Mellowmarsh

According to you there, no problem. For me here, I see it differently.

🎯

I am the consummate artist.

There is no such thing as a “Neo-advaitian” That idea is born of language which is a form of knowledge. Knowledge is the separation that is illusory. On Infinity & Language: Gura argues that because infinity includes everything, it cannot be defined from the outside. He notes that language and analysis, by their nature, falsely subdivide this unified, infinite reality. Art is natural. You are natural. While the nature of language and analysis is ARTificial.

The famous quote by Ken Wilber about everyone holding parts of the truth is: "I have one major rule: Everybody is right. More specifically, everybody — including me — has some important pieces of truth, and all of those pieces need to be honored, cherished, and included in a more gracious, spacious, and compassionate embrace."

Integral Embrace: Instead of fighting over who is entirely right or wrong, an integral approach seeks to weave these valid fragments together into a larger, more compassionate understanding.

Advaita Vedanta is the death of knowledge, NOT YOU Traditional Non-Duality asserts that there is no individual self anywhere. A single, infinite Consciousness underlies the universe. This one Consciousness shines simultaneously through billions of distinct, localized minds. Other people are real expressions of that same universal fabric. Leo Gura’s Radical Solipsism asserts that you (as the Single Infinite Mind) are completely alone in existence. Other people do not possess their own internal, localized perspectives or hidden conscious awareness. They are literal figments of your current imagination, identical to characters in a nightly dream.

My point is that if there’s only absolute being, then you are already the absolute, and there’s no one to become it.There’s no one to open up to it. You already are the knowing that cannot be known. The paradox is the illusion.

Yes, it’s self evidently known that existence is aware right now. But this awareness has no knowledge of it existing absolutely without limitation. To know itself absolutely, awareness must define what it is, which requires using thoughts, labels, or concepts that are inherently limited. Absolute knowledge implies a knower looking at a known, but awareness cannot turn around to look at itself as an external object. So the claim ( I know I exist ) automatically creates a duality of knower and known. Where the totality splits into a subject and object division. Division is known conceptually, which is limitation, but the totality cannot itself be known without the totality becoming just another conceptually known object which cannot know anything.

For a chicken to be a chicken there must be an egg. 🥚

And that would also be this. And this would be all that is, ising.

And I replied to your message.

So why even bother to ask “that still doesn’t answer what is the thing I want to dedicate my life to” ?

The answer will only become known to you in the instance of knowing it, and not one second before.