Mellowmarsh

Distinction is real only in the sense of it’s opposite meaning Indistinct. For example: The changeless change. Or, the unlimited limited. ——- What does A I say… A Möbius strip is distinct in the sense of having only one side despite existing in 3D space) limitations are relative to the perspective of the observer—what appears as dual and separated at one level is unified at another. “The limit of a thing is but the two sides...": This suggests that the boundary, edge, or definition of an object is what defines its duality (inside/outside, front/back, start/end). “...as change for one dimension reflects as two": In a lower-dimensional context, a change on one side implies a corresponding change on the other, creating a dualistic or two-sided view (e.g., changing the top of a line affects the bottom). “...and two dimensions reflect as one.": As you move to a higher dimension, what appeared as two separate, opposite sides can be seen as a single, unified, and continuous surface (e.g., the front and back of a piece of paper are connected when viewing the paper as a 3D object, or a Möbius strip-having only one side despite existing in 3D space). It is a poetic way of saying that limitations are relative to the perspective of the observer—what appears as dual and separated at one level is unified at another.

Death and ruin cannot destroy or ruin what is always imprinted to memory everlasting, already dead, gone but never forgotten. Memories of past is what gives seamless continuity to the present, namely now. There’s no gap between past present and future, it’s always now. Thanks for the memory. R.I.P This illusion is real. Always be yourself, the real fictional impressionable character. 🤭

I wonder if you personally, the one who goes by the name Breakingthewall, can answer what’s the real motivation of the guru’s.

Any search for the origins of consciousness makes no sense of finding the origins when you’re already the origin. Searching for consciousness as if it’s inside or outside of consciousness itself is absurd because there’s no gap that divides it. The idea that consciousness is inside or outside of the body creates the idea of division in the mind. If this division is the minds belief then the search is on for the division of consciousness, not consciousness itself. Then what happens is consciousness is searching for itself in all the wrong places looking for a gap which doesn’t exist for it. Eventually it calls off the search after realising it cannot split into two consciousnesses, where one is the knower and the other is the known. If consciousness is infinite then it cannot be a number, there can’t be multiple consciousnesses that can be counted as being here, there, and everywhere in between. Consciousness can only be a concept, known now, here now, nowhere. And so that’s where it is.

The last fall.

Nature being artificial , maybe they don’t know they are making those walls?

Yes, it’s amazing. There’s nowhere or no thing at which to point their guns at.

There was no other way to define ourself. It couldn’t have been any other way.

Maybe the source intended to lose itself just for the fun of finding itself?

Once you have recognised become aware of knowing yourself. What happens to all those authors you previously mentioned?

Understanding what, exactly?

Okay, thanks for that summary. Did the meditator forget who it is, and so desired to know itself using meditation as the starting point at which real knowing reveals itself ?

Why would a limited mental state choose to observe observation?

Why does the person who thinks he is limited meditate, for what reason?

LoL 😂