Mellowmarsh

Member
  • Content count

    2,809
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Personal Information

  • Location
    Herenow
  • Gender
    Female

Recent Profile Visitors

3,025 profile views
  1. Just for your information, I personally don’t think this about avoiding pain and suffering, it’s about a curiosity as to whom pain and suffering is arising to. On closer introspection which is the nature of the self aware human being that then discovers that pain and suffering arises and is not personal, even though it jolly well feels personal. No person is denying their sense of self doesn’t exist, I mean that’s impossible simply because the pain and suffering still arises anyway, so there must necessarily be something that is aware of these sensations , it’s not as if these sensations are suddenly going to stop arising just because some human being has transcended the illusion of separation, no, the sensations are still going to arise, and the human being is able to recognise that these sensations are not personal anymore, that’s all. No human being I know is denying the sense of self doesn’t actually exist, that’s just another sensation that cannot not exist because it’s simply known to exist, but not to any one personally, that’s all, because we’re all subject to the same pain and suffering, just as we’re all breathing the same air, and bleeding the same red blood.
  2. Like I’ve just said..Self deleting is not Self defeating. The dynamic of Self is fully recognised to not mind or resist what happens in the immediacy of happening. Because it’s not like happening can ever stop happening from happening by unhappening itself, can it?
  3. 😂 Yes, I understand the contradiction, I must be tripping again. 😂😉
  4. Yes but then isn’t the word ( God ) also name/form, therefore the dream? So is Papaji saying the “Wake up” from dream is the disappearance of name and form, which includes the name God? If this is what’s being said, then that just says no name or form ever sleeps or wakes up? Or, put another way, no named thing ever slept or awakened. Is that correct? And if that’s correct, then does the claim ‘God doesn’t sleep’ make any sense?
  5. The words of God are inseparable from the good book upon which the words are inscribed as an imprint of the imageless blank pages. Eh?
  6. There’s no dream to awaken ( from/ to ) without sleep. Eh?
  7. Fluidity and Non-Attachment: A rigid mind breaks under pressure, but a liquid mind adopts the shape of the present moment without clinging to outcomes.
  8. Just got back from my Gap. For Godness sake. Get back, get back to where you once belonged.
  9. Self-deleting is not Self-defeating. It’s how the mind is able to care for it’s mental health, in the most effective way that insanity is never allowed to gain a foothold. It’s simply child’s play.
  10. Everything is so fleeting, nothing is forever. Ultimately, in the end, it doesn’t even matter. Nothing matters. Alone again, naturally.
  11. According to you there, no problem. For me here, I see it differently.
  12. There is no such thing as a “Neo-advaitian” That idea is born of language which is a form of knowledge. Knowledge is the separation that is illusory. On Infinity & Language: Gura argues that because infinity includes everything, it cannot be defined from the outside. He notes that language and analysis, by their nature, falsely subdivide this unified, infinite reality. Art is natural. You are natural. While the nature of language and analysis is ARTificial.