Mellowmarsh

How you were prior to beingness, remain like that." So how were you prior to beingness? You were "not knowing". You were totally unaware of everything. You did not know anything. AI Prior to beingness, you existed as a state of pure, unmanifest stillness without any identity, thoughts, or awareness of a separate self. The State Before "I Am" Before you were born or came into this body, your true nature had no form. No concepts: There were no words, labels, or memories. No body: You did not possess a physical shape or gender. No time: Past and future did not exist. No observer: There was no separate "you" to look at the world. What is "Not Knowing"? "Not knowing" means resting before the arrival of consciousness. Pure emptiness: It is not a dark room or a blank space. Zero separation: Nothing was divided into objects or subjects. No burden: Without the mind, there was no suffering or desire. Remaining Like That Spiritual teachers like Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj suggest returning to this root feeling. Drop the labels: Let go of what you think you are. Rest in silence: Move behind the busy activity of the thinking mind. Be simple: Exist without trying to prove or figure out life.

Anything that appears and disappears must be a dream. “When objective knowledge comes to an end, the individual seer does not survive as a seer. At that moment, the pride of "I" just melts away. As the individual being is conceptual, so also is the seer. If you call this city "Bombay", it appears as Bombay; if you call it earth, it will appear as earth. It all depends upon the seer's concept. If you call an object a chair, it is a chair; if you call it wood, it is wood. If you call the all as Reality, then the all is Reality. If you call it the world, it is the world. Perception of objects depends on the concept of the seer. But Reality is beyond concept and no concept can capture It.“

Reality has nothing to do with words. You can't say how you were prior to beingness. There were no words, no knowledge, nothing. Words cannot describe "nothing".

Definition of Absolute: If something is truly absolute, it exists outside of our thoughts. The moment our minds try to define it, we turn it into a relative idea. Any claim that is defined as God / Absolute cannot know the Absolute because there’s only the Absolute. The claim to know the Absolute would require a split/ division consisting of a knower and known. This split is an illusory construct of mind. While concepts are known, the “known” ie: the concept “known” knows nothing. There’s a core paradox of human thought: our minds constantly seek unchanging, absolute truths, yet the mind itself is a fluid, ever-changing process. Nothing can define the absolute, or, everything defines the absolute. The absolute is already the knowing that cannot be known.

Razard86 - “There is no reality. Reality is a cartoon that pretends to be real. It really tries its best but because it is run by that which has no conditions it cannot help but make no sense.“ Vilius: “ Materialism is complete bullshit” Leo Gura - “You are God” Ziran, wtf are you having a dig at my content for? It’s only your opinion anyway,just like everyone else’s is. The male dominated dictatorship that goes on at this forum is nauseatingly disgusting.

We can all objectively agree that nothing is permanent , including the mind that defines the absolute. A relative consciousness points toward an underlying absolute awareness or universal truth, but the absolute awareness universal truth is never experienced by a relative consciousness. The concept “absolute” is just another word for this “unchanging source” of all things changing. Relative consciousness knows only the impermanence of things, including its own construction of things in this conception which is this conceptions only experience. While the absolute unchanging source of experience is never experienced. Yes, absolute unchanging source is a concept known, but all known things are impermanent and know nothing of their unchanging absolute source.

It’s a popular subject that desires to be put into true context. Carry on…

Okay, if you personally say all that is so, then it must be true.

Self-consciousness is a biological tool used for physical survival, but humans turn it into a false, permanent identity. When the illusion of the self drops away, the physical body simply functions on its own without interference. Animals are luckier than humans because they were not artificially conditioned to believe they are separate from all that is naturally being. Humans “suffered” as their nature split off as and through this artificial conception believed to be real. But it wasn’t all doom and gloom because the same mechanism that was able to split was able to repair the breach. Where wholesomeness was restored, and suffering was known to be no longer suffered by anyone, and there was known to be just sensation sensed as coming and going, bubbling up and dissolving. All just thoughts flowing uninvited lingering for a while then completely disappearing as there was nowhere to land, or belong to.

Yes, Just stories made of empty words. From empty bodies "empty vessels make the most noise," meaning loud talk or constant sound can lack deep meaning, truth, or substance. Behind which remains the vastly deep silent unknowable.

Words originated from sound. So sound heard as words. Sound is empty.

The Self is known, but never seen.

Your videos are directed at your own sense of self, for your personal love of conscious creation that you are creating for yourself. What do you think of yourself now?

Put an ego in your shoe. Try that first.

I’ve noticed you say the word “right” quite a lot after your sentences when talking to the emptiness watching your videos.