Mellowmarsh

❤️

A nonduality teacher can never teach another person what’s being spoken. They’ll have nothing to give you. There’s no teacher, only speaking, only the message, only the listening and only the hearing of the message. Only when the message is heard with absolute clarity is the message listened to, heard. People either hear the message or they don’t, no other person can be your listening or hearing. Only you. From the moment pure clarity is heard…there’s no more teacher or student, or message. There’s just you and you alone.

The observer sees only the movie, the movie of I … the moving pictures of I …but not the I that’s seeing. The observer is never seen because the observer is already the seeing. The observer is the projector inseparable from the projection. The blank screen on which the movie is projected never moves, and the movie only seems to move upon the unmoving screen. So even the movie is not moving, or the movie is just moving on the spot, on the centre of its own gravity completely balanced in every moment.

Yes indeed, and then there was Leo Hartong’s nondual pointing that said.. Nonduality , is the one question to all our answers…. That one’s very good.

Yeah us seeker’s who question the who is the who already have the answer to the question. I mean where else is the answer going to come from if not from the one who questions? LoL 😂 It’s like chasing your own tail until you catch it. Dizzy stuff, eh. 😵‍💫

I like all of them. They all bring different ways of looking at the same empty principles tbh. It’s different that’s all, same difference. That’s the ultimate comic joke. The yolk is on you, leaving nothing left to do but laugh.

Thanks Someone here, I like you too. Are you enjoying the footy?

LoL 😂 Oh yeah, silly me, sorry about that, I was a bit slow, was taking you literally for a minute. But yeah I see now, you got me there didn’t yer, hahaha. I see what you did there, good one. Thanks man.

There’s another “look at your hand” exercise by teacher Francis Lucille. Lucille, a leading figure in the Direct Path tradition of Advaita Vedanta, uses this specific exercise to collapse the illusion of the separated subject (you) observing an external object (the hand). By shifting your perspective, it points to the nondual realization that everything is ultimately a singular field of pure consciousness. He said: are you looking at your hand, or is your hand looking at you? It’s an excellent pointing to the collapse of subject and object duality.

Errr , cos we’re here to discuss Jim’s nondual insights, not your personal search for a girlfriend. But good luck, hope you catch her one day. 🤞

It’s not a separate realisation. It’s the same realisation appearing as a different concept. All these words used to describe the ineffable are known concepts, known by the only knowing there is, which is one singular absolute knowing. Knower and known are One. You are the singular one absolute knowing that cannot be known, because “one knowing’ is by definition solipsistic. This one singular absolute knowing is never separate from the concept known. Concepts know nothing, and that’s what you are. You are the knowing that cannot be known. There’s no other knowing.

Thank you for the laughs. 🤓😎

I think you can describe the real you, but would the real you be in the description? Or in the describer? Or both, maybe there’s two real you’s … maybe. 🤔

Hmm, wait one moment, while I think about that. 🤔 LoL One second please while I have a conversation with myself. Upon looking I see what’s looked upon. It seems I’m right in front of my eyes and not behind them. LoL Hmm, does that mean there’s no me inside me, so where am I exactly, hmm, I must be outside of me. 😬 How did I get outside of my body, hey you, get back in my body, where I can’t see you. LoL