Mellowmarsh

Abandon all hope, ye who enter here.

No one knows this. You are the knowing that cannot be known. ( Your self ) implies an object known. That which is Known, knows nothing. “ If the "Absolute" implies an all-encompassing unity, any attempt by a part to know the whole creates a separation. To know an object, a subject-object split is required, which contradicts the very nature of absolute oneness. This logic—often explored in Eastern philosophies like Advaita Vedanta or Western mysticism—suggests that you can only be the Absolute, not observe it objectively. The moment you try to conceptualize it, you turn it into a relative thought. “

Exactly!

No one knows this. You cannot know the absolute because you are it.

To be honest, most of what I’m reading from him just sounds like blah blah blah, but to him it’s obviously his way of putting this into words, so good for him. I don’t actually care. He’s the only one inside his mind, not others.

I have no problem with how you interpret the infinite absolute. That’s all on you according to your personal unique definition. However, how you interpret it there, is not how I here am personally interpreting it.

I’m not resisting anything. I’m just allowing anything to be as it is. My observation follows the motto, ( this too will pass)

Yes, that why I said you are the knowing that cannot be known. You are infinity in-finite, captured one freeze frame at a time infinitely unfolding eternally.

The mind that can stake a claim to know, can flip the knowledge over to its opposite and can stake a claim to not-know. These claims are artificial constructs within the dream of separation only , and do not exist beyond the language known. Whatever thoughts model reality to be, will not be it, because the known is simply a synthetically created representation, not what actually is. What actually is is unknowable. Knowledge is an artificial construct, a useful tool nonetheless for the character construct appearing within the dream of separation to navigate and make sense of the dreamscape known to it via its constructive conception. Albeit illusory. Infinity cannot be conceived of, it only appears to be conceived of via the mind, which is relative, yet even the mind is an illusion, because relative knowledge of the absolute is bordering on absurdity.

The absolute is all there is. The absolute knowing that cannot be known. You cannot know the absolute because you are the absolute. When you say “ they” say the absolute cannot be known, and that’s a lie. It’s not a lie, it’s actually true because the relative is a temporal appearance. The appearance of a character can never really know what lies beyond the veil of the known character as much as game characters in a video game can’t see the console on which they are being played.

What appears to can, never canned. That doesn’t negate the can, it’s simply seen as illusory. No one knows this. 😎

It’s never escaped my notice that you’ve always understood with absolute clarity, what is actually being pointed to. Kudos to you. 👊

I agree.

The physical eye structure acts like a camera lens recording incoming data that’s then archived to memory bank within the biological computer that is the brain. The brain is what is projecting the data as a living movie, but it’s just a synthetic simulation, it’s an imaged representation of an unknown imageless reality.