Letho

High vs Low power I think would lead to more reliable results. It allows you to immediately develop a meta-theory on the correlation between not only cognitive level translates to certain 'perspective' analogous to eyesight and one's ability to complete the standard eye test optometrists give when you're reading their 'Letter Chart' from a distance but also the intersection of emotion, culture and personality. This hierarchy of low vs high perspective is incredibly tedious and ultimately is only going to yield an accurate result where you've no doubt gone the path of doing precisely as I've explained to figure out 'What Would Be' the high/low perspectives, until you realise of course, it simply has its roots in consciousness power, which has its roots at the intersection of the explained, along with other attributes beyond the ordinary that naturally take more careful consideration not reserved for this discussion. 'Consciousness Power' puts us at the immediacy of original perception, what we're experiencing right now, thereby preoccupied by analyzing how we ourselves generate and fathom any perspective whatsoever emotional and otherwise, thereto, we arrive at the first paragraph for said explanation. Choosing between the high and low in this regard is like choosing between different colored straws where we return to understanding mechanical underpinnings. For a personal development community, what increasingly facilitates higher power vs lower power? Emotional intelligence like that of a pale white redhead drunk breaking onto the set of the series Baywatch screaming and ranting about why I didn't get to be one of the lifesavers, in spite of any cognitive abilities I have, is most likely to misuse the best of my cognitive power as well as not have a cognitive power that is bolstered by the management of my emotional power. Which after enough contemplation, would at the very least come to reason that I'd improve my chances greatly if I started off as a waiter on the set, befriend the right people, always ensure that I've tanned my body and dyed my hair black before I arrive on set or anyone else sees to reveal my secret, and for several months ensure I have far less belly fat that I argue is purely in modelling the winter bear season habits in moderation. My only obstacle at present is a timetraveling machine, given Baywatch's last episode was in 1999. Given its been 25 years thereabouts, I imagine that the original destination for their auditions are unusually short of numbers, and my confidence not only stretches here but also by the mere fact that I'm considering the possibility of being a director for the show. One that captured the transition into the present modern environment I think would be particularly popular, not only this, I think the inclusion of the biodiversity of men like myself and the beautiful intelligent women from multicultural geographies, would not only bring a new spin to the show but a much needed integration. Imagine the future episodes now, redheaded white dude biotech entrepreneur, creating CRISPR enhanced baywatch bodies furthering ultra surf and rescue capabilities. I'm already a little star struck, and if my ego could handle it, maybe I'd enjoy the show so much that I'd be comfortable just sitting back being the director watching it all unravel itself. "We have the sexiest lifesavers ever" says former director of Baywatch, "Well we have lifesavers that are both sexy and can glow in the dark! (CRISPR/related)" - ha!

Another one of societies pedigree classification difficulties. Is it a labrador? A rottweiler? Fuck I don't know anymore, wait... Shit... A chihuahua? no fucking way! I am greeted in emotional presence by passerby's with cognitive and emotional difficulties on a near daily basis, high cognitive abilities does not preclude potential mental illness however by and large, the average IQ is of course, just average. Many more mentally ill people fall along this average than do those with not only exceptional cognitive abilities but also creative abilities. It's a folklore that should never have been folklore and I feel deep down that having these discussions now only allows a community to surface the incongruities between culture and reality but also bring a greater maturity to where most cultural subjects, especially those relating to mental illness and genius, are not only very sensitive subjects that affect the lives of real people but in return add to the definition of our own structures that reflect the language of our consciousness and the subsequent "picture to action" it generates about reality. Tread carefully, there's literally millions of people suffering right that are mentally ill but fall short of these genius and popularity appraisals, and there's arguably an equal number of people that are not 'mad' nor 'genius' but are being programmed to be narcissistic enough to either conclude that they are the latter or hypochondriac's concerning the former, or both, including popular. Narcissists weaponize cultural labels for their popular benefit, even if it momentarily means they have to be partially viewed in a negative light. The mind's capacity for creative 'mad' thinking is not in its reflection of chaos but in its order to handle it where said demonstration of power translates into repeatable not one-off creative feats. Otherwise, likely a German Shepherd. But, I have always had a particular fondness for the Wolfdog which are largely prohibited in Australia however all my life, I've always wanted a Siberian Huskey, though to date, I have been blessed to be the owner of other pedigrees.

@Leo Gura Cheers for clarifying mate but I think part of the confusion here is that your stance on morality often comes across as dismissive, even when that’s not your intent; so there's a lot of room for growth, even if its simply in the gap between your own position and a persons appraisal of yours. When you respond to moral critiques by labeling them “ignorant bluster” or “grandstanding,” it gives the impression that you’re brushing off the deeper substance rather than engaging with it. That’s why people are questioning your position, and I'm sure by now you see the temporal pattern to it? It's periodic man. You say morality can be substantive and not performative, and I fully agree with that. But if that’s your view, it might help to engage with these moral questions at the level of their substance in your creative work. Not in passing, but dedicate deep videos to it, then in future you can just be like, "Well here's my video...", and then any claim of your dismissal won't even emerge in the future and your own habits therein, will just evaporate overtime naturally. Showing how they align or fail to align with deeper truths and how different levels align or misalign with the deeper truth of morality itself, well... its a pretty smart idea, just a thought. People look to you for clarity, and when you respond like this, it leaves room for ambiguity. For example, if morality doesn’t have to be a performance, what makes one moral stance substantive and another performative? How does someone develop the discernment to tell the difference? These are the kinds of questions your audience wants answered, because I can imagine sometimes it feels for some that your responses are their own brand of granstanding, even though they may not be. Morality is tricky because it forces us to confront our egos. It’s easy to accuse someone of “performing” morality, but even that accusation can itself be performative if it’s not grounded in a genuine effort to build understanding. The real challenge isn’t calling out others, it’s showing, by example, what it means to embody morality in a way that’s authentic, grounded, and not ego-driven. People aren't going to believe you if you just granstand the idea that this is what you do. If your point is that morality gets distorted when people don’t understand themselves, then maybe the conversation should focus more on self-awareness, on teaching people how to recognize their ego’s tricks and the ways they unconsciously perform for validation, as opposed to unintentionally or not, trying to trigger the ego of another via the absolutism of the reactive statements you sometimes make. That’s where the real transformation happens. So my question to you is this to take away from this... little instance... for deeper integrative contemplation later.... how do you propose we cultivate morality that’s truly substantive? How do we stay grounded in our values without falling into ego-driven performance? That’s the nuance people are looking for from you. Peace brother.

@Leo Gura @gengar Leo, I don’t think you fully understand how morality forms in the lived experience. If you did, it would show up as something effortless and natural, like when I instinctively slid my bag under the seat at the cafe so someone else could sit down. It wasn’t a calculation or a performance, it was just empathy in action. But if I were to shout “MORAL GRANDSTANDING!” at myself every time I acted in alignment with my values, the question would become: what’s the alternative? Dismissing morality entirely, as though it’s just a trick of the mind, doesn’t make the deeper reality of it go away. Moral alignment comes from the heart as much as the mind, it’s not something to be swept under the rug with a clever phrase. Leo, if morality is just a performance, as you seem to suggest, then where’s your better framework? If you’re advocating to ditch it, what’s your replacement? Your dismissal of it feels less like wisdom and more like avoidance, maybe even frustration at morality’s complexity. But it’s not something you can sidestep if your aim is to teach people how to live deeply and truthfully. Morality isn’t some abstract sky concept to dissect; it’s grounded in the very human experience of being in relationship, with ourselves, each other, and life itself. Gengar, you’re onto something with the connection between morality and collective versus individual mindsets, but your approach could use refinement. Stage Blue’s marital systems worked because they served the collective structure of that time, just as Orange’s individualism reflects its values. Green will indeed reintegrate moral systems, but it will do so with a greater emphasis on inclusivity and shared empathy. That’s the direction we’re heading toward, but calling Leo out in a way that feels reactive only reinforces the very dynamic you’re criticizing. The real challenge isn’t about proving who’s right here, it’s about seeing how morality works in practice. It’s not an abstraction or a debate, it’s lived. The question isn’t just, “What do I think is moral?” It’s, “How does my sense of morality feel in action? Does it create harmony, or does it cause division?” Both of you would benefit from stepping back and asking yourselves: are you using these arguments to build bridges or just to protect your positions? Because at the end of the day, morality isn’t about posturing or intellectualizing, it’s about participating in life with a clear, open heart and a grounded mind. If either of you want to move forward in your understanding, start there. But right now, you're both just wasting your time entrenching yourselves in views that should always be in revision for a deeper human experience in the self, and between one another; that's how progress happens. Through true connection.

@Nito Temporal synchronization with the sustenance's of life. Heart attunes to gut attunes with the rest of the nervous system for the formation of the equilibrium of mind ego either sides with supporting more for happiness or otherwise. As for whether happiness is unconditional/conditional really just depends on the alignment of the habits of being across the intersection of what forms mind and the level of mind they produce therein. Synchronisation is order among the chaos where that synchronization is pointed in the right direction, the more atemporality the less synchronisation and the less internally stable conditions which in return produce states of unhappiness from depression to apathy to regret to anger, there's various kinds and different areas responsible for the particular kind of unhappiness that requires greater internal order. Chaos isn't bad in itself, only in as much as it is an internal that cannot be stabilized by something external to it, a human mind is an example of this. External chaos can bring you happiness because of the higher order brought about within to meet the challenge, at best all internal chaos is going to bring you is either more of it or a stable condition that is just akin to an equilibrium akin to 'happiness', so internal chaos is never something you should work towards where it is an equilibrium unto itself, however if it behaves like something where you are bringing higher internal order to it, like working towards a higher level of consciousness, then this is different, as you're reaching higher order synchronisation. In the absence of self-understanding, we have 'experience' in the form of challenges to define the path our intelligence walks down to generate the corresponding self-knowledge that leads to insight on those unconditional conditions. Take on a big ambition and continually rise to the occasion and you will grow what's now being popularized simplistically as the AMCC, anterior medial cingulate cortex and along with it the concert of chemicals that support that growth relative to the rest of the changes that follow unique to the ambition. The AMCC is being touted as the seat of our will power, and therefore, the will power to be happy, however not at great cost when we don't have the self-knowledge on what facilitates that. No, sitting on a mat simply meditating isn't going to achieve said happiness. However, a meditation practice that's perfected on the basis of bioelectrical attunement between heart, mind and gut as well as the rest of our being is going to breed entirely different more profound results. You don't have this knowledge though, so you are best simply setting an ambition across the indices of human experience from love, relationships, career, exercise and other forms of personal growth and then growing your intelligence in a much more natural way through those challenges that gets you deep in touch with the happiness that you draw from those experiences so you can tap into that on command after you deepen your resolve on the switches that create it. Many people on this forum are unhappy as they are unknowingly complementing each others lower order synchronisation in exchange for a brief dopamine spike of illusory belonging, a form of happiness; most don't form truly meaningful bonds between one another that share an indescribable intelligence to them that's significant to their long term happiness, I would love it if people actively engaged in said depth towards one another however. They do not understand the conditions that create a balanced ordered condition within their being and so they use the social as a mirror for compensatory happiness, just as TikTok and YouTube do this as the authors of those do their best to align with the evolutionary buttons of watchers, providing temporary happiness the user cannot tranpose onto providing them the desired unconditional happiness. You are wasting your time seeking happiness either on this forum from people that are struggling just as much as you or answers that are outside my own that I have described here. Social is exceptionally important for us but maturity especially as a man supersedes social as he matures his leadership over the material while simultaneously making himself deeper inside the spiritual, aka his metaphysical.

So all forms of symbolism are a form of self-referentiality, where the 'self' here contextual. 'Referentiality' is necessitated by how our consciousness creates existence in the interrelationship between awareness and memory. 'Good symbolism' vs 'bad symbolism' in this context is merely that language of symbolism, be it a quantitative (math) or qualitative (i.e. english) language, which is better, higher or 'good' at accurately aligning awareness with perception through memory, so its a subject of efficacious reading over moral standing. 'Higher' languages exist to help remove bias and enhance resolution on what we're measuring is consistently there. Chimps communicate just as well as many people on this subject for example, as even they don't deny that they're speaking something when they speak it. If you negate mathematics with the english language, you're shooting yourself in the foot. You may be able to incorrectly infer and through bias successfully persuade others that you're not performing mathematics in your generation of a qualitative sentence but you can't also simultaneously successfully get away with the fact that you're right now using symbolism to deny symbolism altogether, 'because that's just what I feel bro' even though your feeling in order for you to even perceive it let alone articulate it, is reliant on those same meta-structures we try to build through quantitative and qualitative languages that improve and evolve our ability to communicate both within and between one another as a step towards higher resolution. As for Terrence, he just didn't research multiplication enough its not that he was wrong, its that his interpretation of the purpose of the original definition was incorrect. Terrence is far from unintelligent, his epistemological arrogance just went too much to his head that he didn't research the actual meanings before assuming that 'We've got math wrong!' as he flushed all of academia down in one fowl swoop of centuries of 'expertise' down the drain. I haven't had the chance to listen to the whole podcast, maybe I will down the line. Still, there's little value in trying to bigfoot oneself in these situations which is just meeting the 'grandiosity equivalence error' that brought this as the major conversational point of the podcast altogether, and therefore an insensitive bias then for why the rest of what Terrrence says can also be easily dismissed. We're all here to learn, progress and evolve. Continuing to belittle Terrence beyond what is necessary, is just a timestamp on the de-evolution of topics like these rather than having the maturity to open them up to greater levels. My own progress in these subjects have come by understanding that there's a meta-language to meta-rationality that goes beyond and underpins meta-awareness in itself, its led to me when I have the time to much more deeply introspect on the nature of both mathematics and any spoken language like english. Any mere sentence now becomes its own fascinating self-referential talking point on how sentience understands and creates sentience, and sometimes in our case here... Denying its own existence through dissociative discarding of higher languages like mathematics and their native or second hand tongue. Reflect more deeply. Encourage forum mutual learning.

@quantumspiral We are human bodies creating states of consciousness with feedback loops operating at different qualitative densities and intensities that are more or away from the truth of life. We're either always striking at the heart of it, swinging and missing, trying again or denying the endeavour altogether into apathy and worse, "as we all know". Too many humans are either on the spectrum of giving up to complaining and not re-aligning from the inside out. Never stop swinging, never stop mastering the swing and make sure what you're swinging at is your ball to hit. For beginners, don't feel too humbled by just hitting the ball with a small bunt, you're still far better off than being on that noted negational spectrum, micro progress always supersedes macro stalls/worse. Allow the struggle to define you through your eventual triumph and learn from your mistakes as your guiding light, but for God's sake, choose the right goal, avoid hamburger eating contests look I get the appeal and hey maybe it'll be a confidence booster, but my small suggestion is to just go back to the drawing board and honour the creativity of your minds capacities a little better. But if something like a hamburger contest is what you need reader, hey all power to you and at least you're out socialising and not stuck in your grandmother's basement spending her pension money away to fund your international gaming ambitions, but arguably hey I'm no lawyer (might be an add on in the future) though depending on the context that's even still better than dreaming your life away in a depressive mess that so many struggle to get out of. One small bunt in the right direction. Keep doing that and before you know it. Well, you know the rest. 🎄Best Light🎄

@integral this was actually hilarious. It's the guys own fault. We put ourselves male or female in these positions. It's our responsibility to determine accurate life and therefore relationship principles versus inaccurate ones. If we fail in our accuracy, it's our own decision making, attachment style, etc that needs repairing not the other person, that's their responsibility, you made the choice as a person to make their abuse your responsibility by being with them and or tolerating it in any way. Granted, I have empathy for naive people, I was one of them, I have also had bad behaviour, however once you're aware of the issue its your responsibility to remove the naivety and to not accept abuse. Any form of abuse is a form of ignorance regardless as to the short term power trip it provides and therefore, to an extent it genuinely requires empathy however to the other side, it should never under any condition be tolerated in any way shape or form. Male or female treats me badly or anyone I know badly, they're cut off immediately and then boundaries escalate from there, I'm aware that I can sometimes be too protective as well, we all have unique combinations we have to appraise with wisdom. I react in the same exact same way towards myself as well, The Kybalion, "as above so below, so below as above", principle of correspondence. People are ignorant, this is normality, don't tolerate the complacency of the male either. Have empathy for both, it's become taboo to talk about applying empathy in all situations these days only to the level that we have personal ignorance in applying it with intelligence, an upgrade in our own personal intelligence, inclusive of our sense of humour, is what's needed across the board for our empathic boundaries that have a strong boldness to them, since when were we so ignorant to believe that empathy needed to be without masculine boldness? This is the magnitude of our lack of sophistication in western society these days, a man must place this authority over maturing his intelligence accordingly in all instances, as for a woman, well I can't speak for a woman only for the uncompromising personal boundaries that I have for behaviour male or female, which alters across context, uniqueness of relationship, age, etc, etc, intelligence is an operational function that adapts to change, not static norms that are a defense mechanism to a lack of intelligence one is unable to employ, which again, only to the level it's intelligent to do so also requires empathy, that's strength in judgement. 🎄 Merry Christmas yal 🎄 Go and enjoy yourselves for heaven's sake fuck it's Christmas right? Sincerely! Heh! 🎁🌎🤠

And just to finish this off on my front unless you have any questions @oMarcos, even though as explicitly stated I was purely running a once only social experiment and I never actually 'did it' if you get what I mean, always end as the supreme gentleman regardless as to how a woman treats you otherwise you're just investing your neuroplasticity in an alternate worse future that never had to ever exist compared to the abundance you could have created for yourself. The following message was a copy and paste to all the very understanding women that I'm very grateful for having in my life: 🎄 Merry Christmas yal! 🎄

Anie literally just followed up with an 8 minute voice message by the way. I'm not going to listen to it, at least not tonight, but she's a really great gal that deserves a great guy and I'll give her some attention tomorrow where I'll expand some dimensions for her then inclusive of the above where I establish the boundaries I noted that serves her highest dignity. But yeah, my point is mate let this be a lesson for you, don't live in your own self created smoke that you'll only end up suffocating yourself on in the future because you made too many assumptions and didn't live in the space of mutually created individuated creative intelligence between one another, as that's what a real relationship is about man, what you two create with each other whether it's a friendship or something more, not the script society taught you you're hoping to fulfil in some predictable ritualistic way like most people assume and then they wonder why either they're unable to deal with their marriage issues that lead to divorce or complacency where you both just accept the slum you're in, which is fine for some people that's their future and I think it's truly beautiful if it's genuinely real as it just means they're not meant to explore consciousness all that deeply, and that's fine, it's not meant for many and so they have to live in marriages that live in those limits. Find your mutual true limit. Creatively intelligize the hell out of it with the most wisdom possible that brings the highest humanity possible to your relationships.

This is a different gal. To help you get out of the "idealism" paradigm and into the "trait analysis" paradigm, you must ask the question "who am I speaking to?" And "who am I based on what I am asking?" So I didn't masturbate over her, I told a white lie. I would never lie about something thats something I should never lie about, while at the same time this is a lie where I may need to do damage control, either she has had a bad day and has some unintended reaction for example or on the other hand she becomes overly infatuated with me, for either case because I already know Anie is a good person I'm going to devote the time regardless to ensure that no damage is done and or at the very least I redeem the situation, however in this case, I posed the question, "who is anie?" And I'm not going to be able to have that question answered by just dancing around nonsense questions where we're both in culturally accepted lines thereby producing culturally predictable responses, you must figure out how to cross those cultural lines while doing so in a way that is as respectful to the other person as much as possible. When you end up in a relationship with someone though where your relationship is predicated on culturally acceptable norms rather than a functional understanding of one another with a level of consciousness depth that supersedes the potential for normalised reactivity towards you, that's the relationship mate sorry to inform you, that's doomed to fail and either one of you are probably either only with you for ulterior motives or they're probably just so poorly developed or have such a shallow understanding of you that your relationship just isn't worth the time of day anyway to the extent that it genuinely adds value to your personal growth. I'm sharing this with you because it feels like part of at least one of the outcomes to your attachment is that you create a cultural dream world of social expectation. This social expectation is something you've been socially conditioned to believe in so that you re-enact that ritual in the real world and then wonder why you're not getting the success you thought you were going to get based on the subconscious rituals you didn't even know you were programmed to follow through with and not get adequate enough feedback from reality to change your behaviour in response to. I'm not saying you should now start telling all the women you're masturbating over them even though you're not, I'm just saying that you need to figure out your own independent way whereby you're going to only spend time on real relationships where you're both in it to be real with one another and get through the crass to get to truly know who one another are underneath and waste the least amount of time with those that have ego backlashes and therefore don't even know themselves enough to be able to even pass these kinds of tests to the point where they can intelligently relay who they are to you and vice versa. "Who is X?" Is the same question as "Who am I?", on one side of the spectrum you (or the person you're speaking to) have full ego identification and therefore almost zero self knowledge and on the other side of the spectrum you have full self wisdom and therefore at the very least enough ego integration to the point where you can generate creative intelligence no matter what someone throws at you and create light and heaven out of whatever they bring to the table for you to mirror the universe off with to you. For me, the faster I can find that ego and or lack of integration to the point where there's a lack of empathy on self and other, the quicker I can get out of there and establish creative intelligence in another direction. By generating harmless social experiments like this where I have full positive intentions and empathy towards any potential damage control needed, I get a quick read on biases that reveal truths that may have otherwise been completely missed and put me in a relationship that landed me in a complete mess months or even years down the line because I didn't get an intelligent objective read across many situations that add to my wisdom in a way where there's mutual respect for one another's humanity, including respect for one another's time aka saving months to years of both our lives. Again, if I tell a woman I love her though, that's not something I just throw out and see what flies back. There's simply lines I will not cross no matter the context, I now have a few gals now including Anie that are happy to have learned I just masturbated over them which I didn't, however there's a lot of women where I just simply wouldn't do that of course because it would be totally inappropriate relative to either the context of our relationship or the ego limits that I'd already for example investigated enough. It's the first time by the way where I've tried that social experiment, and now it's just damage control to ensure they're not anticipating this leads to a potential relationship while at the same time benefitting our friendship because now we've mutually crossed cultural lines where we get to explore new creative territory. You've gotta learn how to do that for the sake of understanding yourself and the sentience you're claiming you're trying to have a sentient aka non-culturalized-zombie relationship with. Hope these three comments serve as good learning mirrors for you mate. Again, hope the Christmas Break is serving everyone well 🎄🌍👌

@oMarcos And this gal is pretending to be all empathic towards me and I do believe she's empathic, like she does have a complex compass however for so many women man, they'll in the next breath happily talk about the guy in which their empathy has switched off towards to another guy, in this case, me. What she's doing right now shows a lack of maturity and so I don't hold her in as high esteem, however I recognise there's multiple factors at play here including the cultural pressures that have made her have the sight she has through the smoke and mirrors of indoctrinated misguided hollywood love potions being created by the guys she's speaking to, so I hope this helps you generate another mirror on yourself to see through your own naivety a little bit better just above the horizon of any potential ego backlash you may or may not have from me sharing this with you. Combined with my previous earlier comment above, you need to make a paradigm shift that allows you to see how your own self-indulgence in your own personal delusions results in blocking your primal cognitive empathy to complement your affective empathy, as a result, you get easily played bro and the way to respond to this isn't to try and outplay anyone it's just to make the best use of your time in your life and consequently stay on your growth curve towards reaching your highest consciousness maturity as much as possible to the point where these situations don't even register in your life as plausible scenario outcomes as you're not the naive one where your love isn't coupled with love that's bolstered by the rest of your intelligence and vice versa: These are two separate guys in the space of the last hour by the way. Wisen up, don't get bitter. The biggest problem is you don't view at least 50% of yourself and herself as a biological entity responding automatically to the forces of life around you continuously, instead a part of you that you need to unplug is stuck inside this magical fairy dust space of "Her and I are spiritual beings finding our spiritual paths" or however you frame it, consequently, your reticular activation system filters reality around you incorrectly relative to the level of inaccuracy surrounding the present paradigm in which you're processing your relationship. Fix the (cognitive) paradigm and you'll fix the filters which will in return change the feedback loops within your biology that create your emotions to appraise this and other situations around you to become socially attuned more accurately. Don't get bitter as said, the goal isn't even to get better as they say you should in just another form of delusion just delicately in a more sophisticated way, get more accurate. Get more accurate and you'll get more of you as you being you, being true. So as much as its a lack of empathy at an objective level, of course I play devils advocate on myself where this situation at the same time is the perfect example to reveal the other side of the equation. My revelations should relay that the nuance still reveals how I'm accurate on both accounts regardless but that the original boldness is still where you need to systematically step by step mature towards being able to know how to categorise empathy across the social spectrum as it presents itself to you situation to situation because to add with this second comment, you'll in return know how to self assess aka like in this situation, where your own self and other empathy is lacking and thus where you need to redeem yourself. In the case of these two examples, where the two gentlemen are stuck in their own self indulgence and are totally oblivious to how she may perceive them and so totally misperceive how she may respond to them in the future, in this case either ghosting or/to playing them. A part of it is their own fault and the other part of it, is however slightly, her own suffering because she then loses out on having a more mature appraisal of the situation that benefits her consciousness growth even though her biological response that reduces her empathy as a survival reaction to screen them out as potential partners at the same time is understandable. Good luck, but create your own luck by looking in the mirrors that give you a more accurate reading on life. Again, I hope everyone's getting the most out of this Christmas Break in preparation for the new year 🌍🎄👌. Spread the mature love.

@oMarcos dude gtfo of this asap. You're dreaming, not living. Very clear boundaries: what makes a relationship isn't the attachment its trait based. Attachment minus proper tested traits is actually what leads to you wasting your life filled only with regret if you're without either the sense of mind, deep life lesson or both. This is NOT a complicated situation. Act quickly with the paradigm shift. She clearly doesn't have enough empathy. Who gives a fuck why, whether it's lack of maturity, life experience or genuine deficit, measure what you actually see. That's what you're meant to do as a man and then respond to it objectively, decisively and with momentum. You lack wisdom and that's what's holding you back right now so you must have a serious look in the mirror, remove the ignorance, implant knowledge and your future self will thank you later. Traits create passion that's long lasting and therefore a meaningful attachment that you look back on fondly into your old age, attachments can create passion but without the traits the passion is instead a hollywood delusion ruining your life while you live totally in denial about it. Anyhow, we're here to share and grow from wisdom together so don't let me be the last commenter on this one! Very operationally, two traits I filter every relationship through now or rather the wisdom of it is purely chain reasoning around empathy and family. Pure, simple, beautiful. Done. Best wishes and Merry Christmas mate, sincerely I really hope it works out for you and everyone else struggling with any similar situations present/past.

@ShardMare Speaking of 'Special' just caugh the following on Facebook. I mean, people have lost their minds from Facebook now, that's abundantly clear Quote: "Hello my dear.... I am first hybrid bloodline of the Anunnaki and I was called Ib-Braham(a). I was also a Pharaoh and I and my army guarded the spaceport in the real Jerusalem. The common version of my name is tpday Abraham, Ibrahim or Avraham. I was King Art(h)ur and the most realistic version as a film about him was Guy Ritchie's film, which I saw once in 2007 at the Kabbalah Centre London - just like Madonna. I was Grand Master of the Knights Templar Jacque de Molay (Prieure de Sion), Thomas Beckett, Thomas Moore and El Morya Khan. And from Morocco, Persia to Scotland, many incarnations worldwide on this little world map of lies. The soul of El Morya lives in me. It took me 14 years to allow myself to say it, because NOW is the time for change! This dome construction of this ‘earth construction’ is unbelievably large, the current earth maps are falsified and there are Nibiru, Asgard, Sirius and and and underneath. The sky is so deep blue at night because our dome is surrounded by an infinite ocean. And we are not small and insignificant. But the part where you live has been manipulated into a matrix of incarnation without memory. I permeate you, I am nothing special, but I have full memory. I am HE, I am SHE, I am IT, I am EVERYTHING. Lightworkers, now is our time to step out of our shyness and be A King to serve God (THE ONE)!," And posts like these are the norms in so many demographics there, and that's just the start to tasting the spectrum of demographics on Facebook these days. I peruse their on occasion to take a walk through a sci-fi zoo when I need a touch of the bizarre to hit my consciousness and learn something from. And I thought people from here were off heh! Dude seems like an interesting guy to have a beer with but! I found this humorous only because I made a joke not long back that I went to a psychologist where through one of our "past life remission" sessions we learned that I was a pharoah and some other stuff, again just for humour. It's a George Carlin (the comedian) schtick. Sincerely, Merry Christmas yal, and no disrespect if you want to dress up as the baby Jesus and re-enact Bethlehem saying you were Mary, Jesus, one of the apostles or whatever, each to their own I guess! 🎄🌎 But genuinely, I hope everyone's not having it too rough and you're creating good family memories, or at least recalling and learning from them. Best.

@rachMiel well, to be specific it's not just a thought form, it's literally screwing with your identity. Ground yourself in that. Life is short man, it's not fun to let this stuff get the better of you. Merry Christmas, sincerely. Being away from the monotony of the middle of the year can make it easier for us to resonate with the parts of life that ground us in our humanity 🌲🌎.

@quantumspiral totally feel you man. I'm glad you posted this as well so I could share my answer as I've definitely thought about it and I can totally empathise with people whom don't even want to be a part of this world because there's so much suffering. Because I've already answered this for myself, I can give you an accurate perspective from my viewpoint. You've literally just gotta be real. If you are real, then you're never going to have parts of yourself that are unreal in which case you'll never have a mind that's clouded with the depressive illusions that can easily infect us and that we sometimes need to receive from reality to remember where to plant our feet on the ground. We especially in the west live in a fake world and there is so much suffering compounded even further because the west creates non-real value metrics that reward centres feedback loop on. By purely simplifying life and getting to the raw constituents of being without any nonsense outside of learning to creatively find your way to mastery, you become the antidote the world needs, without even grandiosely thinking of yourself as the antidote nor "what the world needs". Peace. Sincerely, find what comfort you can over this break. To whatever level you can I hope you find love, solace, strength and connection during Christmas. Best wishes 🌲 (and the same to everyone else).

@Husseinisdoingfine Americans cease to amaze me. I took in far too much of their nonsense today as an antidote to my own blindness to some of the messed up stuff in the world. Where other countries are just straight down the line, "yeah we got bombs and we explode stuff.. and ah... We also want your land", in America, they have spectrums of genres on how to master being toxic fools. To any American and elsewhere as I've got friends sprouted all round, just remember what this holiday season is about, visit your childhood and I genuinely wish you a warm cheer and great Christmas holidays 🎄, at least as much as is possible 🌎🙏.

@Flowerfaeiry yeah for me ego is just the boundaried self. And we need it for survival purposes. "Identity" is more along the lines of how I perceive your version of ego. I find it easier to separate them. Awareness is the differentiator and it's a bit like "magic" when it comes to being fooled and by the same power or more, seeing the patterns create themselves in real time.

@Basman I was a bit harsh before. I didn't watch the video. Teal did a good job. I didn't watch all of it. She just talks so much crap though for stupid people I wouldn't be able to do it, commend her to that end.

@rachMiel you're not a nihilist you're a human being, it's the biggest mistake philosopher types make. You've just got to unplug and replug back into the rawness of your experience. It's become hip these days to "see the matrix" but most of those folk don't see their own self-conceited bs. You've gotta connect and feel what it means to be human. I briefly heard in the news today that something like 3 quarters of today's youth in Melbourne have mental health issues. It's absurd. There's nothing wrong with your intrinsic experience, we're kind of meant to be human beings. Trust me, when you unplug from the digital matrix and you wakeup to purely what you are, not god, not vampires, not some Messiah, just purely what you are, all this nihilism stuff will vanish. And Merry Christmas 🎄, sincerely.

@integral I don't think you designed this life, I feel a whole bunch of people forgot to turn on their empathy when understanding existence and then gave their resulting thoughts a positive label then used their confidence to convince others of their thoughts. There's an other, and they're right now eating a salami sandwich somewhere wondering why you're getting tongue tied. We're just humans, intellectual grandiosity leads us to making proclamations that are cognitive steaks too big for our brains to digest. Venn diagrammatically, that's our delusional territory as a species. Sincerely, Merry Christmas 🎄 and I hope your environment is supportive of a good Christmas cheer and positive warm memories 🌍.

@caspex there's benefit to everything, chess is fantastic I got amazing insights from it, one those being deepening my understanding of abstraction. You're only limited by your creativity or character with respect to what you can learn from something. Lots of folk struggle with out of the box thinking so they give inside the box rationalizations on subjects. You should be asking yourself the question and then forming your own independent opinion based on accurate critical thought. Merry Christmas, sincerely.

@Shane Hanlon there so many evil, delinquent, rubbish fucks in the world that I am definitely pro-eugenics and not even first and foremost concerning physical genetics, I just mean morally speaking. If you're a good person, you've gotta sometimes go out of your way to download that stuff off the internet otherwise you're like me and you'll walk around a bit blind as to the disturbing demographics we have in society. Let's have exponential growth of a cockroach infestation, yeah not the brightest idea and I don't trust Musk's tripe less or more than I trust his enemies other than to say you've just gotta call bullshit where there's bullshit in these situations unless you personally know someone and even then, where are the conversational lines of truth drawn. Regardless anyone if you're reading this, just tell someone to have a great day and genuinely mean it for Christ's sakes the world's more and more getting off on the dumbest stuff just looking into the Luigi Mangione rabbit whole a little bit. Sincerely, have a great day yal! 🙏 🌍🎄

Double post, ehk this flu. (I've got my methods to try and get rid of it by the end of the day) To reduce ambiguity: And it's not about being delusion, illusion, bias free. It's about having a minimalist approach. It's why I've learned, truth is about seeking falsity because then you minimise the confirmation bias. Our biologies are not built for the absence of either truth nor falsity, it's because we have areas of our being that are responsible for different reactions within us, my sexual organs (I have multiple now) want me to have sex with the opposite gender for example but my urges for understanding want me to grow my prefrontal cortex. Most of truly living life as it concerns either the resolve of dissonance or the extension of our truth because all our other urges for most of us are so strong, with equally strong variation in the population, is purely mediated by empathy and the prefrontal cortex and the sophistication by which these two can creatively interact with other areas of our being rather than through the rigidity of falsely perceived solitariness, as they're highly complex structures. In serving the latter in light of how little our science has interconnected all of its independent research that albeit still amazing that we can achieve such great feats we're still greatly missing the mark and it's important for anyone with a mind to not placate when we're capable of so much more in this era... there's a few book recommendations to add which are ones you wouldn't normally associate with me having read as I know I may seem pretty existentialist/rationalist, but I'll read everything and anything as I understand the importance of cross-disciplinary thinking in the search for truth, granted there's true intuition but it's the highest or synthesis of perspectivism that greets truth at the door, it's very rarely only one and even more rarely the first perspective. And I'm barely scratching the surface with this comment including too as it's an era where I need to raise my own personal integrity concerning my own philosophical perspective overall on the related subjects: 1. The Upanishads 2. Advaita Vedanta 3. Yoga sutras of Patanjali 4. Mūlamadhyamakakārikā 5. The Platform Sutra of the Sixth Patriarch 6. Tao Te Ching 7. Zhuangzi 8. The doctrine of the mean 9. The works of Zhu Xi 10. Meditations, Marcus Aurelius Areas of future research for next year: * Dreams * Near death experiences * Past life experiences * Super human strength in crisis situations * All areas of Parapsychology * More Cheers Leo, solid post mate. This isn't the great wall of china here, so any immigrants that want to come through and discuss any point or intersect any approach-thoughts the floor is yours.

@LordFall Leo's right. You've just gotta look at yourself objectively and just a being in general objectively. What is it and what am I outside of all of my life experiences? If you can't bridge and reconcile the difference of your inner experience with your objective appraisal of what you are, no matter what it is, whether it's blissing out in a cave or praying to the almighty praise you get from making a dollar, it's not even the case of if you're deluded its by how much. These worlds need to be appraised separately with prudence within the mind and slowly merged together so that the emotions for each are able to unite rather than any resulting dissonance leading to the denial that blocks progress in thought. Most people walking around in life are by some measure deluded, but because they're living inside the Matrix of social reinforcement in determining their reality as opposed to self authored thought, life becomes about the management of their delusions or going from one socially acceptable delusion to the next more than it does establishing very slowly your own personal life philosophy that also isn't a viral reaction to what is a daily trauma for people but is instead an empathic healthy integration that appraises the coexistence of worlds with a sense of groundedness. Otherwise it's your own philosophy that becomes the delusion you're using to self fuel because the ego hasn't achieved enough meta awareness on itself during its rise in success, which is why human half-truths can do so much damage to the individual and a society at large as they're without the introspection on the biases that make them vehemently opposed to anything that contradicts their viewpoints, "Because they've had success!" It's an ego protection of course, all of this is, and mastering it is all rooted in just bringing us back to who we really are after we wipe away the brass tax.