AION

So how would you describe yourself? A Freudian ? I’m not to familiar with him tbh.

First off, he doesn’t secretly believe in a perceiving center. In fact, a huge part of his work is aimed at helping people directly realize that the perceiver, the subject-object split, and the idea of a “center” are illusions. When he says “there is only consciousness” or “this is consciousness,” he’s not talking about perception in the usual dualistic sense. He’s pointing to the actuality of being, not a subject being aware of an object, but the direct actuality that exists prior to that structure. He uses the word “consciousness” to refer to what is actually present, not a mental state or thought process. And yes, he sometimes equates consciousness and reality but only in the sense that what is conscious is what is, and what is actually real is directly conscious, not conceptual. As for form and differentiation, he doesn’t deny them. He invites people to deeply inquire into the nature of form: what is it really? What is it made of? What is its relationship to consciousness? His method isn’t to give abstract metaphysical answers but to push people into a confrontation with their direct experience, beyond assumption and belief. Calling it “spiritual hamburger” misses the whole point. His work is actually demanding and often uncomfortable, precisely because it doesn’t let you settle for intellectual positions, it forces you to look at what’s true without filters. You might disagree with his conclusions, but dismissing it as simplistic or “selling well” probably means you haven’t really engaged with the depth of what he’s pointing to.

At this point he is just trolling. From page 1 he has been refusing to come with arguments. Mods please do something about this because he is ruining my thread.

Just for the record. Please state your arguments against Ralston. Instead of gas lighting getting emotional Shitting all over my thread Comparing Ralston with Ibn fucking Arabi lmao

People like Breaking the Wall can’t be taken serious. Firstly because of his name. Secondly, he is not open for discussion and he doesn’t come with arguments. Just emotional ranting. Everybody can be passionate about something as long as it doesn’t cloud the judgement. And his judgement of Ralston after few minute videos is insane and ludicrous. It is hard to understand Ralston after one read of his books. For example the book of not knowing has to be read twice to get a descent grasp and he thinks he can understand him after couple of minutes. It is feeding pearls to pigs.

Notice how the tone changed in this topic when Leo put his weight in this topic. 😭

I have all of his ebooks

This topic is a good shit test

I was engaging him to get his arguments against Ralston. But he doesn’t have solid arguments. That was the reason for my thread but he started shitting over this thread and some were defending him. I still don’t get what the antithesis is.

In the other thread about Orion Taraban the same thing happened. People watched couple of 10 minute videos and they already had a judgement about him. I had to close that thread because it started to get ugly. This thread seems to go into the same lousy epistemological shit hole.

Ibn fucking Arabi of all people. 🤣

His book are worth the money compared to others. Some condensed Yoda level shit compared to all the fluff books out there. One book is 10 hours of reading but it is easily 10k hours worth of wisdom. And the shit he is writing is integral. No loose ends in his work. All of his books are integrated. That is why I like Ralston compared to other teachers.

you watched couple of his videos and you crafted that criticism? You haven’t even read his books. You are as foolish as those two crazy ladies defending you. This is insane.☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️☠️

@Natasha Tori Maru have you read Ralston? Please be honest.

@Natasha Tori Maru we are all emotional about something. I bet I can find topics you are emotional about. It’s not about the emotional or not it’s about being open. And she hasn’t provided any good counter arguments so I will stand my ground. To be honest, I don’t even think she read Ralston. She is just here for the beef.