Mellowmarsh

Ultimately there’s only (one thing) > ( THIS ) THIS is not an appearance, because THIS is never absent. There’s no word for THIS , or, every word is THIS because there’s no such concept as a (non word) THIS is ONE THING ..ALWAYS, here now, without doubt or error. Because THIS can never NOT be here now, as there’s no absence of ( one thing) (One thing) simply means ( Non Duality ) meaning (One thing) is without a second. THIS ( One thing) knows (no death) and (no birth) because there’s no such knowledge as a (no death) or a (no birth) THIS is known, therefore this that is known knows nothing, because knowing is only one thing knowing THIS

Like a flower opens itself up to the morning sunlight unfurling each petal and then coiling back in on itself at dusk. This process is totally automatic. It’s not something the flower is doing, it’s being done. The flower is not opening itself to its nature, the flower is infinite nature, so there’s no actual flower separate from infinite nature that is opening itself up to its nature. . Theres not a flower and then a separate nature that the flower can open itself up to. The gap between the formless and the structure of the formless is infinite. I’ll stick to the nondual way. Not the distorted blah blah blah I’m just going to wing it my way kind of way.

There’s nothing really going on that can be seen except as an illusory mirage of the senses. There is no mental world made of name and form. So it’s actually quite difficult to get a handle on what’s really going on, possibly nigh impossible.

Spoilt Pig Alert ‼️ A trained pig is still a pig.

Seems like Breakingthewall is just another imposter/ impersonator. .👂 listen, was that my echo? “The true Self is inherently formless, eternal, and limitless, and that any sense of restriction or finitude is a projection of the mind. Reality must be always real. It is not with forms and names. That which underlies all these is the reality. It underlies limitations, being itself limitless. It is not bound." - Ramana Maharshi

We’re not understanding each other. And that’s okay.

No I don’t think.

I’m not talking about an object knowing itself. A human is an object known, and that which is known, knows nothing, obviously.

It relates by saying a machine/ object can never know its maker. Consciousness cannot know consciousness because IT IS IT… In the same context the IT in its raining is the same IT in its conscious.

Always 😎

Consciousness is not even conscious of its creator. Consciousness cannot fully grasp or objectively prove its own source or creator because any attempt to examine consciousness must itself be performed through consciousness.

That’s a good question. The answer is : You are being, it’s only you being your real and true you when no one’s watching. So whatever you are being, which could be absolutely anything, that’s you being who you really are when no one’s watching. And it won’t matter what you are being because there’s no one watching, except you. Just be yourself, the real fictional character.

You’ve never seen what’s really going on.

That’s why we authored books we wanted to get lost in our own stories. Our stories were inseparable from the book.

How would you propose to live with that knowing ?