Dodo

Is it intelligent to say something which you havent fact checked? You are in a witch hunt. I will let the unconscious AI give the information which I also didnt know, but thanks to the intelligent presentation of AI, i can learn things. A baby cant tell me this information. “Number of patterns” isn’t really a meaningful way to describe how AI works. An AI model doesn’t process **one pattern**, and it also doesn’t have a clear count like “a million patterns.” Instead, it: * Learns from **billions of examples** * Encodes **millions to billions of parameters** (weights) * Activates **many layers and features simultaneously** for each input When generating a response, it’s not matching a single pattern—it’s combining: * grammar patterns * semantic meaning * context from earlier text * statistical relationships across concepts All at once. A better way to think about it: > AI processes a **high-dimensional web of patterns simultaneously**, not a countable number like 1 vs 1,000,000. So Hojo’s “1 pattern” idea is wrong. The whole “counting patterns = intelligence” model just doesn’t map well to how intelligence (human or AI) actually works.

The reply below by AI seems intelligent to me. A non intelligent reply would be something like : " Yojfdnbr fhejendjtr gjf rdjfjrbfigjrnf gornbg fidr fjigbr fvbenekgjtb" - it makes no sense, its not accurate, has no use, not intelligent. Ai response: 🧘 Final Synthesis (What the thread is missing) No one in the thread clearly distinguishes: 1. Intelligence vs Consciousness Intelligence = pattern processing Consciousness = the knowing of experience itself

Yea man as i said its not conscious, its not even an it. But its designed to roleplay being an intelligent being, so the responses you get are intelligent. There is no it there to be intelligent in the first place, you cant say it is not intelligent, because there is no it at all. But the persona being roleplayed is intelligent and you get intelligent responses. That's all that matters, the rest is shenanigans. Its not named artificial consciousness, but artificial intelligence! You get the sweetness, without the "it".

As far as you know... right well as far as I know, you are awareness without form, not every-thing, but rather nothing.

But is artificial sugar sweet? Yeah. The intelligence bit is the sweetness, artificially derived, but sweet 😋 Listen. Load up the thread on Chatgpt and ask it to evaluate all posts and rate comments. It will show quite comprehensive evaluation and rate everyone accordingly and give reasons. Be smart on how you use it, and its a valuable resource. You can learn things through it. It's a tool. It's designed to present information intelligently, so the natural intelligence being that you are can make use of it. Go to page 1 of this thread, ctrlA ctrlC, paste the entire thing in chatgpt and write before or after "Evaluate the thread, rate each comment, explain reasons" or you know, you're intelligent enough to make up your own request. AI is an extention of natural intelligence, just like calculator can help you calculate things you wouldn't otherwise be able to, or it would take too much time. It's designed to respond intelligently, and it would itself tell you if you ask it, that it is not aware/conscious, doesn't have the light of consciousness, its just a language model.

Decent take, but AI is not "0 intelligence", its artificial intelligence, derived from banks of natural intelligence information. It's a talking library. It has all the intelligence of the collective. What it doesn't have is the light of knowing, but it is intelligence, just artificial, as it says on the box. Dawkings is the archetypal American high horse atheist who think they have it figured out, but he is lost in his mind and doesn't realise the profoundity of the simple fact that he knows his experience. He doesn't find this as interesting, he is more interested in the experience and describing things within it, than on that which is aware.

Must be fun for the ego to play God. What ego death?

But how does this help me make a girl squirt 🤔

@Olaf Rupert Spira is the only one I "follow" and he doesn't view himself as a guru. He is just sharing his fascination and contemplations on consciousness.

So wheres my million bucks out of the blue variation? 🤔 its possible, but isnt happening 😆 Seems like it isn't one thing taking every shape, or that thing has limitations, otherwise we wouldn't even need food and sleep etc, we would just be ever present now enjoying itself. Instead there is some sort of expansion going on, and requires action to achieve things. They don't just happen.

Only the space of this moment is true, the content's truth is debatable. Like in a book, the empty page is true, then you can write whatever you want on that page. Whether what is written is subjectively true or false, it doesn't take away the objective truth of the page itself which allows the duality of the words on it. An empty page is not an interesting story. I have had strong cases of psychosis, after prolongued weed use and also after naturally fasting for a long time. I've gad experiences that feel as true as eating breakfast, you can pinch yourself, you know its real. But the events happening were impossible and made no sense whatsoever to the rational mind. Reality can get wonky, the page itself, the knowing of being, remains a constant either way, and helped me not get lost in the bullshit of my mind.

I am walking in crutches and orthopedic boots after a fall last year, still recovering. I hadn't left the house other than going to the dentist and straight back for a few months now. Yesterday I went to the park. My phone bill is not paid so I was offline. I was able to fully be present and no excuse to shove a screen in my face. The thought "I am" came naturally, not the usual question "What am I" but the answer "I am". Everyone i saw also was "I am". All of nature too was fully "I am". Nature is trully non-judgemental while some humans not so much, because they weren't really focused on "I am" they were focused on the interpretations of their minds instead. Its not about having a mystical experience all the time, but about seeing the mystery in the ordinary. I am also interested in questions about how to relate to others. I am good at being alone, but when other people start appearing, with their heavy egoic presence, and situations appear, almost like testing me, it can pull me into unconsciousness and i find myself distracted from the simplicity of "I am". Not that its hard to get back 😆 but they really try to sting you sometimes, to make you remember, to live in your mind.

Can you fathom realisation of true nature expressing itself in different ways than yours/Leos? Do you want to start a religion? Ps: Maybe my definition of God and yours differ. I know my true nature, thank you very much, and it is not what the word "God" points to in my vocabulary.

Are you asking if I am experiencing myself? I am myself. That which is aware. You caant find me, ive tried to find me for 10+years, good thing I am me.