Mellowmarsh

Love is Good. Good is Love. = Truth.

I would imagine truth knows without knowing, that goes without saying. Animals instinctively know what’s good for them that will ensure their survival. Nature has programmed this knowing into them. No language is required for an animal to know what’s good for them, it’s just automatic programming in process. If Love wasn’t running through every programmed animal including the human animal, then would there even be a will to live anymore. It seems there is a will to live because of the power of Love which is the main driving force of life. Thats how I personally intuit love.

No one or thing can try not to be now, or try to be out of the now. Have you ever tried to be not now, or out of the now?

Yes really, it’s a viral thing. Virality spreads rapidly throughout the public consciousness like a virus.

It’s my story, no need to be judgemental.

I’m not really sure I understand what you mean. Because how can we not be our authentic selves, it’s not a practice, I don’t think anyone practices how to be, they’re just being what they’re being, as far as I understand being. If someone tells me they visit wormholes in their trips, or dreams, then I’m not going to disbelieve them, if they say they have then they probably have.

You already are both the artist and the art.

But isn’t the intuition just the unconscious made conscious. It’s the unconscious that’s running the show here, the noumenal made phenomenal.

I think it’s all about understanding yourself and not caring about whether you are understood by others. Only you are you, and you cannot be another you, nor can another you be you. However, it’s important to know that any you can only see a reality from the lens of it’s own perception, from the perspective of how it is being revealed to them, and how could they possibly be wrong if what they are perceiving is appearing within them. Is that for anyone else to judge or doubt it’s actual validity? Not really…eh. No one else can disprove another person’s worldview. Any you can report to other you’s what they have seen on their mind trips by sharing their unique experiences with them. And why would anyone else invalidate their sharing of themself. We could either align with their point of view as something we have also experienced ourselves or just say wow that’s cool and not deny them their experience. Or tell them they are lying. I mean it’s no one else’s place but theirs anyway. The point is, I believe we’re all individually each our own little mini universes that are a unique never to be repeated reality, so how one person experiences their reality could never be any different than how it’s appearing to them, and nothing in their personal experience would be wrong. That’s how I look at this, anyway..

I understand everything James talks about too. If I don’t understand something someone talks about, I never hold back or pretend I do , I just outright tell them I don’t know what you are talking about.

I think people just take away from messages what is of value to them. I can see someone else’s point of view from where they are coming from, or I can’t. Same goes for Leo talks, so far I’ve been able to understand everything that guy talks about. Strangely enough.

Who cares about worthless money. Why do we listen to these voices anyway, for their worth and value of course. Everyone of course is born into a world that requires money to survive. One must find a way to make money somehow no matter how, it’s just a job that needs to be done, unless you are fortunate enough to be born to a billionaire parent. Gosh even wild animals have to agree to certain trade off deals with other species of wildlife in order to survive. Every survival instinct comes with a cost, mostly a high price, it’s not exactly free. But it’s the price we’re willing to pay for admission else we’d all go extinct. Personally, it’s not about the messenger anyway, it about what the listener takes away from the message that counts.

Maybe Ralston is right about that. Love to have a chance of any impact, meaning or significance would mean it would have to be absolute. Even facets of the absolute are absolute. Like the holographic idea.

Maybe you love hunger because the hunger signals you to eat, otherwise the body would die.

Wow, doesn’t surprise me.