bebotalk

I don't ever regulate beliefs. I genuinely believe anybody can say what they want. What is being a man? it's relative somewhat. so many "men" have darker thoughts. Your reality isn't THE reality.

Society/the world - self-defence is normal! you - it's wrong! (but in other cases will say it's right)

all of these dating ideoogies are just scams. or i guess the Web has allowed people of like minds to congregate.

does self-defence offend you? I know it does in some spiritual communities, but then for many it's a natural right. I don't care if it seems petty to some. pretty women don't own shit. so if they mess me up in public, then they get it. they as all people are responsible for their actions. seems like you're ms. pretty here and want to a prior "regulate" who does what.

this is why pretty woen aren't nice people. who are they lecture anybody? especially when stated rules state the contrary? and why are there views on WHO can say whatmatter? they take up this false "authority". authority HAS TO BE warranted and earned. fuck authority. not my fault pretties cannot control their brains and not ALL voice their views. Funny grown adults cannot control their brains, since it hurts their feelings.

Incels need tough love. Incels need to be told: - the world isn't fair - we fight and work for everything - systems exist that go beyond us - to master the "game" of life, we have to understand it - the change the "game" we have to understand it - life is chaos. Anything can happen at any time. from the likely, such as changing weather, to the unlikely or far-fetched as in aliens landing and giving us a each a Star Trek-esque replicator device Incels didn't get that some people are born good-looking and others aren't. That there are systems of dating, which are as much biological as they are arbitrary social constructs. And that we cannot control what others value, or what society values at large. Values that are deeply entrenched are hard to shift. It's why LGBT rights have taken decades to come to pass. Said people didn't just mope that the world is harsh. They recognised the reality that it is and moved beyond it. Moreover, incels come from differing socio-economic realities. If an incel is rich, s/he has it made more than others. They might have connections to better jobs, more money, etc. isn't that an advantage? don't humans need resources as much as relationships or sex? do such incels recognise they might have an advantage there, that others might envy or resent? If an incel is neurodiverse, then they won't get these points. Stats do show that most incels are neurodiverse, and thus have challenges in adapting to wider society or healthy thought. They mostly are lost people. Lost people need guidance. As most incels are neurodiverse, then they require support. We should accept that liberal helicopter parenting has failed. This was always some BS movement from California or some other hyper-liberal place, which whilst well-intended has failed a generation. Good intentions mean little, if bad results from them. The road to Hell is paved with them.

That doesn't warrant being weak. Sufferig is part of life. That's normalcy and not weakness.

Does it? the entire practice seems too good to be true. thar's just my opinion on it. And it's probably some darker scam behind it. But judging from your post, you don't get what the LOA is about at its rudiments, yet you critique such.

If you posted negative shit about men, then as a man, I'd just ignore you. I say what I wish, as can you and others. People can filter stuff they don't like. I also don't lecture on how others express themselves. It seems the Salvjnus "I dont' get human beings/my perceptions are bad :(" vibe is spreading.

LOA is based on the universe providing. There is no "universe", not in the sense that it's purported by LOA practitioners. You don't get what the LOA is then.

We need to go back to the time before participation trophies. That seems like a trope, but then it seems practicality has outshone misguided betterment. Nothing comes without work. And we're born in cold, hard and dark spaces.

Well as we live in a society, we will have the capacity to determine how we should structure society. Our intellect can be applied to anything.

LOA is suspicious. Why would "the universe" want what's best for people? The universe isn't alive. it has no consciousness. Why would the universe just give people what they want? It seems too good to be true. Maybe it's some dark energy or some fad/scam made by demon-worshippers or something. People will and should desire things, but this requires hard work and energy. Not wishing and thinking and being happy.

https://www.politico.eu/article/germany-rejects-nicaragua-accusations-facilitation-genocide-gaza-israel-hamas-war/

whilst thst's tragic, that alone doens't warrant claims of genocide.

Leo is wrong. Dictators can be seen as left or right.

How do you know the Aztecs weren't corrupt? Can you say Aztec kings didn't abuse their powers for their own gain?

Do cultural values impact corruption? If given cultures are more prone to cutting corners or not being as fastidious, isn't this why they're corrupt? Corruption happens everywhere. Though it's certainly true that the perception of corruption is higher in some countries more than others. Shouldn't anti-corruption efforts focus on minimised/eradicating "slack" cultural norms?

Getting as big as Mr Beast is as much luck as it is hard work. Arguably, mostly luck.

Most of these are common points, literally for centuries. I don't know how this even became a debate. It's as banal a debate as "do looks matter in dating" or "does money matter in dating". of course they do.

Aren't you the guy who assumes everybody is always hard and morose? that we don't have changes in our moods, reactions, or feelings? And is highly selective in whom he condemns for normal human conduct, and once he has an idea in his head, he expects the masses to conform to it? and uses some spiritual pap he learnt off a guru/pastor as justification for such? Hence why he lets some Indian kid chat the most trite, banal, and infantile stuff out and it's him "just being a human who is learning"? Seems spiritual people don't have an honest bone in their bodies. Or they think it's "normal" to impose whatever random crap they think as "fact". yes, as "normal" as people who never drink booze or pray with Rosary beads. As in SOME do this, it's not a pervasive human "norm" by any stretch.

In my life, I'm focused on my career and developing myself. I accept I'm imperfect. who doesn't have bad thoughts or ideals? I laugh at those who say they don't. Or they're comically condemnatory, or mix some spiritual beliefs with reality.

consistent thought is probably something your guru said is wrong. your guru's beliefs are his own. there are various thoughts in life.

They're humans. they aren't special. who says they are or should be seen as such? pretty women are universally toxic. So others can respond to their toxicity. I don't see the issue, really. It's just very basic human interaction.

does PUA still exist??