Mellowmarsh

This observing has no image. It’s impossible for this observing to know what’s being observed because there is no between the observing and the observed. There is no observer, any assumed observer is the observed of this imageless observing. Your whole imagined life you’ve been living a lie, from cradle to grave, a rather convincing scam contrived purely of empty to the core concepts that know absolutely nothing about reality because even reality itself does not exist outside of its artificial concept. You are fixated on ideas but have zero idea what an idea is, except as belief in this artificial conception .

It’s my answer only when the question arises for me. Questions arise only to the sense of an individual separate self, where there isn’t one.

They are things, they’re things known in this conception. Nothing can be described without making nothing something. It’s the linguistic paradox. While “things” are apparently known in this conception, that which is known ie: (“ things”) know nothing.

The question “Who” informs a not-known. That’s your answer.

So you’re not removing a thing then.

What do you do with the density after removing it?

Only you can know about that.

Nothing describes nothing.

God is FUN - Fundamental Unified Now

God is a happy birthday 🎁

Find out.

You cannot do what you are already doing.

You are faceless. You have no image of yourself.

Nothing is true. No one is posting. No one actions. No one speaks. No one writes.

Happy Birthday Bull. I mean Leo. 🎂 🥳