JoshB

Thats wild.

No one is refuting and denying that. There is plenty of dogma alongside enlightened buddhist teachings of no self. What is being said though is no self is not the end of awakening.

I have seen this as well. Ive even heard some say consciousness as absolute. There are definitely degrees to the delusion of Buddhism.

Ive been there, Conciousness is Absolute but that doesn't mean Conciousness can't deepen its understanding of itself to radically higher degrees. You can awaken from the dream but still realize God at deeper and more total levels. This doesn't contradict the totality, it deepens it.

Ofc and a huge part of that world view isnt giving credence to psychedelics. So to just sit them down and have them take a psychedelic is a challenge in of itself.

Infinite degrees But there are stages and states. You can hit a threshold. God can be concious of itself as God. But there is still an infinitude more for God to discover about itself.

@Leo Gura if all these buddhists, monks, and zen masters just did some dmt they'd shut the fuck up and sit down.

Challenge yourself, go trip and find out. There are degrees of awakening beyond anything you currently comprehend with psychedelics. How can you criticize something you have 0 experience in?

Most people's chances of realizing God is a lot higher on psychedelics. And almost next to none sober.

Belief and opinion is irrelevant in the light of Truth It doesnt matter what I or anyone says, what matters is what is True. And one should align oneself with what is True

The method doesn't really matter as long as you arrive at the intended destination. And Frank Yang has plenty of great insights. But there is huge buddhist blunders in his teachings.

Oh no I was straightening my bro out from the buddhist poison and Ingram got offended lmao Im curious what he said specifically, in the beginning of awakening I realized the aloneness of conciousness very early. So it was extremely easy to see through the conformity and group think.

@Leo Gura Frank Yang was doing some stuff with @BipolarGrowth as well at the time I also did sessions with @Nahm and Satangs with Fred Davis looking back and laughing at what they were trying to teach me

What makes you say that?

No I said it to one of our friends in the group chat. And Ingram got offended from the sideline and left I was tired of hearing the buddhist bs and said its you dumbass to him ( one of my friends)

Also AI explaining Buddhism? 🤮

Daniel Ingram was in a group chat with me, @BipolarGrowth , and our friends. And i was being extremely blunt pointing to you as God. And it made him leave the group because of my remarks.

As in 10 years is too much or too little?

Where are you from?

Obviously I'm No One No Where but that domain is beyond the social domain

What do you mean?

Whats fascinating is a lot of these examples can swing both ways. Some examples can be extremely non conformist within a certain context.

The more conscious I become the more obvious it becomes that awakening is NOT a binary on or off switch.

I was being Facetious, the practice was me untying my shoes. And me playing Minecraft was me tripping over. And im from idaho, land of the potato

The self / ego is like an onion it has layers. Was it fully no self? No, and I would go as far to say you can realize the self is an illusion without fully disolving it. There are degrees to dissolution. Once the ego is dissolved to a certain point you can tell where its heading. But It was permanent and from that day on I was no longer looking out of my eyes. Now im conscious enough to see through space and time to see this image happening in real time.