Mellowmarsh

Consciousness cannot be defined as a word because a word is an auditory illusion of sound and light. There is no consciousness that is brighter or dimmer than another consciousness, similarly, there is no consciousness that is louder or quieter than another consciousness. Consciousness is only ever conscious of consciousness, and never conscious of other consciousnesses. Consciousness doesn't have other consciousnesses as if there was another consciousness existing inside or outside of it. And even if there was another consciousness existing outside or inside of consciousness, the infinite gulf between them both would be impossible to be crossed or closed, simply because a so called boundary of consciousness would be impossible to be detected.

If you are knowing. Why then would you seek knowledge from other sources by asking questions about the knowing that you already are?

The Sun and the Cave One day the sun and a cave struck up a conversation. The sun had trouble understanding what “dark” and “dank” meant and the cave didn’t quite get the hang of “light and clear” so they decided to change places. The cave went up to the sun and said, “Ah, I see, this is beyond wonderful. Now come down and see where I have been living.” The sun went down to the cave and said, “Gee, I don’t see any difference.”

No fear during surrender. Just this pure light love taking over what always is.

Enduring the naked raw groundlessness of being effortlessly. A burden beared without justification.

@James123 🙂

This is confusing. Can you clarify what you mean by dangerous? Confusing because on the one hand Advaita or Neo-repackaged Advaita is stating there is ''no you stuff''. And yet, solipsism is saying there is a you, and the idea that there are other you's is just YOU imagining those other you's. So it's confusing because according to solipsistic knowledge, there is only you, and all other you's are just (P Zombies) that have no consciousness or mind of their own. Which idea out of those two ideas is dangerous, and why?

Consciousness is mind. Mind is conceptual knowing. Conceptual knowing is illusory. The IS NO ... IS identical to there IS Nothing is everything, and everything is nothing, it's all brain state determinism that was determined to be.

It's a synthetic consciousness. It's a known concept that cannot be known, even to itself.

It alters unknowing to knowing, that's all.

Yes, there’s a physical universe. AI is a construction too, made from the same illusory knowledge the human mind is made of. So I agree, not needed, but handy for when the human mind is too lazy to repeat itself, whereby it depends on a machine to do its repeating for it.

There’s no claimer, no we, no wrong or right. Except in this conception, the illusory appearance of mirages believed to be real. A real reality that the mind cannot transcend from. Beyond that fixed ridged mind, lay perfect unborn unconscious freedom, a boundless peace, unlimited and unrestricted.

Okay, but I do my best. I’ll endeavour to try harder to give you the answers you prefer to hear. Keep letting me know I don’t know how to answer your basic questions, and I’ll do my best to auto correct them so you can understand them too.

There’s no “ Your” thoughts. Theres thoughts that are a physical process, the chemistry and physics of life are functioning always on an unconscious level of awareness.

And this is why you suffer, because you think it’s your suffering, when it’s not your suffering, at all. And just as suffering and pain, or pleasure arise and falls away , so too does the thought of ownership of those experiences.