AION

Although I´m not black pill, I kind of understand it. I never got girls laugh at me, ridicule me, or do nasty stuff. But probably if I was a weaker looking man or more ugly, I would get the same treatment. I know a lot of below average guys just giving it up. Too many guys. And nobody is talking about it, especially women not caring about this group of men while they care about everything else and especially caring about their own interests. I have fair share of success because I, kind of, go for 6´s and 7´s because those are easy to wrap up. But if I would aim for my own league I kind of agree that dating is more difficult than ever. I have an American friend in Europe and he says it is more difficult in EU than in the US. I´m not going into the specifics but he was very clear about it. Personally I just do dating for myself, not for the girl. Because I think most women are not worth it. Too entitled for more than they give and too big of a body count to make sacrifices for. And if you have this attitude of doing things for yourself from a POV of already being complete, and her just being a NPC, it actually works out. It is important to not have resentment for female nature and accept them as they are. And from that acceptance, muster some love you are willing to give. Just having huge resentment and expecting women to behave and think like men is just a recipe for unhappiness. Just look at the sadness of Alexander´s face. It is a pity.

Provider game will only work if the girl is poor with no prospect for a good job and you have to be ok-ish looking. In SD orange society and up you need inner game. If you do then your lack of money and looks doesn’t matter. Obviously signaling wealth or your body or anything material can come across as self qualifying and that is repulsive. Money and looks game (provider game) will work in less developed countries or with girls with a lower social status. So attraction is almost all inner game. And it is momentary. For example I’m tall-ish and I do get some attention in nightclubs but when I open my mouth and I start saying stupid stuff(fawning, insecure things, self qualifying stuff), it is over because I will feel the sexual tension disappearing. So being good looking, tall and having money, only gets you initial attention. The moment you open your mouth and say stupid stuff like in this thread it is over. So big part of it is personality.

Provider frame still works but it is not the best. It is for people without game.

I agree with Wilber on this one. Sliding Scale means you can be genuinely enlightened in your own era without having to know about developmental stages that haven’t been discovered yet. For example: • The Buddha didn’t need to include “integral turquoise” thinking in his enlightenment, because that stage of consciousness hadn’t emerged yet in humanity. • Someone today who reaches the same depth of realization would need to include it. It solves a really annoying paradox: it lets ancient masters like the Buddha, Jesus, or Padmasambhava be fully enlightened, while still allowing modern practitioners to go further than they could. It’s basically Wilber’s way of saying enlightenment is real, but it’s not a fixed finish line, it grows as humanity grows. So one should always be aware of the cardinal sin of (spiritual) pride.

If you pay for it. 😭 so Majed is right. The thing is if you are successful some girls will be interested in this orc but that are not the type of girls you want to trust and get in a relationship with.

Human-machine integration with AI will revolutionize spirituality so much. Because AI will be able to get access to our inner states through a brain link. It will help us with interpretation of our inner states. Sort out our bullshit. Such interesting times await us. This is some matrix shit with the good and the bad. And most people are going into this revolution completely blind.

Enlightenment states and intelligence development are two different things but they do have an influence on each other. States are interpreted through the lens of one’s own current structure stage. Wilber explains this in his matrix lettuce. So just imagine a super human in 20 to 30 years and how he would interpret enlightenment experiences. He would look at our chimp interpretation and just smile.

Think and grow rich

Bryan is a freak of nature of SD orange. It is a necessary step in the collective human development. Being anti Bryan is just being anti development. I think he will be a good stick figure on what happens if you deny natural death and deny your own mortality(humanity) because in one or more decades he will start to look like a monster. He already looks kind of freakish to me already. In that sense Bryan Johnson and Leo Gura aspire the same thing but in a different way. Both want immortality (infinity) but in their own way. That is why Leo is triggered by him. One only gets triggered by one owns image.

That is not how Jung looks at love 😭

I’m just telling you how most people think. Especially people who are higher up the social ladder. I mean if one doesn’t have a lot of options you will take what you can get obviously. This forum is not a good representation how the real world works. Most people aren’t anti social introverts like on this forum.

There is not one type of intelligence. But in general intelligence is separate from happiness and meaning. Having said that at a certain point and kind of intelligence you can develop the psycho somatic skill to induce meaning and happiness regardless.

It is hard to find somebody who is exactly at your level. You are either above or below.

In the eyes of most women most men are not breed-able so they are competing for the few men who are.

So what are you saying? You got god like intelligence? For example if you decide to develop musical intelligence you don’t need to practice or learn music theory because you know it all? I don’t think so. Some intelligences might have some overlap but they are very different from each other and they require different skill set. What Leo Gura defines as intelligence is very chopped, unclear and not clearly defined. Like most of his work. And then he has the audacity to criticize Ralston which is mind blowing.

There is not one type of intelligence. Getting spiritual intelligence won't help with your social intelligence for example. So you can't raise your intelligence like it is a single metric. This topic is so chopped.

That is the price of not wanting to die. One morphs into devil looking creature. There is a certain elegance in accepting seniority. And he ain’t it. People already summed up things like makeup and Botox and so on. But what annoys me the most is that he tries to cloth himself as a teenager. And what it tells me about his psychology.

Emotions are integral part of reality. This is the problem of having no model. It is easy for the student to misinterpret stuff. Even models aren’t the truth. It is needed to be used and let go after a certain stage of development.

In his video on relationship it seems like he tries to shame his viewers for having self interests: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DYgJwWdOdMm/?igsh=MWlvaWR2ZjhqejRjcw== He proposing having saintly love but in modern relationships this is not practical at all. This is very unhealthy actually. People come together because people want things for each other. It is is ok to have your and want yours and have win win relationships with each other we’re both benefit from the synergy of the relationship. Owen Cook talks about this a lot. All relationships start transactionally and some become non transactional called love but not all relationships have to make this arch. It is ok that some friendships remain transactional. More over if you try to live Leo’s saintly love you will be fucked over all the time vis-à-vis if you do the opposite. Be ok with your own self interests and be ok with other people self interests and then try to create win win situations where both win. I’m on Owen Cook with this one You don’t have to agree with Owen Cook here but if we just stay with Leo Gura. I think his shaming of self interests is not very integral. Because you are allowing others to have self interests but shame your own self interests. On top of that I don’t even see Leo living this kind of mindset in his life. It was such an awful video that I had to make a postabout it.

If you were a hot girl in this life you would have a blast giving freely to everybody 🤣

@Leo Gura @Sincerity thanks

which part is projection

@Leo Gura I´m in the business of survival and you too. One can´t bypass survival. Only after one secures it, it can transcend and include. I´m ok with admitting I´m not a charity and I´m conscious about that. I provide value and I get value back when I´m doing business. With friendships this is to a lesser degree but I do have some friendships that benefit the other more than it benefits me. So there is a time and place for charity aka being non/selfish. But I don´t think it is either/or... selfish bastard versus being a saint. Sometimes I´m selfish and sometimes I´m not. Being a saint is only for special kind of people. But if you want a regular life etc, get in business and having romantic relationships, you will not get by without being transactional and self interested because that is the driving force. 99% of people in business and personal relationships will leave you if you stop providing them value. So that is just the rules of the game. And one should understand why. Self interests is the expanding force for development.

I know it is hard to formalize it but as long as it can be formalized I think the M3 model by mystery is the best. All other models are a cheap rip off. So best formalized model is M3 by Mystery. The best technicality with its beginner, middle and end game Best informalized model is Owen Cook. He has the best meta physics. If you know both you can be deadly. Owen Cook is more difficult to learn because of the share volume of his content it is hard to extract the gold but I did by crunching all of his videos and seminars into a corpus with the help of AI. What is your favorite model?