Spiritual Warfare

Great videos😄

solipsism involves an individual. Specifically, that the finite mind of the individual is all that actually exists, and that other individuals are merely insentient, a-conscious “robots” of a sort. Non-duality, on the other hand is a different beast altogether. In non-duality the mind is not the source of consciousness, nor is it anything conscious in itself. It is regarded as insentient. Instead, the mind acts a sort of “mirror” in that it has the capacity to reflect consciousness. Just as the reflected face in a mirror is not conscious in itself, neither is the reflected consciousness. The difficulty with the reflected consciousness is that the vast majority of us do take it to be real and conscious within itself, the source of an actual individuality. This misunderstanding is what can lead to the idea of solipsism is the first place. Non duality teaches that consciousness is the only actual existence. This is obviously quite different from the understanding of the solipsist. Actual non- dual understanding has nothing to do with mind at all, just as the original face has nothing to do with the mirror at all. The mirror of the mind breeds seeming individuality, but the one consciousness is free of all its reflection in the mind. The consciousness of any one thing, is the one same consciousness of every other thing. This is quite different than the idea of the sole existence of one finite mind.

Nobody knows everything not even God which is me MOHAHA!

God is a cruel bastard

🤣🤣

That’s the thing If I create my own experience then there is not only one that exist

@Leo GuraI really want to change my username please help me

What would you say if I told you that my experience brought me to that conclusion?

Solipsism is unprovable. There’s no evidence to go against it or with it. The definition of solipsism sounds interesting at first, but it just makes it very difficult to discuss about since it is a far-fetched idea and it can’t be proven or disproven. I think it’s interesting and personally I could talk about it and other relating concepts about human perception and how we view reality for a while, but there is still not much to build off of with solipsism.

Don’t remind me….

Leo needs to humble himself like Jesus did

I agree, sad it got locked! I really wanted Leo to respond);

Greatest plot twist of all time

Someone is about to be banned🤣

Enlightened individuals do not typically claim to know with certainty that they are enlightened. The state of enlightenment is often described as a profound realization of the true nature of existence, which goes beyond the typical egoic sense of self. In this state, the mind becomes very still and clear, with diminished conceptual and emotional activity. However, this does not mean the mind is entirely empty. Rather, enlightened awareness is said to be a spacious, non-dual state of being that transcends the duality of empty and full. Enlightened people are not attached to labels or claims about their own state of consciousness. They simply abide in the clarity and equanimity of the present moment, without needing to define or categorize their experience. The true markers of enlightenment are a deep sense of inner peace, compassion, and freedom from the suffering caused by egocentric thinking.

👍

Why is important😇

The question touches on themes of personal growth, redemption, and sacrifice. It challenges us to consider the deep-rooted beliefs and values that shape who we are, and whether we have the capacity to let go of them in order to become someone entirely different. It also begs us to reflect on the consequences of such a transformation, and whether the end result would ultimately be worth the sacrifice.

Actually, there are no ‘states,’ no transcendence. There’s just One, Being, Energy posing(temporarily) as ‘separate entities,’ ‘humans’ who ‘think’ they need to improve or fix their ‘lives’ by ‘attaining’ enlightenment or some other ‘altered states

🤪

This👆🙌 👏

Why don’t girls want intelligent guys? Ohh I think I got it🌟

Can someone truly change their nature, even if it means sacrificing everything they once held dear? When we get something that we so desire, we feel satisfied. But is it really what we NEEDED? And when we find something that is beyond our resoning abilities, we call it the Truth. But does that make it the Truth? I believe there is no Satisfaction or Truth. Both of them are illusions. Persistent and impressionable, but illusions nonetheless. What is more important in life is to look at everything from an Alien’s perspective. And then, my friend, you would realise that what we believe in is not worth believing. We've created our own tiny little universe for ourselves, for each one of us. We've set some rules and regulations there, which prove to work only momentarily. You've to ignore what you have been taught and see everything for what it really is. For me, that is the way to progress, for me that is the way to prosperity. Thank you.

Hate is easy. Love is hard. Hate requires no justification, and once ‘justified’ allows you to do whatever you want to others, while neglecting to offer them basic respect and decency. Love on the other hand requires that you endure at least some of their difficult qualities, and not only that, but share your good with them, sacrificing time and resources and making yourself vulnerable. Being vulnerable… getting hurt… this is hard.

Spot on