bebotalk

Well, it's not customary for others to be compelled to do what others say. Maybe your temple told you, but your guru is mostly locked in his own thinking. There are other conceptions of life. Your guru doesn't seem like a decent person anyhow.

All monarchies are cringe, even if they are constitutional monarchies like Britain or Denmark.

lol. Why? what will you do if i don't? maybe it's in your culture to give directives to random people.

OK. Well it does for many people the world, and those who live in monarchies.

I'd think all people want others to be respectful or nice. But if others are not, so be it. expecting such in all cases is illogical. however, warding off harmful people isn't that bad. I don't see why you assume it is, or it's something extraordinary. I guess my view can be viewed akin to racism. I myself am a racial minority in my own country, and to be honest I cannot control what others think or feel. if people are racist, then I'd ward it off. I don't want positive attention from pretty ladies. I just think due to socialisation, I know they'd be loud, raucous and in-your-face. They live in a different social conception, so they don't know any better and it's in their nature.

Therapy can work. For shame anybody who says it's a scam. How is helping people a scam? How are techniques learnt from medical research scams? I am a bit sceptical on therapy, but only due to what I perceive as fallacies. I find that therapy is weighted towards people of differing ethnicities and genders, and this is contrary to them "treating people equally". But I don't dispute it inherently as a process. What then is the alternative? is all mental illness false? If a person has emotional/psychological matters that need healing, are they supposed to do it by themselves?

Their cultures are based on putting down and degradation.

Oh, and am I the "loser" in this "discussion"? I don't see how I am. I'm merely stating my points and that I don't agree with you. I'm under no obligation to. State this "obligation"? I told you we hold differing views. I get the suspicion you cannot internally handle somebody with differing views. That's maybe on you to internally process, which you won't, out of "ego".

By your logic. Again, you assume your spiritual views are the way. many people have resentments. I reject spirituality since it's cringe and weird. That's my opinion. is that bad? So? people reject things all the time. you should ask why you care what others think or what their attitudes are. For you, it's like "he's not spiritual. HE IS BAD!!!!!" OK. well "he" may not care about your judgment. It's also fine, I also mock those who think they have "the truth". and never, ever, think "oh that's a different view, that's nice!" i do that often, since i genuinely don't care what others think. even if they have virulent views, i still accept their rights to hold them. you assume your spiritualism is the definitive views. that's dangerous thinking, imho. i admit i have negatibe views towards pretty women, and? you tell me why i must care why pretty womena re special. i think the concept that peopel are special or not offends you. you were taught there are "betters". I wasn't. who is better? You're infusing little subjective things into objective realities. being "spiritual" doesn't mean one is "better". lots of these new-age gurus often abuse their pupils. is that good? hardly. but then you openly tolerate abuse as part of a 'higher plane" but then say it's wrong in other cases. looool. you're older than I am but apparently you're not as wise or grounded. i don't get offended at different views. https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/9jE8L40kMnEYUrx9WRySU3itoMi8uticcjnL4PoSo15ZwhOkax4pjumK2b1ebLyBEL_052UTMeL70t9QdLcy2KMTuZ7gCkXgE1d_1Q=w1064-v0 I see life like this, all on the same plane and level. You don't. that bothers you. your subjective interpersonal understandings are your own, but people can and will respond to you. which is their right. Maybe try and embarrass me as you claim and show how pretties are "superior" and why we must look up to them? spirtual people often aren't good, and this proves it.

Progress is relative. I do progress. Maybe not in the way a spiritualist might see it. I said i don't care about their beliefs. I disagree with you. and that's fine. I don't have to agree with you, nor do you with me. there are many ways to see life, and your way nor mine is the definitive mode. I note it's never on pretty women to wonder why others may dislike them, or if they are the cause. but no. everybody has to bend around them. loooool. Accountability is apparently lost in modern times.

This is how I see life, at least in engagement with other people. None of us have primacy. Such primacy is earned and explained. A teacher has primacy over school pupils since teachers are there to teach and control students. Bosses have primacy over employees as they are there to direct work. Parents have primacy over children since they bore the kids, and have the responsibility to lead them and guide them accordingly. Pretty women reckon they have primacy in social discourse, which is unearned. they are not special innately. No person or group is. there are many who don't immediately swoon over a hottie, even though such acts are understandable and natural somewhat. There are many acts that may seem intuitive that people of varying temperaments may not do. Not all people are quick to anger, even though anger is natural in given scenarios. So since pretty women aren't very good people, then I ward off them. It's human nature to not accept negativity. If one is surrounded by bees, then one defends themselves. If one is in a dark place at night, then one is on guard. If one is in a war zone, one takes cover. Pretty women are kidding themselves if they think others cannot respond to their innate negativities. My view on life is essentially egalitarian. I sense this bothers people. But it's often the same people who condemn racism or sexism who then promote elitism. That's on them. I just laugh and leave them to it. I have my views and they have theirs. So I stand that conventionally hot women aren't very good people. I won't tolerate their elitism. Nor will I ever accept it. Why must I? Who are they? By this logic, can King Charles III just cuss people in the street when he greets his "subjects" on an official tour? Can the King of the Netherlands do that too? I bet they'd be condemned for this, and rightly so. But it should be fine, right? As monarchs, they lead their countries and are the top dogs. So it fits. Anybody who has assumed privilege has rights over others. I get the feeling that you endorse this primacy, Sanjizid, and it bothers you when it's called out. well, what will you do? is it violence again? looool. Maybe you should look into yourself and see why it bothers you. Seems like it's ego. Introspection isn't weak. it's actually a normal trait. i guess people are different. I don't assume life is about being bullish and on the front foot all the time.

I disagree. Again, I don't care if you agree or not. I also don't like people speaking through me. nobody needs to, and any attempt of them to say they're so "nice" is wasted on me. Go and beat your spiritual teachers to beat me. if they beat everybody who disagrees with them or doesn't care about their message, then maybe they should get better cognition, or get that's not how healthy people behave. Spirituality sucks, imho. if that makes me "bad", so be it. Bad in your eyes, maybe. but so what? your opinion is YOUR opinion. At least i was raised it's wrong to beat people merely for a difference in viewpoints. and my parents are hardcore Christians and thus spiritual. I disagree with the core concept that a person can never progress materially whilst holding grudges. It's simplistic and from shallow perceptions of the world.

most native Indian food isn't that spicy. It would depend on the region and culture on the nature of the food. It's more due to unsanitary practices in cooking and preparation. Though if it's fried eats from a street vendor, then the heat from oil might kill any bad bacteria or viruses. What bothers me about India are things like this - https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-11665321/The-women-lived-sex-slaves-Indian-goddess.html. Their culture is too much based on degradation for my tastes.

I don't see anything wrong with grudges. a person can progress despite them. I never said I was unworthy to talk. Using this "probing" tones is hardly benevolent" is it? I know you'll disagree with my point, and that's fine. But it's mine to make.

He had some good geo-political takes, and his views on WW2 were accurate. I don't agree with him on Ukraine. Russia's entire rationale for this is baseless.

but people aren't good or bad...loooool.

Monarchies predate feudalism. China had emperors long before medieval feudalism. Rome started as a monarchy before it morphed into a republic and then an empire. Monarchy started due to strongman-rule, in that the most able, whether physically or intellectually, had earned the right to rule a given people or region.

It's all a massive scam. Just some nerdy geezers looking to understand dating dynamics that they didn't get whilst young, either from osmosis or being told. The redpill for one tells guys that getting money and riches is the key to dating. I don't see how. Many people are not rich and get by in dating. The redpill takes some truths that women care about status, but translates them to some really wild ends.

I don't see the connection with my points. Passive-aggression is based.

Shakespeare also was an anti-Semite, and one of his plays was clearly leaning on this, i.e. The Merchant of Venice. He had his opinions, and as a man his opinions were just that, opinions. I have my views, and you have yours. That's that. I still say I despise pretty women, as they are not good people, so I move away from them. Moreover, you seem to be condoning given acts and people. I cannot. It' just conscience. if that futher makes me "bad" in your eyes, so be it. I'm entitled to my views.

India may be very poor, but it has areas that the average Westerner can adapt to. Specifically in New Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata and other big cities. No culture is perfect but I don't think I'd be happy in India. Indian values are about degradation and debasement and I couldn't abide by a culture where millions of lower-caste people were kept there via some old Hindu code. It also is turning into a Hindu supremacist state, and the many non-Hindus there are being oppressed and marginalised. The ideal of India being a secular state is now eroding. The fact many millions literally poo in public isn't right, IMHO. yes, cultures differ but it's not medieval or ancient times. surely by now, with knowledge of hygiene and microorganisms, we know we shouldn't do this.

Yes, humans are complex. But this doesn't mean that categorising between good or bad is wrong, or harmful or not is bad. All living beings go towards what is comfortable and avoid what is hard or painful. Not all labels of good or bad are arbitrary. I accept that what I say might not be to others' tastes. I don't care really. We all have our own thoughts. This is my self-improvement. To acknowledge that everybody has a partly dark side. Nobody is an absolute angel or a categorical devil. Humans cannot survive without categorisation. Putin isn't bad in my opinion alone. Humans have always differentiated between those who are destructive. Even in cultures that are distinct from our own, this is true. Ancient Rome, the Ming Dynasty, and Taliban Afghanistan all do. If labelling others as bad for being destructive and not wanting to be around such people makes me "bad", so be it. I don't profess to be perfect, and the opinions of others in themselves hold no absolute bearing on me. I affirm that conventionally attractive women are often spoilt and mean, and thus I don't believe in associating with them. As I see it, we're all on a level playing field and I have no obligation to view them as better. they also cannot and shouldn't expect people to view them differently or better. I merely respond to their innate negativity

I see her as the major negative party. Yes, her vids on her were cringe. However, it was mild in terms of internet harassment. This didn't warrant going to his home and asking to "talk". She got off way too lightly, and Google/Youtube were way too lenient on her.

negativity is part of life. I've found it's a pattern that suits me and is often quite accurate. pretty women are humans. i don't believe any group of humans has an a priori right to more respect. pretty women often think this. so others, inclusive of me, are not obligated to grant it to them.

There are gay animals. By this logic, why are some born with disabilities? In Paleolithic times, they would die off. Evolution doesn't mean that every member of a species has to reproduce. The same can be said for infertile people. They are an evolutionary dead-end. Evolution just calls for members of a species to have sufficient genetic variation so that given traits can help them adapt to various environments. Given that every member of every species is genetically identical and would be subject to individual epigenetics, then it stands to reason there is a variety of traitrs abounding in every species.