Mellowmarsh

All words are the play.

At the atomic level, atoms never actually make direct contact. When you feel a touch, you are actually experiencing electromagnetic repulsion between the electrons in your skin and the electrons in the other person. What you interpret as "touch" is actually a high-force interaction of force fields.

God is just another word for nothing. The mind cannot grasp nothing so will resist it and make it something. Without realising it’s simply making something out of nothing. No self, no cry.

Other people appear to have a face because they are your mirror. A face appears in the mirror, but this face is not out there, it’s an image appearing in you. Close your eyes and the image disappears, but you don’t disappear because you are imageless. You are imageless awareness, the external world is in you not out there.

And by the way, you have no face either, you are totally faceless. The image you believe is your face is an avatar, it’s a fake representation, it’s an image of the imageless. The face is your mirror. The mirror is Emptiness reflecting only itself. Close your eyes and the image is gone.

You have never met another person in real life in your entire life. Life is an endless process in constant flux, never a fixed solid entity. Another person is a pattern of thought, sensation and memory constantly changing. You are literally nothing, but you are not purely absence, you are this infinite openness space. A space without imposed definition. Zoom in far enough, or zoom out far enough to see the real you, all will be revealed to be nothing other that infinite space.

You can never prove another person is conscious who exists independently separate from you. You can only be certain you exist, you invent others, otherwise they don’t exist. This is blindly obvious.

Say you did meet these people in real life. They would still be fake, in real life you’re still not able to meet someone else because they are not external to you, they are objects looked upon. When not looked upon they don’t exist for you, except as an idea which is not external to you either.

Hardly, show me a man who has finished with words so that I may have a word with him. 😉 Have a wonderful story to tell. 🙂

This observing has no image. It’s impossible for this observing to know what’s being observed because there is no between the observing and the observed. There is no observer, any assumed observer is the observed of this imageless observing. Your whole imagined life you’ve been living a lie, from cradle to grave, a rather convincing scam contrived purely of empty to the core concepts that know absolutely nothing about reality because even reality itself does not exist outside of its artificial concept. You are fixated on ideas but have zero idea what an idea is, except as belief in this artificial conception .

It’s my answer only when the question arises for me. Questions arise only to the sense of an individual separate self, where there isn’t one.

They are things, they’re things known in this conception. Nothing can be described without making nothing something. It’s the linguistic paradox. While “things” are apparently known in this conception, that which is known ie: (“ things”) know nothing.

The question “Who” informs a not-known. That’s your answer.

So you’re not removing a thing then.

What do you do with the density after removing it?