another limited thing with Absolutely no relation to the previous moment. Previous understanding is that when you realize nothingness you are just discovering something that was true the whole time, and YET it can be absolutely conceived that ACTUALLY the finite perception was true and required no nothingness. Paradoxes like this. It's not just drugs that cause a temporary infinite increase of consciousness we can't explain though. We can't explain the causality of anything really. After living in the physical world for a long time there's an illusion that you understand why things and objects have motion and color the way they do in the environment the way they do, but this is mostly just pattern recognition of a process we aren't controlling or understanding, since the stream of sensations seems to be fed to us. Like feel like we "know" why we see water when we look at an ocean, but it's just pattern recognition of a complex process of the pixels of color and frames per second of shapes one moment then motioning over to another where we don't directly control or grasp the whole mechanics of this, and why putting your fingers in the water generates a different field of tactile sensations that correlates with a complex nervous system in the fingers is lost on us even as though we may have a scientific understanding of two hydrogen atoms and one oxygen atom forming water, we don't know why that process has an appearance of being water as we know it in our visual field with the quality of "blueness". Or if atoms always existed and were discovered or were "invented" by the universe to explain what happens when you look that small. Are abstractions real and infinitely connected to all parts of reality on a continuum, or are they evolutionarily generated/imagined as subtle structures by the mind disconnected from the past that existed before? If your question of the drug is a relative question, it's difficult like all relative questions of any scale seem to be. If it's an absolute question you're just asking why anything exists at all, which is a question that can merge with the relative of why any relative system exists at all inasmuch as it is part of the absolute. But then water for instance is not merely so much oxygen and hydrogen put together---the combination is simply a backstory for enabling the sight of a new thing called water and what that new thing really is is quite another matter, to what degree that it exists as a single line independent of other relative systems or is infinitely caused by infinite finite systems or finite infinite systems. It's a mystery of perception or a not-mystery if we allow the finite room to exist and just say that's how it is. From a sort of absolute perspective everything will happen and in reality systems far more bizarre than this human pattern one, so yeah, being in a normal ordinary human state, smoking a drug one day, and then having a literally infinite increase in consciousness---it's statistically unlikely to happen, like infinitely unlikely, but this is accounted for by the absolute, by the relative it does suggest some kind of relative intelligent design. Fine tuning argument. But from the perspective of infinite relativity being real there are infinite relative causalities at all levels flowing/streaming into the circumstances of the drug experience, infinite planes of existence. When you see water that's just the infinite water plane connecting to the infinite awareness you are. When you go to the 5-MeO space that's a plane that has a connection to this one. OR, Tom Campbell is right, in which case drug experiences are just a data feed. Like Mario eating a mushroom.

Nope, you are not a human right now, and then "becoming not-human" on psychedelics. You are patently deluded. You do not comprehend that then everything is necessary and therefore nullifying your argument. The reason the experience ends is not because it is impossible to imagine a state of reality where God-Consciousness lasts longer, it's because you couldn't do it if your mother's life depended on it and you could only get it from a drug, which is temporary in effect. The reason it's temporary in effect is because you take a drug, the drug comes from the receptor and gets dissolved, and you piss it out of your system. Just because an experience is strong doesn't make your deluded interpretation of it correct. The reason the experience ends is because it's a drug.

No, that's literally the answer. The reason the effect is not permanent is not some grand metaphysical necessity that strong experiences of God must always go away under all circumstances as if there would be any metaphysical inclination for silly anthropomorphic "you need to go back to your human attachment, that's why the experience goes away", it is because it comes from a drug. It's a neurotransmitter, then the neurotransmitter gets dissolved. There's no metaphysical necessity for it to go away. It's a drug. (and whatever activities are on other planes)

Lol, okay, no, it is not a hard question. It's because it was derived from a chemical. The chemical disconnected from your receptors, got dissolved by enzymes.

Not really. Carlos said he's a "bored fuck", which means his parents were bored while they were conceiving him and so he came out with suboptimum energy levels for sorcery. Carlos had three witches named Carol Tiggs, Taisha Abelar, and Florinda Grau. Carlos fucked all of them, and they all wrote books about sorcery. Like this one: https://archive.org/details/taisha-abelar-stalking-with-the-double/page/1/mode/2up But if the freak thing was true it reminds me of a scene from Carnivale and Samson the midget has sent Ben to go look for a lobster girl, and the stuttering albino working at the gas station is like, "That lobster girl, real freak she is." Ben's like, "Thank you."

No, Daniel Lawton, he smoked salvia and like a person came out of the TV and chased him around a repeating version of his house. He was really unimpressed with it because he has crazier cooler stuff sober every night. And he's not some genetic freak. He's just done the work.

AAAHAHAHAHAHAAA At many Buddhist temples you can have "tea ceremonies" with little girls. And those guys shaving their heads and wearing orange? No different than Catholic priests wearing black.

Well, it was enough of a difference that Ken put it in his book The Religion of Tomorrow. Ken's version of the Supermind is like a cereal box version of Aurobindo's original consciousness and description of the Supermind.

He's a calcified mind. We both know there is nothing new. Here's a contradiction between Ken Wilber and Sri Aurobindo where Ken appears to be completely wrong Ken Wilber creates a distinction between waking up and growing up, and says growing up creates stages of increasing holonic complexity that become integrated with waking up in the highest stages, and this happens by evolution. Aurobindo had the more accurate view, the structures aren't just evolved, they preexisted in a higher plane because imagination is not limited by time.

Yeah the Christians in that film were the good guys.

"Why did you make me take those power plants so many times?" I asked. He laughed and mumbled very softly, "'Cause you're dumb." I heard him the first time, but I wanted to make sure and pretended I had not understood. "I beg your pardon?" I asked. "You know what I said," he replied and stood up. He tapped me on the head as he walked by me. "You're rather slow," he said. "And there was no other way to jolt you." "So none of that was absolutely necessary?" I asked. "It was, in your case. There are other types of people, however, that do not seem to need them."

Rastafarianism

@Leo Gura OK demon story time. Daniel Ingram grew up interested in the occult, reading Castaneda, playing Dungeons and Dragons and reading Jack Vance stuff. When he was an adult still learning his friend had a problem. Every time he would touch a piece of technology like a computer or a generator or a light or whatever, it would stop working. So Daniel did the basic scrying, and said, "Okay, it looks like you have two demons. One of them seems to be a tech demon, sure. Let's see what we can do about that." So they did an old-school banishing ritual. Daniel now thinks that could be a terrible idea because of the effects it had and it could have been more caring, understanding, and empathetic to this thing's circumstances. Anyway, they did the banishing, sent the tech demon away, and all of a sudden all of the problems with the technology stopped. Weeks later Daniel was working on a house, standing on a ladder with a drill. The drill malfunctioned, spun around, and fractured his hand. Then he got pulled into some other space, saw the demon standing there smiling and it stuck out its hand and said, "Gotcha!" Then Daniel went back to his shooting pain from his broken metacarpal. There's also Daniel Lawton who was a student of Castaneda and in an arranged marriage by Castaneda with a witch that can levitate objects and has lifted him feet in the air with a single finger. He said this about this being: Sounds like something Minx would do. He used to make some funky looking squirrels for me. And he let me stroke his pink and dirty purple colored fur. Anyone else would have run for their life from what he was looking like at the time. It's almost as if, having been the Devil's Weed entity at one point, Minx still likes to "gross you out". The way the lizards did with Carlos. In fact, the first time I encountered Minx in an ultra realistic form he was pretending to be a large lizard with long toenails scratching on my wooden floors as he hobbled along. I thought he was real. My friend who got one of these allies said: "As a woman who suffered from this don't ever do sex with them in dreaming Never Don't have orgasms and such because they will suck the life out of you" "I was an empty cell. I couldn't think of anything or do anything. With much struggle and will I canceled work for that week. I was watching the wall lifeless for good 10 days and it took me 5 days to start be myself again. I was a leaving dead Literally I thought that if this lasts for more than 20 days I will go to the hospital I was in sleeping dreaming She showed me a room only for me with some female pleasure toys Next thing I know im tied and she is starting to do her thing I told her no but she didn't listen Not that I didn't like it But I didn't want it So I had a strong orgasm and woke up dead" She and her boyfriend also verified they could activate the water heater on demand by instruction. Lawton has said they have bent the water in the shower at a 90 degree angle. When the one I got from Lawton one of the times it visually attacked the orientation of the body, went into the physical body and auditorily screaming vibrated the body really hard, like the strongest vibration or an electric shock made out of boiling bubbles. The water system in the house went crazy. They're able to influence water because it's a fluid light and open system, and when viewing their world to our perceptual interpretation it often appears as water, because that's a closer emanational overlap than ordinary physical perception. Aurobindo called them vital beings. Castaneda called them inorganic beings. “Can we perceive those inorganic beings, don Juan?" I asked. "We certainly can," he replied. "Sorcerers do it at will. Average people do it, but they don't realize that they're doing it because they are not conscious of the existence of a twin world. When they think of a twin world, they enter into all kinds of mental masturbation, but it has never occurred to them that their fantasies have their origin in a subliminal knowledge that all of us have: that we are not alone.” Read The Eagle's Gift and The Art of Dreaming.

AHAHHAHAHAAAAA I knew it The thing with demons, I want to talk about them more literally. Daniel Ingram told me his hand was broken by a demon.

You are the love. In my opinion as far as I can tell people should fully develop their self-confidences (though not arrogances) and fully develop whatever positive qualities and abilities and views they have. This cannot be done if they are just groveling in a religion, made as a template by somebody else.

Don't demonize demon demonizers. God loves demonizing demons.

Demons are speaking right through you.