Mellowmarsh

Self-consciousness is a biological tool used for physical survival, but humans turn it into a false, permanent identity. When the illusion of the self drops away, the physical body simply functions on its own without interference. Animals are luckier than humans because they were not artificially conditioned to believe they are separate from all that is naturally being. Humans “suffered” as their nature split off as and through this artificial conception believed to be real. But it wasn’t all doom and gloom because the same mechanism that was able to split was able to repair the breach. Where wholesomeness was restored, and suffering was known to be no longer suffered by anyone, and there was known to be just sensation sensed as coming and going, bubbling up and dissolving. All just thoughts flowing uninvited lingering for a while then completely disappearing as there was nowhere to land, or belong to.

Yes, Just stories made of empty words. From empty bodies "empty vessels make the most noise," meaning loud talk or constant sound can lack deep meaning, truth, or substance. Behind which remains the vastly deep silent unknowable.

Words originated from sound. So sound heard as words. Sound is empty.

The Self is known, but never seen.

Your videos are directed at your own sense of self, for your personal love of conscious creation that you are creating for yourself. What do you think of yourself now?

Put an ego in your shoe. Try that first.

I’ve noticed you say the word “right” quite a lot after your sentences when talking to the emptiness watching your videos.

You are sharing for the love of the unknown. If you don’t know who you are talking to the conscious creation is landing on emptiness.

You are talking to the unknown.

Hey friends. Is not true.

Ego is an imagined entity. What is imagination?

No one posting about spirituality on this forum is your friend.

You already know what when you label what.

Be that as it may for your personal logical left brained reasoning. But that’s not the point of this thread topic. What I’m trying to say is: All perspectives as to the true nature of reality are relative - therefore cannot be absolutised. On a level of meta logical reasoning: The absolute = undefinable and cannot be different from all of reality itself.The aggregate of all of reality itself is not isolated from all individual fragmented things, events, and experiences, but are interconnected parts of a single, all-encompassing reality.Therefore, all assertions are relative, and relative assertions about the absolute are absurd. Human knowledge/ based on conceptual models of reality, in this artificial conception, is relatively ( un ) true.

We’re all stuck in our own echo chamber. There’s nothing known outside of human language. Period.