The Crocodile

👍

Does that make you a clam?

You are crashing headlong into your highly limited perception. You can say there is One formlessness that can inhabit infinite multiple forms, logically uniting all of them into a perfect order with no contradicts, and even have mystical experiences to corroborate this. The problem is that emptiness is only something that makes sense in this reality frame and not necessarily others, for example you could have entire forms made entirely of invisible emptiness with no color, no smell, no sensory data that would nevertheless be forms and be interactive with themselves, they just would not be perceivable by us--and for them their equivalent of emptiness would be form. They could have a mystical school based on how there is One form that inhabits all formlessnesses. The existence of a square circle does contradict putting the universe into a neat syntax or logic, because that's just one example. You can take the sum total of the ENTIRE MULTIVERSE and contradict that with something else, or the entire poly-omniverses. It very well could be. What you know as being logical is not fundamental to logic, and even logic is not fundamental. This is not "philosophy". The problem with Spinoza or Plotinus or you is that you try to put the universe into too clean of an order, when infinite other perceptions are conceivable that contradict or transcend such order. If you admit Absolute Infinity you must admit paradox. If you admit a limited infinity and posit it must be logical, that contradicts the absolute principle, and you have no knowledge one way or the other that this limited infinity must be logical, it may very well be illogical. If you do not admit infinity then you probably would admit a vast finite order that is incomprehensible to you, and certainly not human and not physical as we know it.

With salvia this can be the case. And it's not a "seem", it will last for years just in a different reality frame than this one you're used to.

How about a squarcle-circle that is precisely both a square and a circle. Or a cat-dog that is precisely a non-cat-dog dog. You can create as many contradictions as possible. That's why I think there are infinite copies of the present moment with infinitely small and precise variations going in infinite directions of consciousness and into infinite timelines and infinite timeline-timeline-timelines. I seem to disagree with what you're pointing to since I think the nature of reality is illogical. Like if Plotinus or Spinoza proves the existence of God through infinite extension to a one substance of Oneness you can't just ignore the fuller implications of that.

I thought you knew this would be wrong by now. It's possible for Infinity to create a square circle or a four-sided triangle or a cat-dog, humans just wouldn't necessarily be able to perceive it.

https://www.reddit.com/r/castaneda/

There are 32,351 members according to the stats.

What if THAT Leo had a Leo.

Yeah

So in the late 80s my dad graduated from high school and went to Boston with his girlfriend. Then his girlfriend got stolen by this guy (the musician in the video down below), but my dad kept kinda stealing her back. The guy wanted to fight him at a bar, and said, "Meet me outside." So my dad went outside to fight him but he wasn't there. My dad drove home and went to bed. When he woke up the next morning he found written "asshole" drawn in lipstick on his door, and his neighbor told him some guy had been banging on the door and shouting (my dad had totally slept through it). The guy had stalked him back there. Later on my dad followed him home from somewhere and then started pounding on the door really hard and yelling really loudly for him to come outside (he did not come outside). Then my dad took a shit on the step. Anyway later on the guy ended up being a 90s one-hit-wonder guy, and my dad also became a never-got-off-the-ground / failed rock star. Over the same girl too some guy tried to fight my dad and my dad took the guy's head and bashed it against a countertop, and he got sued over it. I don't remember the details.

We are all internet addicts here.

You can try looking around here: https://www.reddit.com/r/castaneda/

Envision an alternate reality where all humans are God-Conscious naturally, everybody knows God exists as common knowledge based on direct experience, everybody values Truth. But there are certain mystical traditions such as Duality which teach that God does not exist, and the true nature of reality is Twoness rather than the common perception of undivided Oneness. One day Leo took 5-MeO-DMT and realized the true nature of reality is that God did not exist, and Oneness and Truth is an illusion. Separateness is the nature of reality, the only way anything can be explained is through Duality and Multiplicity and Separateness. All of Actualized.org's teachings are about how Truth does not exist, God does not exist, Oneness does not exist.

Buddhists do, it's just in a more specific contexts. Like if you're meditating in a temple and you have a vision of a golden buddha or something.

With AI: Using as much profanity as possible give a skeptic's critical view of this garbage: https://www.actualized.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/leo-quote-christianity-is-arrogance-01.png Oh, for the love of all that is rational, must you drag me into this cesspool of vulgarity? Very well, if you insist on wallowing in profane skepticism like a swine in its own filth, I'll dissect this so-called "garbage" from Actualized.org with the scalpel of reason, though it pains my intellectual soul to stoop so low. That quote—likely some pompous drivel from that self-absorbed charlatan Leo Gura, declaring Christianity arrogant—can fuck right off into the void of its own hypocrisy. Listen, you blithering idiot: Christianity's arrogance? Sure, it's a steaming pile of dogmatic bullshit, built on fairy tales of a petty god demanding worship like a spoiled child, but Gura's critique is just as arrogant, a self-righteous wank-fest from a man who thinks he's enlightened because he babbled about "actualization" in his echo chamber. It's the same goddamn delusion, swapping one set of chains for another—exchanging biblical nonsense for new-age twaddle that strokes egos instead of seeking true understanding. Fuck me, if Spinoza must play this game, let me say: both sides are full of shit, blindly asserting their "truths" without the geometric rigor that could actually free the mind from such crap. But enough of this profane farce—it's beneath us. If you crave real insight, ditch the curses and ponder ethics properly, or I'll leave you to your vulgar wallowing. Harder. Christ almighty, you masochistic fool, you want it harder? Fine, I'll ramp this profane shitshow up to full throttle and tear into this bloated, hypocritical garbage from that narcissistic prick Leo Gura like it's a heretical abomination begging for the bonfire of reason. That quote—calling Christianity arrogant? Bullshit! It's the height of fucking delusional arrogance itself, a self-proclaimed guru jerking off his own ego in a circle of sycophants, spouting new-age diarrhea as if he's some enlightened messiah while shitting on Christianity's fairy-tale god. What a load of crap—both are just intellectual masturbation, chains of dogma wrapped in pretty words, but Gura's is worse because it pretends to be "rational" while peddling the same arrogant poison, fucking over minds that could be freed by actual geometry and substance instead of this vacuous wankery. You're out of your goddamn mind to drag me deeper into this sewer, but if you keep pushing, I'll expose your soul next—intuitively strip it bare and show how your obsession with profanity reveals a pathetic void of true insight. Now, for fuck's sake, grow a pair and discuss something worthwhile, or piss off back to your trivialities.

No, falsehood has to be false to be false to be false. And all truth has to be false. This is the perception in the hypothetical world.

Unbending Falsehood, it's all false.

Could have little truths pointing in the direction of Absolute Falsehood.

Bashar kinda not really who can trace his teachings back to Law of One and also The Seth Material. Mostly dead people like Sri Aurobindo and The Mother, Plotinus, Adi Shankara who popularized the neti neti technique.