bebotalk

Well, no. It's not "the women", it's just women. Also, you omitted correcting "Saudi", as "Saudia" is clearly false.

Adults aren't directly responsible for their grown children's acts. Good parents generally let their grown children live their own lives. This further proves that American conservatives are fucked up and retarded.

People who say "everybody has a right to an opinion!" but hate even mild opinions that contradict their world view. People who post on social media "be kind!" but then troll others mercessily.

many would say there is no hypocrisy, as an animal and human are not equal.

A good start is figuring out the demand for the service. Who isthe ideal customer and what is the USP are also important points to consider. You perhaps offer initial free sessions which are snippets of the real platform. And dependent on the service you're providing, you can perhaps offer free sessions to people similar to your target market. Say for instance a person is offering career coaching or is a personal trainer, they can offer points to college students or school leavers, or ask friends and family if they would take up a course and offer objective feedback.

This further depends on the business. Not all customers are of equal value monetarily. Not all leads are of equal value. Some industries incur more costs than others, as would some busiensses within industries. You're looking for a simple answer, when the reality is complex. Some businesses might not care as much about profits. It may seem counter-intuitive, but what if a business was a subsidiary of a larger firm, and it made minor losses every year? Maybe the success of other firms in the conglomerate offset these losses? Or the loss-making business was a legacy brand that the wider firm didn't want to sell or divest?

Yes, I get that. This is the longstanding view. But I wonder if people still believe this. Advertising isn't inherently bad, and it's only a subset of the entire practice/industry.

looool. I dunno frankly what you're so irate about. You tell me then what cryptocurrency is about. If people want to make money, let them. Provided it's honest and not hurting people or done via fraud, who gives a fuck? It's cryptobros with their egos making the entire thing about speculation and earning a big buck. they're distorting the purpose of it, which is as an alternative currency. Their incessant "look how I won $1m on USDT, so YOU CAN TOO!" ads online are cringe and distort the meaning of it. Assuming i envy them, or i hate people making money.. looooool. I pity them, in reality.

People are commonly stating their negative views. And yes, I would approach a pretty woman and say what I believe about them. What will she do? hit me? Since I'm male, bigger and stronger than her, it won't go down well, unless she's some special ops/forces person, but that's a minority of people as it stands. Will she cuss me? And? That won't bother me, especially since I condemned a stranger so they hold a right to condemn me. Or if she hit me, I'd just run and tell the police. if she wants a jail term merely since somebody insulted her, so be it. It's dishonest to assume one is perfect, or that the masses of humans are pure. This is what you're doing.

I admit I'm a human and have negative thoughts. So I don't really like conventionally hot women. I think they're not good people. I think generally they're bad people. They get spoilt from societal treatment and they're not very pleasant to be around. They believe the world has to look up to them. They don't get they're human like all others are, and nothing that special in the grand scheme of things. In my apartment block, there are a couple of pretty women who live on my same floor, and apart from saying a few brief hellos I ignore them. I don't speak much with the pretty ladies at my workplace, especially those at the same level as me. I even told one of my cousin's friends whilst drunk at a party that she was a bitch since she was hot. There was a very pretty lady who was serving in Starbucks, and she had a very quiet voice and due to the loud music, I couldn't hear her. So I shouted at her to speak up. I didn't care if I embarrassed her or not, since she was attractive. She was in the wrong anyhow, since she should have used some common sense and empathy and had some accountability. People can't hear you in a loud environment, where people are buying products from you, if you don't speak up. I can't look at porn with super hot ladies. I usually look at milf or granny porn instead. I can't watch Miss World. The way I see it, people can be racist and sexist and get by, so then I can in kind. This is more of a statement than anything else. I just won't "accept" what pretty women think we want them to be. I wasn't raised that way. I was raised to be respectful and that we're all on an even keel in life.

spiritualists are amusing. they often have presumptive thinking. you have no clue, unless you know me and my experiences, the true genesis of my views. they also don't get basic communicative skills. Their presumptive thinking leads them to assume others intent and to lead discourse into areas they want to take it.

i have no desire to be a leader. their ideology is bs that's all.

A growing movement has its major advocates saying it's bullshit. lol.

What is actual intelligence? Who can define this for alien species?

Such as? I don't take any dating school of thought seriously that says women want men who earn $400k a year only. Or only want men with six-packs. Men who push it are either deluded or scammers. tbh, I don't care if i "misrepresent" cringe dating retard ideologies. And it is dying. Most of the big redpilers online have either been cancelled or are disavowing it. The Tates have. Fresh and Fit were thrown off Youtube. Samuels literally died, and that Donovan Sharpe dude got called out hard lately. As did that MSD dude, sicne even that Saint and Sinner cussed him for proving he's fake. The mainstays of the redpill are moving away from it or losing relevance. Fresh and Fit literally said that 40% of US college female students get hit up on Instagram to get fucked by Dubai billionaires every weekend. If they really believe that, fuck 'em. they're retarded with their scammy ideology.

Doesn't matter. It's all cringe and based on fallacies. Fallacies like ultra-wealth is the way to go. And who needs to be told that looks and status matter in women? that's been like a TRUTH for millennia! These redpill guys are scammers who leech off people with literal autism or social maldevelopment. If HUGE money matters as these guys say, how come most people still are average earners but get by in dating? how come poor dudes in ghettos get women? Many of these redpillers online are black Americans who sday they grew up poor. WHo is causing the "baby-daddy" dilemma with high single-motherhood in poor black areas? Is it rich black or even white dudes fucking poor black women? Or is it other poor black men? Even then, i'd say looks and game matter in that content. But not earning $500k as these dipshits say. Let their scammy ideology die a death.

If the President is implicated, then yes, it's wrong. If not, i don't see the issue. Guilt by association is irrational here. He's a grown man, and as an adult child, President Joe isn't responsible for him. Is there any evidence that Hunter's father is implicated in his crimes? For me, that would be the major point that could and should compromise the President. Maybe GOPers linking Joe to it have tiny cocks and Hunter's pics made them envious.

Why wouldn't an intelligent species kill humans? I don't see the connection between the two. Maybe there might be aliens who are out to get non-spacefaring species, for whatever reason.

yes, I am interested, hence why I asked it. Assuming this is a vent is pretty comical. as is using some "scoping" to try and gain others' intent to feel "above them".

Because they distort the purpose of cryptocurrency. And who frankly cares about their egocentric need to profit from it? Them risking their own money isn't the point of it.

This is subjective. What works for me is to form an abstract process in my mind of the thing I'm studying. Say it's a psychology exam. I'd think of a person and how a given state or condition will affect them. it helps me understand it in a practical sense and how the theory of the subject applies and functions.

there is no standard. It depends on the industry, the size of the company, or the goals of the business owners.

Crypto was and still can be an insightful way to buy stuff without fiat currency but has been distorted by cryptobros, who based on their egos use it as a way to make big money quickly.

I can't agree with fallacies, by definition. Japan isn't Western. It has a whole heap of societal issues that aren't caused by America. Japan still has many of its traditional traits from even before the Meiji Restoration, so culturally it isn't Western. If you believe that any democracy is Western, then India is Western also, as are Ghana and Singapore.

Musk left South Africa for the USA, and whilst South Africa wasn't or isn't overly rich, he would have been born in Apartheid times and thus being white would have been privileged. The USA was pretty well-developed and without much wilderness to settle, at the time Musk's family arrived in the USA. Musk himself said that he came from a lower-middle-class family looking for work as they migrated from SA to the USA. I'd say economic pioneers as the post mentioned don't exist, and their view of migration is very romanticised and inaccurate When I said the 19th century, I meant it literally. The post mentioned people from richer countries going to poorer countries to "build them up". This doesn't happen, as global economic dynamics have changed. it's not like the 19th century when Europeans from Germany or Eastern Europe migrated to the rural Mid-West or California. There are no wagon train pioneers anymore. Migration since WW2 has been generally on an economic basis from the "poor South" to the "rich North". The post-writer is therefore out of touch and is anachronistic in their thinking and viewpoints. After WW2, European countries did invite immigrants from their newly independent former colonies, mainly due to labour shortages. This is a well-documented fact. In more recent decades, Eastern Europeans have moved from there to Western Europe for the same reason. There also is no reason to assume that a purely economic migrant, and not a "pioneer" as s/he puts it, inherently gives less of a shit about their new country over a "pioneer". Feminism hasn't been enacted in all countries, and falling birth rates are global in form. Countries that are still heavily patriarchal are experiencing them. PUA was a largely Internet-based dating fad/scam that existed about ten years ago. I doubt it had much penetration in the Middle East, Africa, or Asia, where patriarchy is still entrenched culturally and legally. Your points are relevant somewhat in the USA or Europe, but not as much in Asia, Africa, etc. Even in the US, Internet culture is moot. Not everybody is in open relationships or has an onlyfans, or even subscribes to it. It's mainly because content creators congregate around liberal and open spaces in the USA like California or Florida and thus demonstrate this lifestyle. It doesn't mean it's common throughout the country, or the West for that matter. As for feminism cottoning off civil rights, well Dr. King cottoned off Gandhi and other anti-colonialists. I don't see the issue there. Birth rates are falling in India, yet in many parts of India, it's not ethical to show off skin or for women to wear revealing clothing. Even in the USA, this differs. There are naked parades in Seattle. This wouldn't be allowed in the south. It wouldn't be right in the UK, France, or other European countries. Birth rates are falling in countries where men have to publicly chaperone women. Or where women are not allowed to do specific professions. Or where women are forced to be legally lesser than men due to Islamic or other religious laws. Do you really think that in Iran or Sudan, women can freely walk around in revealing mid-riff tops in warm weather like they do in Germany, the UK, or Canada? Iran and Sudan still have falling fertility/birth rates. Of the 200 or so sovereign countries on Earth right now, I'd argue maybe just over half have full and legal gender equality. But the vast majority, nay all, countries in existence are experiencing falling fertility rates. Your points are based on conservative ideology, and you're using strawmen. Rape is illegal in many countries, nay all countries. it's the fault of governments if they don't implement their own laws properly, or allow migrants to flagrantly violate them. Migrants aren't inherent sociopaths, nor is it intrinsic to migrants to think "Yes, I must sexually assault women as soon as I set foot in my desired country!!" The fact some countries don't manage immigration properly doesn't make migrants invalid. The person in his/her post mentioned ghettos or isolated communities. Yes, this is problematic, but then what is his/her solution? If groups of people wish to congregate, this isn't a problem in any other area or for any other people. If a group of migrants congregate in a part of a city but aren't committing crime, then yes it may look bad, but then that is their right. Curbing their right to do this is problematic. It's up to Sweden to sort out these problems, and tbh I'm not Swedish so I don't care. But if it were my country, I'd make it a point to call out the government for this seeming oversight in punishing those who commit serious crimes. And I also won't condemn ALL migrants, nor essentialise a group based on what some migrants do. I say yes, the post is based largely on cliches, misconceptions, anachronisms, and biased ideological groundings. The issue of migration in the West is nuanced. Yes, there are problems associated with it, in specific countries. But there are also success stories, and it's generally racists or bigots who decry ALL immigration or think migrants generally don't integrate to any extent. That's why I asked if this person actually knows any migrants. I'm not accusing them of being racist or bigoted - I do not know them. But by using fallacies and anachronisms, they are not viewing the issue with the complexity that it deserves and warrants. And bias, whether personal or ideological. should also be accounted for in this case, or any case. It skews perception and understanding, and often away from the general picture or factual picture. To use streamers/content creators as an example, as Leo is such, many of the top content creators in the world are migrants or are the children of such. Pewdiepie, KSI, xQC, Hasan, etc. all are such. From what they've said of their families, they all integrated relatively well. That's the norm, generally, for migrants in Western countries. Pewpiedie for one is a double migrant, as it were, as he's Swedish by birth but moved to the UK and now lives in Japan. Pokimane is another example, as is Destiny as his mother is Cuban. Some of my family are migrants, and have had little issues in adapting and integrating. It's more amusing than annoying to see analyses as presented from that X post, since it shows their limited perspective and often ideological underpinnings of their viewpoints. In my experience, which is admittedly limited, most migrants do integrate and aren't problematic. The X post really was dim, and to reiterate cliched, full of misconceptions and biased, and harking back to romanticised and anachronistic times that don't and cannot apply to modern realities.