Mellowmarsh

@Nemra LoL 😂

Yes, the screen is being looked upon there as an imprint upon the screen of consciousness here. You are the projector, the projection, and the screen, all in one. One is quite an impressionist, yah!

Well said. The physical eye is likened to a camera. The visual field can only capture the image of the camera, not the visual field. The image of the camera is not in the camera, the image of the camera is in the imageless visual field which is one without a second.

That’s all that’s happening anyway. If it wasn’t it’d be game over. It’s a two player game that no one ever wins or loses.

I couldn’t not say neither that don’t exist either. While solipsism is a modern philosophical term (derived from Latin solus "alone" and ipse "self") meaning that only one's own mind is sure to exist.

Solipsism isn’t actually an ism. It’s the placeholder for all isms. It’s the unconditional unmanifest potential placeholder for all conditions to become manifest systems. At best an ism is a description not the prescription. In the same context a menu is not the food.

Concepts are known by the mind. The mind is never seen or known by the concept, as a concept has no mind of its own. The concept known mentally as a “person” is a concept of the mind. No “person” or “ concept “ known to the mind is ever minding the mind, because concepts have no mind. The only certainty is your own mind, there’s a problem with other minds for you because you are never outside your own mind to be able to tell yourself other minds exist.

Rodents don’t have a life.

Agree. What’s remarkable about God is that being all one there’s nothing to attach to that is not the one. It would be like trying to split reality into two halves. It’s absurd.

Reactions are only known after the action, never before the action. All actions are action-less. You cannot do something before you do something. Doing is instantaneous in the moment, never before or after. The moment is all there is, unchanged unmoving. Only the mind moves not you.

There isn’t a contradiction. The infinite reflections are not the looker, they are the looked upon, they are reflections. A reflection sees nothing, a reflection is the seen inseparable from the seer, there’s no division. Notice the seeing is always forward facing and cannot look back at itself which would imply two seers. Also, reflections are always seen as two dimensional objects, because the looker can only see the front of a reflection, it cannot see the front and back of it simultaneously. So a reflection can never be seen in its entirety as a whole 3 dimensional object. Objects never see other objects, because they are never outside of the looker looking back at the looker. Objects being another word for reflections, or projections. The looker, looking and looked upon are inseparable. The eye cannot see itself is a profound metaphor for self-awareness, stating that the observer cannot directly observe their own fundamental nature, just as an eye needs a mirror to see itself. The looker is never in the mirror. The reflection in the mirror is an empty projection of the looker which is the only real. And that’s solipsism in a nutshell. Leo is right about solipsism.

Yes, that’s the solipsistic understanding. The mind of God has to be solipsistic because of the measurement problem. The mind can never be outside of itself to measure it as a limitation, therefore the mind of God must be the open space that is everywhere at once, seamless, without boundary or edge. God Unlimited = This infinite placeholder.

Hahaha

Can you hold rage in your hand? Can you say hey look everyone, come look at this rage I’m holding ?

It’s just a figure of speech. There’s no why about this. Why ?