AION

I think it gave a educated response. Better response than you would get from most people. Which part you didn't agree with?

God makes sense though. But I was just commenting from a point of epistemological hygiene. This is what Claude has to say about it:

Ok. But that is perhaps true. But that is not good epistemology to have fixed truth. As far as I understand epistemology is about the process, not about an end-truth.

You have skin in the game so you can't think clearly

Lmao just stop

No, it is about false promises. If somebody makes a false promise, I'm never going to trust that person again. Same counts for countries. They said UEA was the safest country in the world and everybody with two brain cells knew that was not true. But they attracted all the idiots of the world and now shit show is unfolding. Tragicomedy at its best. No TV show is better than this.

AI is my side kick. I do my own thinking though. You should worry about own own small brain. And as I predicted: This is just happened. At the end Dubai will burn to the ground like Gogg and Magog. Dubai tried to mimmick Babylon and is heavily paying the price. This is better than any movie out there. God is indeed the best of planners.

Thanks I will look into that video But is epistemology about God? It is just about knowledge and perhaps it will lead to God. But not everybody is meant to find God. Nor do they have that brain power. Some people are just meant to live like animals and that is ok. I think a lot of atheist (compared to some zealots) have good epistemology but they don't believe in God and that is ok too. They are missing a fundamental part of reality and project the God image onto other things like the idols they worship but that is another thing.

Let's take the example of Einstein and physics. He first studied the basics of physics and stood on the shoulder of giants. And after that he made his discoveries. If he was too arrogant to not study the existing literature and go into uni, he wouldn't have time to make his discoveries because he would be too busy reinventing the wheel. I wouldn't even know where to start if I wanted to begin to study epistemology. Most people's mind including my mind is filled with bullshit.

But I can still do my emotional/energetic labor after I read the best of the best of the existing frameworks. Leo has done this too. So it is kind of weird to ask people to reinvent physics for example when there is already work done on physics. Same counts for metaphysics. Time is of the essence. I don't have time to roll in the mud. Not everybody has that kind of time. After my research, I can still do my own integration work and find my own style of epistemology.

I think trying to reinvent the wheel is wasted time. Why would I try to reinvent epistemology while others have already walked that path? I asked Claude to give me a framework and this is what I got. I think it is pretty solid:

No, the Iran conflict just started. So the current carnage is just the appetizer. This is what AI says:

What Claude said about this thread

Good one

It would be funny if you just go to a party and say you are God, if you do it with a wink and a smile, it might actually work. If you do it seriously, in the worst case they will call a shrink to tie you up and take you with them. And that is exactly where you belong. I'm just being frank here. That is what people will do to you. And I'm not here to hurt your little feelings. Just stating what will happen if you have some integrity and stand up what you believe in your little DMT dungeons.

Summary with latest Claude model

Sollipsism makes things a little bit more complicated because it says only "I" exist, but it depends on what you mean with I. There is a difference between I and self. In Jungian psychology there is a big difference between I and the Self. Since self is ego while Self is the totality of being. So it is more accurate to say the Self is God. Not I'm God which is egoistical.

In Jungian psychology they explain it through the ego-self axis. There's a difference between the part of you that thinks, plans, and says "I"(ego) and something much vaster underneath all of that. Most spiritual traditions point at that vaster thing when they talk about God or the Absolute. Your ego is like a single candle flame. The divine is the whole room. A healthy inner life means the candle knows it's a candle. It's in relationship with something larger than itself. But sometimes something goes wrong, the candle looks around and thinks: "I am the room." That's ego inflation, and it's the psychological engine behind "I am God." The strange paradox is that the more genuinely someone has touched something sacred, the less likely they are to announce it. Real contact with the infinite tends to produce silence and awe, not declarations. The loudest "I am God" statements tend to come from the furthest distance from the actual experience. Genuine spirituality looks less like ownership and more like reverence. The recognition that you are part of something enormous tends to make you smaller in the best possible way, more humble, more curious, less interested in winning cosmic arguments.

You are something for sure

God is basically the fabric of reality with all POV´s of consciousness, the closest thing science comes to God is the quantum field.

But you don't have 1 toenail. It is more like your toenails arguing who is God. "I'm God" "No I'm God" "I'm you" "No, not you, you are me" Just imagine imagine actualized forum members all sitting in a room all saying they are God and what kind of fights would result. It is no coincidence that this forum has experienced so much drama like no other forum where huge groups tried to do a coup on the forum. Battle royale for ego maniacs. God by definition is something that doesn't have a shape and as a being with shape and material you ain't it. It is not that difficult. I already put up this argument multiple times and nobody could address it succesfully. I don't get what you are trying to say here

So which points did you like? To me he sounded snarky, emotional and straw manning towards my points. He acts like I don't agree that men should improve. Obviously they should. But if I would become the "full package" as women say I wouldn't settle down, since I would belong to the 10-20% of men and have a lot of options. At that point I would just play the field and have as much fun as I can until it is time to have kids.

@Kid A if they want to be ban me for speaking the truth, I'm ok with that. I don't think it is racism by the way to say Jewish people have a lot of collective trauma and that makes them prone to acting out more violently (look at Gaza) or sexually like in this case with Epstein-gate connected to Israel. I still think every person should be treated as an individual but that is something different than the facts of a collective subconscious of a certain group of people.

And I got attacked when I said she was full of bull. My intuition was right about her long before.

Behind that soft spoken voice, there is a female version of Tate🤣