Mellowmarsh

This statement alone is a false flag. It’s a belief within the artificial conceptual dream of separation where there’s the belief there’s a ‘someone’ who is of a low or high state of consciousness, that feels real. In reality, there’s an awareness of these states, but these states are fleeting and temporary within the stateless state of timeless awareness.

That statement still does not prove they are anti sex. These could simply be just some spiritual experimentation practices that they are choosing to explore. That doesn’t mean they are flat out dead against sex permanently as being anti sex oriented. You need to be more careful with your context here when it comes to other people’s attitude to sex. You cannot just pigeon hole someone who is into certain spiritual practices through experimentation as being anti sex, you simply cannot know that for sure, especially if the practices are temporary, which they could be, or not, and that’s not something you could know for certain, is it? Your personal assessment on this issue is weak and flawed.

It is projection when you accuse others of being anti sex when you have no proof that they actually are anti sex. You are projecting your own personal feelings thoughts and knowledge of what it is to have an anti sex attitude onto other people as if it was true for them, when you cannot prove it.

Until you provide the evidence to back up your claim that people on this forum have an attitude of being anti sex, as being the truth. Then you are simply projecting a claim as being true in your mind only, without any direct evidence to the contrary.

NO, I haven’t. I have absolutely no knowledge of anyone on this forum who is anti sex. And let’s remind, that’s how you initially worded it, but then deflected it to ‘sexually repressed’ So if you have encountered someone on this forum who is anti sex, then how do you know that for certain? did they actually communicate to you person to person, face to face, that they were anti sex, which would of course be a prime example of backing up your claim with actual evidence?

Strategy and planning, that’s the golden key. 🔐 You got this, well done. 👏

Yes, this is an excellent observation, it’s the art of what self-mastery is actually pointing to, as you have eloquently and succinctly pointed out. Well put.

This is just more projection. You claimed you disliked the anti sex sentiment in the spiritual community. You cannot prove or back up the claim you claimed, because it was just an assumption that not you, but others are anti sex, and now you’re trying to weasel yourself out of this assumption, which is a fuck up.

Now you’re simply projecting here. I hardly doubt spiritual people are anti sex as you put it. It’s just that they sometimes choose to be celibate. But that doesn’t mean this choice is rendered a fixed choice, where they padlock their nether regions and throw away the key forever, no, they can always change their mind, again that’s another choice always open to them. Life long virgins are probably very rare, so most of us have enjoyed the joy of sex, and undoubtedly do not have an anti attitude towards it, that’s just a weird thing to say imho.

The irony is, is that women can enjoy sexual intercourse all their born natural life, and even more intensely as they age. It’s the men that often need more time to get an erection, and orgasms may feel less intense as they age. Erectile dysfunction (ED) can start at any age, but it becomes significantly more common after the age of 40. But then there’s viagra that can help with the dysfunction, so it’s not all over for the man. Ironically the man can still father babies well into their 80’s but the woman’s reproductive cycle stops around the age of 45/ 50 years. It’s all swings and roundabouts for sure, such as nature.

You are the dreamer, the dreaming, and the dream points to a profound spiritual truth about the idea that the observer, the process of observing, and the object observed are all one single reality. The Dreamer: This represents your deepest essence, your true self, or pure consciousness. It is the silent awareness behind all thoughts and experiences. The Dreaming: This represents the active energy of life, creation, or the mind in motion. It is the bridge of experience and perception connecting consciousness to form. The Dream: This represents the physical world, your ego, and your daily life experiences. It feels solid and real, but it is actually a temporary projection of consciousness. Die before you die then do whatever you like. There’s nothing wrong with you or that or this. Thats what I admire about Dave, he’s not asking anyone else for permission to live his life the way he’s chosen to live it. He’s just living life on the razors edge of creation, it’s what he chooses to create, and he gives himself full permission to do so. Good for him, fortune favours the brave, and Dave is fearless because he’s awake. Those people are rare on this earth, more power to them, for not being afraid to be vulnerable.

Nahm was an exceptional performer here. Banning him just reeked of ‘ bad for business ‘ mentality. There’s no need for that sort of competitiveness or fear of being driven out of business. To me, that’s just a low quality mindset. Simple ordinary “Recognition” of knowing we’re all just unique single facets of the same one diamond is the highest form of human intelligence, imho. No need to feel threatened here. Unless of course the threat is going to become a danger to your life, therefore you must defend against it. But that rarely happens anyway, so….let’s just rise above the jealousy, it’s not real, and you already know that, so what’s with the beef. It’s so unnecessary.

Everything is ghost writing here - pen in hand. ✍️ Question is, who’s directing that pen is the one question to all our answers. What is that thing, exactly , but everything expressing itself as known, in the instance knowing arises, one with the knowing, and not even ‘with’ except in this conception. There is only the divine expression, the beloved.

I understand what you are saying, but my point being was that this automatic trigger reflex to the sensation of “unease “ or “danger” is not happening to ‘someone’ who claims the sensation as belonging to a “me or my or ‘I” and that any claim of ownership is a synthetic creation of brain function. For example: A new born baby if handled very clumsily soon after its birth will automatically move its arms and hands as if its trying to grab onto something secure for its own stability. There’s no one within that baby that is telling itself that it feels unstable. There’s only the sensation of ‘unease’ which then instantaneously triggers a reaction as an automatic reflexive response mechanism, all playing out as a unitary action. There’s no “I” in that baby that’s performing the reaction to sensation because its automatic, the baby is not thinking to itself its in danger, because there is no baby there, there’s just the action and reaction in the same instance, as one unitary movement.

So brain cancer had to exist so that the self preservation operating process mechanism could inform itself it is suffering?