Infinite Tsukuyomi

Similar to the photo that @LordFall posted mentioning the game of ping pong. I actually had the same insight a few days ago on a very low dose of mushrooms. "It's a game of catch, it's a game, we're playing" I understood in a swoop that if this is not happening then really nothing is happening in terms of dating/game via text. People, women, men want to play. Relationships themselves are a game if you watch closely. Entire marriages are two people playing house at scale. That is totally fine. For me, I realize if I'm not playing the game and just having a good time then I might be being too serious or perhaps not interested myself. Most people decide if they'll play very quickly within a few seconds of meeting you.

@oOo Thanks for sharing and I would have to agree, the nervous system does indeed create these meaning-feeling states. As a neurodivergent they are actually quite pronounced for me.

It's funny I never considered myself a sports guy but have been playing soccer recently after being invited to do so. Now the guys have been expecting me to show up and wondering where I am if I miss a week. I discovered that I am still not really a sports guy nor very good. But technically I do play now. Sucking at something can suck but I do like to double check my self concept assumptions.

Before 5-MeO pretty much just gets me stoned. After 5-MeO increases for me.

Face palm at the instagram video Leo shared of the guy sharing why the Universe isn't eternal from the physics standpoint. The rules of physics not "allowing" the Truth that the Universe is eternal is just plain silly. You can see, by how your mind formulates the phrase itself. No assumptions were questioned at all. The laws of physics are not binding the Universe, those laws are products of the Universe. When you speak of the "Universe" these laws must be nested within. Physics is an artifact of existence, it does not govern the existence that is responsible for it in the first place. He's also saying that the death of stars (and for the sake of argument, the death of anything in the Universe) means that the Universe can't be eternal because this implies time as he states that the stars 'would have' burned out eternally long ago. Everything in the Universe including the stars eventually changes form in some way or dies yet the present moment itself is still untouched, undefeated and very much prior. He's placed physics before what is. He's already considering physics as Truth, and because of that he obscures Truth. He's right that physics doesn't allow something coming from nothing. Physics came from nothing. Where else would it come from. I noticed that Truth/Reality is constantly overlooked even though people graze the answer constantly. People find Infinite Regress a problem, but infinite regress is not a problem, it's the solution. We you find that nothing would be a problem, that means you found the answer, Why would nothing or infinite be a problem? It's about whatever answer the mind is prepared to handle. It's okay if 5+5=10 but then it isn't when reality comes from nothing.

Well, if you use a DMT pen, you could take small hits and see if what they feel like for you and if you want to continue. DMT and 5-MeO DMT will both invoke fear for sure, even if you've done it multiple times, it's a healthy respect type of thing. What happened on your mushroom trips?

Great example of creativity as well, is this device. Inventions like these inspire me into more creativity. What other problems could be solved completely or dramatically improved but no one cares to tackle it?

Yeeeess, you get it. I smiled when I saw the title.

I'm happy to see this post, I say this weekly. Most neighborhoods I jog through is just a bunch of dogs barking. It's like damn, take them for a walk. I spend a lot of time outside and some homes I rarely see their dogs get watched. The dog is just a hostage, which at one point served as an emotional lift/ shiny object when they first got it. My mom is little better and walks the dog shortly every day, multiple times a day, I just think she should walk him longer and further. They have plenty of energy they want to use. My current roommate has walked his dog once I believe, and it's in the house bored. Much larger than my mom's pomeranian. So much hate for cats out there, yet most of these people should have cats and maybe not that. Scratch that maybe a house plant.

Humanoid Robot Takes Vows to Become a Buddhist Monk https://cbn.com/news/world/humanoid-robot-takes-vows-become-buddhist-monk-era-robots-has-arrived?fbclid=IwY2xjawRvoUBleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETFCaFlRYkdoQnRNME9zZlF5c3J0YwZhcHBfaWQQMjIyMDM5MTc4ODIwMDg5MgABHpGX_mvfRzOjCaJzcWr12kt_M4Nvjo30eUq-jM9TIjkJE8cSUSEAji8nuiRZ_aem_ixBI6SExZcDcKMp73l-oZw

What I would want from such a platform is: People who care about and take seriously epistemology. Other people being able to help reground me as the user, in the fact that we are engaging in knowledge or knowing. A focus on creativity. It would be nice to have something that is really effective and robust for building creative capacity. Lots of required observation work. Examples include, talking to people as a prerequisite and observing what they say and do. Perhaps a user that is interested in genetics for example might observe a lot of data. Obviously lots of observing one's own thoughts.

I wanted to share what works for a mind (mine) that is ADHD and OCD (self-diagnosed) in regards to contemplation. You may try these out if you don't already. 1.) Thinking out loud Just working through the logic of something with my voice works for me a lot better than thinking alone. It also works for me with everyday problems like fixing machinery at work. 2.) Pacing Pacing helps my body get involved when I contemplate and think through everyday problems. This also works for me if I am speaking to a group or teaching a class at work. 3.) Supercharging Not Knowing with Questions My mind tends to try to land on conclusions often (knowing). To manually flip the direction of my contemplation back into not knowing I'll take that conclusion or suggestion and turn it into a question. "Truth is the Ultimate Logic" >>> "Is Truth the Ultimate Logic?" "Meaning is something I imagine" >>> "Is Meaning something I imagine?" 4.) Suggestive Inquiry This is one is not knowing for the body. Suggesting that the body is holding an answer, usually in a specific spot, implying that you don't know but could know. I borrowed this idea from Gay Hendricks and remixed it into contemplation. I also use a bit of reverse psychology on myself, and pretend to know something to see where feelings of uncertainty or lying appear in the body. "What is this reaction to meaninglessness in the stomach?" Share your own process or anything that works better than you thought it would. My list is not all inclusive of what I do.

Video is not mine, just sharing with everyone.

@Ananda This And those other people you want to know more than don't want it either and won't understand any explanation of it you come up with. They will stick to their guns, which is their conception of what must be true.

It appears that productivity as held by us collectively is the thing being questioned when it comes to ADHD. Cred is looking at productivity, victim mindset, success and conformity and looking at a new way for the neuro-divergent mind to approach them at all. I would argue that victim mindset is a reactionary term created to describe people who are more non conformist in their approach to life. You mentioned "vs figuring out to how to adapt to it", which is precisely the subject matter. Adaptation is survival conformity. Neurodivergence according to Cred seems to have a built in authenticity bias making this adaptation less likely. A neurodivergent probably wants to achieve their goals and feel aligned and authentic while doing it. Being blinded by survival pressures is anti authenticity, which is often necessary. And yes, it is only because of the times we live in that so many different people can be supported and survive. So our current way of doing things is primed more for survival and less for authenticity, as expected. It is from this exact position that new more effective ways of living can be imagined and perhaps realized. As an accomplished man with ADHD, It would be a stretch to say I have a victim mindset for example. I can go on long inauthentic stretches of mostly focused activity and find ways to get my success. This comes with the cost of not knowing who I am, which then triggers the vicious cycle of self-improvement. I actually derived pomodoro before realizing it was already discovered, it had noticeable but marginal effects overall. I still use it, but I am aware that I only use it provisionally; it is an external system because my internal system is different. Overall, Cred does not seem to have a victim mindset but is open-minded and doing a neurodivergent God's work. Most people don't question anything. They will believe the victim mindset rhetoric because it is readily available.