Mellowmarsh

Member
  • Content count

    3,212
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Mellowmarsh

  • Rank
    - - -

Personal Information

  • Location
    Herenow
  • Gender
    Female

Recent Profile Visitors

3,590 profile views
  1. You’ve done the same as what you’re accusing others of doing. Prove me wrong.
  2. “Alone” simply means the only one here. Only & One ..Call this pure awareness or whatever, in this artificial conception. But this recognition goes much deeper and becomes more unsettling than that, how can “one thing” exist, exactly? Well, One doesn’t, except as a “thought” which is dead. There’s only dead thoughts, even the thinker is a thought. The thoughts are never found in reality. That doesn’t negate them, they appear and disappear, for sure. But they’re not physical. Neither is the awareness of thought ever found, either, because awareness is not physical. Point is, trying to find this “alone one”is like trying to shine a torch on darkness to illuminate darkness into existence. It’s impossible.
  3. First of all, you asked the readers…”Do women actually realize how much female beauty can affect men?” To which this woman here replied “ yes, they realise” Then your response to my reply was….” This is why you love manipulation, because you know people see you as a prize” Dude, what the heck did I say that warranted that response?? What had my reply have anything to do with prizes and manipulation? Furthermore, you then proceeded to say I was triggered, and that I have autism. Dude, what the heck are you talking about?? I simply answered the question asked. Oh and then you wanted to know if I’m a baddie, just for answering the question. Genuine question: Dude, are you actually okay? I mean, what’s with all this weird labelling, what’s that about?
  4. @Monster Energy It must be so frustrating for you that when you express here something that is understandable for you is not necessarily understandable to those who are reading. Most people are not mind readers, so I suggest you say what you mean and mean what you say, concisely, so that us readers have at least some modicum of understanding of what it is you are actually trying to convey. It’s obvious that all your responses have a negative aggressive tone, as if you’re not getting your actual point across without having to resort to making this all about your self serving agenda to make a point heard coherently, which quite frankly, is mostly missing its target… just an observation, no offence.
  5. That “Thought” is dead. Thought can’t touch life. Life just is.. life is neither dead nor alive.
  6. @Carl-Richard In knowledge only, in this conception, this known, that knows nothing. Knowledge can only point to the illusory nature of reality.
  7. Thanks for letting us know. There’s no such thing as nonduality. From belief to clarity. 👍
  8. Well now, to first be a human pussy, I need to stop playing dead. Stop being shy, I need to leave the confines of my casket, and get out there into the vast open space of infinity and bring my enlightenment with me, the enlightenment I didn’t get.
  9. Well that’s something you have to figure out, no one else can help you understand what you desire to understand. You could ask AI maybe it knows what desire is.
  10. IDK ..maybe sugar and flour eggs and butter. Maybe that’s the cake you desire.
  11. You asked a question, I answered the question directly and honestly. Then you started going on about manipulation and failing tests. What the fuck are you even going on about?? ffs. 🤦‍♀️
  12. Your op asked ….. do women understand how men see female beauty? Now you’re not talking about biological men and women, you’re talking about consciousness. You should have made it more clearer, like mud.
  13. Now you’ve lost me. Wat evvs.
  14. Tbh, I’m not even sure what the hell you’re talking about now. And neither do I care.