Letho

I'm not going to do a long intellectual analysis. In as pure, short and simple of a way of expressing possible its really helped me invert my perspective on the paradigm of meaning that the world has so far achieved in its value differentiation on our axis between sentience and the rest of the universe. We are empty creatures, to cut to the chase. I honestly think Chad based on the political speech above and the ease by which people can be persuaded to move in one direction as opposed to the next purely due to a certain facial expression or hand gesture (however humorous along the way), could easily beat Donald Trump in a political debate. They have a very comparable style. Use the world as your benchmark for the bare minimum amount of meaning that has been actualised by our species thus far in our understanding of reality. We don't have any philosophers that have scratched the surface, think of your greatest and you will find purely a kid that looks like a fast runner because they're the fastest in their class by a long way but you've never seen anything close to a world class athlete. If one follows this advice while having a laugh along the way, they will undoubtedly live a happy, fulfilling and meaningful life. Rock it.

In answer to my that final question, "Where is Chad going now?" Well, he ended up SnapChatting me and well... It turns out he's now running for International Office... He ah... Wants to be President... of ah... Everything.... Anyhow, he ah... had this message he wanted me to pass along as his in his words... Secretary of soon to be world... but ah... I don't know where he's going with his... I never thought of myself of doing anything much 'worldly' so yeah... anyway... Chad's Political Speech to People of Earth "HELLO, PLANET EARTH! It’s Chad.... your soon-to-be Commander-in-Chief of Everything! Now, I know what you’re thinking: ‘Is this guy seriously running for President of the World… in a Hard Rock Cafe t-shirt?’ And to that, I say: Absolutely. Because I don’t need a fancy suit to lead. I need comfort, confidence, and the perfect amount of vintage rock vibe. You can’t spell revolution without ‘rock,’ people! Look, here’s the deal. The world is a hot mess right now... and I’m not just talking about my reflection in every mirror on the planet. We’ve got crises on crises, and what we need is a leader who isn’t afraid to take the right selfies. Someone who understands that change doesn’t happen in boardrooms... it happens at rooftop parties, in group chats, and, yes, sometimes over a great plate of nachos at Hard Rock Cafe... You've checked out my Political Campaign video below right? I know everything of everything of people now. And life. Let’s talk policy. Economy? Easy. I’m gonna sell merch... and by merch, I mean limited-edition Chad-branded everything: from t-shirts to toasters. You like my Hard-Rock shirt right? It’s gonna be a global drop, and trust me, it’s gonna go harder than a Michael Jordan sneaker release. I mean, if I can sell a selfie for $100 a pop, imagine what I could do for national debt. You guys don't know what it means to think outside the square until you've seen my square jaw line. World peace? Done. I'm calling it the ‘Peace, Love, and Chad’ initiative. I’ll host all world leaders for a week-long retreat in my jacuzzi, all expenses paid by… well, not me, obviously. I'll get them to all want to pay to go to the party because they'll want to meet each other as I'll advertise them all as interesting people. I'll make a smashing more than the rent it costs to pay of the house. But think of it — me, shirt off, sun shining, and nothing but good vibes and deep negotiations over cigars, you've seen the way I puff my smoke by now. I make the dragons of Chinese new year look like fortune cookies, I'm the new magic of magic of Tao. You think anyone’s gonna want to start a war after seeing my midnight blue moon eyes? I don’t think so. Climate change? Look, I'm not saying I can solve it overnight, but have you seen my electric skateboard? I’m already ahead of the curve. Every world leader gets one of these bad boys... zero emissions, maximum swag. We’re talking a total rebrand of the green movement: ‘Chad for Eco-Chill.’ Oh, and free Hard Rock tees for anyone who recycles. Boom. I just saved the planet and looked amazing doing it. You feel it now right? Yeah you feel it. It's happening now. Didn't believe before did you? Now, I know some of you are still skeptical. You're thinking, ‘Can Chad really do this? Can he actually run the world in a t-shirt while blowing smoke’ But here's the thing... my entire life is a masterclass in defying expectations, like I say in my campaign video... I can empathise with any existential quandary you have. I mean, look at me. I was voted ‘Most Likely to Marry an Instagram Model,’ and here I am, marrying entire countries together with nothing but charisma, good hair, and a humble wardrobe choice while showing everyone how to give one another the ultimate respect with the ultimate video selfie looks no matter the occasion. So, my global citizens, it's time for a new era. An era where leadership is measured not by how many ties you own, but by how many followers you have and how good your video angles are. It’s time to vote for someone who’s not just relatable but also totally aspirational. Vote for Chad... because the future isn't wearing a suit. It's wearing a Hard Rock Cafe tee, aviator sunglasses, and a smile that says, ‘Yeah, I got this' with a finger point that shows maximum respect to their audience. Now remember everyone, all people of earth. You great one's. I am the great Chad, and I love you all. JUST... as equally as one another. Now watch my political campaign vid below if you haven't already re-watched it as many times as you should have shared it by now. Not that need it, as its probably already viral by the time you finished reading this, and I... am your new president of the world.

So I just hit my next level of awareness (not my final form... yet -> see earlier video above for related anticipatory elation when I do). And on a serious note, this is why I am scared and why it reflects a lack of awareness in a sentience not to be. This alteration in my awareness is only like a slightly brighter Chad, however its enough there to appreciate its novel aesthetic nuance. It's difficult to talk about this without adding natural flavors of humour obviously but only view that as a covering over the rational fear present because its revealed to me just how unaware I've been in my life, and I'm overstating my own awareness right now in accurately categorising my own lack of awareness in the past. As intuited, even though my last post of the day linked in my previous journal only add a layer to this realisation it very much has felt now like both the final piece of a transformation and the first piece of a future one that I've barely scratched the surface of. And that's what's scary, who the fuck am I going to be in one months time, much more, who am I going to be just at the end of the year let alone years down the line? And I haven't even had any psychedelics yet. My journal is going to naturally now take a new turn, a slight refurbishment and we'll let that play out on its natural course I guess however I hope that at the very least overtime, representing these transitions to graduations as they're generated within my consciousness is the smartest intuitive approach to getting the most visceral self-knowledge for the reader from this project as opposed to just always being say formal and representative of purely what's "easier" to read and cognitively synthesize, as its then without the invisible background behind this journal that's picked up more from the readers intuition rather than something that's explicitly stated for myself. Question everything I express in this journal for the benefit of your own evolution. Believe nothing except your deepest intelligence that leads you to taking that next step forward in the way that is truest to you. Where is Chad going now? Don't ask. I think he just got a notification on SnapChat again.

And one final question before I head out clubbing. It's still only 8pm here. From yours, Chads Galore Truly

Leveraging your question @hyruga to plant the right seeds in myself on something that cognitively intersects. Long version: One of my weaknesses in personal development that I want to point out in my movement forward, to give a mirror to others that then may also want to address this in themselves if this was also an area they overlooked too much and needed a nudge. A simple question like this, with coordinates: self + future + possibility = simulation of self -> the ability to empathise enough to experience an existential reaction to said empathy. Overlaps with phenomenology in action, a level of self-existentiality that I quite honestly, am not good enough yet at leveraging to my advantage and one of those reasons is that I have very few to any people at all that I even know that utilise this to their strategic advantage. Understandably so though, as its not that its difficult in the same way that runnings not difficult. But just imagine you never knew that running offered any benefits to you, its a lot like this situation here, basically no one comes out saying “Hey yeah, spent an hour on x thought experiment that’s now had a fundamental impact on my personal identity because I experienced it with such psychedelic intensity without any drugs required.” If 100 people on this forum came out tomorrow for example and stated this, I guarantee you that the likelihood of anyone attempting to replicate one of the persons results would skyrocket, as we’re social creatures, I’m certainly not immune to it no matter how critical thinking I may appear. So how do we do it? Well, let’s use your question as an example. What are the ingredients to the simulation in order to perform this internal experimentation correctly? I need to: Imagine as intensely and as fluidly (as in at ease/calm) as possible I need to experience a self-mirror from the experience, that is to say, an empathic response that triggers the survivalism that dually activates both “critical curiosity” which is kind of a transcendent state of contemplative consciousness combined with an almost overly sensitive reactionary energetic/emotional biological response Generate and experience various forms of consequential thinking relating to the experiment, in this case, various ages in which I could die and the historical consequences of this One of the core lessons here is not only my visceral reactions but the prudent focus that is required not only during the exercise but arguably even more importantly, before an after the exercise where the latter relates to teaching oneself to then install the consequences of the learning that followed from the depth of the lesson itself, which could include replaying either the same self-experimentation or variations for a testing of different results Change the way I view your own consciousness, more and more, I need to get into the realisation that I am a soul in an experiment called the human brain that affords me with incredibly expansive limits of consciousness that I’ve barely scratched any true comprehension to yet and that first and foremost, awaits my own diligence in implementing these basic understandings. To that end, a comparison of deeply experiencing my own death as actually occurring: (1) yesterday (2) today (3) tomorrow And then change 1, 2, 3 to 10 years, 50 years and 500 years from now respectively. For each of those, imagining the myriad of the ways in which I could have died and the various possible circumstances surrounding it. Moreover, for the reader, what do your own choices for these timelines reveal about yourself. For example, let’s say I wanted to imagine myself dying on the top of Mt. Everest. Why did I choose this, because it bolsters my ego or maybe I’m interested in how other people will remember me? Or was it truly, because of the personal challenge outside of ego and I saw it as a way to connect as deeply as possible to nature embracing whether I was going to die or not and accepting with humility, the possible success if I did survive, to have a story for myself to learn from rather than just a story to tell outside of genuinely benefitting others. Wim Hof for example paired his climbing adventures with the releasing of a technique that made sharing his adventurous climbing stories much more impactful for people. In direct response to your question, I honestly feel like I’m going to figure out how to reach a level of agency that I’ll be able to reverse aging, so I don’t think that’s going to be my cause of death, not to mention with this timeline eventually intersecting with tech adaptations here anyway. More practically, for me it’s like what age do we want to live? I honestly feel like on the one hand life is beautiful and I want bliss and happiness for everyone, on the other hand I think its logical to question ourselves as a species and wonder what it is we’re actually doing alive together existentially rather than just aimlessly living out our lives, even though, there really isn’t an intelligent intervention here other than one that does involve an advancement upon our intelligence. However either way, its still the grandiosity of humanity that we’re saying should win out, and I’m saying then even if we do become a super intelligent species, what is the relevance to said super-intelligence universally speaking? I don’t think it equals being greater than the simple joy of living as justification, at least I’m not smart enough to have a better answer yet, but because of said answer, I also don’t yet then know what the justification for our species is then if we’re going to always at odds with other species. All in all, there is a window of possibility that our coexistence naturally only begins to harmonise the more our intelligence also naturally intersects with a greater spiritual universal intelligence, as it will, providing that it is first made done with the best positive example set for others to follow. We wouldn’t for example, want Vladimir Putin to be given free use of the Limitless pill, as the film showed, that’s when peoples unique alter-egos come alive if they’re not taught to use their intelligence to also grow their spiritual intelligence. Lastly, let’s say 500 years if I’m purely speaking from the perspective of when I think my responsibilities would have been properly served. Practically speaking however, given how imbalanced our spiritual intelligence is at this point in our human development, it’s possible I don’t at all see my first 100 years due to this reason. Not that I’m say more special than anyone else necessarily to not die from some arbitrary reason like, being attacked by Grass Fed Zombies in my sleep. To sum my intersectional point here, if my own simulations don’t equal empathic-self-remodelling that translates over into a healthy existential motivation for life seamlessly, given my other knowledge on this subject, I’m doing something wrong that I need to train better on as I know what I’m saying is accurate given my recent ‘wannabe acting’ experiences I’ve publicly shared on this forum.

I'm a bit bored of Chad. Had early morning laughs but. On that note. Chad writes. So he must share. I've learned so much from Chad but that's actually been again, like previous, very interesting, for example Chad isn't all bad there's definitely some characteristics there that via the empathy from that self-mirroring, is an exercise in positive reformation, however subtle. What that means is, by taking on Chad's thoughts or any extremism for that matter as previously noted regarding the benefit of implied contrast biases, its like comparing red with black rather than red with a slightly lighter red, the extreme difference generates insight that would otherwise be impossible. Because I'm too stupid otherwise, I'm not intelligent enough to notice the differences if I just to a slight variation of myself in order to draw deeper self understanding, another analogy is that if we characterised for a moment consciousness as having a gravity to it aka so let's call it "Gravity Consciousness" then for this moment, we would need a force that was great enough to escape it, aka the more extreme the better at least up until there's either diminishing returns or the returns start to become negative. This is what I eluded to in my first journal entry, I may seem unafraid, however I genuinely am still scared of certain aspects of my psyche, anyone who's not scared of certain playing fields of their own psyche hasn't yet fully explored their own consciousness rationally enough, and that's okay, everyone has the opportunity to do so in their own time if they want in this brief life. Like I say in my last comment here, its why its good to be a cockroach right, peeps thinking they're all that, its why we're in so much trouble in humanity, a proper ontology if I go to my second last comment here hasn't been built yet on the ego, something I haven't done yet and ideally, hey that's what Chad should get to at least within the first few drafts of "The Meta-Transcendence of Consciousness". Saw a mother chook feeding its younger chicklings a piece of fruit this morning, was the coolest most adorable thing ever. Anyhow, my intellectualisations on Chad will come some other time, gotta head out to the nightclub again. And by the way regarding my answers below, I may as well bring consistency and rigour to them from now on in light of the positive feedback loop I can generate with this section.

Questions are totally overrated though, just to level my comment with some humility. They're only relevant because I'm not a cockroach, not because I'm superior enough to ask them. Kickass life just being able to roam around without having to think. We have to exert so much effort to even like ourselves, cockroach just gets all that handed to em. Knuckle tap to cockroaches. It's not an insult to me, its a self-observation of my observation of monitoring the shifting value-hierarchy of another humans perceptual apparatus when they see the association between human and cockroach and they relationship they give it to the scale of bad vs good; though sometimes at least as I reflect on myself historically, I've definitely had in-group situational bias with respect to how I categorise the world. It's a part of our disgust sensitivity, which I self-monitor regarding my own automatism in this regard and its relationship to the biological underpinnings of morality in my nervous system outside of cultural conditionings/related, so there's an 'otherness' here that shares equivalence with our empathy while also grounding ourselves in positively reinforcing others to still seek a deeper objectivity in their comparisons to the rest of the evolutionary tree. Short version, 'Cockroaches are people too'. Even a simple sentiment like this points to so many different perceptual value-hierarchies that stretch over many varying demographics reflecting so many different variations of the same evolutionary algorithm trying to work overtime to aid the perceivers survival that it overdoes it. Another important question, how to think critically and become a more objective person where said objectivity overlaps with benefiting survival? Given the previous sentence reflective of when survivalism overcompensates when it's unable to sort its value hierarchy in a way where it sees objectivity as the highest value option in its algorithmic output.

@Julian gabriel How to improve one's intelligence? The most important question for a human to answer. The second most important, what is the ontology of being? And I only just thought of this, if anyone's been following previous words not that I'm attempting to tout my efforts as so far the most formal of my life though arguably it really just depends on one's perspective, this question is purely just an aspect to my developing work on transcendence. By this question, "ontology of being", to the level that we're unable to computationally categorise, interconnect and communicate with our experiences, God, given the level to which its memetically intertwined with the cycles of thought of the forum, is never even going to become a relevant thought we'll even have, at best it'll become an indoctrination, if we however have a truthful ontology on being that allows us to better organise our experiences through that triad, God becomes a misnomer, a misnomer that changes relative to one's graduation of a particular level in said hierarchy. For example, in my previous comment I made an observation on a dichotomy between 'cycles' and 'forces', afterwords I went on a walk and my brain started to continue to naturally rotate over in my subconscious on what I had shared in my comment where I then began to automatically associate that relationship with my engagement with everyday moment to moment experience. Aka, this thought exists 'at the end of a cycle' and the 'beginning to the force of a cycle' within a hierarchy of evolutionary development of what is possible within my biology up to this point in my development so far. 'Cycles' and 'Forces' are analogous to the kinds of categories one can think of as it concerns brainstorming on what said ontology would be, even if its just a part of a secondary and tertiary ontology that supports a deeper primary ontology you've developed, for example, both ideas would be considered as either secondary or tertiary to simply something that went to a deeper level of metaphysics. Lastly, said ontology paints the picture for the various categories of intelligence that one should develop as an answer to the first question, with particular emphasis on heart intelligence to juxtapose others automatic biases they may have towards me merely thinking intelligence equals the cognitive, preliminary resources of which again as previously shared, can be found at heartmath.com.

@Javfly33 My intuition is that you're attempting to create a world that makes sense logically from a personal safety standpoint in relation to women or a single woman even rather than only relying on understanding that helps you understand the dynamics of where there's connection versus staying away from the patterns that altogether don't facilitate what is good for the both of you in this regard. By intellectualising to the point of generality, you're overcomplicating it and forgetting that 'relationship' is just steering the ship on what helps you relate to another human being. Just because both sexes have now been a part of societies thought experiment on what would happen if we warped the ego development of many demographics, it doesn't mean that the statements that can be said about the patterns of those outcomes are now reflective of sexes in general, rather symptomatic of an environmental sickness that is continuing to spread, across new viral cultural mutations. In other words, you need to become seriously clinically self-honest about all the potential false ideas you have about both sexes, but not to berate yourself, rather to then be totally clinical about those potential relationship partners that are going to be aligned for something that is not only long term but genuinely reflective of what a truly good relationship can be come like. View your own perception of the opposite sex or even just someone you may like from the viewpoint of a scientist researching todays modern sociological patterns for greater objectivity to disentangle yourself from any potential ego backlashes you may have from this process. 90% of your work here is not going to be in analysing the opposite sex but in just examining yourself with a greater level of depth and self-honesty. Apply responsibility always to the inside, don't give your power away by blaming an entire sex when 99.99% of both men and women had no idea they were going to be born into society with a bunsen burner underneath a flask to see how different cultural mutations infect one another.

@Leo Gura Understood. But let it be fully behind us now. It only holds us both back from ourselves otherwise. You have my full positive regard for your work and progress.

@Leo Gura My brain is associational. Others brains are as well. It's other peoples choice if they want to prompt me for more or not. You can choose to do as you wish, I won't mind. I act based on integrity. And you can choose to act on yours, which in this case, includes threats that I thought we were past. I've answered honestly. If I have any request, it is to move forward based on mutual respect. If you choose not to, that is your choice but I thought we were past that.

Strategic-distance-socialise-more.

Directionality-over-positionality.

Origins-does-not=causality-it=circumstance.

Sociology.

heartmath.com

Pseudo-educational-futurism.

Self-referentiality.

Relationality.

Chad Parody (intellectual cultural analysis will follow after I'm back from the gym.) Yo, what’s good? It’s Chad. You checkout my video, right? Good, then we're both on the same page. Sorry, didn’t meant to startle you there. Take a moment to collect yourself after all this radiance, it’s a rainbow wolf breeze. And yeah, I drive em. And my bod. Yeah, its me. I must have shocked you with this god-like glow. I know, it’s a lot to take in — I’ll give you a sec. Anyhow, you probably know me. So, I get it — you’re probably thinking, ‘Wow, Chad, is this your worst photo?’ And yeah, it totally is. But even at my worst, I somehow turn it into a movement. #ChadVibes. You're welcome. Every one of my looks as a unique name like stars in the sky. All orbiting me continuously, go figure. Listen, if you haven’t hit up my Insta yet… well, consider this your wake-up call. Go ahead, smash that follow - it’s not gonna break your thumb. I’ve got more body shots there than a Spring Break in Cancun with Kanye. No big deal. Yeah, we know each other. Oh, wait a sec, getting a notification… yup, another snap. Gotta take this. “Hey Jane, yeah, last night was epic. But you know, duty calls. Gotta inspire the masses. Friday? Rachel’s in too? Sweet, I’ll pencil you in between my morning workout and my midday flex. Catch babe.” Anyway, where was I? Ah, yes, back to me. So, back to you — and by you, I mean me. See, I'm basically the prototype for what you could achieve if you just believe in yourself…and also have an absurdly high credit limit. You want my life. Don't fight it. Twitter? Exploding. YouTube? Algorithm loves me, trending harder than a cat video in 2012. Women? Let’s just say, I’m not here to disappoint. You want to be this. Admit it. We’ll both feel better. Plastic surgery? Yeah, I've dabbled. But don’t hate the player, hate the game. These are the times we live in, man. My hair? Fresh from the lab. My eyes? Special order, limited edition color contacts.. My lips? Pfft, these lips got their own agent. But trust me, all of this is a tax write-off. After-all, it’s an investment… in global admiration. You think I got here by accident? Nah. It’s all about strategic selfies, knowing which lighting brings out my 'mysterious-but-approachable' side, and never, ever skipping leg day… because, you know, balance. I’ve mastered the art of being. The universe? It’s basically on speed dial with me. I’ve cracked the code on this whole existence thing. It’s all about knowing the right people and playing your cards right. People say, ‘Chad, you can’t just coast through life on good looks and a smirk.’ But guess what? Here I am, coasting. And it’s glorious. Those people who say, “Oh, you can’t make it, it’s too tough”— they don’t get it. They don’t have the Chad mindset. Stick with me, and you might just learn something. If not, at least you’ll get a great selfie out of it. I can show you the way... if you can handle it. And just remember what Jeff Bezos said who’s my good friend now, 'I knew that if I failed I wouldn't regret that, but I knew the one thing I might regret is not trying’. So hit the link below like Babe Ruth, and for only $1000 I can be your personal mentor. (intellectual cultural analysis will follow after I'm back from the gym.) Some Critical Thinking Questions... Just before you hit the 'Buy Now' button. Obviously. 1. How does this parody reflect society’s obsession with social media and validation? Think about the way "Chad" talks about followers, likes, and his constant need for online attention. What does this reveal about how social media shapes identity and self-worth today? 2. What role does consumerism play in "Chad's" identity? Analyze Chad's references to plastic surgery, high credit limits, and cosmetic enhancements. How does this reflect a consumer culture that equates self-worth with purchasing power and appearance? 3. How does the parody use humor to critique the concept of self-improvement culture? Consider Chad's offer to be a "personal mentor" for $1000 and his use of buzzwords and self-help jargon. How does this mock the commodification of self-help and personal development industries? 4. What is the significance of Chad's references to famous personalities like Kanye West and Jeff Bezos? Reflect on why the parody includes these figures and what they symbolize in a cultural context. How does associating with these individuals reinforce or undermine Chad's credibility and persona? 5. How does the parody expose contradictions in the ideals of masculinity and success? Think about how Chad embodies both a stereotypical alpha male and a deeply insecure individual reliant on external validation. How does this duality challenge traditional notions of masculinity and what it means to be "successful"? 6. In what ways does this parody critique the idea of "authenticity" in the digital age? Examine how Chad's persona is constructed through artificial enhancements, curated content, and self-promotion. What does this say about the concept of authenticity in an era dominated by social media influencers?

No jokes in this one, just a very quick journal after a bit of clubbing tonight following from the parody above ------ like I said, I did it to promote creativity and it did heh: Experiencing the multiplicity of worlds as I move between the shadows of dancers in the entropic field of night clubs I become entranced by the extra-dimensionality of empathy of consciousness and how it dissolves my own sense of self. Parodic work like the above has now painted the importance of generating stark realities so that one's subconscious becomes hypnotised enough that this preoccupation brings about a hypervigilance that highlights their own related inclinations, in this case as it pertains to their potential alter-ego. It's made me realise how under highlighted the negative formations of ego actually are in society and how overweight we consequently are at large, we've allowed corresponding negative-ego-formations to become so normalised that its actu uspicion or socially accepted mask that their audience is tacitly trained to reinforce. It's become as normal as being overweight is in some parts of the United States or as normal as being underweight and malnourished in parts of South Africa. In The case of our consciousness, we are both simultaneously malnourished, underweight and overweight, experiencing all the variants of the physical undesirable as it can be applied to the path of the degenerative development of consciousness. With enough intelligence and awareness, this reality becomes all too obvious, and thus when we have not only cultural norms formed from primitive tribal in-group biases at the bottom up level but also at the top down level from government and organisation to the actual laws and policies that are put into place, how can this at all be confused as anything other than the purposeful dumbing down of society when our susceptibility to not even negative ego, as perhaps on some level we shouldn't even call it that, but rather when our susceptibilities towards degenerative consciousness are leveraged to that end as we read the fine prints of the labels of those laws and policies by observing their effects? There are hundreds of people surrounding me, I do this nearly every night and still I haven't fully uncovered the deeper knowledge behind this reality. Even though with every person's life I enter by transmitting my consciousness into their primary observation I see the life that makes their consciousness that adds to helping me solving this puzzle, how is my own experience of this ability totally destroyed by me not even being aware of how someone else is doing the exact same thing about me to a far deeper and more sophisticated end? My own experience, intractably separate from literally every single surrounding persons inner life of what we are mutually interpreting and this becomes a frustrating unsolvable computational problem that reveals my own limitations in experiencing the life around me, hyper-aware of my own lack of hyper-awareness, that it becomes strange that we would then even be possible that we'd be able to come together and create a dancing space together, or another way of looking at it of course being that the space of interaction we mutually create is generated due to our limitations and that for every scale of consciousness that we grew, if you imagine someones scale of consciousness as being represented analogous to the size of someone's aura, I wonder that the loud music would become quieter and quieter and we would all become internally louder and louder in our connection together where the music perhaps grew into our telepathic connection. That then, in this moment I am making the connection that because we cannot make this overlapping internal interconnection loud, for every decibel we miss there, we require loud music to compensate to create the harmonic artificial sensation of a telepathic connection even if its not created in reality, perhaps its what's artificially induced as being satisfied and thus why said environments are those where hook-up culture originated from. If we compare standard nightclubs to other demographics that create similar outcomes, the underlying qualities are rhythmic harmonic environments that establish mutual harmonised oscillations of consciousness. These environments create an 'alter-ego' by which people can simultaneously let go of their ego and or have the permission to highlight a pre-existing one, it is the stage by which normalised day to day behaviours can be momentarily put on hold to partake in the ritualistic dance of connection. We're a sea of dancing ego's, all pretending that ours is the face of who we're being asked to show, bringing our ignorance to the forefront of what we must use to trade our sense of selves with so that our happiness is that which is achieved via our joint social mirroring. We want collectivism with a flare of individuality, that is our implicit social alter-ego we've created, we're all allowed to have our own individual alter-ego however if it goes against this collective alter-ego, it is the hidden enemy. Everyone is the same on the dance floor while everyone is uniquely experiencing the individuality of their self-expression, whoever can align with their synchronisation of greatest energetic phenomenological depth... wins. Exploring the qualities of dimensionality that create this social truth helps me realise the illusion of the negative forms of ego that hold me back. These qualities are: Scope: The scope of ego in the context of awareness, as ego by definition has no scope in the context of awareness otherwise it wouldn't be ego it would be awareness. Moreover, scope by itself is sufficient enough, as negative ego is just negative ego because it misinterprets itself as the self therefore has no scope to itself because its just itself to itself. So, I simply add genuine scope to break through to the other side of the illusion of negative ego. Negative ego is just that ego that is anti-reality, because positive ego is purely that which attempts to align one with reality. Therefore positive ego here is actually making the conscious choice to add in qualities to one's agency like focusing on scope as an example. Multiplicity of Perspective: Similar to scope, however to make it distinct refer to scope as representing more on individuality and multiplicity of perspective more related to collectivism, where "Scope of Individuality" continually redefines "Perspectivism of Collectivism" and vice versa, this creates evolving integrative awareness. Here, multiplicity of perspective is that of imagining those many varied perspectives of all simultaneously, and using the deep phenomenological experience of those alternative interpretations of others to deeply redefine one's own. Empathy as Extra-Dimensional: Purely deepen and widen empathy from the perspective of scope and multiplicity when it comes to harbouring the different dimensions of another, and in their unique recombinations. Experiencing how the world around me is both say to return to my earlier coined terms along the "axis of integration" vs "axis of disintegration" allows me continuous feedback for redirecting my own path in this regard. Parodic and Stark Realities of the dance floor creates awareness of the greater spectrum of others experience: I'm hardly aware of the extreme realities being experienced by others more than I am the general feel of the place and being preoccupied with my own experience and my connection with those immediately around me and this lack of greater imagination, it limits me in unique ways I'm no aware of, I don't stop to think about the extreme reality of another whatever extreme reality they may be inhabiting that I could learn from whether on any variant of positive/negative. And even if I know it, I don't truly know it, it's usually always under-theorised. There's a deepening I'm missing and by over-representing extreme contrasts like I did with the parody, it teaches the subconscious to translate more seamlessly between environmental plasticity and integrative consciousness. The Fluidity and Limitation of Social Masks revealing the lack of Awareness that is truly present in most people, usually, surprisingly at all times: This is a massive realisation that echoes with my earlier sentiments on free will versus determinism purely just being a debate between awareness and lack of awareness. From one to point five now here, this is a conversation that super-imposes one's responsibility towards making their own path towards greater awareness and too, leveraging one's understanding of the simplistic judgements people make about their environment, including one's own inclinations here, as an energetic buffering point to stimulate awareness to push itself to go to the next level. 'Alter ego' is simultaneously that which most people want to be but will struggle to admit even to themselves and therefore it will act on them in hidden ways, and even if they're aware of it, only some are able to make it transmutational whereby they're aware enough that they can dissolve its essence to reform it into a new one. Hold a mirror up to someone their alter ego and either they will shroud away in jealousy or some other insecurity, admire with a sense of pride or perhaps be totally ignorant enough that they will deny that its even (partly) theirs. By differentiating between how it gets created socially and is represented socially on an x and y axis of individuality and collectivism while optimising insight across qualities that tap into deeper dimensionality that enhances awareness across their manifestations, consciousness can use the language it creates around identity on the intersection between the social self and the personal self as a leverage point for its, going back to the way I used the term in a refurbished way a few posts ago now today, self-revolution. "Self-revolution" now though, having a totally different feel to it following that video I created, now having me question the automatic feelings that may or may not follow from the thought of self-revolution, helping me approach personal growth with a greater sense of immortality rather than say through an unbreakable accomplishment of power over the universe but rather instead, just a calm sense of humble levity where you're just chill no matter what. Where "scope", "multiplicity of perspective", "empathy as extra-dimensional", etc, etc expand so much at such an automatic and now natural level, that negational ego can only choose to fully dissolve, and you're deterministically wired for free-will actualisation as and for god along the positive spectrum of "self-evolution" rather than falling for the illusions society wants to program you with into getting totally over-hyped about the smallest increase in "self-evolution", something that's never realised if you never get the right contrast bias to self-question the automatic feelings that can sometimes come with personal growth, like the false pride that can go undetectable in our experience because of how much its socially reinforced in the subtlest ways without us even realising. On those 4 points above by the way, I've just totally taken for granted that someone's going to be energetically aligned in order to make best use of leveraging the cognitive as opposed to the intellectual there being a compensatory mechanism where instead you'd be better off learning some techniques to instead become more connected to a certain aspect of your nervous system, as per the site I previously mentioned: heartmath.com

Ultimate Form (Transcendence) I've decided to go for it and get the first draft done by the end of this weekend. On that note, I thought I'd do a bit of a parody as above. I'm actually going to turn it into a good song and that's the sneak peak, I've already got the vision for it now with so far decent lyrics let's see by the end of the weekend whether it lives up to the hopes which I'm sure it will. The rest of the parody that'll actually be turned into a pretty damn good rap, will be released along with the first draft this Sunday, Vietnam time on "Ontological Mapping of the Meta-Transcendence of Consciousness." Firstly, its a backing track not my music so it'll just stay as 'Unlisted' of course, after-all it's all just for entertainment to deepen the creative connections. To get thinking in new ways for greater theoretical depths. I have for example, a lot of differentiated thoughts on negative vs positive ego that are going to be compressed within the mapping. First Draft: Ontological Mapping of the Meta-Transcendence of Consciousness. Rise for the challenge. Released this Sunday, Vietnam time.

The Law of Warren Buffett Dividends And if you're wondering why the change in 5%, its because now there's a +/- 5% on whether I'll be able to release the first draft this weekend rather than waiting till the weekend next. ~ Man this is going to be a badass ontological map ~ And its not that I've beat anyone to the punch with anything I'm working on here, its not like that, we're all working together in learning and evolving from one another. As I stipulated above even though I've been working with meta-language structures from a number of domains of thought around consciousness for a while now it was Leo that got me to pull out a pen and paper here to give me the insight to start remapping on a blank sheet of neural paper. As I talk about regarding the thinning of consciousness, more and more the ego reaches a level of flexibility that as I refer back to what I coined earlier pertaining to the "Axis of Integration", more and more the Axis that make up that larger intersectional axis become more and more positive and consequently that's when we start to see the desirable incalculable exponential positive spiralling within that grand axis of consciousness that maps on top of reflecting what I am ideally going to mirror as much as possible in my first draft of this "Ontological Map on the Meta-Transcendence of Consciousness." Perhaps than an even better title than before? Too long? This Berkshire Hathaway meeting is now over, be sure to make sure you tweet the picture of me in my Lambo to share with everyone to help my social media following on how to get rich by making me money through said virality. Tweet it. Rock it. ~ Drive it ~ See you on insta flashin my abs of charcoal steel.

EDIT TO ABOVE LINK that goes to bouncer telling us not to step on his gold chain given by the aliens------- www......youtube.com/watch?v=hNUHIhz2y6Q Was meant to instead be (as I already mentioned the bouncer earlier) Michio Kaku respectfully giving his endorsement to Luis Elizondo: We'll let the two have the spotlight here anyway so its better I made the mistake in the above quoted text. UPCOMING: Previous post explains the reconceptualisation of trajectory for this journal as beginning with two or so wks from now: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The Meta-Transcendence of Consciousness (a first draft on its ontological theory. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Only losers delete posts by the way, its good for the future readers efficiency but not good for the preservation of my own awareness on actual prior states of being as an evolutionary point. As I noted earlier about the importance of preserving truth over falsity in our recordings, interpretations and understandings of past events in the digital world we live in now so that the most accurate, honest and truthful forms of learning for consciousness and its trajectory towards its highest transcendence are given the highest probability of being achieved. But... Only idiots reveal too much. And that's me, so I gotta slap my own wrist there haha. Moving Forward. Ode to Joy. From this point moving forward this journal will be dedicated to two core assignments, the mapping of ideas important to me because I enjoy sharing and helping others in this indirect sense in however small of a way, and two, the free styling of consciousness as I just get such a laugh out of that haha we’ll just see how that changes over time, temporal self-analysis, etc right on how my reticular-activation-system attentional markers evolve with every new learning on life spanning over several months to years.. This week, I am going to be sharing my first map of actualisation from my perspective for where I am in my development, make of it what you will as per previous sentiments in this regard, you are your own doorway for your own enlightenment, something that will be an indirect learning point from my journals as I charter theoretical maps that facilitate this realisation. Two points before I begin, even though I was already highly interested in meta-actualisation and, taking in Leo’s recent videos and his future prospecting there on meta-rationality has certainly obviously had an impact on me concerning my now prioritisation of this direction, and therefore on that note, Leo has my genuine positive regard here. My second point is that I’ve realised in my core there’s very little I can do to actually self-actualise outside of moving up the Developmental Hierarchy of Awareness (DHA). This both includes and excludes ego development where the latter here is really all that exists in personal development outside of the awareness development track relative to our present cultural positioning. If things go well and I'll be devoting as much of my resources that I can towards the future of humanity to help our growth here, words like "meta-consciousness" will become so obsolete that people will wonder why someone is even using the spoken language to even say "meta-consciousness" as it would reflect a level therein achieved that perhaps just becomes a sentimental pastime on respecting the sacredness of our past. Kind of like my journal right reflecting the sacredness of my past, so many glamorous points I've made poignant points that others quote me on for the ages to win arguments in The Supreme Court of your respective country, like "Don't tell your mom her milk is bad", is that what I said, really? I can't remember, now I have to get that out of my reticular activation system so I'm a more respectable man for the ladies in the future haha. Regardless, its a polite point to make and maybe there's a context for that I'm sure there is, we should listen to our egoic reactions and recontextualise them in the context of the map that I'm about to reintroduce as reflective of my first assignment point for this journal. Just remember, one reliable measure of an aspect of maturity is not to have a stick up one's ass so tightly that their social perception becomes so skewed that they suddenly for that moment until their insecurities return to their ego become the arbiter of truth on what's acceptable to say and what's unacceptable to say irrespective of one's cultural background and time in history. Maybe in the next few weeks to months I might be able to also do a map of maturity from an energetic perspective, something that'll be underpinned by this map on Transcendence I'm creating. The reason for my sole ethos now bound by DHA is because as one moves up beyond mainstream views on ego from the decreasingly negative forms of ego to the increasingly more healthy forms, there’s a natural thinning of consciousness which results that you’re all familiar with and that many of you are seeking along your own personal psychedelic tracks, some of which has been successful for you and for others, its been merely a 5 minute illusion, along with every other experience underneath the sun. Conversely to aid understanding, if we imagine the thickening of consciousness we can also much more fluidly pair that with its increasing inflexibility, to quote myself beyond the boobs moving back to my earlier point which the reader can search "Rigid Linear Conventional Consciousness Stanzas versus Flexible Dynamic Creative Consciousness Stanzas". I will leave it there to spare the redundancy in light of earlier mappings that have already primed the readers consciousness in the right direction anyway. For myself very briefly concerning psychedelics, I have chosen the long term route where I’ve decided to dedicate myself fully to consciousness actualisation via my mastery of the nervous system, and very simply, once I surpass this it is my truth that not only will I then be truly ready to explore psychedelics, I would have of course, plenty of experience then concerning the mapping, theorising and further development of my consciousness experiences using psychedelics as an instrument of scientific consciousness self-experimentation. Concerning Leo's track on psychedelics, I have absolutely no point to make there other than to respect the man's privacy and simply state that I'm personally simply not ready and its not of anyone's business really when any one of us is or isn't ready and we should respect one another's boundaries in this and every other chosen path so there's the greatest facilitation in mutual learning of one another's wisdom in the best way we're capable of relative to where we are in our unique development. What is actualisation at its core to me now ? One simple word. Transcendence. (regarding the film by the way, its a plus or minus 25% on the must see list of films Am I drunk or not? Do I have a stick up my ass or not? Am I smoking a cigar or not? Am I having psychedelics for the first time or not? All four of these questions and more are relevant in deciding whether its going to be a plus or minus 25% on the must see list of films) By the end of the week, at the very least my goal is to have built the first draft of the first phase of an ontological map of actualisation on Transcendence relative to where I am in my personal development. For the record, my previous note on "dream to love, love to dream" as an appendage to this journal will be now encompassed by this endeavour towards "phases of transcendence" from low to increasingly higher, understanding that said sentiment ("dream to love, love to dream") is only reflective of a certain level within a comparably infinite consciousness transcendence hierarchy. Transcendence is the perfect steorm (storm + term -- haha) for me to describe the transition between awareness of actual state A towards the awareness of potential positive state B and the movements involved between awareness and agency in the cycles of consciousness needed to move to its next transitionary state that can be labelled as self-revolutionary. Very briefly, I want the reader to entertain the thought of redesigning their perception of the word self-revolutionary to include a mutual pairing of both negational and positivistic states, and therefore, something is only self-revolutionary if it is reflective of the true self otherwise the self cannot be used in this sense and two, revolutionary, where there is a reaching deeper towards the self and therefore also positivistic towards the higher light and negational towards the revolution against forces that negate that positive actualisation. I'm sensing so many overlaps with other words here that I don't want to get into yet however my lack of conceptualisation is revealing to me the more sophisticated design I have to achieve by the end of the week for a fuller review. The definition of transcendence in the context of awareness is meta-consciousness. Meta-consciousness is the meta’s of all functional meta’s, meta-language is the meta’s of all structural meta’s and meta-rationality, is the meta’s of all intersectional meta’s that plays the role of being the bridge between these two meta’s. Meta-rationality is the cross-section between action and positionality, the combined effort of meta-awareness and meta-knowledge or rather, knowledge of what was uncovered within meta-awareness. So when we speak of meta-consciousness, we’re saying something that is descriptive of both our highest knowledge point in the context of meta-rationality and our highest universal-awareness point in the context of meta-awareness, starting with self-awareness, at a certain position in time, however many dimensions there that exists in one's definition of time, don't believe the bullshitters that say that time is an illusion, they're just referring to 3D notions, but let's avoid that tangent. What we’re doing here is working with different levels and structures of encompassment of "meta's" in the context of consciousness as our sentience is best able to understand them relative to the present power thresholds of ability its able to surpass. If we for example, make a slight detour to Michio Kaku's book "Future of the Mind" that's coming to me as I type this comment [==========hey by the way ((((——BROKEN LINK —— https://w....w....w.....youtube.com/watch?v=hNUHIhz2y6Q )))) Kaku here endorsing Luis Elizondo whom wrote "Imminent: Inside the Pentagon's Hunt for UFOs" saying that he did a public service by writing his book and coming out of the closet being gay/God with aliens, "I wonder how's their milk right? Am I right or am I still writing? I'm still writing!"==========], let's briefly focus on his personal postulation of levels of consciousness from "Level 0 - Basic Consciousness (Reactivity) to Level 4 - Advanced Consciousness (Potential Future AI or Transcendence)" in being able to generate an analogous hierarchy that we would build if we were to accurately contextualise precisely what I mean by "Power Thresholds", in this case to join the three, "Levels of Power Thresholds across the Meta-Consciousness Hierarchy". By the end of this week I'll have created my first theoretical ontology on Transcendence in this regard achieving my stated micro-cultural reconceptualisation from both the described structural, aka comparably meta-rationality, and functional, aka comparably meta-awareness or meta-cognitive. Concerning the latter at the very least, by the time I finish my first draft I will indeed create further distinctions i.e. between meta-awareness and meta-cognitive, two distinctions coming immediately to mind for example being that the meta-cognitive is generally more temporal and control orientated whereas meta-awareness is generally more present and observationally orientated, both however, have unique ties to our experience of them in the phenomenological sense. Finally, as an echo of previous sentiments relating to Alignment, now its going to be reconceptualised via the meta-perspective of understanding levels of Transcendence towards higher and higher levels of absolute truth within being, which makes perfect "Michio Elizondo" sense right, hey maybe Michio was also working with (or is) the aliens and that's why he's so smart when it comes to strategically providing his endorsement on aliens as he has over the years from being the subtlest Luis Spy to the increasingly more abrasively drunk sailor like myself, oh man imagine Michio acting like me in an interview with Ross Coulhart I think both of them would simultaneously lose all credibility because I think the ability for the general public to contextualise the reality of humans working with aliens in the 1900's is likely equally as difficult as people maintaining their respect for Michio if he acted as loosely as I did here haha. And I literally just realised the simultaneous link between "Alignment, Absolute Truth and Transcendence" just now by the way, I had to come up with an ending to this entry to appear more orderly, as in, when I've shot a child out of my first (and only?) wife (honey if you're reading this in the future yes this was my past self before you kissed the more transcended version of me with a self-created variant of the neuralink that's a biological evolution rather than just a tech app for the alien government to keep track of me), I'll have a Hierarchy of Transcendence for him to align with for HIS UNIQUE stage of biological development in all ways as we've literally ALREADY attempted to do in our theorisation of parenting tutelage trajectories thus far in humanities development so the relationships I've tied together here are ALREADY FUTURE PROOFED I'm just giving it a more compressed language that spans many more interdisciplinary hierarchies on actualisation that makes it easier for my mind to create deeper, stronger and more aligned developments on as it concerns our relationship to ensuring the highest possible pairing between "SENTIENCE", sentiences experience of "ABSOLUTE TRUTH" and therefore, its NATURALISED PATH towards Transcendence, which explains exactly the purpose for building this meta-ontology on what all in all becomes theory on the Meta-Transcendence of Consciousness. Hey maybe that's what I should call it? I feel this goes back to what I said about the plus or minus 20% haha but this time on a must-name rather than a must-watch, unless we're returning back to what I said about adding a few extra dimensions than merely just three to our perception on time as opposed to crudely restricting it to a 3D psyop in the same way we can speak of the now undeniable psyop that's occurred with respect to potential extraterrestrials, or just to be scientific, the UFO/UAP subject given their isn't future proof yet on them causative to extraterrestrials, unless we're talking about the possibility that its us in the 'flying saucers' from the future which simultaneously ties in with Jack Sarfatti experiences; a cool physicist who's created some awesome stuff I gotta study. We'll go the plus 20%. Moving extra forward. Introducing... The Meta-Transcendence of Consciousness (a first draft on its ontological theory. 1st share: two wk's from now, as I got too much shit to do) [ Create your own luck! Maintain your appreciation and strengthen your life gratitude with it! ]