Mellowmarsh

Imagine if bulls could talk, they might share embarrassing, confidential, or unwanted information about their owners. If we could read each other’s minds, we’d all be dead. Lucky there’s only one mind.

I strongly disagree.

Yes, it’s been realised many times over in his videos. Leo is already aware of this BS and already knows that two sages have nothing to say to each other as there’s no one there in the other to bounce off.

Firstly, you would need to prove that someone else exists as another completely detached and separate from you.

Deep sleep and death are the same nothingness. Awakening or waking up from the nothingness means you never actually die or sleep, because you are able to always awaken from the nothingness. You can know you are awake. But you cannot know you are asleep or dead. You can only awaken from death and sleep in awake conscious state, upon awakening. You can only be aware of being aware. As Awareness you can’t disappear in sleep or death, if you could you wouldn’t be able to wake up from sleep or death. You wake up because awareness can’t die or sleep or disappear. Awareness is always here and never not here. Awareness can never know its not here, it can only know its here. And here it is, it’s you.

When you say.. “ what is real is what you are “…that’s still presupposing an idea of how reality is. It’s still a presuppositional claim, which is the very “thought” that you are trying to negate when you said..” if you don’t think about it it’s irrelevant “ The problem with saying “dont think about it” is it’s nonsensical because that’s still an instruction of how to do something. Saying “don’t think about it” is still doing something, where there’s a thinking about not thinking. There is still a claim being made there of how reality is. So your argument for what’s true or not is going nowhere, you’re like a tar baby trying to stack post-it notes to the moon. Solipsism means oneness. Nobody is saying how oneness is because how does one thing exist? How does a body tell itself it exists. The how never arises for the body, because the body functions alone. There’s no one driving the engine. That’s solipsism in a nutshell. So who is no one? That’s the one question to all our answers. It’s still an idea, and what’s an idea? I’ve absolutely no idea.

@Nemra LoL 😂

Yes, the screen is being looked upon there as an imprint upon the screen of consciousness here. You are the projector, the projection, and the screen, all in one. One is quite an impressionist, yah!

Well said. The physical eye is likened to a camera. The visual field can only capture the image of the camera, not the visual field. The image of the camera is not in the camera, the image of the camera is in the imageless visual field which is one without a second.

That’s all that’s happening anyway. If it wasn’t it’d be game over. It’s a two player game that no one ever wins or loses.

I couldn’t not say neither that don’t exist either. While solipsism is a modern philosophical term (derived from Latin solus "alone" and ipse "self") meaning that only one's own mind is sure to exist.

Solipsism isn’t actually an ism. It’s the placeholder for all isms. It’s the unconditional unmanifest potential placeholder for all conditions to become manifest systems. At best an ism is a description not the prescription. In the same context a menu is not the food.

Concepts are known by the mind. The mind is never seen or known by the concept, as a concept has no mind of its own. The concept known mentally as a “person” is a concept of the mind. No “person” or “ concept “ known to the mind is ever minding the mind, because concepts have no mind. The only certainty is your own mind, there’s a problem with other minds for you because you are never outside your own mind to be able to tell yourself other minds exist.

Rodents don’t have a life.

Agree. What’s remarkable about God is that being all one there’s nothing to attach to that is not the one. It would be like trying to split reality into two halves. It’s absurd.