Dodo

Wait... are you saying.. you peed your pants? 😆 So tell me, do you feel this now or was it just one time deal during a high? Is this something maintainable, or is it just like "well now I know" type of thing? Because you say in past tense how you felt so conscious, what about now in your regular state of mind?

Enlightenment in 0 steps, allow everything to be as it is, notice that it is known, abide as that ever present unchanging knowing, which you always were. -But mr Dodo i cant sell books with this simple shet, lets do some steps and progression so i can make the bucks.

You are just being silly, there is nothing behind me, everything including the sensation of a head is happening within me, awareness itself, the brightly shining void.

The poisoned milk analogy fits perfectly. It looks just like regular milk. Only awareness can separate the poison from the milk. I have listened to Bentinho in the past and knew that he was off, but I could still separate the milk from the poison through my own intuition due to raised awareness. I've had this with others too, like Sadhguru. I dont think Leo is teaching solipsism, he is teaching Awareness/Being, if he has called it Absolute Solipsism because there is only one being which is shared, thats just a label. I wouldnt use the label, but I get it.

First time nonduality? The sun is an object in awareness. Awareness is that which allows it to be known.

"Claiming something" is happening in the me, awareness, which is not a thing. The human body sensations, perceptions and conceptions happen within awareness. Like in a dream at night, the dream body appears in the same awareness.

Yeah, we are aware whether we say it or not.

@Mellowmarsh but you are aware, right? Undeniable fact of direct present moment experience, directly verifiable and constant. Only awareness can be aware. Not a dead, but alive emptiness.

throwing the baby with the bathwater there. I am awareness, but awareness is not a thing.

What I see is that you are not homeless and probably on a drug induced high.

Well actually you are always the true self. You don't stop being consciousness when you stop meditating. Meditation only helps remove distractions. Consciousness is pure knowing. The "Beauty, perfection, love" are terms from the duality of mind. Beautiful or ugly, perfect or imperfect, love or hate, are dualities that are known within a single field of knowing (consciousness, I). The knowing itself is neither one of the dualities. The dualities are objects that are known. Consciousness is that which allows them to be known. Murder and rape are ugly. They are NOT perfection and love. Get out of that spiritual trap you are in, you've read some things and now parroting them without actual direct experience verification.

Wow bro, that took me on a journey

There are different types of intelligence, thats true. But what im trying to argue is that the content provided by AI is intelligent. If a knowledgable human told me those things, the same information, i would say, that's an intelligent reply. Its designed to artificially derive answers that an intelligent being can say. Im not saying that it knows its own being, but that the output is intelligent. Whether a human said it or AI, the messenger is not important, the message itself is the same amount of intelligent regardless of who made it. The artificial sweetner is sweet. I used the AI output in my reply to show the accurate information, rather than to use it to reply instead of me. I have no idea how AI works, thats why i used the AI output so we can both learn. Its not about winning or losing an argument. Intelligence is different to consciousness. Consciousness is the empty aware space within which the duality of intelligent and non-intelligent, sentient and non-sentient arise. We dont HAVE consciousness, at least in the nondual perspective. Consciousness is not a property humans and animals have. Consciousness, in the nondual perspective, is the knowing space in which all "mind and matter" arise.

Is it intelligent to say something which you havent fact checked? You are in a witch hunt. I will let the unconscious AI give the information which I also didnt know, but thanks to the intelligent presentation of AI, i can learn things. A baby cant tell me this information. “Number of patterns” isn’t really a meaningful way to describe how AI works. An AI model doesn’t process **one pattern**, and it also doesn’t have a clear count like “a million patterns.” Instead, it: * Learns from **billions of examples** * Encodes **millions to billions of parameters** (weights) * Activates **many layers and features simultaneously** for each input When generating a response, it’s not matching a single pattern—it’s combining: * grammar patterns * semantic meaning * context from earlier text * statistical relationships across concepts All at once. A better way to think about it: > AI processes a **high-dimensional web of patterns simultaneously**, not a countable number like 1 vs 1,000,000. So Hojo’s “1 pattern” idea is wrong. The whole “counting patterns = intelligence” model just doesn’t map well to how intelligence (human or AI) actually works.

The reply below by AI seems intelligent to me. A non intelligent reply would be something like : " Yojfdnbr fhejendjtr gjf rdjfjrbfigjrnf gornbg fidr fjigbr fvbenekgjtb" - it makes no sense, its not accurate, has no use, not intelligent. Ai response: 🧘 Final Synthesis (What the thread is missing) No one in the thread clearly distinguishes: 1. Intelligence vs Consciousness Intelligence = pattern processing Consciousness = the knowing of experience itself